portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

economic justice

Enron and My Power Bill

My power bill was gigantic this month. More than $100. I couldn't believe it. It's just been going up up up, no matter what I try to do to save energy. And I know I'm using less energy than I was using last year. (Remember that ice storm last year?!) So I called my utility company, which is likely the same as your utility company. And I asked them. Does this have to do with Enron?
Listen, I will tell you right up front that I don't know a lot about this whole scam with Enron and the power companies and all that. I just can't wrap my mind around it all. It just all seems so unbelievably dirty and corrupt and tangled. I don't know how they got away with it, or what the damages are, or how deep it all goes. I can only relate this to the little bit that I know, and my power bill.

So here's what I know. Enron used the same jargon we always hear about the great boon of deregulation. "Deregulate energy, and you will pay less! Yes you will! Yay!" And, as always, dammit, people fell for it. Idiots. Because, as is always the case with that shit, the only people who ever benefited from it were Enron execs. The rest of us saw our bills skyrocket. They used fradulent "rolling blackouts" to put little old ladies in the cold, dark, night, and literally extorted more and more money for the power we needed. People had no choice but to pay them, under threat of more blackouts. But many people couldn't afford the exorbitant amounts, and had their power cut off. Meanwhile, Kenneth Lay, friend of fake presidents, lived in one of the many multi-million dollar manors he owned, and still owns, in Aspen. He was cozy and warm all through the winter, laughing at people who were freezing and people who were foolish enough to keep giving him more and more and more. Laughing at you, and me.

And then, people found out about their scam. And Enron went bankrupt. And Kenneth Lay still lives in a manor in Aspen. And my power bills are still enormous. And that's what I know.

So I called the utility company, and was told, "off the record," that yes, it does have to do with Enron. We're paying extremely high prices for power, in effect, to bail out the industry after the Enron scam. Apprently, it's legal! Tell me how this works? Why is Kenneth Lay living in a mansion while I bail out an industry that allowed him to suck my hard earned money, which I need to support my family, right out of my pockets? Why am I expected to keep his family in luxury while my family shivers under a blanket because we can't afford the price of his wife's jewels? And why are we now sitting in the stands just watching, while industry officials and politicians wrangle over who they will sell our power company to now that Enron is bankrupt?

These utilities are no longer theirs to sell. This is OUR energy. We bailed their asses out, that makes them OUR power companies now. No, we don't have to buy anything from those corrupt pigs. And no, they don't get to sell them to anyone else. PGE is not theirs to sell anymore, it's OURS. We paid for it, fair and square. Let Kenneth Lay sell a mansion to bail out the industry, and by the way, let him rot in jail. But let the rest of us rise up and take control over our own resources. Why isn't anyone else angry about this anymore?
join the crowd, do something useful 16.Apr.2005 19:30

.

plug "PGE" into the search thingie up there, top, right

visit Oregon Public Power Coalition
 http://www.oppc.net/
OPPC
818 SW 3rd Ave, PMB #1335
Portland, OR 97204-2405

Thanks, I wanna do something useful 17.Apr.2005 09:02

Matilda

Thanks for the suggestion. I'll check into this. Sometimes, it's just really overwhelming having sooo many battles to fight. But I realize as I read your suggestion that having as much info as possible seems to make it a lot easier to meld all these concerns together and actually move forward. This battle, for example, is an immediate, personal concern on one level (trying to pay my bills and being ripped off). But it's also tied to capitalism and exploitation and social justice in general, and certainly to the environment.

If we allow giant corporations like Enron (and bechtel, and Halliburton, and Monsanto, and etc) to take control over our *pulic!!* resources, the resources we need to survive, then we are giving up all control over our lives to them. So this is just a small piece of the whole thing, but in fighting it we make progress on a larger stage as well, I think. If we take back our own power from Enron, we take back the water mother nature has provided for ALL of us from Bechtel and Halliburton, we take back our genomes and our food supply from Monsanto, then we can drive these fuckers outta dodge.

Thanks again for the suggestion.

who owns what 17.Apr.2005 10:50

stingybrim

as long as power can be owned it can be sold. should a corp, or individual be able to sell a product at what ever price they desire? you do not want the product... find an alternative. the significance of this "issue" reflects the great dependancy on the product, oil being another example. outraged about your electric bill and gas prices stop empowering those selling it. live love.


Who owns what? 17.Apr.2005 11:25

What?

Speaking of water and the food supply, we need those things. So yeh, I guess you can say we're "dependent" on them. Um, I don't see a way around that dependence, though, so the answer is in taking them back. Taking control back and not allowing any faceless corp to seize them ever again.

What's in it for us 17.Apr.2005 16:44

.

Why Public Power Is The Best Power

People's Utility Districts solve the PGE/Enron mess for Oregonians:

Provide stable, local control:

Locally owned and controlled: board of directors directly elected by voters
Stable power supply: Cannot be sold at the whim of a private corporation
Independent of the Oregon Public Utility Commission, which approved the sale of PGE to Enron and then OK'd the largest rate hike in Oregon history

Good for Labor:


Must honor existing union contracts of PGE's workers
Have no overpriced executives draining money from workers
No absentee ownership: Local control is invested in employees
Multiple PUDs = a larger job market: No corporate mergers = stable jobs

Good for Business:

Lower rates mean reduced overhead
Stable rates mean predictable overhead
Lower rates mean customers have more to spend
Locally elected board means a greater voice for business

Lower Costs:

Will get PGE's assets at the lowest price by using eminent domain: doesn't bid at the Enron bankruptcy auction
Get wholesale power at low rates unavailable to private utilities
More money stays at home: PUDs don't pay Federal income taxes
Provide power to citizens, not profits to shareholders: 14% of your PGE bill goes to shareholders!
Have no overpriced executives draining money from ratepayers

Good for the Environment:


Can make decisions based on best environmental practices, not highest income
Can develop renewable resources
With a People's Utility District, we can control our energy future. We will not be subject to the whims of absentee owners whose primary objective is to make a profit, not serve the public!

Ironic results of electric privatization beyond US borders 17.Apr.2005 18:39

Patty Hearst

Here in Portland we're getting a li'l taste of what our government has wrought throughout the world. The World Bank & IMF with the carrot of big loans to corrupt governments and the stick of mandatory privatization of just about everything that governments do, has handed over control of water, light and heat to Enron and their ilk all over the globe. Hey neighbors - it could be worse - we could end up like Nicaragua:

<reprint from Nicaragua Network newsletter>
The Nicaraguan government owes the private Spanish company, Union
Fenosa, which bought the previously State-owned
electricity distribution system five years ago, US$5.6
million in energy subsidies. As a result, Union Fenosa
owes the companies that generate electricity a similar
amount, and the generators owe ESSO for the petroleum to
power the generators. Now Union Fenosa is threatening to
ration electricity to all Nicaraguan homes, offices and
businesses as of Apr. 2 if the government has not paid by
then. The government had not responded to Union Fenosa's
threats by Mar. 28.

Complaints against Union Fenosa have been legion virtually
since electric distribution was privatized to it in 2000.
It has greatly increased charges for electricity, causing
many, even in the capital, to have to go without or to
hook up illegally, a cottage industry in poor
neighborhoods and a way of life for the politically
connected and large businesses. The company even ended up
owning wires and poles purchased by international
solidarity groups for communities that had not previously
had electricity, such as El Regadio. Now many in those
communities again have no electricity, since Union Fenosa
cut them off when they couldn't pay the high bills.

Union Fenosa cites the record-high cost of oil as a factor
in what they call the energy crisis. The company also
complained about the large percentage of Nicaraguan homes
and businesses that are connected to the national energy
network illegally, which they claim causes huge losses for
the company. On Mar. 23 El Nuevo Diario published a long
list of private businesses that do not pay for the
electricity they use. Many of these enterprises use the
power to irrigate their large-scale rice plantations. On
Mar. 24 a representative of Union Fenosa confirmed that
all the names on the published list corresponded to the
company's list of illegal users, and added that Union
Fenosa has information of other illegal users including
people who hold influential positions in local and
national government. It was revealed that a member of the
National Assembly, the owner of one of the largest rice
plantations, is connected illegally to the national energy
network. Although neither the name nor the political party
of this person was revealed, Union Fenosa says all the
relevant information will be given to the press in the
coming week. <end>

....so it could be worse, we could end up with rationed electric to everyone in Portland... oh wait, Enron kinda already pulled that one with the rolling blackouts in California....

Your right! 17.Apr.2005 20:03

D. Burbeck

Matilda, every thing you said is true......except for one very common error. Enron is not bankrupt (although the mainstream press still calls it the "bankrupt energy giant". Before de-regulation Enron was doing 2 to 3 Billion dollars a year and they were cooking the books to get those numbers.

But after de-regulation they made close to 100 billion dollars......from you and from California and many other places......$40 billion from California alone. But they didn't use that money to pay off their debts or buy back their stock. NO NO.
They stashed the loot in the 4,300 off-shore accounts in the Cayman Islands.

The American public should not only take control of the public utilities, they should also take control of the 4,300 off-shore accounts.

Here's a piece I wrote about Enron over a year ago:

--------------------------------------------------------------

In the timelines that have been published on Enron, there is always
one very important notation that is always missing. The day Enron
started making $100 BILLION/year, which coincides with their
emergence into the electricity grid in California and a few other states.
>
> The timelines report the important information of what the Company
was doing when they weren't making enough to keep their stock
price climbing, and they were hiding debt here, there, and anywhere
they could. At that time, annual earnings were in the $1-3 Billion
range. But when the gusher broke (deregulation), their tactics
changed from hiding debt....to hiding profit in the 4,300 SPEs.
ABC News reported that these accounts were given (typically)
$100 Million in cash, and $800 Million in stock deposited in
> off-shore accounts...... away from the IRS, stockholders, and
debtors. These accounts were derived with a mere 3% investment,
and if the truth be known, it's very likely that these investors will
turn out to be the wonderfull wizards of the Savings and Loan
Scandals of the Eighties.....Carl Ichan, Ivan Boesky, Michael
Milken, etc. etc.
>
> Enron is still referred to as the "bankrupt energy giant". That's
the spin they want people to believe. They want everyone to
remember the shady deals they were doing BEFORE the
gusher, to keep everyone's mind off of the money stashed in
the Cayman Islands and other places that allow numbered
bank accounts.
>
> One post office box in the Cayman Islands is the sole
business address of nearly 600 Enron SPEs. The Cayman
Island Gov't stated 18 months ago that it has changed it's
policy and would reveal information about these
> accounts.......but no one has asked!
>

who owns what 18.Apr.2005 07:42

stingybrim

what? if this is how I address you, I thought the issue at hand was electricity and its cost? You mentioned food and water? As sure as we can own land we can own that which grows and flows through it. The issue in this case seems to be the ownership of land? Have a good one, or two.


ENRON ENMOD CHEMTRAILS AND FOREIGN GOVT IN USA 18.Apr.2005 09:39

BILLDER

ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION -- The Key To GM Foods, WEIRD WEATHER, TIA, and MORE
--------------------------------------------
YOUR LIFE AS A HUMAN TEST SUBJECT
By Bill Gallagher 051404
 http://www.luxefaire.com/electro.html

Chemtrails And Terror
In The Age Of Nuclear War
By Amy Worthington
Idaho Observer
6-3-4
 http://proliberty.com/observer/20040501.htm

PATENTLY OBVIOUS AEROSOL PROGRAMS
PATENT LIST
 http://users.ev1.net/~seektress/patlist.htm

THE METHODIC DEMISE OF NATURAL EARTH
An Environmental Impact Overview
By Dr. R. Michael Castle
 http://www.wnho.net/methodic_demise.htm

SOVIET SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS
The Coin used by Russia to buy a BIG piece of the New World Order
At American Expense
 http://www.luxefaire.com/SCALARRUSSIA.HTML

THE SUNSHINE PROJECT
 http://www.sunshine-project.org

ATMOSPHERIC CHARGED-ION PLASMAS
 http://www.luxefaire.com/chargedionplasmas/index.html
--------------------------------------------

ENRON AND WEATHER CONTROL

For the most part these are old articles...i got the lead from an article i pulled off clifford carnicoms site, its after these links, somebody posted it without a link a while ago, 01/03, it bears reading all the way. It obviously is from the time before the big E went kaput. I wonder if it had anything to do with the big E going kaput....if the CT technology was co-opted for surveillance, and other nefarious uses like mass mind alteration, because of, let us say, something like TERROR, then it is not beyond the realm of possibility that enron got shut down to hide all this....there were many small-fry weather control companys like Dyn-O-Mat ffeding off this lopsided insurance, guaranteeing enron or whoever certain weather factors for a price...even being small fry the ops were big bux and a lot of the early stuff went down in Clintons time....I think the initial spraying experiments by these weather companys was a success, meaning nobody squawked, and then way was made to deploy the control technology which govt has been developing now for 5 decades or more....b


 http://www.derivativesstrategy.com/magazine/archive/1998/0598fea1.asp

 http://www.themanagementor.com/kuniverse/kmailers_universe/finance_kmailers/IF_Weather.htm

 http://www.financewise.com/public/edit/energy/weather99/wthr99-newangles.htm

 http://www.financewise.com/public/edit/energy/weatherrisk/wthr-derivatives.htm

 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=274195

The hype over weather derivatives is being replaced by real deals, and everybody's scrambling for position.

The viewership of the Weather Channel has always skewed decidedly toward the nerdy. But if the lightning-fast development of the weather derivatives market is any indication, before long the ratings-challenged cable channel could reach a whole new audience financial players around the world who have suddenly become obsessed with occluded fronts, La Niña and other weather arcana that for years had been the exclusive province of people with backyard barometers.

While derivatives historians may quibble over the precise date of the first weather contract some say July 1997, while others say August of that year everyone in the weather business agrees that the market hit the ground running.

There has been an explosion of deals in the marketplace and a tremendous amount of interest on the client side, says Richard Turrin of Paribas' strategic derivatives group. The industry has seen the birth of a new market in the last year to 18 months, and in the last six months the growth has been exponential.

Houston-based energy giant Enron estimates that between 900 and 1,000 transactions have taken place to date, with the notional value of those deals exceeding $1.5 billion. Kansas City, Mo.-based Aquila, the unregulated marketing and trading arm of Utilicorp, puts that figure closer to 1,200.

While energy firms are still the most active in the weather business, other industries are getting into the game as well. Enron has already acted as counterparty in deals with manufacturers of snowmobiles and snowblowers, the film industry and the fertilizer industry, and has fielded inquiries from theme parks, golf courses, sports-drink makers, car washes and ski resorts. Aquila boasts transactions with salt producers, ski resorts and other entertainment companies. In addition to the relatively commonplace degree-day deals, says Enron's Lynda Clemmons, a director at the firm, she has been approached by companies interested in rainfall, snowfall and even barometric pressure contracts.

******* Weather derivatives allow companies to control the effects of the weather on demand for their products. Here are some of the most popular structures.*******

Temperature Contracts
A degree day is the deviation of a day's average temperature from 65 degrees Fahrenheit. In the summertime, the demand for energy increases with every degree above 65; in the winter, the demand for heat increases for every degree day below 65. There are a number of degree-day products available to energy producers. In most, payment is made for every degree day above or below the strike, with a maximum payout that can range from $500,000 to $5 million or more...
-------------------------------------
Bernard Eastlund, Inventor of HAARP (High Frequency Active AURORAL Research program), from his Patent # 4,686,605 "...This invention relates to a method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region normally existing above the Earth's surface...by initially transmitting electromagnetic radiation from the Earth's surface... altering solar absorption...weather modification is possible... for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device...A moving plume could also serve as a means for focusing a vast amount of sunlight on selected portions of the Earth...HIGH INTENSITY, WELL CONTROLLED ELECTRICAL FIELDS CAN BE PROVIDED IN SELECTED LOCATIONS FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES...(caps ours, ed.)...Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by detonation of a "Heave" type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device..."


More Excerpts from Patent #4,686,605 HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION...
...Sufficient energy is employed to cause ionization of neutral particles (molecules of oxygen, nitrogen, and the like, PARTICULATES, etc.) which then become part of the (plasma) region, thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region. This effect can also be enhanced by providing artificial particles, eg electrons, ions, etc, directly into the region to be affected from a rocket, satellite, or the like, to supplement the particles in the naturally occurring plasma. The artificial particles are also ionized by the transmitted electromagnetic radiation thereby increasing charged particle density of the resulting plasma of the region...
In another embodiment of the invention, electron cyclotron resonance heating is carried out in the selected region or regions at sufficient power levels to allow a plasma present to generate a MIRROR FORCE which forces the charged electrons of the altered plasma UPWARD along the force line to an altitude which is higher than the original altitude... Sufficient power, eg 10 to the 15th joules, can be applied so that altered plasma can be trapped on the field line between mirror points and will oscillate in space for prolonged periods of time. By this embodiment, a plume of altered plasma can be established at selected locations for communications modifications or other purposes...
-----------------------------
ed.-That means Surveillance KEYHOLES of ALLLLLL types, folks. Coupled with Time Domain Corporation Classified Eavesdropping Patents (200+) that does not bode well for Human Liberty ANYWHERE.
--------------------------
...Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of power in the Earths Atmosphere at strategic locations, and maintain the power injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far more precise than heretofore accomplished by prior art, particularly by the detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various altitudes...
Disruption of communications can be employed by one knowledgeable of this invention as a communications network at the same time (Disruption is caused to other parties)...knowledge of the various em waves being employed and how they will vary in frequency and magnitude can be used to an advantage for positive communication, and eavesdropping purposes at the same time..
------------------------
... In 1966 in October, possession of LSD was declared a Class One felony,
stopping all research on it. The psychedelic 60's were over and the war
on drugs began. 'The cryptocracy black ops. funds grew fat. ln 1967
DARPA, that's what the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency was called,
Project Pandora got under way with Dr. Joseph Sharpe who is presently in
NASA-Ames Laboratory today. Pandora concluded in 1969 stating that
nothing would be clear without experiments on human subjects in their
natural settings. Nixon approved- "basic research" on voluntary human
subjects. In 1968 at the peak of the student unrest Dr. Gordon J.F.
McDonald, Science Advisor to Lyndon B. Johnson described how man-made
changes in the earth's ionosphere could be used for mass behavior
control. He pointed out that low frequency electromagnetic operations
could be used to attack the brain-waves of human beings. He stated, "
perturbation of the environment can produce changes in behavioral
patterns"....W. Bowart from interview in mid 1990's
---------------------------------
Hurricane Charley in Florida is just a warmup---it is well within the capabilities of the bush crime government to send most of California into the sea, and do not think they will not do it, if they are thwarted in their efforts to pervert America...


Natural Disaster As Means To Cancel Elections

I hope I am wrong about this. And just by writing about it could deter it, a nice thing. So. If nadir doesn't split the freedom vote enough, and kerry is appointed by the rothschilds as next prez, then of course the bush scum will try to canx the elections...terrorism is getting old, especially seeing as they are so dorky they cannot cover their trax, and are busted for it everytime....but...natural disasters, such as California going into the sea, or massive EARTYHQUAKES elsewhere, would fulfill the need for total emergency measures, including cancellation of elections.
Natural Disaster which is not natural is a big part of the Radiant Arsenal, and well within the capabilities of the bush crime family nazi government. There is a lot of proof for this if you read. The Radiant Arsenal is being used against the world right now, and HEAVILY in The USA, because the USA is the last stumbling block of the NWO bankers---we still have some guns (Though I doubt we have the wherewithal to use them) and we can still speak out, a little bit. Chemtrails are just the visible part of the Radiant Arsenal, and below you can see some excerpts and links concerning various aspects of the Radiant Arsenal, and Man-Made Natural Disasters. BTW, the seismic activity in various unstable places within America has taken on alarming tones in the last week or so.

Bearden Described The Working of TMTs (Tesla Magnifying Transmitters):

They will go through anything. What you do is set up a standing wave through the Earth and the molten core of the Earth begins to feed that wave (We are talking Tesla now). When you have that standing wave, you have set up a triode. What you've done is that the molten core of the earth is feeding the energy and its like your signal--that you are putting in--is gating the gate of a triode....then what you do is that you change the frequency. If you change the frequency one way (dephase it) you dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side of the earth that you focused upon. You start ionising the air, you can change the weather flow patterns (Jet streams etc)--you can change all that--if you dump it gradually---real gradually--you influence the heck out of the weather...its a great weather machine. If you dump it sharply, you don't get a little ionization like that...you will get fireballs and flashes (Plasma & Earthquakes) that will come down on the surface of the earth...you can cause enormous weather changes over entire regions by playing that thing back and forth....
----------------------------------------------------------

1978
FROM:
 http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/fulcrum_main.pl?database=TR_U2&database=FT_U2&numrecords=25&search.DOC_TEXT=barium
(This is hit 16 of 25.)  
AD Number: ADA072167
Subject Categories: RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
Corporate Author: MISSION RESEARCH CORP SANTA BARBARA CALIF
Title: Radio Communication Utilizing the Base of a Striated Barium Plasma.
Descriptive Note: Topical rept. Apr-Jul 78,
Personal Authors: Fulks,G. J. ;Scott,L. D. ;Sowle,D. H. ;Wortman,W. R. ;
Report Date: JUL 1978
Pages: 43 PAGES
Report Number: MRC-R-401-R
Contract Number: DNA001-78-C-0237
Project Number: S99QAXH TASKNUMBER: B053
Monitor Acronym: DNA,SBI
Monitor Series: 4670T,AD-E300 465
Descriptors: *RADIO TRANSMISSION, *STRIATIONS, NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS, HIGH FREQUENCY, PLASMAS(PHYSICS), REFLECTION, NUCLEAR EXPLOSION SIMULATION, CROSS SECTIONS, HIGH ALTITUDE, NUCLEAR CLOUDS, COMMUNICATION AND RADIO SYSTEMS, RADIO SIGNALS, BARIUM, BOTTOM, RADIO RECEPTION.
Identifiers: Avefria operations, Barium clouds, Cloud bases, Base reflection, PE62704H, WU09
Abstract: In conjunction with the DNA barium releases, Avefria I and II, an experiment was undertaken to determine if radio communication was possible off the base of a striated plasma created by these barium releases. A transmitting station was set up to broadcast a steady signal at two HF frequencies toward the base of the barium striations and two receiving stations listened for signal returns on the two frequencies. (The chosen geometry prevented reflections off the sides of the barium cloud from affecting the experiment). One station heard substantial returns while the other heard nothing. Data from the first station provide an estimate of the reflection cross sections for the base of the striated barium cloud. The negative result from the second station arises partly from limited sensitivity of equipment but the upper limit on cross section was less than that seen from the first station. This suggests a directional character for the signal reflected from the base of the cloud.
Limitation Code: APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Source Code: 406548
--------------------------------------


EVERYTHING YOU EVER WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE SKULL AND BONES SOCIETY BUT WERE AFRAID TO ASK
KERRY AND BUSH BOTH BELONG -- THEIR DADDIES SOLD AMERICA OUT A LONG TIME AGO
 http://www.luxefaire.com/politics.htm

YOUR LIFE AS A HUMAN TEST SUBJECT
 http://www.luxefaire.com/electro.html

REAL LIFE BIOTECH IN THE USA
 http://www.luxefaire.com/real/index.html
 http://www.luxefaire.com/080804newskinerupt/index.html

HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION RESOURCE
 http://www.dc.peachnet.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/assignments/experiment.html

MK-ULTRA LIVES!  http://mindcontrolforums.com/mkdoctable.htm
 http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm

------------------------------------------------
People are not talking about several important aspects of these frenzied and frequent military developments. First is that U.S. military deployments to 132 bases outside American borders — dominated by hundreds of thousands of military personnel in Iraq, and tens of thousands in Afghanistan and in the fleets patrolling the Pacific — depletes defensive forces in America too dangerously low levels, and as we know from 9/11, America's military defense of its own borders can realistically be expected to fail at any time. So sending so many forces out of the country all at once, especially considering Bush's irrational and suspicious behavior, is a very ominous development, one which should terrify all Americans. J Kaminski
-----------------------------------------



I, -----------, (ON THIS DAY OF-DATE) DO HEREBY RIGHTFULLY STATE, TO ALL PARTIES CONCERNED, AND FOR ALL PURPOSES PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, THAT I SPEND THE CURRENCY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING CONGLOMERATE STRICTLY FROM WITHIN A SITUATION OF DURESS: THIS SITUATION BEING A REAL AND TRUE RESULT WHEREBY NO ALTERNATIVE, OR RECOURSE IS AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL RESERVE CURRENCY (WHICH IS NOT AT THIS TIME BEING ISSUED ACCORDING TO THE STRICTURES CONCERNING THE CREATION OF MONEY AS ADDRESSED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) AND I IMPLY NO CONSENT WHATSOEVER TO ANY CONTRACTS MADE IN MY NAME, OR NOT, OR IN MY INTERESTS, OR NOT, THAT I HAVE NOT DULY REVIEWED AND APPROVED WITH MY SIGNATURE. I RESERVE ALL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS LEGALLY BEQUEATHED TO ME AS A NATURAL AND SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ANY TYPE. IN NO WAY SHALL MY SIGNATURE OR MARK, OR ANY ACTION OF MINE NOT STRICTLY DEFINED AS CONSENT, BE CONSTRUED AS CONSENT TO ANY OTHER CONTRACT, AGREEMENT, OR PROCESS OF WHICH I HAVE NOT BEEN MADE COGNIZANT, AND GIVEN MY FORMAL APPROVAL. I HEREBY RECORD AND MAKE KNOWN MY KNOWLEDGE, AND I HEREBY DEMAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND SATISFACTION BASED ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VERSUS ANY SUBSIDIARY LAW BASED ON THE DEFINED BENEFIT OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKING CONGLOMERATES CURRENCY, ANY STATE OF EMERGENCY, OR ANY OTHER SCENARIO WHEREBY MY RIGHTS AS A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES ARE AT ISSUE. THIS NOTICE SUPERCEDES ALL OTHER STATUS ASSIGNED TO ME, WITH OR WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE, BY ANY ENTITY OF ANY TYPE.
------------------------------------------
PHOTOGRAPH THE SKY

GATHER EVIDENCE OF ATMOSPHERIC ENGINEERING AND ATMOSPHERIC WEAPONRY BEING USED AGAINST THE PLANET AND THE PEOPLE.

JERRY E. SMITH AUTHOR OF HAARP: ULTIMATE WEAPON OF THE (NWO) CONSPIRACY
 http://www.jerryesmith.com/books/research.php

SOME CITATIONS CONCERNING BARIUM AND ATMOSPHERIC ENGINEERING
 http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/fulcrum_main.pl?database=TR_U2&database=FT_U2&numrecords=25&search.DOC_TEXT=barium

www.luxefaire.com/holeclouds/index.html

www.luxefaire.com/real/index.html

www.luxefaire.com/thosewhomoveclouds/index.html

www.chemtrailcentral.com

AEROSOL OPERATIONS CRIMES AND COVERUP
www.carnicom.com

www.bariumblues.com

THE PENTAGONS PEOPLE ZAPPER
 http://www.sfbg.com/reality/22.html

CROWD CONTROL COOKERY: MICROWAVES AMONG THE NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
 http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/27a/057.html

ATMOSPHERIC CHARGED-ION PLASMAS
 http://www.luxefaire.com/chargedionplasmas/index.html

NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
 http://www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/soft/softkill.htm

MILITARY OPERATIONS OTHER THAN WAR
 http://www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/mootw/mootw3.htm

MORE NON LETHAL WEAPONS
 http://www.au.af.mil/au/aul/bibs/soft/nonlethal.htm

 http://home1.gte.net/quakker/Documents/Chemtrails_Over_America.htm

 http://mindcontrolforums.com/mindattack-directedenergyweapons.htm

 http://www.raven1.net/uncom.htm

 http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html

 http://www.world-action.co.uk/gwen.html

 http://www.gulfwarvets.com/nbc.htm

 http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/bskies1.html

 http://www.gulfwarillnesses.com/mycoplasma.htm

 http://www.maebrussell.com/

 http://www.datafilter.com/mc/humanExperimentation.html

RESOURCES ON HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION
 http://www.dc.peachnet.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/assignments/experiment.html


----------------------------\
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I: BAN ON THE USE OF METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE
THAT DAMAGE THE ENVIRONMENT
Protocol I of 1977 additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 applies to international armed
conflict and contains two specific provisions for the protection of the environment. These provisions
are clearly complementary to the ENMOD Convention in the event of armed conflict: while the
Convention prohibits deliberate modification of the environment as a means of warfare, Additional
Protocol I prohibits attacks on the environment as such, regardless of the means used.
Article 35, para. 3 of Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of "methods or means of warfare which
are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the
natural environment".
Using the same language, Article 55 aims to protect the population, whose health and survival in the
event of armed conflict could be endangered by damage to the environment. The article also
prohibits attacks on the natural environment by way of reprisals.
The Rome Statute of 1998 incorporates some of the prohibitions contained in Additional Protocol I.
For instance, the future International Criminal Court will have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes
that consist in "intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause
incidental [...] widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be
clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated" (Article
8, para. 2 [b, iv]).
Source:
 http://www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList74/195998B28FD631C0C1256B66006021F5



COMPLETE FILE BELOW:

Annex 1 - reference material to accompany IUCN Statement
5
The definitions are as follows:
widespread: encompassing an area of several hundred square kilometres;
long-lasting: lasting for a period of months, or approximately a season;
severe: involving serious or significant disruption or harm to human life, natural and economic
resources or other assets.
As examples, the Understandings also include a non-exhaustive list of phenomena that could result
from the use of environmental modification techniques: earthquakes and tsunamis; an upset in the
ecological balance of a region; changes in weather patterns (clouds, precipitation, cyclones and
tornadic storms); changes in climate patterns; changes in ocean currents; changes in the state of
the ozone layer and changes in the state of the ionosphere.
ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL I: BAN ON THE USE OF METHODS AND MEANS OF WARFARE
THAT DAMAGE THE ENVIRONMENT
Protocol I of 1977 additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 applies to international armed
conflict and contains two specific provisions for the protection of the environment. These provisions
are clearly complementary to the ENMOD Convention in the event of armed conflict: while the
Convention prohibits deliberate modification of the environment as a means of warfare, Additional
Protocol I prohibits attacks on the environment as such, regardless of the means used.
Article 35, para. 3 of Additional Protocol I prohibits the use of "methods or means of warfare which
are intended, or may be expected, to cause widespread, long-term and severe damage to the
natural environment".
Using the same language, Article 55 aims to protect the population, whose health and survival in the
event of armed conflict could be endangered by damage to the environment. The article also
prohibits attacks on the natural environment by way of reprisals.
The Rome Statute of 1998 incorporates some of the prohibitions contained in Additional Protocol I.
For instance, the future International Criminal Court will have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes
that consist in "intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause
incidental [...] widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be
clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated" (Article
8, para. 2 [b, iv]).
Source:
 http://www.icrc.org/Web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList74/195998B28FD631C0C1256B66006021F5
PASCO2003
PASCO2003
PINELLAS 2003
PINELLAS 2003
NM 2004
NM 2004