portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

actions & protests | government | political theory

Bush's Road Trip: Potemkin Town Meetings and a Potemkin Opposition

The president is tightly controlling who gets into his Social Security public gatherings. No surprise there. But why aren't Democrats complaining that tickets are only being offered to Republican members of Congress?

President Bush claims he's holding "conversations" all around the country on his plans to "reform" or "save" Social Security. These purported dialogues with the public take place at gatherings which the president likes to characterize as "town meetings."

Now as a native of Connecticut, a New England state that prides itself for its town meeting form of local government, and as a reporter who got his start covering such exercises in real people's government, I have to say that I know town meetings and Mr. Bush, those events you're hosting are not town meetings.

Real town meetings, a form of direct democracy developed by the colonists in New England in reaction to the old European model of representative or appointive government that featured mayors and counselors, tend to be pretty freewheeling and rambunctious affairs, where any citizen can attend, speak out on an issue from the floor, and vote on the issue at hand.

As I wrote in an article in Counterpunch two months ago, when I tried to go to one of those Bush "town meetings" that was staged at a community college a couple miles from my house, I found myself turned away by Republican Party goons barring the entrance--something that would never happen at a real town meeting. It turned out that, as with all the president's "public" meetings on this issue, you have to have a ticket to get in, and those tickets are being handed out only by Republican members of Congress.

No wonder the crowds seem so friendly on TV!

What I'm really surprised at, though, is how passive the Democrats in Congresss have been about this road show charade.

The Huckster-in-Chief, after all, is traveling the country not as a candidate for office, but as the President of the United States. He's making this tour at taxpayer expense, and he's holding his meetings in public buildings--in my case at an auditorium belonging to the Montgomery County Community College. But he's only talking to Republicans. Even people with tickets are being turned away if it appears they may have contrarian ideas, like several people who arrived at one such event in Colorado with tickets, but with a bumper sticker on their car saying "No Blood for Oil." The president's GOP security goons apparently aren't just blocking the doors; they're spying in the parking lot, too.

Why aren't Democratic senators and representatives screaming bloody murder at this scam?

I asked my local representative, the recently elected Democratic Rep. Alyson Schwartz, when she led a teach-in on Social Security at Temple University (a teach-in at which she, astonishingly, accepted the bogus 2041 date being touted by Bush as the day Social Security will go bust).

"Shouldn't you Congressional Democrats be screaming about not being offered tickets to distribute at these presidential events?" I asked her.

"Well I guess maybe we should be," she agreed.

That was over a week ago.

I still haven't heard a word of complaint about it from either Rep. Schwartz or from other members of the so-called opposition in Congress.

Why are these people, who are supposed to be the opposition, so quiet? If Congresswoman Schwartz, for example, had stood outside the auditorium at Montco Community College decrying the inability of her Democratic constituents to get into the building and "dialogue" with the president, maybe the somnolent TV reporters who didn't even notice or remark on the packing of the hall would have actually reported on the president's deceit.

Instead, we got reports that evening about how supportive the public seems to be of the president, and how worried people at the event seemed to be about the viability of the Social Security system.

For the rest of this column and other stories by Lindorff, please go (at no charge) to This Can't Be Happening! .

homepage: homepage: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net


Fake Fake Fake 06.Apr.2005 15:51

sam

Maybe all the above mentioned parties would care about the fake democracy if we didn't have e-voting and optical vote counting equipment owned by the monopolists. It doesn't help either that the voting results are reported by fake journalists through the CIA media. And to top it all off we have the fake commentators telling the Mind controlled people how to discuss the results. In Montgomery County, Maryland the "elected officials" stopped pretending to represent the voters when the e-voting was installed. No auditable paper trail, no verifiable records and most importantly no independent oversight. They know who put them in office and they are representing their interests quite openly.

Lets hope more people start participating in their government and start thinking critically for themselves. It takes time to build a new public forum to replace the fake ones but IMC is a good model to copy in Montgomery County Maryland and elsewhere. The last thing the monopolists want is for the majority to discover the fraud being advanced by their hired liars. When their message becomes irrelevant to the masses then things will change.

# 06.Apr.2005 17:11

A

Give the mofo a Potempkin Bill to sign and put him in a Potempkin Hospital; one with windows that only look like bars.