portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

9.11 investigation

US DoD McNiven RICO SUIT! BUSH SENIOR, CIA head, & his 1976 state terror plan to hit WTCs!

[[unsure why this was composted? It's very timely and important? Perhaps that is why is was composted? I'd like to understand the decision to compost, if anyone would like? It's hardly a 'repost' from a corporate source, and it has a great deal of other personal analysis to boot.]]

A LIVE COURT CASE! DEAL WITH IT! WELCOME TO REALITY.

Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC...McNiven, who first went public in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004, claims his unit was ordered to create the "perfect terrorist plan" using commercial airliners as weapons and the Twin Towers as their target.....publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.

The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security. To silence critics, McNiven has successfully passed a credible lie detector test regarding his participation in the study as well as other specific orders given to him by his superiors in case of a real attack on the Twin Towers. The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.

McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that "the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976."
composted article [WHY?] coverage global 19.Mar.2005 08:54
imperialism & war | political theory

McNiven RICO SUIT! BUSH SENIOR, CIA head, & his 1976 state terror plan to hit WTCs!
author: repost


"During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I'd go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers." However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds. "I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people. "I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded - never - because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people."


GET RID OF ALL BUSHES NOW! TAKE NO PRISONERS.




The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level The Twin Towers Created In 1976
By Greg Szymanski
Exclusive to American Free Press
3-19-2005


Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC using commercial airliners and box cutters as weapons.

The laundry list of terrorist warnings handed to the Bush administration prior to 9/11 makes the President and others look like "bumbling idiots or a bunch of conniving criminals" responsible for the mass murders at the Twin Towers and in Afghanistan and Iraq.

These are the harsh words of Timothy McNiven, an outspoken critic of the President's handling of 9/11 and a 29-year U.S. Defense Department operative still under contract with the government.

He says not only did the Bush administration purposely ignore Al Q'aida in the months preceding the WTC attacks, but the situation is even more disturbing, considering his military unit way back in 1976 devised a mock terrorist attack of the Twin Towers exactly like what occurred on 9/11.

McNiven, who first went public in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004, claims his unit was ordered to create the "perfect terrorist plan" using commercial airliners as weapons and the Twin Towers as their target.

The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.

The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.

To silence critics, McNiven has successfully passed a credible lie detector test regarding his participation in the study as well as other specific orders given to him by his superiors in case of a real attack on the Twin Towers.

The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.

McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that "the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976."

"I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100 story building to the Twin Towers," recalled McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.

"He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we devised in the 1976."

Since that ominous realization, McNiven has devoted his entire life to alerting the American public about the similarities between 9/11 and the 1976 study without much success, his story basically being ignored by politicians and the mainstream media.

"Why am I doing this? Why have I spent every waking hour trying to bring this story to the American people?" asked McNiven, claiming he still is following a strange direct military order given to him more than 25 years ago.

"During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I'd go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers."

However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds.

"I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people.

"I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded - never - because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people."

Besides taking a lie detector to verify his story, McNiven has made public a detailed list of about 40 names of those individuals who took part in the mock terrorist plan, including Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt. Middleton, Sgt. Arroyo and many others.

"There were also people from the Defense Department and the CIA who were monitoring the study, but I wasn't able to get their names," he added.

Some of McNiven's most recent assignments with the Defense Department include work on the Northwest Drug Task Force and various other drug smuggling and weapons trafficking cases.

March 9, 2005

"If the people knew what we had done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us." (George H.W. "Poppy" Bush)

Support American Free Press

 http://www.rense.com/general63/TWIN.HTM


comments:

this explains several things,

1. explains how the whole 1976 staffing was put back in place (Rumsfeld, Secretary of State in 1976; Bush Senior, CIA Director in 1976, Nelson Rockfeller as Vice President and almost President after three failed assassination attempts on appointed Ford; Cheney was chief of staff for President Ford in 1976. These three came back together under the son of Bush Senior when George W. Bush was installed by the Supreme Court. Then Bush Senior really back in control once Bush Senior's right hand man, Meuller, was placed as head of the FBI weeks before the 9-11 self hit.

2. explains why postponed: Bush removed from CIA position by Carter, plan postponed. Regroup....

3. explains 'delay' when Nelson Rockfeller both fails to become president like he wanted in 1976. Then he dies in 1979.

4. explains how they thought they could seriously rewrite the U.S. Constitution in 1976, to set up totally appointed frameworks of the legislature. Kid you not. This was connected to Rockfellers as well. Perhaps the terror hit that was planned was to be done in a few years to do it.

5. explains the Trilateral issues here: Nelson got half his wish by basically dominating all appointments of the Carter Administration with Trilaterials, a clique of banker/internationalists (which included George Bush by the way) all hand picked by his brother David Rockfeller. Trilaterials were started up by David Rockfeller with aid by Mr. Grand Chessboard himself, Zbigniew Brezesinki, who in late 1990s wrote of the "requirements" for a "new pearl harbor" because U.S. democracy 'lacks the will to be an empire without such events, history has shown'. Carter one of the first Trilaterials as well.

6. explains why the WTCs were chosen: found to be unstable, and perhaps even the WTCs were created simply for the Rockefeller desire of destroying them. After all, they were constructed under Nelson Rockfeller himself (as Governor of New York), with help from his brother on financing, David Rockefeller (founder of the Trialterals). These would be the very people who thought they would be in charge directly after Ford Assassination attempts. However, all these failed.

7. explains surrogate hit on Three Mile Island to "jump start" FEMA as a back up plan, in 1979. FEMA is actually 'activated' three days early, before it is even authorized, to be in place for the fake hit on Three Mile Island. FEMA allows total media seal off and vetting of all events through the federal government. The state terror test successful.

5. explains why Bush Senior so anxious to get into the Presidency in 1980.

6. explains why he is willing to murder Reagan to do it, when his Vice President, in 1981, mere months into Reagan's first term. THE ATTEMPTED COUP D'ETAT OF MARCH 30, 1981 (87,300 bytes)  http://www.tarpley.net/bush17.htm

7. explains the later 1993 FBI sponsored attempts, months into Bush proxy William Jefferson Clinton (drug dealing connections) to destory the Towers thorugh surrogate terrorists they actually told what to hit and how to hit it. However, the Towers failed to fall down.

8. explains how directly after this failed attempt to take down the towers, the Bush family buys up the WTC security contracts. Soon, Marvin Bush head of Security (Securatec) for the WTC. (The reality is a bit more complicated, though shows Bush company (Kuwaiti-American) in charge of security at the WTC's after a failed attempt.

8. explains how in early 2001, the whole 1976 team were put into power once more through Bush family appointments: Baby Bush appoints his father's 1976 friends to power once more: Cheney (Bush Senior's Secretary of State for the Gulf War I, Halluburton connections, and Cheney was Ford's 1976 Chief of Staff), Rumsfeld (appointed Secretary of State in 2001, was appointed Secretary of State in 1976 for appointed Ford as well...), and appointing George W. Bush (a proxy for his father coming back into power from his "interrupted" 1976 CIA Directorship), and the appointing of another GHW Bush right hand man, Meuller, as FBI director. Then they were set to unleash their hit on the United States. Which they did. Which they still are.

add a comment on this article
George W's great uncle 19.Mar.2005 10:19
President Teddy Roosevelt link

"(Edward Harriman is an) undesirable citizen, deep seated in corruption... (an) enemy of the public."--Teddy Roosevelt 1904, in a letter to Sen. James Sherman.

Good piece, if a bit redundant. 20.Mar.2005 07:12

Sheepdog

You've brought, however, a lot of important connections together.
I believe it.

Rense? 20.Mar.2005 09:44

Moonshiner

Are there any other sources of this information besides Rense? I believe this stuff to be true but it is tough to believe this stuff when it comes from a notorious tin hat website such as Rense. We need more sources that we can draw from to convince more people that this is true.

I heard the audio segment of this man's testimony. 20.Mar.2005 10:09

Sheepdog

I'll see if I can find a link to it. At the time I was thinking, crap! these guys are going to be wacked if this heats up. Be good to be very careful.

Rense! 20.Mar.2005 10:34

Listen Up!

I find Rense's graveyard recordings from the other side to be a bit much, yes. But Rense never does anything with those but interview the "tin hats" that are into it.

More telling, I recall when Rense first started about prions and mad cow. It was straight wacko. No standard-brand scientist had ever heard of prions. It's like when accupuncture was considered the most outrageous form of charlatanry. Soon after the mainstream began a campaign to denounce accupuncture, Dr. Hung came to Oregon - at the request of envious M.D.'s - to teach them accupuncture. Soon after that, the standard-brand M.D.'s tried to fence off the field so that only they could practice it and went after Dr. Hung personally to run him out of the country -- because Hung had so many success stories. To me, the prion thing is like the accupuncture story. The same people who were ridiculing talk of prions a few years ago, are now saying - "Oh, well, yes those are just a kind of proteins, we've known about that for years!"

So, as some one who has followed Rense over the years, I would never say "Rense?" -- I'd say "Rense!"

If Rense was so unreliable, why is Art Bell still on the air, while it is almost impossible to get Rense on any station, even in the middle of the night? Ooops! Don't answer that question - it'll get you in TROUBLE!

If you ain't paranoid, you gotta be crazy.

Can't find it right now, but there's this 20.Mar.2005 10:49

Sheepdog

- Plaintiff's basis for alleging Defendants had prior knowledge "terrorists" could highjack commercial aircraft and attack the United States is not only due to Defendant GWB's continued withholding of facts and public records necessary for the "911 Commission" to perform its public duty, but, supported by the sworn affidavit of Timothy Stuart McNiven, former United States Army participant in a 1975 Congressional funded military study which purpose was to "identify security lapses and submit corrective actions" to Congress. (See Exhibit "B"). [24]

52. Based upon review of Affiant McNiven's sworn statement Plaintiff asserts Defendant USA, et al., charged with defending America had prior knowledge before "911" that the events of this infamous day in American history could take place and did. Hence, Defendant USA's failure to implement the findings of the study was grossly/criminally negligent and Defendant's "failing to prevent" the attacks of "911" raises other serious national security and public trust matters important for Plaintiff to obtain justice in this case. Affiant McNiven's testimony and the chilling similarities of the study's scenarios to the actual events of "911," support a basis Defendants were grossly/criminally negligent in failing to prevent "911." Affiant McNiven's testimony also provides the "nexus" to include Defendant George H. Bush, Sr., (hereinafter "Defendant GHB") as a critical party to this litigation as Defendant GHB as CIA Director at the time of the study and reasons for its not being implemented are very relevant for Plaintiff to find the answers as to why her husband was murdered on "911."

 http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/MarianiAC.html#PAC

why all of this Rense debunking? Is it necessary? 20.Mar.2005 11:36

we're after the TRUTH

& it's not that important as to where it comes from, for TRUTH often comes in different
packageing than we're often accustomed to getting it gifted to us...i.e., some think it
is found in a gift box nicely ribboned with their name on it, whereas other's are NOT at
all concerned as to the wrapping...it's what's inside that counts to them!

To claim www.rense.com os a "notorious tin hat" website is to completely miss the REAL
purpose of Jeff Rense and his website...if you'll carefully note, he does NOT endorse
any of the postings put up on his webpage, and only very rarely will he post anything he
himself writes...his purpose is to put out for the public the thinking, investigations,
uncoverings, thoughts, etc. of OTHER'S and it's "reader beware"...always has been, and
always will be. It's simply put out there for YOU...presumbably an ADULT...to read and
decide for YOURSELF as to whether the particular posting has merit or not, whether it's
plausible, a "maybe", a TRUTH, or an outright lie...it's up to the READER and that part-
icular reader ALONE to decide these important question's answer for themselves, and not
be lead astray by various assortment of wannabe highbrow so-called "intellects", trolls
on the pay of government(s) or Korporate Amerika or personal-agenda foister who're into
temporary trolling to foist their pet project and stir other's away from what they feel
...the key word here is "they"...is not suitable mind memes for potential readers.

Having said all that, then come back and show us you complete unfailing dedication to
FREEDOM OF SPEECH and do some more attacking the "messenger" by engaging in senseless
RENSE-bashing...come on back and let's see some more of it, shall we?

By the way...this just my personal opinion, mind ya...but, RENSE has far more integrity
than Art Bell does now that Art sold out to Clear Channel, who dictate's his agenda and
what he'll speak about and what he'll not be allowed to crank away on...those who are old-time Art listener's can clearly discern what's happened to him and his program now
that Korporate AmeriKa has taken it and is in charge. Not so with Rense...he still is
plugging away on a shoestring and is beholding to no one...if he make's a mistake, a
miscue, or change's his mind, he'll tell you on air...it's that simple...NOTHING IS ALL
THAT WRITTEN IN STONE that it can't be looked at from a multitude of perspectives...that
is all he is facilitating with his program...it's up to you...the listener...to select
the "perspective" that suit's YOU!

Rense. 20.Mar.2005 12:44

Moonshiner

Okay, you're point about Rense and Art Bell's credibility is well taken. And, I agree that there is much truth to be found at Rense.com. My point is that so many people pass it off as phony information unless they find it elsewhere like our good old main stream media. I think if we were to find more links to Rense from places like DailyKos.com or AmericaBlog.com we might be getting somewhere.

There is so much information out there that isn't getting to those people who really need it. I think if more people were reminded of Johnny Gosch's story there would be a full fledged investigation without all the conspiracy and murder. But we first have to give the mainstream the facts and finding those facts from one source does not allow us to make a well rounded opinion.

I think the general public should know more about HAARP, the DRug War, the Franklin Cover-up, and the 9/11 attacks. But instead we're investigating baseball players using steroids and arguing about a woman's feeding tube. Personally the Terry Shiavo case should be between the husband, Terry and her family and NOT the general public.

Again, the Bush Admininstration plays the game well to divide, conquer and distract the American Public.

Thanks for setting me straight on Rense.

MS

non-Rense source 20.Mar.2005 15:30

Converse Murdoch umlaut@idir.net

I read that article Saturday morning and a couple hours later it was gone. THAT really got my curiosity going. I typed " McNiven rico suit " into google and came across this:

 link to 64.233.167.104

Conformation will be difficult without a FOIA 20.Mar.2005 15:50

Sheepdog

This has a white hot handle, "national security" wise.
I wonder if there are any surviving witnesses willing to come out? They better do it now before they're ... neutralized.

neutral 20.Mar.2005 18:26

Moonshiner

I'm currently reading the book "The Franklin Cover-up". I just got it yesterday and I'll finish it tonight. That is how compelling it is.

Why the American public didn't get outraged upon hearing Noreen Gosch's story about her son Johnny's kidnapping is absolutely appalling. There is a child prostitution ring in this country and around the world where children are auctioned like cattle. Children. Auctioned. They are then used as sex slaves for wealthy businessmen and/ or politicians. Sometimes these child slaves are used sexually to compromise politicians for blackmail.

Why aren't more mainstream news sources, (TV, Radio, Internet, etc.) reporting this story? Why? I'm outraged by the lack of coverage of things where Mother's are losing their children.

Why isn't Congress investigating missing children?

I wish more people would read the book "The Franklin Cover-up" and "Why Johnny Can't Come Home". This world will be a better place when Mother's don't have to worry about their children being kidnapped by wealthy politicians.

THANK YOU! THANK YOU! 22.Mar.2005 06:59

DEAR PEOPLE

for dishing out the truth on these dirty bastards...our so-called ruling "elites"!!!!

It's all about logic, people 24.Mar.2005 04:42

EastCoastBlue

Re: the 9-11 plot allegedly exposed by Mr. McNiven, as well as the allegations of a nationwide child prostitution/slavery organization -

Of course very few people, Mr. McNiven being one of them and George Bush, Sr. being another, truly have the necessary experince and access to privileged information to ascertain whether these stories are absolutely true or false. However, we would all be doing ourselves a grave disservice to dismiss these allegations simply because they have not been proven as fact as yet. As far as I can tell, everything alleged re: 9-11 by Tim McNiven is entirely plausible, and it is my opinion that much of his story is more plausible than the official story of a filthy rich Saudi heir working with the CIA and then turning rogue, yet being cunning and lucky enough to avoid capture or death at the hands of the CIA or other US military/paramilitary personnel for over 15 years after turning against us. I am not saying that I believe Mr. McNiven's allegations as the definite truth, but until the defendants in the Mariani case can present a believable version of events that accounts for the gross negligence and incomptence on the part of several US government officals that would have had to happen to allow the attacks to happen in a manner congruent with the offical story, I am forced to consider it a possibility that the 9-11 attacks were a political ploy to allow the Bushes and their elite cronies to circumvent the laws and traditons of our nation in order to exert an ever tightening grip on our rights and our collective psyche.

Granted, I am biased like many if not all people that would post to an indymedia site - but, be honest, which sounds more likely? Our leaders either made 9-11 happen, let 9-11 happen, or had no IDEA 9-11 was going to happen despite repeated warnings from their own intel agencies, not to mention the capture of multiple terrorist cells in the US during the late 90's. I know Bush comes off like a jackass when it comes to public speaking, but I refuse to believe that he or any of the people working under and next to him are so stupid as to have had no idea that the terror warnings should have been taken seriously.

PDF or image pages of McNiven statement here 24.May.2005 09:31

.

The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level The Twin Towers Created In 1976

Prison Planet.tv | March 21, 2005

Comment: If completely confirmed 100% then this is THE smoking gun, over and above Northwoods, the NORAD stand down, the explosives in the buildings, any other piece of 9/11 evidence. It's going to be interesting to see how they pass this one off as a 'coincidence' - we need to get this on newswires immediately. This is the straw that could break the camel's back.

 link to www.infowars.com
PDF or image pages of McNiven statement here

Rense 30.May.2005 23:27

anon

I don't blame those who refuse to read the rubbish on the rense site, and what do you expect, if you do your digging you will find one of Rense's guests, and a good friend of Jeff Rense, is a convicted pedophile, and former nazi, hmmm, you really want to believe the site whose owner befriends such people.

On top of that, you can follow rense.com articles back to their source and some times find that rense.com have changed some of the wording on the articles.

rense bashing, lol, grow up child. If you don't like people expressing their views, then claiming that to do so is rense bashing, then you are just as bad as those that claim freedom fries, and all the other US government rubbish.

Do your homework, and you might well find jeff rense is closer to the government than he would like you to believe. Continue to read the site of a man that befriends convicted pedophiles if you wish. But frankly, there are better and more trust worthy non mainstream news sites around the internet than that who befriends monsters that molest children.

neutral 30.May.2005 23:35

anon

Moonshiner, you ask

"Why aren't more mainstream news sources, (TV, Radio, Internet, etc.) reporting this story?" The answer to that is easy, because the US press is tightly controlled, and lacks the freedom to run such a story. The stories are out there, or were written back in the 80's, about the pedophiles ring in the white house, some major papers carried those articles.

Look, there is over 7 million child prostitutes around the world, this does not count those abducted by the pedo rings, there is over 300,000 child prostitutes in the US. Child prostitution was not much of a problem in the US until congress passed laws that took away the ability of the police to pick up kids who were on the streets late at night.

These pedophile rings reach right to the roots of the government, the roots of corporations, the roots of the media. The CIA abducted children, prostituting them with politicans so they could blackmail them. The people in these rings control what you read in the press and on the news, and the laws they pass. Take them on with evidence and end up dead

got a p2p client? Download Conspiracy of silence and any ted gunderson lecture.

recalibrating to fix the margins 16.Nov.2005 15:02

with a new comment...

.