portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

government | media criticism

Who Is William Krar?

A man planning a major terror attack in the US is apprehended by the law enforcement. Yet both the US government and the media are tight lipped about this.

NOTE: This article was originally published here on 18 August 2004. Republished for the purpose of newsfeed distribution.

If you don't know, it is OK. You likely got lots and lots of company. Even though Krar was arrested during what appeared to be preparation for major terrorist activity, his arrest attracted minimal attention from the media and caused no press release by the Department of Justice, which under John Ashcroft, as of the press time for this UPI report, had "found at least 2,295 occasions to toot its own horn that are apparently more newsworthy than the Krar arrest". According to this report,

Krar, who is affiliated with several anti-government, white supremacist militia organizations, was apprehended after mailing a package containing false U.N. credentials, Defense Intelligence Agency IDs, phony birth certificates and a forged federal concealed weapons permit to a co-conspirator in New Jersey.

The package came with a note that read, "We would hate to have this fall into the wrong hands." It did. It was delivered to the incorrect address.

An alert citizen contacted the FBI, which led to the arrest of Krar and the discovery of a mind-numbing weapons cache: fully automatic machine guns, remote-controlled explosive devices disguised as briefcases, 60 pipe bombs, nearly 500,000 rounds of ammunition and enough pure sodium cyanide "to kill everyone inside a 30,000 square foot building," according to federal authorities.
Krar consequently pleaded guilty to possessing a dangerous chemical weapon and was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Sounds fair enough to me, and I am satisfied that Mr Krar will be away for awhile and will get a chance to cool his heels and maybe revise his attitude. What I do find astounding is the near silence surrounding this case,- which is most likely why you are first reading about this gentleman here, if that is the case. One would think that, quoting the same UPI report, both the administration and the media would pay more attention to a man whose "arrest by federal law enforcement in the small town of Noonday, Texas, last April may have stopped the most devastating terror attack on U.S. soil since Sept. 11". So, what is the reason for that near silence? I don't know, but I think part of it may be that the story would not sell, that it lacks the sensationalist value, that maybe after 9/11 the non-Muslim Americans were supposed to be "good guys only" and writing about this sort of individual would be disturbing news that would in turn drive down ratings. Once again, these are just some thoughts of mine, I do not have any serious research to back it up with. However, be that as it may, the following seem to be some of the lessons from this story. Firstly, not all terrorists are Arab or Muslim. Secondly, not all Arab or Muslim people are terrorists. Thirdly, the evil of all kinds can be found anywhere, and when it is found among us, the worst thing for us to do would be to pretend it is not there,- which is pretty much what the media is covertly trying to get us to do through their biased and incomplete (and, in most cases, outright missing) coverage of the Krar case.
NOTE: The text above has been slightly modified to reflect the newly acquired data as well as correct for hyperlinks that have become obsolete since the time of original publication. As for factual accuracy, please note that Mr Krar was sentenced to 135 months (11 years and 3 months), not 11 years, imprisonment.
Also note the the DOJ website did report on the Krar case, albeit very briefly. To the best of my knowledge as of today (March 3, 2005) there has not been a mention of the Krar case during any of the DOJ or White House press conferences.

homepage: homepage: http://pyramid.blog-city.com/
phone: phone: 617 816-9654


UPI 03.Mar.2005 13:27

MOONY

UPI is another moony establishment. But I think you nailed it. The democrats and republicans didn't need this kind of information making the rounds, especially when both were trying to be "tougher on terrorism". Also, they want a muslim to pull another 9/11, that will give them the justification to continue their blatant fascist agenda. We need our enemies to come from the middle east, so we keep on trying to incite an attack from them, to justify the "long hard slog" of an endless war. Bush is doing a good job of that on behalf of his good friend Reverend Moon who has even bigger plans. He is the messiah after all.

Here's a guardian article that touches on what you said:

"Critics say the case shows that the authorities, obsessed with Islamic terrorists, have ignored the deadly assortment of domestic extremists. America's right-wing groups, though diminished in numbers since 1995, have become bent on acquiring weapons capable of mass slaughter."

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1174639,00.html