portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

legacies | political theory | resistance & tactics

The Value of Total Critique and Escape From Left-Wing (and Right-Wing) Fundamentalism

From the surveillance camera on the street corner to the genetically engineered soy product, from the strip mine in the West Papua jungle to the increasingly broad and far-reaching "anti-terrorist" laws, the world is becoming an interwoven network of control and exploitation coupled to an unending parade of environmental and social catastrophes that are used to justify the increase in control. For those of us who imagine and desire a world in which we, as individuals, truly determines our own existence, together with those we enjoy sharing our lives with, it is necessary to develop a critique of this world that goes to the roots of all this, a total critique of the existence that has been imposed on us.
Excerpts from "Everything Must Go" by Venomous Butterfly
 http://www.geocities.com/kk_abacus/vb/wd4-2go.html


[Total critique] is by no means an easy task. We have been taught to simply accept things as they are, and when we start to question, it is much easier to examine things piece-meal, not trying to make connections or keeping those connections on a surface level.
(... )
If we view the killing of an unarmed person by a cop, the war against Iraq, the clear-cutting of a forest, the sweatshop in Taiwan and the emptiness of our daily lives as separate matters, we can easily conceive of them as mere aberrations. Our task then simply becomes that of pointing out the problem to the right authorities, so that they can correct the problem. Voting, petitions, litigation, appeals for legislation and public non-violent demonstrations before the symbols of the institutions responsible for taking care of these matters become the order of the day. The aim is simply to make the institutions live up to their own proclaimed ideals. But in the present reality, this reformist perspective either requires one to put on blinders so as to only see one's own narrow issues, or to continually scurry from one isolated problem to the next, on and on in the activist rat race until one burns oneself out.
(...)
As true as this may be, all that we have done if we do this is given a label to this totality, and labeling a thing is not the same as understanding it adequately to be able to confront and challenge it. In fact, without an adequate analysis of the nature of the state, capital or civilization, they merely function as abstractions that can distract us from the actual realities we face...
(...)
Deeper connections - connections that show how the ruling order can recuperate partial oppositions (anti-racism, feminism, gay liberation, even those forms of opposition to capitalism, the state and civilization that continue to operate within a political activist framework) to its own ends - can only spring from a different kind of critique.
Even when a critique places the various oppressions under a single conceptual umbrella (e.g., the state, capital, patriarchy, civilization) in order to explain them, this critique is not necessarily a total critique. Such critiques may in fact be broad without having depth.
(... )
...a total critique requires depth; it needs to get to the bottom of things, to the roots.
(...)
a total critique is qualitatively different from a partial critique. All partial critiques, regardless of how extreme they may be, start from the perspective of this society. ...The more extreme and broader partial critiques simply lead to an ideological rejection of major aspects of this society or even of all of it considered abstractly because this society is deemed to have failed on its own terms. Such ideological rejections offer little of practical use to the immediate struggle against this society since they are based on the same reifications through which this society seeks to justify itself. In developing a total critique, one starts from herself, from her desire to determine his existence on his own terms. This critique is thus the act - or better, the ongoing practice - of confronting this society with oneself and one's hostility to its intrusion into one's existence. It is from this basis that one can indeed plumb the depths of this society and begin to recognize the intertwining networks of control through which it defines every moment of our existence.
(...)

homepage: homepage: http://www.geocities.com/kk_abacus/vb/wd4-2go.html

add a comment on this article

Partial something 16.Feb.2005 20:05

politics as impossible

Having downloaded and read the entire article by Venomous Butterfly, I have to "critique" it as disappointing because, while good points are made, it presents only a partial critique of anything -- at most, it may be prefatory to a total critique to be given later. The last sentence of Butterfly's piece is:
"And from here solidarity and revolutionary practice can develop."

But where is the "here"? Is "here" any attempted "total critique," some particular already articulated "total critique," or is "here" simply the idea that a "total critique" is the way to go?

Very "partial" thinking, so far.
 
 

some more total critique: TOWARD A BIOREGIONAL STATE 17.Feb.2005 03:42

author

Title: TOWARD A BIOREGIONAL STATE: People Have Right to Stop Ecological Tyranny & Make Democracy
Author: web
Date: 2003.12.25 12:52

Description: "Presently we are trapped within these unecological democracies that are underwriting and protecting this process of politically sponsored ecological degradation. How do we instead explain to others that the state has an Ecological Contract with its people, and if such a contract is neglected, they can overthrow it as an ecological tyranny?" . . . ". . .a people's self-interest is geographically specific and protective of a particular geography. . . .Citizen feedback is always in and from particular geographic spaces and human-environmental contexts. To create the additional checks and balances for an ecologically sound developmentalism is merely to latch onto and facilitate an already-existing affirmative feedback from watersheds/bioregions that is ignored though waiting to be formally organized. This is done by aligning political feedback as closely as possible to a direct feedback from particular geographically specific areas into the state. My [first] suggestion is through watershed based vote districting."

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/277248.shtml

more links on total critique: TOWARD A BIOREGIONAL STATE 17.Feb.2005 04:03

author

Title: TOWARD A BIOREGIONAL STATE: People Have Right to Stop Ecological Tyranny & Make Democracy
Author: web
Date: 2003.12.25 12:52
Description: "Presently we are trapped within these unecological democracies that are underwriting and protecting this process of politically sponsored ecological degradation. How do we instead explain to others that the state has an Ecological Contract with its people, and if such a contract is neglected, they can overthrow it as an ecological tyranny?" . . . ". . .a people's self-interest is geographically specific and protective of a particular geography. . . .Citizen feedback is always in and from particular geographic spaces and human-environmental contexts. To create the additional checks and balances for an ecologically sound developmentalism is merely to latch onto and facilitate an already-existing affirmative feedback from watersheds/bioregions that is ignored though waiting to be formally organized. This is done by aligning political feedback as closely as possible to a direct feedback from particular geographically specific areas into the state. My [first] suggestion is through watershed based vote districting."
 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/12/277248.shtml

Toward a Bioregional State: website and book
 http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~mwhitake/bioregionEC.htm

Bioregional democracy (or the Bioregional State) is a set of Electoral Reforms designed to force the political process in a democracy to better represent concerns about the economy, the body, and environmental concerns (e.g. water quality), toward developmental paths that are locally prioritized and tailored to different areas for their own specific interests of sustainability and durability. This movement is variously called bioregional democracy, watershed cooperation, or bioregional representation, or one of various other similar names—all of which denote democratic control of a natural commons and local jurisdictional dominance in any economic developmental path decisions--while not removing more generalized civil rights protections of a larger national state.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioregional_State

re: politics as impossible 17.Feb.2005 13:41

here

The partial critique is probably meant, as VB has a record of wanting, to inspire others like yourself in adding to it.

As far as adding from "here" I think he means the "here" of our increased consciousness about reality.

Radical Empiricism 17.Feb.2005 20:23

March Hare

This sounds a lot like William James' "Radical Empiricism" about which he wrote a book.
The two requirements of Radical Empiricism are:

1. All verifiable facts must be included.

2. No facts that are not verifiable shall be encluded.

It transcends political and religious idiologies and can be an aid in supporting your particular world view.

this total critique 18.Feb.2005 01:20

friend of a friend

this total critique is based on the presumption that the answer to a particular problem or step that needs to be taken must account for the totality and must be CREATIVE. This is becoming more and more obvious and the answer will not be abstract but will be concrete and involve a revolutionary approach to LIFE and not just fragmented responses to SEPERATION or alienation in our world and society. Instead, experimentation without alienation will foster a community in dialogue with itself and its self-creation. The antithesis to alienation is obviously creaton! Thanks "unbridled" and hope to cross paths with you again!

add a comment on this article