portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article coverage global

gender & sexuality | health | human & civil rights

German women forced in to prostitution by government

'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits'
By Clare Chapman
(Filed: 30/01/2005)

A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year.

Prostitution was legalised in Germany just over two years ago and brothel owners - who must pay tax and employee health insurance - were granted access to official databases of jobseekers.
The waitress, an unemployed information technology professional, had said that she was willing to work in a bar at night and had worked in a cafe.

She received a letter from the job centre telling her that an employer was interested in her "profile'' and that she should ring them. Only on doing so did the woman, who has not been identified for legal reasons, realise that she was calling a brothel.

Under Germany's welfare reforms, any woman under 55 who has been out of work for more than a year can be forced to take an available job - including in the sex industry - or lose her unemployment benefit. Last month German unemployment rose for the 11th consecutive month to 4.5 million, taking the number out of work to its highest since reunification in 1990.

The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. As a result, job centres must treat employers looking for a prostitute in the same way as those looking for a dental nurse.

When the waitress looked into suing the job centre, she found out that it had not broken the law. Job centres that refuse to penalise people who turn down a job by cutting their benefits face legal action from the potential employer.

"There is now nothing in the law to stop women from being sent into the sex industry," said Merchthild Garweg, a lawyer from Hamburg who specialises in such cases. "The new regulations say that working in the sex industry is not immoral any more, and so jobs cannot be turned down without a risk to benefits."

Miss Garweg said that women who had worked in call centres had been offered jobs on telephone sex lines. At one job centre in the city of Gotha, a 23-year-old woman was told that she had to attend an interview as a "nude model", and should report back on the meeting. Employers in the sex industry can also advertise in job centres, a move that came into force this month. A job centre that refuses to accept the advertisement can be sued.

Tatiana Ulyanova, who owns a brothel in central Berlin, has been searching the online database of her local job centre for recruits.

"Why shouldn't I look for employees through the job centre when I pay my taxes just like anybody else?" said Miss Ulyanova.

Ulrich Kueperkoch wanted to open a brothel in Goerlitz, in former East Germany, but his local job centre withdrew his advertisement for 12 prostitutes, saying it would be impossible to find them.

Mr Kueperkoch said that he was confident of demand for a brothel in the area and planned to take a claim for compensation to the highest court. Prostitution was legalised in Germany in 2002 because the government believed that this would help to combat trafficking in women and cut links to organised crime.

Miss Garweg believes that pressure on job centres to meet employment targets will soon result in them using their powers to cut the benefits of women who refuse jobs providing sexual services.

"They are already prepared to push women into jobs related to sexual services, but which don't count as prostitution,'' she said.

"Now that prostitution is no longer considered by the law to be immoral, there is really nothing but the goodwill of the job centres to stop them from pushing women into jobs they don't want to do."

add a comment on this article

just wondering? 02.Feb.2005 04:02

alan

how do I get these benifits? :)

Read the story CAREFULLY 02.Feb.2005 08:33

Mike stepbystepfarm <a> mtdata.com

The very best propoganda uses just true statements, stringing them together so that erroneous conclusions are drawn. No I am not saying that this is the case here, but surely we know enough about European cultures to be suspicious that something might be going on. It's fishy seeing reports that people are losing benefits for refusing to take work AS PROSTITUTES << would be politically impractical almost anywhere in Europe let alone Germany >>

Well read carefully and you realize that all the story really says is "in a brothel". Now I could imagine THAT to be an explanation because a functioning brothel would have lots of other sots of employees besides the prostitutes. Do you imgine the prostitutes change the sheets and make the beds? (could an out of work hotel maid turn the job down without losing benefits). Do they serve food and drink? (this woman was a waitress and bartender). Do they have live music? (could an out of work piano player turn down the gig).

Yes the story ALSO described the job center being asked to post job openings for prostitutes --- but you did see that the center was saying that while they felt that they had to accept the postings they did NOT think that they would be able to sned applicants for THOSE positions.

Now I am NOT saying that this IS the case, just that "sensational" and "unbelievable" stories have to be read VERY carefully and it would be wise to get other versions to see that one is not beong led down the path.

read more carefully Mike 02.Feb.2005 11:29

Sam

The very first line explains, "A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel..."

That's not changing sheets.

#$% 02.Feb.2005 11:43

(())

Just because the torture stories about Abu Ghraib (for example) are shocking and horrible doesn't mean (as many American sheeple believe) they must be made up. Every day prisoners and suspects in America complain about abuse at the hands of law enforcement and nice respectable moderates discount the stories because the government couldn't possibly do anything that awful.

Would the reactionaries running the world today use any technicality they can find to kick people off unemployment benefits, a program they would destroy completely if they could get away with it? OF COURSE THEY WOULD. They'll kick EVERYBODY off unemployment if they can. "Save your money and get another job, loser!" is all they've got to say about it.

And when it comes down to it, "sexual services" are just one kind of prostitution. Everybody who's getting cut off and impoverished because they won't take bad jobs is really in the same boat here.

@$%&!! 02.Feb.2005 12:01

#%&&%^

Welfare is already like this here!! You have to participate in their GENUINELY FASCIST, CAPITALIST job programs, be disabled, have fascism against your religion............or you and your child don't eat. Period. These are the facts that the media doesn't report, right here in the United States.

Truth unclear 02.Feb.2005 12:58

Bison Boy

This article first came to my attention via a posting by a US expat living in Germany. While this story is fairly widespread int he english-language press, he reports that the german-language press only talks about this being theoretically possible... not that it has actually happened.

Snopes.com lists this as an unconfirmed story, last I looked.

It is possible that the details of this story are true, and it is also possible that it is a piece of alarmist fiction. In either case, I think that this theoretical loophole is likely to be swiftly closed by the German government.

HOAX 02.Feb.2005 14:34

german indymedia surfer

yes, the schröder government made laws (like hartz 4) that cut down welfare enourmously and u even can be forced to accept to do an "appropriate" job (otherwise you loose your welfare money), but:

nobody can force u to become a prostitute.

this "report" is a lie.

we don't know what happened 03.Feb.2005 09:05

Helen G.

It's not confirmed yet and there's a woman who says it happened and who hired a lawyer. The law itself seems unclear and the woman's claim will have to be decided in court I presume, so don't go jumping the gun and discarding this woman's claim that this really happened to her just yet.

add a comment on this article