portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

9.11 investigation

No Gurus Mike

Many reasons to dismiss Ruppert...
No Gurus 21.Jan.2005 23:36
Already Published link

quote:
============
But the stuff he's{Ruppert is} doing on peak oil and his collaboration on the most important documentary of our time THE END OF SUBURBIA, Is kick ass.
===========


The so-called "peak oil" marketing scam - rather reminiscent of Enron's mulcting Californians on the basis of a supply problem (google: supply and demand) - is just another of many reasons to dismiss Ruppert.

Here are a few more:

(1) Ruppert has for years ranted about the plan outlined in Brezinski's "Grand Chessboard", but says NOTHING of PNAC or their need for a "new Pearl Harbor", as detailed on page 51 of their September 2000 document, "Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies and Resources for a New American Century".

(2) Ruppert says nothing significant or evidence-based on the role of Israel's URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS FRONT in the organisation and execution of the attacks in New York.
(google URBAN MOVING SYSTEMS)

(3) Ruppert says nothing of Richard Perle's CLEAN BREAK, or the policies contained therein, which were formulated--much like PNAC policies--purely for the benefit of Israel's Netanyahu government.
(Google: Clean Break, Richard Perle)

Cui Bono, Mike?


(4) Rupert doesn't mention that car manufacturers are not trying to curb consumption of an allegedly depleted resource--au contraire!--or the number of orders placed recently for the world's largest oil-guzzling Airbus.
 http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp...
(+ google: Airbus, orders)
But the end of oil is imminent, isn't it Mike?


(5) Bombastic faith-based smearing of those who question the official version of Gary Webb's death by Mike.

add a comment on this article

what's ruppert gonna do? 22.Jan.2005 15:00

answer from the afterlife?

do they have high speed internet in 'heaven'?

oops, my bad 22.Jan.2005 15:10

answer from the afterlife?

it's early (for me) and i mistook mike ruppert, currently living and breathing as far as i know, for recently deceased investigative reporter gary webb.

sorry for any inconvenience, etc.

Get a grip on reality 24.Jan.2005 12:54

Jesse (CIA double agent)

Let's begin with this, since it sums up the vindictive motive behind the self righteous outpouring of venom towards Mike.

"(5) Bombastic faith-based smearing of those who question the official version of Gary Webb's death by Mike."

Chip on the shoulder - Yes, some people never forgave Mike for calling Alex Jones what he is, an opportunistic scare monger without a shred of journalistic skill or integrity (or, something to that effect :^). As just one example:  http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2005/210105devilhand.htm

Yes, Bush is a Satanist, you see. That's why he is supported and surrounded by Christian fanatics (no, it really doesn't make sense). Why isn't Mike Ruppert reporting this hard hitting story? It must be because he is a cunning psy-ops agent! Or maybe, maybe it's because he has an ounce of journalistic decency, and doesn't spout off whatever half cocked theory enters his head just to keep his web traffic and speaking tour attendance up. Ya' think? Naaaah, Bush worships Satan, and Ruppert is a double agent!

Now, onto...

"(1) Ruppert has for years ranted about the plan outlined in Brezinski's "Grand Chessboard", but says NOTHING of PNAC or their need for a "new Pearl Harbor", as detailed on page 51 of their September 2000 document, "Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies and Resources for a New American Century."

You forgot to mention that you are a reactionary moron who, like Alex Jones, doesn't want to be bothered by the facts.

"Similarly the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into "tomorrow's dominant force" is likely to be a long one in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like ****a new Pearl Harbor****"

Wow, I guess that makes you an irresponsible damned *fool*, now, doesn't it? Come out of the dunce corner when you know what the hell you are talking about.

oops 24.Jan.2005 12:57

Jesse

"Similarly the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into "tomorrow's dominant force" is likely to be a long one in the absence of "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like ****a new Pearl Harbor****"

I gorgot to mention, that is of course, from Mike's website, fromthewilderness.com

How much is Ruppert paying you? 24.Jan.2005 15:12

get a real job

Jessie you're beginning to look like an OFFICIAL Ruppert defender/attack dog. How much are you getting paid to stop anyone from questioning Ruppert's true motives? Oh I forgot Ruppert is a saint and must not be questioned...right? Stop promoting Ruppert he really soesn't need yor talents. He's a master at self promotion.

pitty da foo! 24.Jan.2005 16:21

Jessture

"How much is Ruppert paying you?
get a real job"

A typically piss-poor response. Sounds just like the crap a right-winger will fling at an anti-war activist. "How much is Osama paying you? Get a real job!" Don't you have anything real to say?

"Jessie you're beginning to look like an OFFICIAL Ruppert defender/attack dog. How much are you getting paid to stop anyone from questioning Ruppert's true motives?"

Oh, if you only new the fabulous riches which await those who swear eternal allegiance to the church of Ruppert ;^)

"Oh I forgot Ruppert is a saint and must not be questioned...right?"

Yup! They say, if you spot him on a crisp winter's eve, you can see his silver wings, shimmering in the moonlight.

"Stop promoting Ruppert he really soesn't need yor talents. He's a master at self promotion."

Promoting Ruppert? The punk-ass above, who, by your tone, I suspect is you, stepped-to. The bitch wanted to fight, and the bitch got served. Unless you think of something worthwhile to add, other then the equivalent of, "Oh, man, yer' like... yer' like... uh, like... uh... ", just shut da phuq up, cuz you aren't saying anything anyway!

the charming ones 07.Feb.2005 02:01

Already Published

Thanks for correcting me on 1 of 6 points, Jessie - great to see Mike finally woke up on the need for a New Pearl Harbor detailed in the neo-version of ISREAL'S CLEAN BREAK, better known as PNAC.

Perhaps you can explain Mike's ad-hominem attacks on Alex a little better, since ad-hominem is, by definition, a logical fallacy.

Then you can explain why Mike ignored the activities of Israel's Urban Moving Systems agents - since Mike certainly wont.

thanks in anticipation.

add a comment on this article