portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article coverage united states

election fraud | government | imperialism & war

4 Chinese terrorists, a dirty bomb, doomesday plan inacted & the coronation of the emperor

like a demonic chess game the playing pieces of the fascist rule of amerika is now in place.
Isn't it "ironic" that as Mr Bush is declared emporer that the country has chinese terrorists potentially running around with the goal to set off a dirty bomb. Lucky for us the fascists got the "doomesday plan" approved just in time (sarcasm). Gee also when there was going to be massive protest of the boy king. Do not be shocked if the fascists try something. And if so and we do not throw off the yoke of our oppressors then I guess we will all meet in the FEMA camps with glowsticks up our butts.

dirty nuke story  http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2005/01/20/6_sought_after_tip_alleging_dirty_bomb

So we now have lost our constitutional government on the 11th of January 2005 as well as of democratic illusion on January 6th 2005. Below are articles the corporate media chose not to mention in favor of celeberty divorces. As of now of now our constitutional government (that silly documents that declared how our government would be determined) is at risk of a Coup d'Etat. A simple declaration uttered by the president or the head of Homeland Security that we are under attack or a state of emergency will set in motion the system of rule that the founding fathers had constructed in the United States. Welcome to "Doomsday". Below are articles addressing our new uncconstitutional system with Urls attached at the bottom. Please tell a friend and stranger of our new system since the corporate media decided not to.



Tuesday 11th January 2005 (09h40):
Congress passes 'doomsday' plan- ethics rule changes were diversion


WASHINGTON - With no fanfare, the U.S. House has passed a controversial doomsday provision that would allow a handful of lawmakers to run Congress if a terrorist attack or major disaster killed or incapacitated large numbers of congressmen.

"I think (the new rule) is terrible in a whole host of ways - first, I think it's unconstitutional,'' said Norm Ornstein, a counselor to the independent Continuity of Government Commission, a bipartisan panel created to study the issue. ``It's a very foolish thing to do, I believe, and the way in which it was done was more foolish.''

But supporters say the rule provides a stopgap measure to allow the government to continue functioning at a time of national crisis.

GOP House leaders pushed the provision as part of a larger rules package that drew attention instead for its proposed ethics changes, most of which were dropped.

Usually, 218 lawmakers - a majority of the 435 members of Congress - are required to conduct House business, such as passing laws or declaring war.

But under the new rule, a majority of living congressmen no longer will be needed to do business under "catastrophic circumstances.''

Instead, a majority of the congressmen able to show up at the House would be enough to conduct business, conceivably a dozen lawmakers or less.

The House speaker would announce the number after a report by the House Sergeant at Arms. Any lawmaker unable to make it to the chamber would effectively not be counted as a congressman.

The circumstances include "natural disaster, attack, contagion or similar calamity rendering Representatives incapable of attending the proceedings of the House.''

The House could be run by a small number of lawmakers for months, because House vacancies must be filled by special elections. Governors can make temporary appointments to the Senate.

Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.), one of few lawmakers active on the issue, argued the rule change contradicts the U.S. Constitution, which states that ``a majority of each (House) shall constitute a quorum to do business.

"Changing what constitutes a quorum in this way would allow less than a dozen lawmakers to declare war on another nation,'' Baird said.

 http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2005/100105doomsdayplan.htm

by : Boston Herald
Tuesday 11th January 2005
Found at  http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3...

_______


Doomsday Provision and the Death of the U.S. Constitution

by Kurt Nimmo
published by Another Day in the Empire
Doomsday Provision and the Death of the U.S. Constitution
I wasn't fazed after I read this, nor was I surprised that I was not fazed, or did I get angry because—well, because it is predictable and wholly in keeping with the personality and character of the plutocrats who claim to represent us—most of them whores and shameless hucksters for multinational corporations and so-called "special interests," in other words a small number of mega-rich people—here in America:

"With no fanfare, the U.S. House has passed a controversial doomsday provision that would allow a handful of lawmakers to run Congress if a terrorist attack or major disaster killed or incapacitated large numbers of congressmen," the Boston Herald reports. "The circumstances include 'natural disaster, attack, contagion or similar calamity rendering Representatives incapable of attending the proceedings of the House' ... Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.), one of few lawmakers active on the issue, argued the rule change contradicts the U.S. Constitution, which states that 'a majority of each (House) shall constitute a quorum to do business' ... 'Changing what constitutes a quorum in this way would allow less than a dozen lawmakers to declare war on another nation,' Baird said."

Baird needs to get on Paxil, and right quick. Obviously, the Constitution is now entirely irrelevant. Most Americans don't even think about the Constitution on a regular basis, except maybe on the Fourth of July and only after it is mentioned on the soma tube. Moreover, the American people—essentially a mass of consumers and consumption requires not any exalted principles or philosophy and operates most effectively if consumers are irrational and impulsive—are incapable of appreciating or basically understanding constitutional government. Constitutional government, of course, is a set of rules designed to make sure our "elected" rulers don't abuse their power and obey the law. Constitutional government supposedly protects the rights of the individual.

Does that sound like a description of America?

I had to chuckle—if slightly and with an attendant degree of cynicism, per usual—after reading Baird's assertion that the "doomsday provision... would allow less than a dozen lawmakers to declare war on another nation."

Get real, Brian. Bush started a war (or, rather, an invasion) all on his lonesome—with a small cluster of incestuous Strausscon intellectuals—and Congress had nothing to say about it, all they had to do was sign off, and if they didn't they would have been accused of lacking "patriotism" (i.e., having the cahones, or ruthlessness, to kill thousands of innocent people) and thus singled out by Bush's fellow travelers in Congress and earmarked for political extinction, a nightmare for any self-serving politician, as most of them are (those who are not egomaniacal, perfidious, unconscionable sociopaths—for instance, Paul Wellstone or Cynthia McKinney—are either purged from "public office" or killed). For as I have said now for thirty years, in general the largest, most malodorous pieces of shit rise to the top of the cesspool—and Congress fits the dictionary definition of a cesspool, a "filthy, disgusting, or morally corrupt place." It is not a place Madison, Hamilton, or any of those who signed and ratified the Constitution would likely recognize.

Interestingly, although predictably, a Google news search of "doomsday plan Congress" and "doomsday provision Congress" returns but a single news article—the one quoted above. It is simply not a story the corporate media considers worthy of ink or electrons.

As I said at the outset, I am not fazed the corporate media does not find this story important or even worthy of passing mention. We no longer have a representative government—and have not for some time—in this country and that "less than a dozen lawmakers" may run Congress after "a terrorist attack or major disaster killed or incapacitated large numbers of congressmen" is almost completely irrelevant (presumably only Democrats would fall victim to this "doomsday" scenario for, as I recall, only Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy received letters in September, 2001, containing Ames strain anthrax developed by the U.S. military at Fort Detrick).

So, this is a big yawner as a story. Far more important, of course, are death threats made after the broadcast of Jerry Springer: The Opera. Since those threats were issued—possibly by Muslims—against corporate media executives working for the BBC, the story is far more important (Google returns 239 related news items) and presumed to be of more interest to both Americans and Brits than the fact that another bite-size chunk was chewed off the Constitution last week. Since the Constitution is a cadaverous bit of history—colorfully invoked during the Fourth of July—the "doomsday provision" is a basically a non-starter as a news story.

Now, please, let's hear more about the phone sex between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (Google News search returns 513 stories).


Found at  http://progressivetrail.org/articles/050110Nimmo.shtml

______

Congress Passes 'Doomsday' Plan
By Noelle Straub
The Boston Herald

Sunday 09 January 2005

Washington - With no fanfare, the U.S. House has passed a controversial doomsday provision that would allow a handful of lawmakers to run Congress if a terrorist attack or major disaster killed or incapacitated large numbers of congressmen.

"I think (the new rule) is terrible in a whole host of ways - first, I think it's unconstitutional," said Norm Ornstein, a counselor to the independent Continuity of Government Commission, a bipartisan panel created to study the issue. "It's a very foolish thing to do, I believe, and the way in which it was done was more foolish."

But supporters say the rule provides a stopgap measure to allow the government to continue functioning at a time of national crisis.

GOP House leaders pushed the provision as part of a larger rules package that drew attention instead for its proposed ethics changes, most of which were dropped.

Usually, 218 lawmakers - a majority of the 435 members of Congress - are required to conduct House business, such as passing laws or declaring war.

But under the new rule, a majority of living congressmen no longer will be needed to do business under "catastrophic circumstances."

Instead, a majority of the congressmen able to show up at the House would be enough to conduct business, conceivably a dozen lawmakers or less.

The House speaker would announce the number after a report by the House Sergeant at Arms. Any lawmaker unable to make it to the chamber would effectively not be counted as a congressman.

The circumstances include "natural disaster, attack, contagion or similar calamity rendering Representatives incapable of attending the proceedings of the House."

The House could be run by a small number of lawmakers for months, because House vacancies must be filled by special elections. Governors can make temporary appointments to the Senate.

Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.), one of few lawmakers active on the issue, argued the rule change contradicts the U.S. Constitution, which states that "a majority of each (House) shall constitute a quorum to do business.

"Changing what constitutes a quorum in this way would allow less than a dozen lawmakers to declare war on another nation," Baird said.

 http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011005E.shtml

add a comment on this article

The Empire's Hoax Opera 20.Jan.2005 05:57

twospiritwarrior

Now it is Chinese "terrorists" threatening the U.S?

FBI Investigating "Dirty Bomb" Threat in Boston

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

The FBI said that it was investigating a report of a "dirty bomb" threat in Boston, MA.
Federal teams equipped with radiological sensors
were looking for the "dirty bomb" throughout
Boston.
Local police said that they have no information
about federal activities.

Boston FBI spokeswoman, Gail Marcinkiewicz said
that the "evidence" we have has not been
corroborated, and that we have shared our
information with our law enforcement partners,
and we are all working aggressively to resolve it."

According to an ABC News report, broadcast on WBZ
Radio in Boston, the San Diego FBI office notified
the FBI office in Boston that terrorists may be
trying to detonate a dirty bomb in the city.

Gail Marcinkiewicz declined to reveal the source of the information, and said that she would not speculate on why this particular report had generated so much media interest.

FBI ALERTS BOSTON OF FOUR "TERROR SUSPECTS"

The FBI has notified law enforcement officials
to be on the lookout for four Chinese nationals
described as terror suspects heading to the
Boston area.
The FBI said that they had received a dirty bomb
threat earlier today, and have released photographs
of the two men and two women they were looking for.
The FBI also said that none of the names had been
on previous terrorist watch lists.

Governor Mitt Romney, of Massachusetts said that
the state's threat level would not be raised, but
more people would be on duty in the state's emergency management bunker outside Boston.

An anonymous federal law enforcement official
told the media that the FBI's Joint Terrorism
Task Force that the suspects may have entered
into the U.S. through Mexico.

Brian Roehrkasse, of the Homeland Security Department said the agency was working with the FBI.
A joint statement issued by Michael Sullivan, U.S.
Attorney for Massachusetts; and Kenneth Kaiser,
Agent-In-Charge of the Boston FBI office said that
the suspects have been identified as Zengrong Lin,
Wen Quin Zheng, Xiujin Chen, and Guozhi Lin.

Four Chinese + Two Iraqis = Four Chinese 20.Jan.2005 07:20

Skepto

How come the Feds aren't also looking for the two Iraqis? No photos available yet? Maybe they can recycle a couple of the 911 "terrorist" photos and use them.

Odd that the names of the Iraqi "terrorists" were not released by the FBI 20.Jan.2005 18:44

twospiritwarrior

FBI Identifies 10 More "Terrorists"

BUSHINGTON, D.C. (Dominion of Cheney) - Today the FBI added the names of
nine Chinese people and one other man to the list of those being sought for questioning about a "dirty bomb 'terror plot'" in Boston.

FBI spokesman Joe Parris said that the terrorists were identified through
their investigation, but that the information is still uncorroborated,
which came from an anonymous source.

Apparently, the names of the "terrorists" came from the same anonymous
tipster, which led federal authorities to start looking for four other
Chinese and two Iraqi suspects.
The new names brings the total of "terrorists" being sought to 16.

A federal agent, speaking anonymously, said that the dirty bomb tip was
initially received by the California Highway Patrol, and that the tipster
claimed that four Chinese people -- two men and two women -- had entered
the U.S. from Mexico, and that they were waiting for a shipment of "nuclear
oxide", which they were going to take to Boston.
The agent also said that the nuclear oxide could be used as material to make
a "dirty bomb" that would spew radiation and devastate the Boston area.

The four Chinese "terrorists" previously identified by the FBI are Zengrong Lin, Wen Quin Zheng, Xiujin Chen and Guozhi Lin.
Nine new Chinese "terrorists" have been identified -- Yu Xian Weng, a 41-
year-old woman. The others are men -- Quinquan or Quiquan Lin, 21 --
Liqiang Liang, 28 -- Min Xiu Xie, 27 -- Xiang or Xing Wei Liu, 22 --
Mei Xia Dong, 21 -- Xiuming Chen -- Cheng Yin Kiu, and Zao Yun Wang.

The final name on the new FBI list was Jose Ernesto Beltran Quinones, of unknown age or national origin.

FBI:  http://www.fbi.gov