portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

9.11 investigation | alternative media

Dutch royal bribery and the Fortuyn/vanGogh assassinations

Libertythink puts on their tin foil hats, the only way to shield yourself from disinformation, corporate media lies, and government propaganda, it's not just for aliens anymore. Someone send foxnews the memo.
Dutch royal bribery and the Fortuyn/vanGogh assassinations


UPI Dec. 4 2004:
The father of the Queen of the Netherlands, Prince Bernhard, who died Wednesday, admitted posthumously he accepted bribes of $1.2 million in the 1970s.

Bernhard said in the confession that he took the money from Lockheed in exchange for his help in getting contracts for the U.S. aircraft company when his wife, Juliana, was Queen of the Netherlands, reported the Times of London Saturday, [quoting] the weekly Groene Amsterdammer magazine after the prince died.
In the 1970s, the prince denied allegations of bribes and influence-peddling occurred to secure contracts to buy Starfighter 104 jets. At the time, the German-born Prince was forced to give up his role as ambassador for industry.
C onsider that in the light of this exchange by two leading comix journalists on MackWhite.com 11/8/04:
Following is an excerpt from a recent email correspondence with my friend Marcel Ruijters (who contributed "The Bush-Nazi Connection" to The Bush Junta).


What Marcel has to say about the current situation in The Netherlands, in the wake of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh?s death, is very important:

The brutal murder of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh on that day by a Muslim extremist has put politics and the entire population in a state of shock. I don't think this has reached media abroad, so i will elaborate a little. Theo Van Gogh (he was indeed a distant relative of the famous painter Vincent) had made a name for himself as the enfant terrible of Dutch filmmaking. He recently shot a film about the assassination of political maverick Pim Fortuyn (which sent a JFK-like shockwave throughout our country two years ago) which is about to be released soon. He also did a short film, Submission, about the fate of battered Muslim women, which was written by Somalia-born politician Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Both had received numerous death threats for it, but Van Gogh in particular, as he was always very crass in his critique of Islam (i thought that his vulgarities hurt his case) but nonetheless, he was nonchalant about it. I thought that strange too, as he just made a film about someone who was threatened and then killed in cold blood. An eerie detail is that the two killings are exactly 911 days apart.
0605, the film about Fortuyn deals with the conspiracy theory that Fortuyn, as prime minister, would have objected to buying American fighter planes


[specifically, Lockheed's Joint Strike Fighter
-- total411.info] for some 10 billion Euros and that the American ambassador had ordered his death. The screenplay was written by Thomas Ross (here a well-known thriller writer) whose father--as was Van Gogh's- was in the Dutch secret service. It is a good theory...

MACK REPLIES: I heard about the murder of Theo Van Gogh, but did not know that the deaths of


Fortuyn and Van Gogh were 911 days apart. This is important, because numerology is used by the globalists (for reasons I don't fully understand) to stage these events. These particular numbers, 9 and 11, have particular importance. The Madrid bombing, for instance, occurred 911 days after Sept. 11, 2001. There are many more examples. Too many for it to be simple coincidence.

When I first heard about the Van Gogh murder, I was willing to think this was a random killing, but after reading your letter I'm sure it was instigated by the globalists. The globalist plan is to use fear to manipulate the public into accepting a one-world totalitarian government. They take a different approach in each country, but the outcome is the same.
They have had many years experience using the Hegelian Dialectic (the old "Problem-Reaction-Solution" game) to create crises that will force people to accept changes they otherwise might not. Therefore, we should always remember that, when events occur that traumatize an entire country, they may not be coincidence. As Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "In politics, there are no coincidences. If it happened, you can bet someone planned it that way."

add a comment on this article