portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

government | human & civil rights | media criticism

If you care what people think : Poll results from Cornell University

Like they supply some missing link...

Yesterday, the communications department at Cornell University released a poll exploring some of the pertinent topics of our times. They studied the effects of "religiosity" against attention to corporate media (which means TV news) and how these factors affect personal opinon of such things as civil liberties and treatment of Muslims.
I've attached a couple of charts from the report. Figure 5 shows that people of low to moderate "religiosity" tend to be less favorable of national registration of Muslims as their attention to TV news goes up. But those highly religious (defined as Christian) tend toward stronger support as they watch more TV. Hmm -- from my own perspective the more TV I watch the more sceptical of media and the more suspicious of the administration I become. My "religiousity" is very low so this matches my own experience.

Table three shows an unsurprising spread of opinion across political lines. What is surprising is numbers, the intensity of belief -- a full 76% of republicans support indefinite detention. How loud would they scream when it's their turn?

One point that surprises me is that about half of all those surveyed think it's OK for the gov't to lie to the media. They apparently don't mind being lied to. This surprises me because I strongly dislike being lied to. Especially be the media, and even more so by the government. I am just old enough to remember Eisenhower being caught short with the Gary Powers affair, and that was perhaps my downfall, but that's another story.

Mind you, I'm not a great believer in statistics. About 50% of the people of the U.S. voted for bush but keep in mind that 50% of the people are below average and also that 50% of all statistics are made up on the spot. But studies like these -- presumably objective -- do give insight into the thinking of those beyond ones spere of influence. I tend to live in a bubble, and do not associate with many conservatives. So the notion that about only 50% of republican/highly religious folks think that protests or criticism of the government in time of war is OK, startles me. To me, what better time is there to hit the streets and speak up?

This study came to my attention via a recent repost of an AP article. That article just reeked of spin -- the kind of spin that gives polls a bad reputation. This quote from the original is just plain untrue -- "Researchers also found that respondents who paid more attention to television news were more likely to ... support limiting the rights of Muslim Americans." As you can see from the attached graph (figure 5), the figure actually goes *down* for all but highly religeous people. That's an example of making things up on the spot.

It would be interesting to reproduce this poll, only this time replacing TV news with Indymedia! Maybe I'll do that in my spare time...

peace




Excerpts Copyright 2004, Media & Society Research Group, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Reprinted with permission
Take two... 18.Dec.2004 18:32

noncombatant

The attachments did not come through. Trying again...
Here's the original report
Here's the original report

Big, No... HUGE Difference 18.Dec.2004 21:47

Bedouin

What you should have said, and maybe meant to say, was that approximately 50% of all the votes cast and counted were for the runt.

And I will stand aside for a better figure from anyone with the accurate data, but I believe all who voted in the White House corporate fascism stooge contest--who gets to sell The War--was something like a mere 30% of the U.S.

In that respect, then, approximately 15% of the U.S. made an X for the runt.

In any case, it can't be said that about 50% of the U.S.--all those of voting age in the feed lot-- voted for him.

Bedouin caught it! 19.Dec.2004 01:08

Messenger

That is a fact jack! Of the 300 million people in the US, Bush got (supposedly)
59 million. Grab your calculator and figure that one out. Then figure in all the E-vote fraud.....which means he got around 40% of the votes, if that.

The massive cheating in the election is starting to surface. Kerry won in Ohio and Florida. Stay tuned to INDYMEDIA.

kerrycrats are in denial. bush really won 19.Dec.2004 07:24

nader08

i agree there was fraud by republicians, such as insufficient voting machines in ohio dem districts and in other states

but democrats spent $20 million keeping nader off state ballots. greens & other 3rd parties were also denied ballot access by republicians AND DEMOCRATS.

the criticisms of bush ring hollow when democrats suppressed the vote as well.

bush really won the election in which fraud was committed by BOTH dems & reps.

kerrycrats & demogreens seem to be saying bush won because he committed more fraud than kerry.