portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

government | police / legal

Something to Ponder in the Days Leading Up To December 22nd

On December 22nd, the Portland City Council will once again meet to decide whether to re-certify the Portland Joint Terrorism Task Force (PJTTF). When you go to protest this violation of our constitutional rights, be armed with the knowledge that JTTFs all over the country have been exposed for blatantly spying on political and environmental activists and critics of the government.
On December 2, the ACLU filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests all over the county to expose this nest of vipers. According to an ACLU press release, they filed FOIA requests in 10 states (including Oregon) and the District of Columbia "seeking information about the FBI's use of Joint Terrorism Task Forces and local police to engage in political surveillance." Said the press release:

"The FOIAs seek two kinds of information: 1) the actual FBI files of groups and individuals targeted for speaking out or practicing their faith; 2) information about how the practices and funding structure of the task forces, known as JTTFs, are encouraging rampant and unwarranted spying."

Rampant and unwarranted spying indeed. This is something we know a lot about in Portland. Last month, a Portland activist was tried for various trumped-up charges relating to his participation in a protest against the sale of one of the last patches of old growth forest left in our state. During the course of that trial, we learned that the FBI requested and received video footage of that protest in an effort to identify all of the people who were there. These are not "terrorists," as the FBI implies. They are simply effective activists.

Consider also that agents with Homeland Security requested and received footage of Portland anti-war protests from Moba Media, the agency that collects and licenses corporate media "news" broadcasts. Isn't that interesting. The corporate media and the corporate police state, working hand in glove to collect "intelligence" on non-violent political protesters -- this is a clear violation of constitutional protections under the First Amendment.

Environmental, religious, labor, and political activists all over this city have been targeted. Groups have been infiltrated, homes have been violated, and files have been filled with information about those of us in resistance against the genocidal path upon which our nation has embarked. Has any of this actually made us "safer"? Is there less threat from "terror," now that we and our neighbors are under surveillance? I think not. Despite having an old Portland police file of her very own (though she was incorrectly labeled "linda Katz"), Mayor Vera Katz has repeatedly agreed to allow the FBI to spy on us. I think we've all had enough of this.

At least we are not alone. Again, according to the December 2nd ACLU press release, "Over the past few years, ACLU attorneys around the country have provided direct representation to many individuals and organizations targeted for exercising their First Amendment right to criticize the government, including people who participated in numerous rallies and marches to protest the war in Iraq, who were excluded from meaningful participation at public presidential speeches, and who protested at the 2004 Republican and Democratic National Conventions." From Quakers to NLG lawyers to street medics, if you've ever criticized the government or big business, you've probably been surveilled. Enough.

Although we are clearly in the midst of a fascist power grab that rivals Nazi Germany, it's nevertheless possible that the tide may be turning in regard to how much we, the public, will willingly concede in the name of protection from "terrorism." The cat is out of the bag, as they say. We know what the JTTFs are doing, and why they're doing it. Now, we must stop them. See you all on December 22nd. Maybe this time, we will make ourselves heard.



(For more info on the ACLU FOIA requests, see  http://www.saveourcivilliberties.org/en/2004/12/819.shtml.)
Just as an aside... 13.Dec.2004 06:27

footnote

Isn't it interesting that this is being pushed through during the last sitting duck days of the reign of Vera ("Linda") Katz. The date kept changing, rumor has it in order to keep people away. (First, when the public showed interest in attending, they canceled it. Then they rescheduled for the day after thanksgiving, I think, and now it's the day before Christmas eve? Wow. Blatant.) But now they can't just hold it off until Vera leaves, since she no longer has a stake in this anyway? I never thought I would say this about a former police chief, but I already like Potter better than Vera. I think I'd prefer he gets a chance to weigh in on this important issue rather than Vera again...we already know she's sold out to the business interests.

Time 13.Dec.2004 09:13

Details

I believe the hearing is scheduled for 10:30am, but plan to arrive early. One never knows what they might try to sneak by.

Place 13.Dec.2004 18:52

More details

Also, the hearing will be at city hall, 1221 SW 4th Avenue, right across the street from Terry Shrunk Plaza. You can ask the info person on the 1st floor where to find the council chambers, or you can just head up the stairs and look for them. Easy to find. It'll be the room with all the people milling around in front, I think. It's right behind that wall with the weird sculpture stuff all over it.