portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

election fraud

"Vote Fraud in O-hi-o" (a song for the occasion)

A song about vote fraud.
Links to best websites.
Original article on the issue.

to the tune of "Four Dead in Ohio"
by Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young

Vote Fraud in O-hi-o

Lost ballots and Diebold's counting
We're finally on our own
This winter I hear Bush laughing
Vote Fraud in Ohio

Gotta get real ballots
Paperless taking us down
Should have been done long ago
Keep blacks from voting and
TV won't make a sound
Kerry won, but he said NO.

Vote Fraud in Ohio
Vote Fraud in Florida
Vote Fraud in Nevada
Vote Fraud in Iowa
Vote Fraud in New Mexico ...


stolen elections, 9/11, fascism
World War IV, media, Peak Oil

Cautions about media claims this is merely a "Conspiracy Theory"

1. It's a violation of the Voting Rights Act to prohibit people from voting, especially based on their skin color (as happened in numerous places in Ohio and other states).

2. We have no clue what really happened inside the voting machines. Imagine if Michael Moore made voting machines, promised to deliver Ohio to the Democrats, and then put these auditless machines everywhere. Would the Republicans tolerate that situation?

3. People in Ukraine are protesting vote fraud that was caught via exit polls. The former President of Georgia was ousted a few years ago in a similar scandal. Perhaps exit polls are less trustworthy in the US.

4. There will probably be some claims of vote fraud that turn out not to be true -- but the fact that there was tampering is indisputable. It is likely that Karl Rove's forces will plant some fake evidence to discredit the whole issue, just as they've done with the 9/11 scandal, Bush AWOL story and others. It's interesting that the Wash comPost, NYT, Fox, The Nation, Salon.com have all denounced "conspiracy theories" in the past few days. Usually, it takes a much longer time to earn their scorn.

5. There were many places in several states (at least) where there were more votes than voters in precincts. Fascinating that the voting system isn't set up to catch these problems. The full extent of the fraud will never be known, but there's more than enough to get an indictment.

6. There are numerous reports in several states that touch screen machines selected Bush when voters pressed for Kerry. This website has been unable to find any reports of the reverse problem -- claims that Bush voters had their machines select Kerry instead. Computers are neither smart nor stupid - they are merely programmed to do specific tasks. Has anyone found any "computer errors" that favored Kerry over Bush???

Another Stolen Election
Diebold determinator: the rise of the (voting) machines
by Mark Robinowitz

On Election Day, I asked to see Lane County's new ballot scanning machines, made by Sequoia corporation (of England). While watching the ballots being fed into the machines, a Democratic Party poll watcher told me the exit polls did not match the election results in the "swing states" using paperless ballot machines.

There is now ample evidence to confirm this discrepancy -- and that Senator Kerry won the 2004 Presidential election in both the popular vote and Electoral College. Exit polls in Ohio, Florida, Iowa, New Mexico and Nevada predicted a Kerry win, yet Bush was declared the winner. In several other states, the point spread was significantly different between the polls and the results, helping ensure that Bush was given the popular vote. (The 2000 election fraud was embarrassing for Bush, and claiming that millions more voted for him than for Kerry, despite a stronger Democratic voter registration drive, provides a veneer of legitimacy for what is about to happen.)

The Democratic Party let this theft happen. There was ample warning from computer experts, investigative journalists and leaked documents that showed how paperless voting is an invitation to vote fraud. The head of the Diebold corporation, the most famous "touch screen" manufacturer, had pledged to ensure that the state of Ohio would go for Bush -- and paperless machines were used in some of their counties.
In 2002, the Georgia Governor and Senate races were predicted to favor the incumbent Democrats, yet the touch screen ballot machines determined that they lost (the first election in that state with this technology). Bev Harris, author of "Black Box Voting," found numerous problems that strongly suggest these outcomes were rigged. Despite this evidence, on October 25, National Public Radio ran a story on touch screen machines quoting a Georgia elections official who claimed there were no problems in their initial use.

In the last Congressional session, a few brave leaders introduced a bill to require paper trails for all voting systems, but it was ignored by the Democratic leadership. Why did the Democratic Party allow the Republicans to install insecure computer ballots in key states -- the Republicans wouldn't allow the Democrats to do this.

There have been numerous stories of voters using touch screen machines who pushed Kerry but the machine tallied Bush. Some of these voters were able to get the machine to acknowledge their choice, others were not. There is no way to verify that the final totals reflect the voters' choices (no recounts are possible). Diebold makes automated teller machines (ATMs) for banks -- if their ATMs confused withdrawals for deposits, no bank would dare purchase their products. How can Diebold accurately count our financial transactions, yet is unable to accurately count votes for Democrats?

Your vote may have been ignored, but your dollars are counted. If everyone votes with their money to support media institutions that investigate scandals, not those that parrot propaganda, democracy could have a chance.

Many states had voter intimidation problems, some subtle, others blatant. Some of these tactics are intentional incompetence, such as absentee ballots mailed out too late to be received. In some Democratic strongholds in Ohio, potential voters had to wait all day in the rain to be able to vote, yet nearby Republican districts had short lines since they had enough voting machines. Republicans tried to disenfranchise African American voters in Kansas City through fake change of address cards sent to the Elections department. A precinct in Ohio was caught having more votes for Bush than voters. Similar "more votes than voters" problems were also found in other states. A gambling referendum "passed" in a Florida county when a bunch of votes magically appeared at the last minute. A friend in Boulder, Colorado told me about a church in a Democratic area that pretended to be a polling station the day before the Election -- voters who believed their claims of "early voting" were not counted.

These manipulations, coupled with the fact that Kerry ran such a lousy campaign that many Bush-haters agonized about voting for him, ensured that the results could be fixed in advance. If Kerry's campaign had been better, it would have been harder to change the results.

The Democratic Party has thousands of lawyers and $45 million in funds to challenge vote fraud, and Senator Edwards wanted to contest the outcome. Kerry rushed to concede before all the votes were counted and the flood of complaints of vote fraud and disenfranchisement were noticed. Perhaps a future historian will uncover why Kerry surrendered. Was he threatened with a "Wellstone plane crash"? Bribed? Or was the election a farce to create an illusion of democracy, since Kerry and Bush are both members of the occult Order of Skull and Bones, and Kerry, Bush and Cheney are distant cousins?

Most industrial democracies use paper ballots, counted by hand. This might not appeal to those with a naive fetish for technology, but it is the most accurate vote counting method, and the hardest to tamper with. (Optical scanning of paper ballots can also be tampered with, since the software is a proprietary trade secret not subject to public scrutiny.)

A deeper problem was the Democrats' "Bush Light" strategy -- trying to replace Bush without discuss the deeper scandals. Many Democrats proclaimed that "Bush Lied" about Iraq, but few said why the US seized Iraq, even though the whole world knows it was about oil. Two thirds of the Earth's remaining oil supply is in the Persian Gulf area, and it would be nice to have public discussion of whether we will use it for renewable energy systems and relocalizing production, or to have World War IV to control what is left.

The vote fraud story risks becoming like the evidence of US government complicity in 9/11 -- explained in detail on the internet, yet totally ignored by the media. However, the evidence is being assembled even faster than documentation of the 9/11 scandal, and is becoming the greatest Constitutional crisis in our country's history. The Congressional Government Accounting Office has been asked to investigate. Some media voices are daring to question the outcome -- such as actress Susan Sarandon on Bill Maher's HBO show last Friday. Protests are happening all over the country, and the documentation of fraud is piling up all over the web.

Cheating in the Electoral College should be grounds for expulsion. Under the Constitution, questions of legitimacy of a State's Electors can be debated by Congress when they ratify the outcome. The film "Fahrenheit 9/11" shows the effort by the Congressional Black Caucus to have a debate on January 6, 2001, when Bush was confirmed as President despite the fraud in Florida. It takes a Senator and a Representative to allow this debate, but no Senator dared to support the right of all citizens to vote.

Lots of links 29.Nov.2004 02:05

Live Free or Die Bold


Fantastic 30-minute introduction to the scandal:  http://www.votergate.tv
This is a preliminary version of a full length movie that is in production. Votergate's crew was with Bev Harris of blackboxvoting.org in Florida in mid November when they caught Volusia County officials throwing out voting records into the trash.
(39 megabytes for low resolution version)

 http://www.blackboxvoting.org/baxter/baxterVPR.mov - one minute movie asks the question "Can Voting Systems be Monkeyed With?" (12 megabytes)

 http://www.invisibleballots.com Invisible Ballots

Best websites tracking the 2004 Stolen Election

 http://www.blackboxvoting.org Black Box Voting (the best investigation into touch screen voting machines)

 http://www.votescam.com election rigging is not a new problem - on line book about an ignored investigation about vote fraud in Florida in the early 1970s


 http://www.freepress.org Ohio publication documenting severe violations of the Voting Rights Act (Democrats, especially African Americans, impeded from voting)

 http://www.legitgov.org Citizens for Legitimate Government (founded to protest the last stolen Presidential Election - 2000), excellent news service about the latest coup

 http://www.truthinvoting.org Eugene, Oregon citizens group formed after 2004 "election"

 http://www.nov2truth.org another activist resource for exposing vote fraud, archive of most of the key articles

 http://www.truevotemd.org Campaign for Verifiable Voting (in Maryland) seeks to ban paperless voting



 http://ohvotesuppression.blogspot.com election theft in Ohio



"many counties are violating the campaign law as I understood it from you. God help us if the Democrats find out."

 http://www.commondreams.org Common Dreams news service has been publishing many critical articles on the vote fraud (perhaps NOW they will re-examine their decision to largely ignore Cheney's complicity in 9/11?)






Saudi/Enron $29M funding of election theft alleged:

The report certainly seems to connect "organically" to the well documented Bush dynasty/BCCI/Enron/Saudi etc web of deception, off-shore money laundering, drug money, etc. The article is full of important recent historical details many people are not aware of.

 link to www.newstatesman.com
Did Dubya rig the election?
Michael Meacher, MP
Monday 29th November 2004

Former UK Environment Minister Michael Meacher, Member of Parliament, has written an article exploring in some detail many of the major areas of evidence that strongly indicate the US election was criminally manipulated. It is fair to say he is probably the most prominent official in the UK or US to write in such detail about this.
MP Meacher wrote an excellent article in September 2003 detailing much of the evidence that 9/11 was allowed to happen by the Bush regime in order to provide the pretext for seizing the Middle Eastern oil fields.

How George Bush Won the 2004 Presidential Election (an article written in 2003 about fraudulent voting machines)
"The 2004 election will be the first to use nation-wide electronic voting. With the purging of voter lists, secrecy surrounding voting machines, the lack of a verifiable paper trail combined with voting machine companies with strong Republican ties and funding from the radical right, a Bush victory is all but inevitable. Welcome to the machines."

47 State Exit Poll Analysis Confirms Swing Anomaly






(rebuttal to official media dismissals of vote fraud story)






 link to www.thehilltoponline.com



 http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/111304Y.shtml (apathy is the worst scandal)

Gives state by state example of how the Republican Party stole the 2004 election.


 http://www.counterpunch.org/singley11102004.html (voter intimidation in Tampa)

Howard Dean acknowledges that electronic touch screen voting machines should not be used
So why did the Democrats allow their use in key battleground states?

Electronic Voting - Not Ready For Prime Time
By Howard Dean
June 01, 2004, 2004

The Big Fix 2004: How to fix a Presidential Election
Pt. I: Convicted Felons, 'Shadowy Financiers' Own Companies Counting Votes  
November 15 2004-Venice,FL. 
by Daniel Hopsicker
An investigation into the surprisingly-sordid history of America's "election services industry" has revealed that executives and owners of the two largest companies, E S & S and Sequoia Pacific, have been convicted of bribery and suborning public officials in more than a dozen states.
And while a felony conviction may be enough to prevent you from voting in Florida, convicted felons can take heart in the fact that the "blemish" on their record in no way disqualifies them from owning companies counting the votes. ....

Election Company has Long Criminal History
Thugs, Racketeers Counting American Votes
"An electronic voting system is to a mechanical one what a nuclear bomb is to a hand grenade... If someone manages to sabotage it, the results can be catastrophic."
November 24 2004-Venice,FL. 
by Daniel Hopsicker 

Beware "votefraud.org" -- this is a site that praises Holocaust denial
(if you inquire why they promote the "American Free Press," which publishes the Holocaust Denial publication "Barnes Review")