As I wrote in the last indymedia subdomain not censoring the truth about the satanic cerimony staged as US "elections" ... http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/301461.shtml ... about this article of "The Independent" : http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=577504
This article is deception of the worst type, pretending to expose in order to cover-up better. Check to what lengths it goes trying to cover-up the simple fact that ONE simple line of code decides what results you will get ("invested, may, None has been tested, difficult, risks, possibility, could") : refusing to vote is not enought to pretend not to carry the markTOUCH-SCREEN VOTINGrefusing to vote is not enought to pretend not to carry the markA fter the "hanging chads" nightmare in 2000, many states have invested in electronic voting machines. But these may introduce new problems. None has been tested in a presidential election. In the event of recounts, few produce a paper record of votes, which will make verification difficult. Other risks include malfunctioningmachines or computer servers, and the possibility that outsiders could hack into the system. accepting to press the touch screen machine is accept to carry the markThere are no excuses - even a child understands that a computer will "say" whatever he was told to "tell". accepting to carry paper to cast the ballot is accepting to carry the markThere are no excuses - even a child understands that alone the fact that more than one third of the votes will be created by computer is more than enough to falsify ANY results.
Besides that, any adult voter understands that the possibility of voting on paper is only an alibi to tranquilize the sheeple (including himself) as electronic vote is introduced : Results of votes from paper will not be statiscally checked against results of electronic voting, unless results of paper votes are also "counted" the "right" way.
Nobody can pretend that he doesn't understand the difference between democracy and how votes are "counted" the "right" way - the Stalin way : "elections" in Afghanistan. The difference is that Stalin wasn't pretending to play democracy - Kerry, Bush, Nader & Badnarik are. refusing to vote is not enought to pretend not to carry the markRefusing to take part in this satanic cerimony is not enough. Any adult understands that this is the celebration of the situation that has existed now in fact for years : the end of freedom, the official proclamation of enslavement and allegiance to satan.
God is going to ask you what have you done against it, and you'd better have a good answer, if you think that you will not be carrying the mark of the beast during the short time of the satanic rule.
|
A god is intelligent.
Not delusional.
Can any church prove where you came from?
No.
So, the truth is they are full of it and it is all about money, control and power. Basic animal genetic impulses, just like a dog that wants to hump your leg.
How can you have a religion of what you are?
Talk about Ego, we have enough people who worship themselves as it is.