portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

government selection 2004

Nader's not on the ballot, and that's a shame

Bulldogs hold their ground. So long as there are unrepresented citizens, unprotected consumers, uninsured Americans, abused workers, and corporate militarism, the Nader/Camejo campaign will fight. We will vigorously challenge the corporate power structure in this country and demand that the American government serve the public interest before commercial demands further erode our weakened democracy. Nader/Camejo 2004 will not back down from this struggle.

--votenader.org
9/23/2004


ON THE NADER-FOR-PRESIDENT Web site, the American map features states in five colors: blue, red, purple, yellow, and gray--on the ballot, off the ballot, off the ballot (write in), off the ballot (in court), on the ballot (in court), and no chance whatsoever of being on the ballot. For Mr. Nader's third-party candidacy, just getting in the game in 2004 is an uphill battle.

Which is a shame. For whatever else you might say about Ralph Nader, he is, at least, a different voice. Both major-party candidates are sons of the upper economic class. Both have emerged from the ethereal world of corporate interests. Both have a vision of American life skewed by privilege.

Not so Mr. Nader. The of-the-people, by-the-people, for-the-people consumer advocate--and now two-time presidential candidate--runs on a platform that is environmentally sound and promotes the welfare of common American workers. But in Virginia and many other states, voters won't have the chance to add a resounding "Yes!" to Naderism. Thanks to a vigorous campaign by Democrats fearful that the Nader candidacy will spoil a John Kerry victory, the third-party candidate is being denied a place on the ballot, and his campaign war chest is being bled dry by the legal costs of defending his right to run.

In Virginia, the candidate needed 10,000 signatures to make the ballot. Although Naderites submitted 12,900, state election workers could verify only 7,342. The rest were in some way illegible. So the State Board of Elections refused to certify Mr. Nader.

But the situation in Virginia is sunny compared with those in some other places. The campaign had to take its case to the Supreme Court in Florida, and in Ohio, another battleground state, the feud is being fought down to the last signature on the last petition. As we write, 29 states have allowed Mr. Nader to enter the November race, but in 17 states his staff is fighting 21 separate legal battles to get on or stay on the ballot.

Of course, Mr. Nader must follow state election rules. But how philosophically traitorous of the Democratic Party, which for decades has crowed that it's the party of the people, to refuse to allow the people to vote for the era's leading anti-plutocrat. The "party of the little guy" suddenly plays duopolist plug-ugly when there's a chance the little guy might not fall into line.

Mr. Nader's quixotic campaign still has some snap. The Washington Post says he called national Democrats "a gutless, spineless, clueless, and hapless party." What's more, "We must never tolerate a Democratic Party that turns its back on the very people it depends on to win elections," Mr. Nader says, champing down hard on the donkey's leg. If the Democrats hate George Bush so much they're willing to scuttle a centerpiece of their heritage, what exactly does the party have left to offer?

homepage: homepage: http://naderoregon.org

Another thing... 23.Sep.2004 12:32

alsis38 alsis35@yahoo.com

I hope that those who despise what Nader has done, yet still say that there is hope for a 3rd-Party movement in the U.S. at the local level will consider the actions of Bill "The Maggot" Bradbury, Oregon's Sec. of State, and the assholes on the Court who have just thrown Nader off the ballot once again. Even if you think that Nader is the biggest asshole who ever lived, you should ponder the meaning of this twisted and blatant grab for power on the part of a man who supposedly represents the whole state, not just Democrats. Think of the message that he and the court have just sent --at the tops of their lungs-- to ANY candidate, at ANY level, who dares to run without the blessing of a major party. Then tell me how having these people in charge is going to be anything but the death knell of any serious attempt at all to break the duopoly... unless we get lucky the Court's latest ruling is overturned by a yet-higher court.

The Democrats, as embodied by the charming Mr. Bradbury, are supposed to be the folk helping us take back democracy from Bush ???!!!

It's been lovely, but I have to go puke up my guts now. :(