portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

government | imperialism & war | political theory

Flag burning

Inteelignece failure headquarters want to pass a constitutional admendment that prohibits flag burning.

Its obvious to me the flag is burning from our invasion of Iraq. The contitution too as a matter of fact.
Measure to Outlaw Flag Burning Advances in Senate

Tue Jul 20, 1:33 PM ET Add Politics to My Yahoo!


By Thomas Ferraro

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A proposed constitutional amendment to outlaw the burning of the American flag won the approval on Tuesday of a Senate Judiciary Committee (news - web sites) split largely along party lines.



Raised by some Republicans as a mark of patriotism this election year, the measure passed on a 11-7 vote and was sent to the full Senate for final congressional approval. While the Senate has repeatedly rejected such measures in the past, both sides predict a razor-close vote this time.


The Judiciary Committee's vote came a week after a divided Senate blocked a White House-backed bid to amend the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage, another issue Democrats have accused Republicans of pushing merely to rally their conservative base for the November elections.


Backers said the proposal is needed to protect a symbol of American democracy. But foes warned the measure would infringe on First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and expression.


The amendment was drafted in response to a 1989 Supreme Court decision that struck down a Texas law against flag desecration and a 1990 decision that ruled as unconstitutional a flag protection law passed by Congress. While flag burning had been frequently used as a symbol of protest against the Vietnam War, it has been rare in recent years.


"We're hopeful (of passage)," said committee chairman Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican who sponsored the measure with Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California, the only Democrat who voted for it.


FREE SPEECH


"I worry about what we are doing here," said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the Judiciary Committee's ranking Democrat.


Leahy noted that President Bush (news - web sites)'s secretary of state, Colin Powell (news - web sites), a retired four-star general, came out against such a measure in 1999.


 http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040720/pl_nm/congress_flag_dc


Leahy quoted Powell as saying: "I would not amend that great shield of democracy to hammer a few miscreants. The flag will still be flying proudly long after they have slunk away."


Proponents are hopeful a new wave of patriotism in response to the war in Iraq (news - web sites) will help squeeze out needed votes, but foes say they are guardedly hopeful they can again block it.


In the past 15 years, a flag amendment has repeatedly sailed through the 435-member House only to fall a short in the 100-member Senate, including by four votes in 2000.


"It's desperately close," said Terri Ann Schroeder of the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites), which opposes the proposal. "But I'm fairly confident we're going to prevail. We'll win."


The proposed measure would specifically amend the Constitution to permit Congress to pass a law to protect the flag from desecration.


For a proposed constitutional amendment to become law it must be approved by two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives and then ratified by 38 of the 50 states.


Vice presidential candidate John Edwards (news - web sites), a North Carolina senator, joined six fellow Democrats on the Judiciary Committee in voting against the proposed amendment. He voted by proxy.
more bs 20.Jul.2004 16:53

can't cover it up fast enough

 http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&e=5&u=/ap/20040720/ap_on_go_co/us_iraq_weapons

WMD Claims

39 minutes ago Add Politics - U. S. Congress to My Yahoo!

Intel from the people without Intel for the people without intel


By APARNA H. KUMAR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - An upcoming report will contain "a good deal of new information" backing up the Bush administration's contention that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) pursued weapons of mass destruction, Senate Armed Services Committee (news - web sites) Chairman John Warner, R-Va., said Tuesday.
Dude Wheres Your Country
Dude Wheres Your Country

Executive Branch Attacking Opponents 20.Jul.2004 16:57

Is this HARDBALL or What?

 http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040720/ap_on_el_pr/berger_kerry

Presidential Elections - AP


AP: Berger Steps Down As Kerry Adviser

1 hour, 31 minutes ago

By RON FOURNIER, AP Political Writer

WASHINGTON - Former national security adviser Sandy Berger, the subject of a criminal investigation over the disappearance of terrorism documents, stepped aside on Tuesday as an informal adviser to Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry (news - web sites).


AP Photo


AP Photo
Slideshow: John Kerry

Clinton Aide Investigated on Terror Memos
(AP Video)



Latest headlines:
Bush Has $64 Million in Bank for Push to Convention
Reuters - 12 minutes ago

Berger Steps Down As Kerry Adviser
AP - 17 minutes ago

Bush: Re-Election Will Ensure U.S. Safety
AP - 18 minutes ago






"Mr. Berger does not want any issue surrounding the 9/11 commission to be used for partisan purposes. With that in mind he has decided to step aside as an informal adviser to the Kerry campaign until this matter is resolved," said Lanny Breuer, Berger's attorney.


Word of the Berger investigation comes a week before Kerry's convention and two days before the commission releases its report into the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, which could prove politically damaging for President Bush (news - web sites).
2004 Election
2004 Election

It;s nothing more than! 20.Jul.2004 18:46

Bird dog

Smoke and mirrors for the election/scam process!

They already know that it will not pass, but it makes them look good to the assholes that have their heads buried up their republicans!

Don't forget the TP!

Remember, just like playing chess!