portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

government

Postponement of the November Election

What had been merely a rumor has now become fact.
The Bush administration has asked for legislation enabling it to postpone the November election as a result of a terror attack. While worded very carefully to suggest that an attack must take place for such a move; I do not see either of the below stories unequivocally state that, if granted, these powers might not also permit elections to be "postponed" on merely a well-publicized threat. Don't believe the press stories. Read the legislation when it is introduced to see what it says there. If that discretion is included then we are at the edge of an abyss more dangerous than anything we have ever faced.

These powers, if enacted, will go to the Department of Homeland Security. DHS would also be the entity to decide when, or if, postponed elections would be held.

Allowing suspension of the elections on just the threat of a terror attack would create a hole in the legislation big enough to drive an oil tanker, or an open dictatorship, through. Since the legislation has not been seen yet we do not know what it will say. Once introduced, the bill would then go into Senate and House Committees (Republican controlled) where the language could easily be modified to give discretionary power to the Administration. At that moment the Constitution would overtly cease to have any operational meaning at all. The separation of powers would vanish.

Judging from the news stories tonight we will probably see the legislation introduced fairly quickly. From the instant it appears, this legislation must be tracked daily, even hourly, at  http://thomas.loc.gov.

Does any one of us doubt that if threatened or desperate, the administration would use those powers without hesitation?

I ask those who read this to stop for a moment and consider what it would mean for all of us on this side of the fence if the Bush administration both acquired and used the power to suspend the election -- with or without an attack. What restraints would be left to prevent some of our worst-case scenarios from coming true? Why even maintain the illusion of democracy? All vestiges of accountability will have been removed.

We should each evaluate our own situations accordingly. Hopefully most of us will see that we have no choice but to bond together more than ever before. To quote Ben Franklin: "We must all hang together or else we shall surely all hang separately."

This is the moment at which it all becomes very, very real. Although there is strong Democratic Party opposition appearing with derisive statements from Rep. Jane Harman and Sen. Diane Feinstein, my initial assessment, after watching CNN, FOX and MS-NBC, is that the press is already "selling" us this legislation. Fortunately, early stories also report that the act would also require a constitutional amendment.

However, with this Supreme Court we can be assured of nothing. Yet, knowing this, we can be sure that there will be many chances to fight and beat this travesty. There will be many places at which our skills and resources can function to create and implement a coordinated response.

All the efforts put into 9/11 and into the anti-war movement will need to pale by comparison with the effort that must be put forth to prevent this legislation from passing. Every lesson learned about organizing; mobilizing; reporting; strategy; education; and influencing congress (if that's possible), needs to be remembered and applied now. There will be many tests to come.

May whatever form of divinity each of us holds dear give us guidance, wisdom and strength as we consider this.

For almost three years FTW, along with many other brave souls, has been saying that 9/11 was just the beginning. Tonight it seems that the next stage - whatever that will turn out be - is knocking tonight at everyone's door. Do not give up. Do not be afraid. If all this is true and comes to pass, then everything is as bad as we have been saying all this time. So we had that much of a head start, didn't we?

We are not defenseless. The cause is not lost. There is always a sense of relief when a dreaded event finally arrives because - only in that moment - can anything be done about it.

I don't usually quote Dianne Feinstein but she was right when she said that America holds elections in the middle of wars, earthquakes and disasters. No matter what, we must demand an election this November. Even the debates about which candidate is or isn't better, or whether one will or won't make a difference, are now moot.

Stop. Catch your breaths. Steel your hearts and minds in preparation. Soon we're all going to find out what we're made of. If we do not have an election this November then the world we have been fighting to change until tonight will become only a "pleasant" memory compared to the world that will follow.
It doesn't matter if there is an election or not... 12.Jul.2004 22:43

Pravda or Consequences

Warmongers of both parties will acquiesce to fascism.

Where the fuck is Nader? 12.Jul.2004 22:50

Chris

This is why Ralph will never be President, he just doesn't care especially for a monumental event like this.

No Need For That 13.Jul.2004 06:40

TragicHipster politics@tragichipster.com

If they could hold elections during the Civil War, we could probably manage to hold elections if a terrorist attack happens. Where in the constitution does it say Congress can grant the authority to suspend the elections to an internal security agency? Not that any of you on the left actually care about what the Constituion says, other than maybe some vague interpretation of the 1st Amendment.


take to the streets 13.Jul.2004 09:47

the lavender lady

If this is not cause to take to the streets people
I don't know what is!!! And yes, where is Nader and
Kerry and Edwards and all of the rest of our so called
leaders.We the people must take the lead and take to
the streets!