Boeing Claims National Security On WTC2 Plane
It is clear that the flight that struck the second of the TwinTowers on 9/11 was not United Airlines Flight 175, because views from underneath the plane reveal a 20 m. long, 1/2 m. diameter, cylinder that opens just before impact. The pod appears in all photographs that clearly show that aspect of the plane, and can be seen in the frame-by-frame analysis of all videos of the impact, where there is sufficient contrast and resolution.
The Barcelona daily La Vanguardia, which has run a series of articles based on a technical report on this pod, asked Boeing about these features, who claimed they were unable to respond for reasons of national security!
From Paul Higginbotham
Hello Jeff - This concerns the article about the anomaly on the 767 (sic) that struck the tower. I have worked on Boeing 767s as a licensed aircraft mechanic for fifteen years and I can tell you there is nothing that even remotely resembles what I see in the photographs on "normal" aircraft.
I know the 767 literally inside-out as I have overhauled them hundreds of times and that "pod" or device is NOT normal. But what strikes me the most - and sends chills up my spine - is the frame that shows the plane JUST hitting the building. Where in the HELL do the flames come from?? The fuel is stored in the WINGS!! The is NO fuel, not a DROP near the nose of the aircraft. It is held in the wings and pumped to the engines. That's it. The nose contains NOTHING that could cause a fire on impact.
I believe this was a deliberate act by our government.
Also, when I saw it live on TV my first thoughts when the buildings collapsed was "Hey! that looks EXACTLY like a professional demolition" to keep the debris in the same "footprint" as the building. It was too neat of a job.
If this is true, what kind of country are we living in now?