portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article announcements global

labor | neighborhood news stop starbucks

First in Nation, Starbucks Workers Form Union

Starbucks workers here have organized a union with the Industrial Workers of the World IU/660 and have submitted union cards today to the NLRB for a certification election. The workers are poised to become the first Starbucks Baristas union certified in the country.
New York, NY- Starbucks workers here have organized a union with the Industrial Workers of the World IU/660 and have submitted union cards today to the NLRB for a certification election. The workers are poised to become the first Starbucks Baristas union certified in the country. Starbucks Baristas at the 36th and Madison location in Midtown Manhattan have come together in an effort to raise themselves out of poverty as well as to achieve respect and dignity on the job. The workers are calling on Starbucks to obey the law as the election approaches.

"Behind the green aprons and smiles are individuals living in serious poverty," said Daniel Gross, a worker at the store. "Baristas are the cornerstone of a Starbucks coffee shop, we just deserve better. Starbucks cashes in on a community friendly image but it certainly doesn't extend to their workers or coffee farmers. That's why we went Union."

Starbucks is a $15 billion company with over 7,500 locations around the world, but workers have most emphatically not shared in their success. In New York City with one of the highest costs of living in the world, Starbucks workers start at $7.75 an hour and eventually receive raises amounting to merely a few cents. Starbucks has also developed a scheme whereby all Baristas work on a part-time basis and are not guaranteed any amount of hours per week thus making it exceedingly difficult for workers to budget for necessities like rent, utilities, and food.

"I come to work and I work hard," said Maureen Medianero, 23, who has worked at Starbucks for almost 2 years. "But I'm still hanging on by a shoe string not knowing if I can make ends meet to support my daughter. It's frightening."

Although Starbuck workers serve an enormous volume of beverages, many of them extremely hot, in order to save money management refuses to schedule enough workers to do the required work safely. Instead, workers are forced to perform their duties at unsafe speeds with an undue level of physical exertion.

"A Starbucks coffee shop is an ergonomic minefield. The stores are supposed to mimic an Italian cafe without considering the uncomfortable bending and reaching we have to do," explained Barista Anthony Polanco. "This isn't your mom and pop coffee shop, we're talking McDonald's busy every day. Starbucks talks about 'Creating Warmth' but the only warmth I feel is the heat pad at the end of the day."

The Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), founded in 1905, is a union dedicated to workplace democracy. IWW IU/660 represents workers in the retail industry.

homepage: homepage: http://iww.org
phone: phone: 503.231.5488


Hit 'em where it hurts 18.May.2004 06:45

Coalition for Useful Actions

This seems like a hell of a lot better idea than busting in the windows, don't it?

It certainly does. 18.May.2004 07:39

Amused

Having been a member of SEIU, the collective bargaining can be a useful edge for the workers. However, I have my doubts as to how well this will work in what is essentially an entry-grade food service job where employees are pretty much another commodity. If IWW accepts them, then additional leverage will be added through the network of other (now allied) trades.

I suppose we will have to wait and see.

Great! 18.May.2004 11:43

Fellow Wobbly

Best of luck in the campaign. It is about time the workers at Starbucks started organizing. Keep us updated!

Pro union- pro diversity 18.May.2004 11:59

Migratory Bird

I am emphatically pro union. I respect a diversity of tactics. But the union formed in New York is such a tiny step. Unions are wonderful. That is why the coffee workers keep dying trying to form unions in Central America. I don't think it is a positive or respectful action to try and unionize starbucks on division. I think teh best thing would be to drive them the fuck out before they take over! Each small step ie Starbucks, NEw Seasons, etc is a giant leap for the corporations. Trust me. Small family owned business are closing down at an extinction rate throughout this country. Divison street is one of the last few strong holds! Unionizing on this street has failed. If you let starbucks flourish they will shut division street down. I watched this kind of shit when Walmart came to my small town. Walmart shut everything down. Starbucks does the same thing. It ain't obvious at first.

When you drink Starbucks you are swallowing misery.

To Migratory Bird 18.May.2004 14:00

Coalition for Useful Actions

Emphatically pro-union you say?

And then: "I don't think it is a positive or respectful action to try and unionize starbucks on division."

I'm not sure at this point we should be terribly worried about being "respectful" towards Starbucks.

About local vs. corporate stores: Frankly, I'd might rather support a unionized chain store in which the workers have benefits and security, than a local store in which they don't.

Small business owners can be just as exploitative of their workers as chain stores.

Local vs. Union? 18.May.2004 17:23

Lucy Parsons

If there's a choice between supporting a non-union, local (and small) business and a large, unionized, corporate chain store, I'll support the small business.

Why? Because a small, local business will have to respond to community pressure to unionize if/when their workers decide to do so. Because a small, local business is able to be unionized by a small, locally-run union -- or a small, democratic, accountable union (like the Wobblies).

Also, a large chain store can buy off (literally, or persuade with power) a large, hierarchical union. Witness the unions at chain grocery stores (UFCW, for instance). Those workers often slave away for two bureaucracies, one of which is deducting dues from their incredibly meager paychecks. And if the megacorporation fails to buy off the union, it can fund a decert campaign easily.

When there's a union, I want to see the workers in control, not just more bureaucratic union bosses. I also want to see the struggle center around what's good for all of humanity (the workers of the world, so to speak), rather than what's good for U.S. workers at the expense of other folks.

bye bye starbucks 18.May.2004 17:51

Caffeine fan

There are so many Starbucks in Portland already! Look in the phone book. While a wobbly union at the idiotic new starbucks on division would put some heat on the company, I'd rather see the place get lost entirely. Of course given the existing conditions a union there would be a slight improvement compared to other starbucks, and might set an agitational precedent.
but really, do we need another starbucks period? No.

Off to drink coffee at an independent cafe.

Outraged 19.May.2004 11:04

Starbucks Fan

I really don't understand any of this. Why the hatred? Starbucks helps employ over 80,000 people around the world. Does anyone think that there would be these 80,000 jobs if Starbucks wasn't around. As for taking care of their 'partners' (employees) Starbucks offers medical packages, 401ks, vacation hours and stock compensation to any one that works over 20 hours a week. Can your local businesses do that? Not likely. Starbucks is trying to do good in the global community. Have any of you even thought about doing some research towards this point. I'd be glad to help you out! Starbucks has started publishing a Corporate Social Responsibility Report. It is a public report just like the annual fiscal report. Also like the annual fiscal report it is audited by a third party. Here is the link:  http://www.starbucks.com/aboutus/csrannualreport.asp

Starbucks is so commited to this country's screwed up health care system that they participated in Cover the Uninsured Week ( http://covertheuninsured.org). Starbucks' chairman, Howard Schulz, has spoken publicly on the isssue of health care reform ( http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/hcast_index.cfm?display=detail&hc=1140). All of these links were found on Starbucks.com.

As for the partners that felt moved enough to speak publicly and to attempt unionization: Go ahead. It is a free country and I'm sure no one with in Starbucks will stop them or will try to buy out a union. If a union is formed I'm sure it will be worked with. I just don't see what the hell good it is going to do anyone if Starbucks is already providing more to its partners than most other employers. Worst case scenario is the union is formed and it sets the precedent for other baristas that work for mom and pops. What happens when all of the employees of these tiny independents see that they could have better lives with all these benefits? They will start demanding the same and will mom and pop be able to take care of their people the way they want to? Not likely.

More on independent coffee shops

It is not Starbucks that closes down these independents, it is the conusmer. Do you spend your money in a place that you hate? In a place that you get crappy service and nasty drinks? Of course not. So, why is Starbucks so successful then? Maybe because we really are a sadistic society after all. Maybe that is it. It certainly couldn't be the logical choice. That Starbucks has been able to create a warm and inviting place and provide great service with a fantastic tasting beverage.

Welcome everyone that reads this website to do some real research and not just jump on the "Down with corpoartions!" bandwagon!