portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary portland metro


The truth about John Kaminski

Why does this guy's hateful articles keep getting published here?
The opinions of Florida internet columnist John Kaminski keep getting published at this website. This happens in spite of - or is it BECAUSE of? - the fact that JOHN KAMINSKI IS A HOLOCAUST DENIER. Don't believe it? He proudly proclaims himself one in his article titled "Heads they win, tails we lose", dated February 25th, 2003. In later articles, he proclaims the government and the media in the USA are totally controlled by Jews. I posted this observation on www.voxfux.com. Vox's response: "Go f### yourself, you chubby conservative pr###." How sweet.

You guys still want to keep publishing articles that probably give Richard Butler a woody?
check your batteries there 01.May.2004 22:36


or maybe get a new bulb. Yours isn't shining so brightly right now. It's dim...as in dimwitted!

Oh...ha ha 01.May.2004 22:44


Yeah, but what I said was accurate.

fuck Kaminski 01.May.2004 23:48


ok "Flashlight",

it's officially YOUR TASK to get the two-bit unknown Kaminski banned here, or wherever his name shows on the internet. (while you're at it and since your so concerned about the topic, why not write your own feature article for Indymeda on 'Holocaust deniers' of reknown: listing their names, addresses and home phone numbers so that we all know what to look out for. BOOGA-BOOGA!!!)

the fact is that even if by your definition Kaminski is a 'Holocaust-denying' kook (like many of the far-right wing, independent Militia, and even card-carrying Republicans in this country), the only thing of interest here is his research and writing on 9/11.

as far as that goes there's plenty of other, better, more relevant activists, researchers, and writers about the 9/11 scam to fill any 'Kaminski gap'.

The Greatest Holocaust of Them All 02.May.2004 00:39

Holocaust Amplifier

As naturalist Tom Brown has been fond of saying, the greatest holocaust of them all is the one holocaust that has been happening right under everyone's nose twenty four/seven. That holocaust is the holocaust of the Earth - the geneocide against the Earth, herself. Scientists now say species extinction is reaching critical proportions. Water pollution has reached such epidemic proportions that water may soon become more valuable than oil. Greenhouse gases threaten world wide cateclysmic climatic changes. Yet human beings quibble over whether this detail or that detail occured in history. Human beings fiddle while Rome burns.

To whatever 02.May.2004 21:51


Booga Booga?? Oy vey.

Why can't we discuss the holocaust? 03.May.2004 06:20

what are they hiding

Hey, why don't we just pass a law that makes any denial or question of the official government version for "the" Holocaust.inc. illegal. Oh wait they did. There are many languishing in jail for this offense and to defend yourself you again are guilty of another charge of the same crime. No discussion, no opening up the records for inspection, no interviews of those who have opposing views...what do they think will happen if this discussion occurs. History is a review of the archival documents and open to interpretation and debate over time.
That is except the holocaustinc. Every country in Europe has made it a crime to articulate views or evidence outside the official version for the holocaustinc. Now elements of the Israeli government have convinced a legislator to sponsor a bill making the same articulation a "hate crime" in the United States.
Be careful what you ask for you could be surprised at the outcome.

Who does own the North American media, anyway? 03.May.2004 12:38

curious and always critical

1. It would help if someone showed clearly who does own the North American media. It is fact that owners do push their ideology. It is also fact that "objectivity" in the social sciences is a myth.

2. A jewish professor known as NORMAN G. FINKELSTEIN wrote "The Holocaust Industry". His book is causing an uproar because a Jew dares to look at the extreme right wing politics of Israel.

3. The native people of America also criticize the Jewish claim to "holocaust exclusivity" - are they now to be called "anti-semites". (By the way, are Palestinians and Arabs not Semites? Some light here, please!)

4. Can institutionalized religion step aside and let humanity recreate a peaceful spirituality...for the planet's sake?

not likely 03.May.2004 13:59


i dont believe it flashlight. but because i regularly read kaminski on rense i had better check it out. thanks for including a link to the article BTW. really does wonders for your credibility. will post again with what ive learned. kaminski is one of the few that has consitently told it like it is IMO. who's next on your hit list to ban? Hsing Lee? he's pretty damn radical too. i'd like to reinterate voxfux's statement to you, but i will control myself until i have reread said article. for now...

say there!...so you like John Kaminski 03.May.2004 22:17

here's his latest...pretty one too!

Big White Stone
Thoughts On A Visit To The Tomb Of The Unknowns
By John Kaminski

I received this from Marty Cepielik, publisher of News of Polonia in Pasadena, California:

"I don't know if you saw this in the news but it really impressed me. Funny, our US Senate/House took two days off as they couldn't work.

"On the ABC evening news, it was reported tonight that, because of the dangers from Hurricane Isabelle approaching Washington DC, the military members assigned the duty of guarding the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier were given permission to suspend the assignment.

"They refused. "No way, Sir!"

"Soaked to the skin, marching in the pelting rain of a tropical storm, they said that guarding the Tomb was not just an assignment, it was the highest honor that can be afforded to a serviceperson.

"The tomb has been patrolled continuously, 24/7, since 1930."


Once upon a time, not long ago, I did the monuments tour in Washington. It was the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier that really got me thinking. I lit a cigarette in the gray drizzle, surveying the puddles forming on the august granite quadrangle, in the shadow of the majestic Corinthian pillars of the museum nearby. Gazing at the mammoth cube of Colorado marble, I tried to think about the archetypal spirit of the mythical warrior resting inside it.

In the mist, closing my eyes, with as much compassion and respect as I could muster, I dared to say: "Hey buddy, how's it going?"

And in my reverie, maybe assisted by some helpful spirits nearby, I imagined I heard a raspy response: "Can't complain, man. We all do what we have to do." Then a pause. Then ... "I sure wish I could still smoke though."

The image of a grizzled, unshaven GI, battered helmet askew on his unkempt head, popped into my mind.

"So you were in World War II?" my thoughts guessed in the humid air.

"Hah," the voice shrugged. "I was in all the wars. From Thermopylae to My Lai, I was there. Everytime there was a bullet fired in anger, an arrow aimed from ambush, a club bludgeoning the teeth of someone you never met and would never meet again, I was there."

"You know the question everybody asks you," I said in my mind, projecting my thoughts toward the elegant monument. "Was it worth it?"

"No, it's never worth it. At the time it's happening, though, there's really no choice to think whether it's worth it or not. You get caught up in the inevitability of the thing, swept along, as it were. Then it becomes a matter of staying true to your buddies."

"What's it like to kill somebody in combat?"

"It's not a good thing, though for some people it's kind of a drug-induced high. I think the people who like killing don't really like themselves. Killing others is like killing yourself, except you get to walk away, and they don't.

"At that moment you fire the bullet, and someone drops, never to get up again, it makes you feel kind of immortal. I mean, to have that kind of power, to stop someone's life its tracks, it's kind of like a drug. Or at least until sometime later, days or months or years later, and your mind tricks you and you start seeing the faces of your children on the people you are shooting ... that kind of comes with the package."

"What's it like to be killed in combat?"

"It's funny. There's usually no pain, although sometimes there is and it's beyond anything you ever thought of at the dentist. But usually, unless you're blipped out instantaneously, there is this kind of calm. It's dazzling and boring at the same time. When you know you have about twenty seconds of life left, it's not the wound that you think about. It's where you came from, trivial moments of childhood that somehow foretold the end you are now confronting. And then, for a second or two, it's where you would have gone, what you would have done. And it's about those people who are close to you, that girl, that little boy, or your mom. She'll be so angry, you think. Then the dark shade comes down and you can go anywhere you want. But you can never talk to anybody again."

"Do you get time to ask the question 'Was I doing the right thing?"

"Not usually, unless you linger on. It's the wounded who have to deal that trip, those with legs blown off or made blind by some explosion in your face. Then you can really work up a case of resentment. The 'what-might-have-beens' are about the most painful injury that can happen in anybody's life. Regret is about the worst thing there is."

"Did you ever realize, in any of all those wars, that what you were doing, was probably an exercise in futility, a pre-arranged deal, a conflict set up by rich men to make money off the sale of armaments or to steal someone else's property. I mean, did you ever realize that the song-and-dance about patriotism or defending your country was just a cover story for some much larger economic crime?"

"Shee-it, every enlisted man who ever served in the military knows that from practically day one. You only need to look around you to see the injustice of the whole system, where rich kid junior officers too timid to poke their eyes out of their tent flaps order ragtags into harm's way without any thought of what will happen to them. Or, of how the equipment they give you may or may not work, and superiors don't really care about that, they only care that they don't their asses kicked by somebody of higher rank. If the enlisted men, the real soldiers, got to run wars, there wouldn't be any wars. The only reason there are wars at all is because the men who decide to make them are never the ones who have to fight them. Can you say Dick Cheney?

"Ha. Well put. Has it always been that way?"

"Yes. Hail Caesar! Onward Zachary Taylor! But at least they got out there and swung their swords on occasion."

"What do you think of all these stories about rapes by Americans in Iraq?

"Pfft. That's war. Happens every time. Nobody remembers the 1.9 million American rapes of German women after WW II. But the Krauts and Japs had set the standard by doing the the same. Depravity is not limited to one ethnic group, though it may be limited to the human race. You don't see other animals doing this kind of crap."

"So, you're saying that's normal behavior for any soldier, any warrior in combat?"

"No way. A real soldier is like a wild animal. Totally controlled, utterly savage. He doesn't kill unless he has to. The true soldier is about the most honorable person on the planet, even though he has been hired to kill for wimpy rich men who are afraid to fight. Still, there is the code of honor. A true soldier won't follow an illegal order, but you can tell how many true soldiers there are these days by the paltry number who refuse immoral commands.

"Just like the rest of the country, every country that ever was, people are afraid to stand out, to say what they really believe even though they know it's right to do so. In the service you can't do that either - or not easily anyway - because if your commander tells you to wipe out a village of women and children, and you don't do it, you get thrown in the brig. Maybe you'll get shot. But those who kill unnecessarily or rape women are just the kind of psychopaths who wind up in the military because they can't find a job anywhere else."

"What do you think of our fearless warmaking presidential candidates today?"

"Same as every other day. They all think soldiers are little stickmen on a chessboard to be sacrificed for somebody's stock options. Based on what I've heard about Kerry, he did soldiers dirt by opposing what they were doing. They say he has lots of medals, but from the things I've heard, he's lucky he didn't get fragged in 'Nam. And Bush. What a pansy! He's a deserter, in time of war. He should have been shot. But he had a rich daddy, so they let him fly planes til cocaine got in the way.

"And he killed all those people in Texas whether they were innocent or not. Tied them down and killed them, then laughed about it. What he did flying onto that carrier saying the Iraq war was over was a disgrace. I'd like to see him a fistfight with the weakest person in the Iraqi army. Bush'd get his throat torn out, which would be a good thing for the world, though there are plenty of other strutting punks like him to take his place."

"As a soldier who fought for your country, you are honored for your sacrifice and your patriotism. Does that make you feel proud in the place you are in now?"

"I wish they would have honored my widow and my orphaned children instead of me. They never had much when I was alive and now have a lot less. I miss them. And patriotism. There is a difference between patriotism and esprit de corps. The former is used to lure halfwits like me into putting everything on the line for some reason which is never fully explained to us. But esprit de corps is one of the great things in life. You get to know who you real friends are when somebody steps in the way of a bullet meant for you."

"What do you think about the people who come here to visit you?"

"I feel sorry for them, that they venerate a process that is so unnecessary. I appreciate their thoughts, like I appreciate your thoughts, but what happened to me, all those times on the battlefield, was completely unnecessary in all instances, and was caused by those who sought to make a profit by the deliberate manipulation of social forces and public opinion. I would advise people to remember that if they treated me as well in life and they have in death, neither one of us would have ever had to be in this sorry place."

"And kids who want to be soldiers, what would you say to them?"

"Slit your belly open with a knife, just to see how it feels. Then imagine how someone else would feel if you did it to them. Then imagine how your mom would feel if it really happened to you.

"Especially if she found that the war you were fighting in was a total lie, and never had to happen? All wars are lies, you know. None of them ever had to happen."

"So, go be a soldier. Go be a fool. Kill somebody over nothing. Watch yourself die. Hell, they might put you in a monument like this one. And no one will ever remember your name."

John Kaminski, an honorably discharged Navy veteran, is the author of "America's Autopsy Report," a collection of his Internet essays seen on hundreds of websites around the world, and also "The Day America Died: Why You Shouldn't Believe the Official Version of What Happened on September 11, 2001," a 48-booklet written for those who still believe what the U.S. government is still saying about 9/11. For more information about both, go to  http://www.johnkaminski.com/

America is committing suicide 14.Jul.2004 20:38


I cannot believe the idiocy people are willing to swallow. And no, I don't mean the stuff on the right end of the political spectrum. I mean the claptrap coming from the left. I used to be a liberal until the requirement for being one was to turn my brain off. John Kaminsky offers absolutely no evidence for anything he says. He just uses reasoning -- flawed reasoning at that -- and states that his claims are all verifiable. Okay. So where's the verification. Do people on the left these days hate their own country so much they are willing to believe anything bad anyone says about it, but ridicule and attempt to discredit anything good someone says? I find this willingness to believe claims with no support really scary. Who the hell needs enemies from the outside to bring on the downfall of America? We have plenty of homegrown America haters right here. It used to be that liberals were motivated by a love of country and its people. They criticized politicians and policies, but they did not hate their own country.

I used to think about moving to Canada for fear of what I thought my government might be capable of doing. Now I'm comptemplating it because of what I fear my fellow countrymen are capable of doing. I strongly suggest people pick up a number of history books and read them all carefully. I also strongly suggest that people question what they read and hear -- regardless of which side it comes from. Blindly believing any claims is, IMO, at best stupid, but at worst, dangerous.

No matter what we may think of our government and politicians, we should be damn glad we are able to say whatever we want about it all. We should not take that freedom lightly -- or irresponsibly.

lightbulb = dim bulb 27.Nov.2004 14:30

bil d. berg

i hope they come get you first

on the original post 29.Nov.2004 09:09

milky way

The original poster claims:

JOHN KAMINSKI IS A HOLOCAUST DENIER. Don't believe it? He proudly proclaims himself one in his article titled "Heads they win, tails we lose", dated February 25th, 2003.

That is not what he says. He claims that laws that prevent challenges to the "official" version of the holocaust are disingenuous. If the holocaust deniers have no leg to stand on, then their evidence will be dismissed.

I have always accepted the official version of the holocaust and, from eyewitness reports I have myself heard, am certain that Jews, Romany, and others were subjected to attempted genocide. However, I have begun to question the motivation of the attacks against anyone who criticizes Israel, which are often vicious and include some reference to holocaust denial.

You should reconsider your approach to this issue. For someone who is less than analytical, it comes across as if you are indeed attempting to conceal something.