portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

government | police / legal

ACLU Lawsuit To Protect Right of Assembly

ACLU protects right of assembly
An ACLU Lawsuit Seeks To Protect the Free Speech Rights of Marchers. Last week the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Seattle challenging the City of Seattle's Parade and Special Events Ordinances.

Seattle Police were once again committing political crimes by denying citizens rights afforded them by the U.S. Constitution, and agreed upon in advance by City of Seattle authorities.

As the City of Seattle's Parade and Special Events Ordinances are ignored by Seattle Police, they are in turn being challenged by local ACLU attorneys on behalf of the October 22nd coalition, holders of a permit in the march. Current laws insure that only wealthy citizens who are able to aquire enormous insurance policies can assemble in Seattle. In a catch-22 situation, Seattites once again ask "How does a poor person get to assemble without being beaten up by the police".

ACLU Lawsuit Seeks To Protect Free Speech Rights of Marchers.

Taken from an ACLU Press Release: Seattle, WA, April 14, 2004

Seeking to protect free speech rights on Seattle streets, the American Civil Liberties Union today filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Seattle challenging the City of Seattle's Parade and Special Events Ordinances. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the October 22 Coalition, a protest group officially granted a parade permit by the City who was nonetheless barred by the Seattle Police Department from marching on the street. The ACLU says Seattle's regulations are confusing, burdensome, and so vague that they wrongly give police unfettered discretion to alter or revoke parade permits.

"Marching in the streets is a traditional way for Americans to express their political views. Yet activists in Seattle have long experienced difficulty in seeking to hold peaceful marches. Too often, City officials have set up unreasonable obstacles when people try to obtain a permit for a march," said ACLU Legal Program Director Julya Hampton.

The lawsuit addresses longstanding problems that many activists have experienced in seeking to hold peaceful marches in Seattle. It comes after years of troubleshooting by the ACLU for groups encountering difficulty with the City's permit process. Seattle uses three separate ordinances that apply to free speech activities in public places, each of which has its own standards and procedures for granting a permit.

"The ordinances have imprecise and unduly subjective terms that make seeking a permit very frustrating. Officials can deny a permit based on a number of broad factors that lack any objective criteria. Our goal in this lawsuit is to update Seattle's overly bureaucratic and antiquated permitting system for public demonstrations," said the ACLU's Julya Hampton.

The October 22 Coalition to Stop Police Brutality, Repression and the Criminalization of a Generation is a national organization that seeks to draw attention to issues related to police brutality by organizing an annual National Day of Protest. The Coalition has affiliates in 40 cities, all of which coordinate marches and other demonstrations on October 22nd each year. The Seattle Coalition has organized an annual march and rally in Seattle since 1996.

In 2003 the Seattle Coalition obtained both a parade permit and a special events permit authorizing the group to march from Seattle Central Community College to a rally at Hing Hay Park. The parade permit did not include a requirement that a minimum number of marchers participate in order for it to be valid. On the evening of October 22, approximately 80-100 people gathered at the college to take part in the march and rally. When the group moved into the street to begin its march, a Seattle police officer informed organizers that the parade permit had been rescinded because they had too few people. The police officer declined to provide any documentation explaining when or why the permit had been rescinded.

Prevented from marching in the street, the participants were forced to proceed on the sidewalk and stop at all the intersections. As a result, the October 22 Coalition was unable to march as a cohesive body since many participants were cut off from the larger group at intersection lights, limiting the march's effectiveness. Throughout the march, the police occupied at least one lane of traffic, thereby closing off the very streets the marchers were not allowed to use. In addition, a police officer grabbed a sign from a marcher and confiscated it, and the sign was never returned.

The lawsuit seeks an injunction barring the City from violating the rights of the October 22 Coalition. It also seeks a court ruling that Seattle's Parade and Special Events Ordinances are unconstitutional because they allow city officials and police to place arbitrary conditions on permits and to revoke them without notice.

ACLU cooperating attorneys Michael Ryan and Christopher Varas of Preston Gates & Ellis and ACLU staff attorney Aaron Caplan are handling the case.

From: "Doug Honig" Subject: ACLU Lawsuit Seeks To Protect Free Speech Rights of Marchers Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 14:55:09
. 23.Apr.2004 18:38


The police have the idea that they are a law unto themselves. It is time the people reminded them they are public servants and if they are not serving the public, then they should be removed.

DFGI 23.Apr.2004 20:28


Only in a Military Dictatorship do they think they are the law unto themselves.

why would the ACLU, or anybody 24.Apr.2004 01:46


even agree that marchers need a permit, or anything at all, in order to exercise such a basic right. This permit business is bullshit, and I am concerned about what the ACLU is doing by accepting the concept of a permit WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!!!!!!