LINEAGE CHARTS: The CLOSET CRIMINAL MINI-MONARCHY of American Presidents
welcome to your world, already in progress...to somewhere....
and you wonder why there is endemic organized crime protected in the world, when you have these interbred elites who keep themselves above the law? Look to your inbred leadership for why the world is screwed up.
IF YOU WANT AN ACTUAL DEMOCRACY, SPREAD AROUND WIDELY AND EXPOSE THEM.
DEMOCRACY IS A WORK IN PROGRESS, YET TO BE BORN.
Title: INTERVIEW w/Fritz Springmeier on trauma-based dissociative identity disorder[ ILLUMINATI ]
Date: 2004.04.06 08:16
Description: Good morning, welcome to the International Connection. This is show #35 in the radio series on Mind Control and over the next few shows we are going to be talking to Fritz Springmeier and Cisco Wheeler, co-authors of the "Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave" and "Deeper Insights", books about trauma based conditioning mind control. Fritz is a researcher about the Illuminati and minister to mind control victims. Cisco Wheeler says she is from a generational Illuminati family and that trauma-based mind control was perpetrated against her from birth. We will hear the interview with Cisco in a couple of weeks, and today we are going to hear an interview with Fritz Springmeier. Fritz talks about the Illuminati families and how they have used mind control to consolidate their power throughout history. You are listening to CKLN 88.1 FM. "...a large percentage of these people are programmed multiple personalities and just that in itself creates a whole different thinking pattern from those of us who are not multiple." [and later, information on the US (Illuminated) federal government's attempt to frame him and stop the publication of his second companion book...]
Bush Beats Gore in Presidential 'Blue Blood' Stakes
Updated 11:12 AM ET October 17, 2000
LONDON (Reuters) - If royal genes have anything to do with electoral success, then Republican U.S. presidential candidate George W. Bush will be the next man in the White House, Britain's blue blood bible said Tuesday. Burke's Peerage, a revered guide to the breeding of the aristocracy, said both Bush and his rival Al Gore are of royal descent, but investigations deep into their heritage show Bush has far more noble and royal connections.
Bush is closely related to every European monarch on and off the throne -- including the King of Albania -- and has kinship with every member of Britain's royal family, the House of Windsor.
He is a 13th cousin of Britain's Queen Mother, and of her daughter Queen Elizabeth and is a 13th cousin once removed of the heir to the throne, Prince Charles.
Bush's family tree can be documented as far back as the early 15th century.
He has a direct descent from Henry III and from Henry VIII's sister Mary Tudor, who was also the wife of Louis XI of France. He is also descended from Charles II of England.
"It is now clear that Mr. Gore and Mr. Bush have an unusually large number of royal and noble descents," said Harold Brooks-Baker, publishing director of Burke's Peerage.
"In point of fact, never in the history of the United States have two presidential candidates been as well endowed with royal alliances."
Brooks-Baker said there had always been a significant "royalty factor" in those who aspired to the White House, with Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Franklin and Theodore Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan, among others, all boasting blue blood links.
Democrat candidate Gore, who is currently lagging Bush by one point in opinion polls ahead of U.S. elections in November, has a less illustrious gene pool.
Being a descendant of Edward I, he is also a cousin of former U.S. president Richard Nixon, who resigned from the White House in 1974 for his part in the Watergate scandal.
But Gore does have direct links to the holy Roman Empire.
He is a descendant of Roman Emperors Louis II, Charles II and Louis I and is therefore also a direct descendant of Charlemagne -- the eight-century Emperor.
The problem is, Gore's Charlemagne links also make him a cousin of George W. Bush.
11/1/2000 - Archive
November/December 2000 Vol. 18 No. 6
Editor's Note: This article is one of two sidebars to "Give Your Pedigree the Royal Treatment: Researching Noble Lines" by Eugene A. Stratton, FASG. See also "Comments on Royal Descent."
When most Americans hear the word "queen" these days, they immediately think of Queen Elizabeth II of England, whose lengthy reign and media-hounded royal family make newspaper headlines all over the world daily. But Queen Elizabeth is not the world's only current, reigning queen—she's not even the only queen in Europe.
Currently, three queens reign in Europe, and a fourth is close to the throne. The four are: Elizabeth of the House of Windsor, Queen of the United Kingdom; Margaret of the House of Holstein-Glucksburg, Queen of Denmark; Beatrix of the House of Orange-Nassau, Queen of the Netherlands; and Victoria, the crown princess of Sweden, who will inherit the country's throne upon her father's death. Historically, this is a unique circumstance, but even more unique is the fact that they are all related.
The "millennium queens" trace their ancestry through three notable, sixteenth-century queens: Elizabeth Tudor of England; Mary of Guise, Dowager Queen Consort of Scotland; and Mary, Queen of Scots. All four are also descendants of Christian I, a fifteenth-century king of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. And the four all begin to trace their ancestry through King George II of England. Coincidence? Hardly. It all comes from the last millennium's frequent, political marriages between European monarchs. But the event, in its uniqueness, is certainly remarkable.
And if that connection is not enough for royalty aficionados, also of note is the fact that both English queens to bear the name of Elizabeth have succeeded to the throne at the comparatively early age of twenty-five. Elizabeth I was born in 1533 and gained the throne in 1558; Elizabeth II, born in 1926, succeeded in 1952, just before her twenty-sixth birthday.
To read more about the millennium queens and their ancestry, and to trace their lineages through historical figures of note, read Stephen Ash's article "Millennium Queens", from which this sidebar has been abstracted.
12/31/1999 - Archive
- Dr. Stefan Ash
Nothing that is unique in history can, by definition, be unremarkable. It can be unimportant, perhaps, uninteresting, possibly, but never unremarkable. In this new millennium, another unique event in the annals of history has almost been brought about. Currently, three, and possibly four, queens reign at the time in Europe. It is a circumstance that is, indeed, unique.
The three current queens are Elizabeth of the House of Windsor, Queen of the United Kingdom; Margaret of the House of Holstein-Glucksburg, Queen of Denmark; and Beatrix of the House of Orange-Nassau, Queen of the Netherlands. With a change of law in Sweden (first brought into operation on 1 January 1980), the eldest child of the reigning sovereign—irrespective of gender—can now succeed to the throne. Therefore, on her father's death, the Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden will inherit the throne rather than her younger brother, Prince Charles Philip. She would then become the fourth reigning queen (assuming none of the other died or were stripped of the monarchy).
But there is another unique circumstance connected with this: all four are related.
Connections With and Between Four Renaissance Queens
In the mid-sixteenth century, a fiery Scotsman of the reform faith issued an article that is known to history as, "The First Blast of the Trumpet Against a Monstrous Regiment of Women." The fiery Scotsman, John Knox, revealed that he thought a woman's place was in the home, not on a throne. His "first blast on the trumpet" was against four queens: Elizabeth Tudor of England (1558-1603), who never forgave him; Mary of Guise, Dowager Queen Consort of Scotland and widow of King James V, who held with difficulty the throne for her infant daughter; Mary, Queen of Scots; and Catharine de Medici (1519-89), Dowager Queen of France, widow of King Henry II, but queen de facto in the name of her sickly children.
Of these four blasted queens, three are direct ancestors of the millennium queens. The exception is Catharine de Medici. If her son, King Francis II, had had a son with Mary, Queen of Scots—his wife of eighteen months—then Catharine would have been an ancestress. As it was, Francis II died childless.
In England, Elizabeth Tudor, daughter of King Henry VIII by his second of six wives (Anne Boleyn), had survived a very uncertain childhood. The uncertainty stemmed from being branded a bastard, banished to Hatfield House, and force to live in virtual penury to being petted by her father, declared legitimate and in line of succession to the throne, and thus in favor. Surrounded by many self-seeking enemies during the reign of her half-brother King Edward VI (1537-53), she circumvented them. After her brother's death, Elizabeth survived the attempt to place the Lady Jane Grey on the throne in 1553 in preference to Mary Tudor. She also kept her head during "Bloody" Mary's perilous reign, but she spent part of the time in the Tower of London as a prisoner. Upon Mary's death, Elizabeth became Queen of England, just eleven years after the death of her father.
To continue with this web of royal connection, one should know that Elizabeth Tudor was also the niece of Margaret, sister of Henry VIII, who had married King James IV of Scotland in 1503. Thus, Queen Margaret (1489-1541) was both Elizabeth's aunt and the grandmother of Mary, Queen of Scots.
In making the connection between past and present, it is worth noting that both queens regnant of England to bear the name Elizabeth succeeded to the throne at the comparatively early age of twenty-five years. Elizabeth I was born in 1533 and succeeded to the throne in 1558, and Elizabeth II was born in 1926 and succeeded in 1952, just before her twenty-sixth birthday.
Catharine de Medici
In France, the uncouth, undereducated, and ultra shy Prince Henri (later King Henri II) had been forced into an arranged marriage with Catharine de Medici. Catharine was the daughter of Lorenzo, Duke of Urbino. Unfortunately, Henri was ruled by his mistress, Diane de Poitiers, to whom he had been deliberately introduced by his father, and Catharine suffered twenty-six years of humiliation, knowing that Henri only came to her bed on sufferance, at the behest of his mistress, and for dynastic reasons. Unhappy though this marriage undoubtedly was, Catharine produced ten children.
After the death of her husband in 1559, Catharine was able to cast her malevolence upon people and events. Feared by all and loved by none, she ruled France through her sickly offspring. One set of twins died in infancy. Her oldest son died at the early age of sixteen. History relates that she deliberately delayed sending for the doctors, thus causing his death. Her second son, Louis, died in infancy. Charles, her third son, was mentally unbalanced, if not completely mad. Her fourth son, Henri, was undoubtedly a homosexual, unacceptable in those days except in royalty. Her fifth son, Francis, was deformed, and her youngest child, Margaret, was little short of being a nymphomaniac. Of her other two children, both daughters, she married one, Elizabeth, to Mary Tudor's widower, King Philip II of Spain, and the other, Claudia, to the powerful Duke of Lorraine.
Mary of Guise and Mary, Queen of Scots
In turbulent Scotland, torn apart by religious factions and the constant incursions of the English across the Scottish border, the young king was having domestic problems. King James V (1512-32), son of Margaret, the sister of King Henry VIII of England, had buried his childless wife, Madelaine. Less than nine months later, he married Mary of Guise. Four years later, his wife produced a child—Mary, later known as Mary, Queen of Scots—but the king died, leaving Mary of Guise as regent in the name of their infant daughter queen.
Mary was born on December 7th, and her father died on December 14th. Within the first six months of her life, Mary survived several kidnapping attempts of warring religious factions. These mostly stemmed from hatred toward the co-regent, Cardinal Beaton. During the same period, England ravaged the country, the Cardinal was assassinated, and the gory battle of Pinkie took place, wherein the English narrowly missed capturing the infant queen. Eventually, still at a tender age, Mary, Queen of Scots, was shipped off to France to supposedly less dangerous territory; there she came under the evil influence of Catharine de Medici.
By the time she was eighteen, Mary, Queen of Scots, had been in turn Dauphine of France (Crown Princess) and, on the death of her father-in-law King Francis II, Queen of France and Scotland for a short eighteen months. She had seen her cousin Elizabeth Tudor ascend to the throne of England. She had also lost her own mother, become Queen Dowager of France, and witnessed firsthand the vengeful nature of her mother-in-law, Catharine de Medici. It was Catharine who had ensured that Mary was shipped back to Scotland to rule that turbulent country.
For Mary, the last twenty-seven years of her life were as eventful as her first eighteen. She made an ill-fated marriage with the handsome, but feckless Henry, Lord Darnley, by whom she had a son (subsequently King James VI of Scotland, who succeeded as King James I of England in 1603 on the death of Elizabeth Tudor). She then married Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, who was murdered in 1567—supposedly at the hands of the man Mary subsequently married, James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell, who was said to have raped the queen. After the murder of Darnley, the people rebelled. In 1567, Mary was captured, imprisoned, and forced to sign her abdication in favor of her infant son. She managed to escape her imprisonment in Lockleven Castle and fight a final battle against her subjects at Langside. Defeated, she fled to England and threw herself on the mercy of her cousin, Elizabeth Tudor. While imprisoned in England, Mary plotted against Elizabeth, who finally signed her death warrant. Mary, Queen of Scots, laid her head on the block at Fotheringay Castle in 1587.
Mary of Guise died in 1560, Mary, Queen of Scots, in 1587, and two years later the evil Catharine de Medici followed suit. Of the queens whom Knox had trumpeted against, only Elizabeth Tudor remained. She would linger on for another sixteen years and die unmarried and childless on 24 March 1603, thus bringing to an end the turbulent Tudor dynasty and uniting the two crowns of England and Scotland. Four months after Elizabeth's death, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, was crowned at Westminster Abbey as King James I of England along with his wife Anne of Denmark. History always refers to this first Stuart king of England as "The wisest fool in Christendom."
Ancient and Modern Relationships
With this background on four Renaissance queens, it is now possible to understand the common ancestry of the millennium queens. The present Queen of Denmark, Margaret, descends directly from the marriage of Frederick V of Denmark and the Princess Louisa of England. The present Queen of England, Elizabeth, is directly descended from Princess Louisa's father, King George II. George II descends from the marriage of King James I of England and through James VI of Scotland, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots. Mary, Queen of Scots, of course, was in turn was the granddaughter of the Princess Margaret, sister of King Henry VIII (father of Elizabeth Tudor).
The present Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands is also linked to Princess Louisa. Louisa's sister, Princess Anne, married Prince William of Holland. William, like his predecessors, held the title of Stadtholder of Holland (which, at the time, translated to governor or viceroy of Holland). It was not until the reign of this couple's grandson that Holland was recognized as a kingdom. That grandson became King William I of the Netherlands. The present Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands descends directly from the marriage of Princess Anne, and like Queen Elizabeth and Queen Margaret, she traces her ancestry back through King George II of England to Mary, Queen of Scots.
The common ancestry of the three then continues further back in history. King Malcolm III of Scotland (1031-93), known as Canmore, married as his second wife the Princess Margaret (1045-93), known to history as Saint Margaret, who was the daughter of Edward Atheling, the last Saxon prince. Their son, King Alexander I (1077-1124) married Sybilla (unknown-1122), the natural daughter of King Henry I of England (who was the son of William the Conqueror, the first Norman king of England). So the intermarriage between countries continued. And as if that wasn't enough, King Henry I (1068-1135) married Matilda (1079-1118), the sister of King Alexander (the son of the Princess Margaret and King Malcolm mentioned above). This king was the grandson of the first indisputable king of the Scots, Duncan I, who reigned from 1034 until his murder six years later. Thus, the line stretches back on the English (Norman) side through the Saxon line, during the course of which, although unrelated, three Danish Kings reigned in England (for more information, see the sidebar entitled "Danish Royalty in England").
The Swedish Connection
Should this millennium see a fourth queen regnant, it would be Victoria (1977-), Hereditary Princess of Sweden. In the past, the throne of Sweden has always passed to the oldest son, and only if a son is lacking has a woman succeeded. Having said that, keep in mind also that Sweden has been ruled by a woman only once. Queen Christina was born in 1626 and reigned as queen from 1632-54, when she abdicated and died in Rome in 1689.
Understanding Victoria's connection in the ancestry means learning a little Swedish history as well, and Sweden's history is a checkered one. Over the centuries, its kings have ruled over Norway and Denmark as well as Sweden. When Sweden finally gave Norway its independence in 1905, the people of Norway decided to retain a monarchy, and instead of choosing a Swedish prince as king, they went to Denmark. The choice fell on Charles, brother of King Christian X, who in taking a Norwegian name became King Haakon VII of Norway. This is significant because Haakon was married to an English princess: Maud (1869-1938), the daughter of King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra of Denmark. This marriage is the connecting point for Victoria and the other millennium queens (see the "Danish Royalty in England" sidebar for more information on these connections).
The Princess Victoria of Sweden also has a closer and more recent kinship to the Queen of England. Her great-grandfather, King Gustavas VI Adolphus (1882-1973), was married in 1905 to the Princess Margaret, daughter of the Duke of Connaught, son of Queen Victoria of England, who was a great-granddaughter of King George II. The Duke of Connaught was the brother of King Edward VII, who was the great-grandfather of Elizabeth II—thus the connecting point.
A Final Bond
There is one other common marriage bond between the four millennium queens. Philippa, daughter of King Henry IV of England, married King Eric VII of Denmark (see the "Danish Royalty" sidebar for this ancestral line). At the time, Eric was king of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. And although he was childless, his sister would continue the line. Her son became King Christopher III of Denmark and Sweden, and Christopher III married Dorothea of Brandenburg. Upon his death in 1448, Dorothea then married the next king, Christian I of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, from whom all four are also descended.
A Truly Remarkable Event
Thus, at least three and possibly four queens regnant—all of common ancestry—could be reigning sometime in the millennium. It is surely a unique event in history that shouldn't go unremarked.
"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC, Part Two
by Sherman H. Skolnick 10/7/01
Let a candid and vigilant populace consider my pleas and contentions. We ordinary Americans are being led, step by step, down the road to a dictatorship more evil and all-pervasive than that of the late Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party of the German aristocracy.
The high-level treason that afflicts us cannot be cured or delayed by the alleged "U.S. Government" as now constituted. Within our borders, traitors to the U.S. Constitution and to the Bill of Rights, and to the American common people, cannot be prosecuted. Without the consent of us, the governed, they are in charge, have been in charge, and will remain in charge, to the bitter collapse of our organic law. With complete impunity, they turn over our most profound industrial, financial, and MILITARY secrets, to sworn enemies of the United States of America, such as to Red China and Iraq [the Bush Family and Bill Clinton have done that].
It is a dire reality that my well-meaning country-men must now ponder and understand, or fail to do so at their peril.
The overthrow of the American Republic began at least at the time of the political assassination of John F. Kennedy. In violation of their own rules and procedures, the U.S. Secret Service, on behalf of the ruling plutocrats, utterly refused, failed, and neglected to protect Kennedy as President. They knowingly took him in an open car around a hair-pin turn into the target sights of paid assassins, firing by military-style triangulation. No Secret Service agent, contrary to their rules, was there on foot, on duty, to examine and monitor the dangerous slowing down of the Presidential vehicle. With flimsy excuses, several reputedly venal and for-sale reporters were right there, available in the murder zone, to be later rewarded for false reports, opening the way for their promotion to highly-lucrative TV network status, such as Dan Rather, later CBS Network anchor face, and Robert MacNeil, later PBS co-anchor and co-owner of his own network program with Jim Lehrer. Rather was standing in the shadows of the triple underpass bridge, a few feet from one of the concealed shooters. Rather was the only one on the planet to be able to verify that JFK had been mortally wounded as the Presidential motorcade passed right under Rather's view. MacNeil was in the Book Depository Building and was in a position to see Lee Harvey Oswald and give false data. [According to an FBI document of 11/29/63, the Elder Bush, already then in the CIA, was part of an apparent cover up of the assassination of JFK.]
If they survived, there were numerous eyewitnesses and reliable sources that could have contradicted the false declarations of reporters such as Dan Rather and Robert MacNeil, on behalf of the ruling elite, that a "lone assassin" murdered our President. In the wake of the bloody deed in Dallas, November 22, 1963, some 200 eyewitnesses and sources were themselves murdered, snuffing out their possible testimony, their demise a horror-filled death warrant warning to others available to testify.
On behalf of the growing American dictatorship of almost near faceless satraps, a five-person tyranny of the U.S. Supreme Court, sitting as if a junta, with serious conflicts of interest, installed George W. Bush as the "occupant" and "resident" of the American White House. This done, contrary to basic case law precedents and in violation of the Bill of Rights, it being a near-midnight-deadline ancient-style edict, "obey our command or be banished from the kingdom".
So even if the complicit members of the American aristocracy were somehow to be apprehended, which historically is highly doubtful, they would suffer no punishment. The federal prosecutors are selected on the basis of being blackmail-able and with the implicit understanding that they would go against primarily small fish, no one of any great importance. Even if traitors were put in custody, federal grand juries and U.S. District Court trial juries are carefully screened to eliminate independent-minded persons. The American Gestapo, the FBI, constituting part of the nation's secret political police, in most federal districts, select the pool from which grand jurors are selected, and hand-pick the venire, likewise the pool, from which trial jurors are chosen. In Chicago, for example, the supposedly all-seeing FBI selected a known gangster to sit on a federal grand jury for a number of months, corrupting and perverting the process, and he being supposedly part of investigating fellow mobsters. [The Chicago U.S. District Court case of U.S. versus Robert Girardi, not adequately reported by the monopoly press. A watered down story appeared in the Chicago Tribune, January 21, 1994, "Ex-U.S. Grand Jury Member Indicted In Leaking of Information".]
In its simplest explanation, we went to war in 1991 because George Herbert Walker Bush, then President, was disgruntled against his former private business partner, Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi strongman. [Visit our website story for details, "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".] Hussein was installed in the 1970s, in part at the time the Elder Bush was head of America's secret police. Some ten years after 1991, we went to war again because the former head of the secret police's son, George W. Bush, is disgruntled against HIS former business partners, the Bin Laden Family and their family member Osama bin Laden, falsely described as being on the outs with his family. Osama was, like Saddam Hussein, created by the American CIA, with the connivance of former Director of Central Intelligence, the Elder Bush, as Vice President and later as President, to engage in a war with the Soviet Union. The Soviets were worn out by this. This led, in part, to the downfall of the Soviet Union and the Moscow government. Also helping destroy the Soviet Union, to make them now a "friend" of the United States, was the CIA-orchestrated attack on the Russian ruble, which undermined the Soviet's financial validity. [See the book, "Thieves World" by Claire Sterling, Simon & Shuster, New York, 1994. Also, our website story, "Marc Rich and others Fingered By A Letter".]
Over the centuries, Afghanistan has been the graveyard of invaders. No prior army ever previously has succeeded against the tunnels, the mountains, the terrain. The American CIA has been instrumental, in the past, in helping the Afghans finance their way of life with growing poppies and being the supplier of upwards of sixty per cent of the heroin to Europe. With a large supply of heroin parked outside Afghanistan, the Afghans are in the works to flood heroin throughout the world AT HALF THE GOING PRICE. The Afghans resisted Unocal and others of the oil cartel, tied to the Bush Family, in putting a natural gas/oil pipeline through Afghanistan to Pakistan and to Red China. The Afghanis, in the view of the cartel, have been demanding too large a percentage as their cut for allowing the pipeline project to proceed. Hence, the oil monopoly needs to overthrow the Kabul government, install their own government, and proceed with the pipeline project. [A situation somewhat similar to the British Counter-Intelligence joint effort with CIA, in 1953, to overthrow the Iran elected government and arbitrarily restore, as a CIA puppet, the Shah to the Peacock Throne. When the Shah became difficult, in 1979 the CIA overthrew him, and installed a British Counter-Intelligence agent, Ayotollah Khomeini, to rule. George Bush worked a treasonous deal in 1980, to delay the release of 52 U.S. hostages, held by Iran, so as to make Jimmy Carter, running for re-election, appear to be a wimp. This benefited the Reagan/Bush election campaign. The hostages were released at the very moment Reagan/Bush were inaugurated in January, 1981. This treachery by George Herbert Walker Bush was dubbed part of "The October Surprise".]
British royalty put the Elder Bush into the oil business. [See, for example, "The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush" by Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaiken.] For laundering the proceeds of dope trafficking, oil deals, and weapons smuggling, the Bush Family has a joint account with the Queen of England in her private bank, Coutts Bank London. Through that joint account, hundreds of billions of illicit dollars are washed. [See our website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush" and the Bush Family's 25 secret worldwide accounts, together with the secret federal reserve wire transfer records that can be brought up on your screen from our website, showing the hundreds of billions of dollars.]
For almost 40 years, our group, the Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts, has successfully time and again fingered corrupt members of the state and federal judiciary. Our firm policy always has been to NEVER divulge eyewitnesses and sources, since the government is incapable of protecting them. As the Chairman/Founder of the group, I take the responsibility of confronting the judges to their face and have suffered the consequences repeatedly over the decades. The corrupt judges have demanded I divulge methods of investigation, witnesses, and sources, and when I refuse, invoking our policy, they have time and again put me, wheelchair and all, in prison, for contempt of court, a nebulous power that seems to be inherent in their black robes of office. Most every such judge, having falsely jailed me, later was sent to jail for bribery. An identified crook on the bench is no longer useful. No decent bagman will further bother to bribe them (a funny contradiction of terms). A crooked judge is thrown away like an old shoe, no longer capable of doing as told.
I have always tried to be fair even to known corrupt judges. I have made it our policy, that I or a close associate in my presence, asks the targeted judge to confess his crimes. I explain that this will save the taxpayers expense in getting rid of the judge by having to put him or her on trial and after conviction, sending them away. [The biggest judicial bribery scandal in U.S. history, touched off by us, is now the subject of a book, "Illinois Justice" by Kenneth Manaster, published September, 2001, by University of Chicago Press. The cover of the book with my picture on it is on the website, www.rense.com Click on my name on the side where it shows columnists.]
Will George Herbert Walker Bush confess his prior knowledge of the violence occurring on September 11, 2001? Will he admit that HE was running the country from in or near the White House on that tragic day? What provision, if any, of the U.S. Constitution, empowers the Elder Bush to have such a power? Will the Elder Bush confess openly his private business partnership which went sour with Saddam Hussein, being part of an unpublicized lawsuit in Chicago? [See our website series, "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh", giving the name and number of the litigation and other details. My exclusive details were in a populist paper, Spotlight, August 19, 1991.]
Will his son, George W. Bush, confess his private business partnerships with the bin Laden Family, including Osama bin Laden who is not that much on the outs with his family reportedly receiving tens of millions of dollars from them secretly? Will George W. Bush confess that he and HIS family have a huge financial interest with the oil cartel which wants to overthrow the Kabul government so the Afghanistan oil and natural gas pipeline project can proceed? Does the secret political police really know who all the hijackers were? Did they not use fake identification? Knowledgeable sources contend the violence of September 11, 2001, was part of a bloody internal struggle within the hierarchy in the United States. That it was done through surrogates that may not have known their handlers and patrons in the American aristocracy.
More coming. Stay tuned.
The Daddy Bush inauguration date is significant. He was started in the oil business in the 1950s by members of the British Monarchy. When the Queen visits the U.S., she boards and merges her horses with those of Bush's closest pal, handler of the Bush Family's secret trusts. [See details in "Unauthorized Biography of George Bush" by Webster .Tarpley.] Our website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush", has attached documents showing the Bush Family, through their secret fronts, has a joint account with the Queen of England, through her private bank, Coutts Bank, London, where hundreds of billions of dollars from illicit trafficking are laundered.
As the Journal's South Asia bureau chief, Danny Pearl was well aware that the Bush Family were greatly implicated with the massive flow of drug trafficking from the poppy production in Afghanistan to the ethnic Albanian traffickers masquerading as the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, who according to law authorities are flooding Europe with dope. Bush Family cronies in the American CIA have been supervising the KLA. [View our website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush" and the attached documents showing hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars being washed through a Bush Family joint account with the Queen of England at her private bank, Coutts Bank London.]
Like Danny Casolaro, Danny Pearl's fatal mistakes included the following ===Trusting the higher ups at the Journal, same ones that covered up for Dow Jones Director Carlos Salinas, to know what Pearl was working on as stories.
7. George Bush the Younger is directly implicated in the dirty work of Enron. Their four thousand offshore "partnerships", kept off the books and more or less "secret", laundered the proceeds of illicit dealings---dope trafficking, gold smuggling, weapons shipments to "terrorists"----done by the Bush Crime Family. [For documented links to the Bush Family's 25 secret worldwide accounts, see our website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush". Included there is the document, the Federal Reserve secret wire transfer, under the code of Fed Chief Greenspan, showing ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS laundered through the Bush Crime Family's joint account with the Queen of England at her private bank, Coutts Bank London. Recently, the Queen ordered a top official of her private bank to become an official of the Bush Family-linked Carlyle Group where Daddy Bush has been a paid consultant to the bin Laden Family, including Osama who is NOT on the outs with his family. "The Queen has a new bank manager, following the departure of Andrew Fisher, chief executive of Coutts, TO THE CARLYLE GROUP, the US private equity firm." Financial Times of London, December 19, 2001 (emphasis added.)
 Daddy Bush and his cronies run Carlyle Group, a secretive zillion dollar enterprise that has quietly gobbled up struggling and other firms in defense contracting, telecommunications, and aerospace work. As we have pointed out in our website series on Greenspan and Bush, with documents attached there, the Bush Family, to launder illicit funds in the hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars, has a joint account with the Queen of England at her private bank, Coutts Bank London. "The Queen has a new bank manager, following the departure of Andrew Fisher, chief executive of Coutts, TO THE CARLYLE GROUP, the US private equity firm". (Emphasis added.) Financial Times of London, 12/19/01.
In our website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush", we attached documents of secret Federal Reserve wire transfer records, showing the Bush Family, through their investment front Martwell, have a joint account with the Queen of England at her private bank, Coutts Bank London. The documents show the secret authorization code of Alan Greenspan, Fed Chief. One of the documents, showing the secret password used, listed the ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS transaction, shared by the British Monarch and the Bush Family, stemming from a clandestine private partnership of Daddy Bush and Saddam Hussein. [Subject of an unpublicized federal court case. See our website story, "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".]
The Persian Gulf conflict of 1990-1991, in its simplest form, was just, as we have shown, a falling out of disgruntled private business partners, Daddy Bush and Saddam Hussein. In 1991, Daddy Bush stole billions and billions of dollars of monies and assets belonging to Saddam, his former partner. These purloined funds were transferred to twenty five secret worldwide accounts of the Bush Crime Family. [Visit our extensive website series, "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush", where the secret Federal Reserve wire transfer records, showing Greenspan's and other secret codes, are attached and can be brought up on the screen. For example, one account shows ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS (partly traceable to assets and funds belonging to former business partner Saddam Hussein) were transferred to a joint Bush account that the Bush Crime Family had with the Queen of England in her private bank, Coutts Bank London. And notice how the Queen arranged for the head of her bank to leave and become a top official of Daddy Bush's purported war-mongering operation, the Carlyle Group, with an armlock on the American war weapons industry. "The Queen has a new bank manager, following the departure of Andrew Fisher, chief executive of Coutts, to the Carlyle Group, the US private equity firm." Financial Times of London, December 19, 2001.]
All excerpts 4-10 from Skolnick's ongoing historical review and political analysis, THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC
contribute to this article
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion