Condi lies: Sibel Edmonds back on TV at INN Report
http://www.radiofreeamerica.tv/video/2004-03-26/edmonds.jpg INN World Report, include a brandnew interview with ex-FBI Translator Sibel Edmonds, about her reaction on the testimony of Condoleeza Rice, plus quotes from Kyle Hence (911 Citizen's Watch) and 9/11 Widow April Gallop of Woodbridge, Va. "There was a failure to mention that mistakes were made. I didn't hear that."
Furthermore an Interview with ex-Pentagon Whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and two correspondents from Iraq: Dan Murphy (CSM) and Stephen Funk. Tun
e in at 6 pm EST at FreeSpeech TV (Network Channel 9415) or watch the stream from MNN (MNN on NY Cable, see mnn.org)
Top Story of the Day:
Memo warned of attack inside U.S. Newsday -
A month before Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush received an intelligence memo describing Osama bin Laden's interest in attacking the United States, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said yesterday.
..."Please don't filibuster me," Kerrey implored Rice, to no avail, noting that he had only 10 minutes for questioning.
...Henry Hughes of Smithtown, whose son Kris was killed in the World Trade Center, said after the hearing that Rice "didn't answer a lot of the questions," such as her reply, "I really don't remember" when asked if she had told Bush before Aug. 6, 2001, that al-Qaida operatives were in the United States.
BEN-VENISTE. Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the Aug. 6 P.D.B. warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that P.D.B.
RICE. I believe the title was Bin Laden Determined To Attack Inside the United States. Now, the P.D.B. -
BEN-VENISTE. Thank you.
RICE. No, Mr. Ben-Veniste -
BEN-VENISTE. I will get into the -
RICE. I would like to finish my point here.
BEN-VENISTE. I didn't know there was a point.
RICE. Given that - you asked me whether or not it warned of attacks.
BEN-VENISTE. I asked you what the title was. RICE. You said did it not warn of attacks. It did not warn of attacks inside the United States. It was historical information based on old reporting. There was no new threat information. And it did not, in fact, warn of any coming attacks inside the United States.