The Dem/Rep 9/11 Cover Up Conspiracy, Richard Clarke.
By Lloyd hart
As we have seen in the recent history of the United States of America when the conservative elites and their pals the U.S. military throw a temper tantrum like when they murdered president John F. Kennedy for not handing them Vietnam on the presidential silver platter Republicans come out swinging on the generals and Conservative elites behalf, Democrats feign opposition and vote complicity to cover up the crime so that the entire elite control of the U.S. economy foreign and domestic does not completely unravel as a result of the public actually using the levers of what available democracy there is in America.
This is why I am warning all those that have researched and are researching the truth around the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001 (9/11), do not put your hopes of getting at the truth openly and publicly in former terrorism czar Richard Clarke who recently testified before the 9/11 commission, that the Bush regime did not do enough to stop the 9/11 attacks. That had the Bush regime shook the intelligence tree hard enough they would have come up with two of the hijackers the FBI had tracked coming in to the U.S..
In reality, Richard Clarke is simply the New York Council on Foreign Relations answer to the vexing exchange of 9/11 Research over the Internet that has found the smoking gun, that North American Air Defense System (NORAD) Air Guard sized elephant sitting in the room of the 9/11 commission's public hearings last week that no one would acknowledge but yet was dropping elephant dung all over the two party criminal conspiracy to cover up what happened on September 11, 2001.
Instead of belaboring the facts around what the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has already testified to at the 9/11 commission concerning the failure of NORAD and the Air Guard to follow well established procedures in intercepting errant off course aircraft in North American airspace I would rather let a member of the British Parliament, a former member of Tony Blair's cabinet Michael Meacher explain what actually happened on 911. Michael Meacher published the following article in the mainstream British newspaper The Guardian last September which basically lays it all out.
Richard Clarke along with the corporate media and almost every Democrat and Republican in the United States has not once publicly mentioned the name of the former head of anti-terrorism in the United States who had become deputy director of the FBI's New York office in charge of national security, go to guy for Richard Clark and Bill Clinton throughout the '90s, senior FBI agent John O'Neil.
I have been waiting for over two years now for the evidence that was brought out very early by two French intelligence community researchers Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie' in their book "Forbidden Truth" published early in 2002 that has John O'Neil discussing in an interview with them his resigning from the FBI in protest because he was told by the Bush regime when it came to power, to back off Osama bin laden, back off Al Qaeda and back off the Taliban.
The many revelations in Brisard and Dasquie's book "Forbidden Truth" are too many to discuss here but the glaring omission of FBI Deputy Director John O'Neil, head of anti-terrorism investigations from the public discussions within the United States and its publicly mandated commission to get to the bottom of what happened on 9/11 reveals complicity of not just conservative elites but of liberal elites as well in a criminal conspiracy to cover up what actually occurred on September 11, 2001.
With Senator John Kerry recently swearing allegiance to unilateral military action in order to maintain U.S. economic control over the resources of the world's poorest nations both Conservative and Liberal elites can now accept his presidency. Especially now that the perception has been created thanks to Richard Clarke that both Clinton and Bush screwed up on terrorism and not just Clinton. So by framing the debate between Richard Clark and Richard Perle who were put on a Sunday political talk show circuit opposite of each other this week, the debate is no longer nor will it ever be "what happened on September 11th. 2001?" but rather "was Iraq the correct course for the war on terrorism?" as opposed to "is the war on terrorism simply just a front for U.S. military and economic global dominance which will also benefit Europe and Russia?" The end result being the same trade off as the Vietnam War after the generals murdered JFK, the generals and conservative elites get the war on terrorism, the liberal elites get their social, environmental engineering personal guilt trip boil lancing programs.
This elitist debate might not be of the greatest importance to the self imposed ignorant middle class's in the United States but they are to the world's poorest people. The reason being, that if the liberal and conservative elites in the U.S. and Europe are allowed to avoid their responsibility for leading us into the global environmental crisis we are now in as a result of their feudal control of the Global colonial economy over the entire history of the Industrial Revolution that crushed forests, erased wetlands, poisoned the air and water leading to a global Health crisis, the only future we can look forward to is one of war over what little resources are left. A war in which millions will die, between the world's rich and the world's poor over the collapsing global fresh water supply and the global food supply that relies on it.
The fact is with Russia being bought off by the U.S. reinstating Russia's $9 billion Iraqi oil contract Russia's extensive satellite and ground spying apparatus will most likely now look the other way while the Bush regime plants weapons of mass destruction albeit a small stash on Iraqi soil which will be found for a perfectly timed October surprise which will give the conservative elites the opportunity to out maneuver the liberal elites and keep the Bush regime in the White House. Because, as it turns out the capture of Osama bin laden will not matter anywhere near as much as the discovery of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Ironic isn't.
Oh, the webs the elites weave. The wars between the conservative and liberal elites have left behind a trail of blood a mile deep, a mile wide and all of history long. With the destruction of the world's resources and the creation of systemic poverty for the majority of the people that live on an earth that had no intention of anyone living in poverty, it is now time to democratize not which devil will dictate to the world from the White House but rather to democratize the world's food and fresh water supply for distribution to all life on this planet. This means the elites must back off from their conspiracies to maintain power or face their own extinction from the resulting war against the "war on terrorism." The rich always conspire to stay rich which means they will always conspire against democracy even if it means murdering their own people in their own nation states to do so.
In this day and age of the instantaneous free flow of information over the Internet and dwindling natural resources this feudal pattern cannot survive. And ironically if the elites shut down the Internet in order to maintain control the emotional reaction from Internet users will most likely result in the elite's extinction as much as maintaining control of the world's resources will. In other words, Catch-22 has been turned inside out in the 21st century.
The Alternative 9/11 Investigation: