portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

government | human & civil rights | political theory selection 2004

Exposing the Real Nader

I found this list of Nader article's at  http://www.jackblood.com/index/id1.html and thought it would bring healthy discussion on what is really going on
in this selection for the next resident, and who really does pull Nader's string's ?
Ralph Nader: A First Impression

"Nader put the greater of two evils in power. He split the vote so that the largest crime syndicate in history would have their muscle in the executive arm, and now the judicial as well. And he's being rewarded by the republicans for it. He's been invited to speak at their fund raisers (speakers get paid, eh?) and been praised highly by such persons as Phyllis Schlafly and Pat Buchanan."

 http://eschatology.crackapple.org/NaderThePIrG.htm


Ralph Nader Visiting Cuba

Former Green Party presidential candidate and consumer advocate Ralph Nader arrived in Cuba Sunday for a three-day visit - his first to the Communist nation.

 http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewForeignBureaus.asp?Page=%5CForeignBureaus%5Carchive%5C200207%5CFOR20020708e.html

Skolnick nails it: RALPH NADER and THE RULING CLASS
by Sherman H. Skolnick

It is no secret that Bush White House bagman and Rasputin, Karl Rove, is overjoyed that Ralph Nader has announced he is running on Third Party ticket for President. If not on the Green Party ticket, Nader may not even be on lesser state ballots, but no doubt will be shown on those necessary for the big fix favoring possibly Bush.

IS RALPH NADER AMERICA'S MOST PROTECTED AND CONCEALED "Agent Provocateur"? Using polished rhetoric to mislead those dumbed-down by the oil-soaked, spy-riddled American monopoly press? Retired spooks aver that Nader is a CIA weirdo provocateur. He appears to be part of the gay underground media and government cult, that includes George W. Bush and U.S. Senator John Kerry.

IS NADER JUST MORE BUSH WHITE HOUSE ELECTION INSURANCE? Is Nader part of "The Secret Agenda" to discredit the U.S. nation-state, put an end to Presidential elections, and create the Breakaway States of the disunited provinces of America? [That was one purpose of the Brits in turning the North versus the South, on the excuse of the "slavery" issue, in the U.S. Civil War, or "War Between the States".] AND TO RUN THIS LAND WITH AN EMERGENCY FASCIST PANEL, not a Presidency?

 http://cloakanddagger.ca/media/RALPH%20NADER%20by%20Sherman%20H.%20Skolnick.htm
and the 9.11 Perpetraters ARE NOT "Agent Provocateurs" ??? 26.Mar.2004 18:00

oh for goodness sake

Dire Wolf, concentrate on something worthwhile  http://www.verifiedvoting.org. you've been pretty good lately  http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/03/284064.shtml , but this is a complete waste of time.

CNS News and their John Birch/Jerry Falwell background and funding is definitely NOT a reliable source. as mentioned before on this site about that particular Skolnick reference: Skolnick is far more reliable and has better evidence/substantiation for the Bush Family Mob's death dealing machinations.

CLAIM:
"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the American people.''
- President Bush, 3/25/04 [Source  http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=1524]

FACT:
On August 6, 2001, President Bush personally "received a one-and-a-half page briefing advising him that Osama bin Laden was capable of a major strike against the US, and that the plot could include the hijacking of an American airplane."
- Dateline NBC, 9/10/02

 http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/September11.html

 http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/911bush.html

 http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/foreignwarnings.html


more like... 26.Mar.2004 18:06

laughing hysterically

This is more like who are Nader's detractors. Come on, Nader is a gay communist CIA agent? Good for a laugh but a "healthy discussion", I think not.

And Rove is overjoyed about Nader running. It makes it easy for him to distract gullible democrats away from election fraud, just as it did in 2000.

Dire Wolf 26.Mar.2004 18:12

jlii

Coming on here and attacking Nader. Isn't that something better left to a open publishing site?

this always gets me 26.Mar.2004 18:45

Sheepdog

the moron said
-" I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the American people.'' "-
and in his small acorn of a mind is is true as it is assumed that 'people' are those who own huge blocks of stock and live off their dividends.
We, on the other hand, are farmstock.

But isn't it obvious 26.Mar.2004 19:05

-

But isn't it obvious that "the American people" are a foreign entity to George W.? Farmstock, fodder, impetuous, emotional beings that must be conrolled and used... What makes them tick? GW doesn't know. But Karl does. Not that he sees us as human either.

I believe.... 26.Mar.2004 19:43

Tony Blair's dog

that the term is "useless eaters".

Nader 26.Mar.2004 23:34

George Bender

The next task is to get Nader on the Oregon ballot. To do that we need to get 1,000 registered voters together in one place at the same time. Join us on April 5, 6 p.m., Roseland Theater, 8 NW 6th Ave. It's free. If you're not already registered to vote you can register there.

 http://naderoregon.org/

new york 27.Mar.2004 00:19

slimharpo

Regarding the initial article, Bush did not say attack America, he said attack New York. I read this article earlier and it has been changed.

He had plenty of information that America would be attacked but can't be blamed for the specific attack on New York.

Pentagon 27.Mar.2004 01:09

kingbee

"He had plenty of information that America would be attacked but can't be blamed for the specific attack on New York."

--wtf???? what on earth is your point? the entire AP  http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=1524 article quotes Bush on "protecting America", "attacks on America" "make America safer" - says ___nothing anywhere___ about a specific city, it's all generalities.

if in fact the article's last sentence - where the phrase "strike America" may perhaps *according to 'slimharpo'* have been changed to "strike New York" - was altered in a previous version, it changes NOTHING about the context of numerous other citations of Bush's remarks on "protecting America".

oh 'slimharpo' - did they change the final part of that sentence to read " . . . I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the _____people of New York_____? you're going to have to specifically show us exactly what was changed in the article before we believe you.

New York is no possible excuse for anything. they [whoever 'they' were . . . ] also went for DC, hit the Pentagon, and apparently almost succeeded in getting Capitol Hill if Flight 93 hadn't been shot down.

it was an ATTACK on ____AMERICA___ (not just New York).

BUSH & CO. KNEW, and did nothing.

CLAIM:
"Had I known that the enemy was going to use airplanes to strike America, to attack us, I would have used every resource, every asset, every power of this government to protect the American people.''
- President Bush, 3/25/04 [Source  http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=1524]

FACT:
On August 6, 2001, President Bush personally "received a one-and-a-half page briefing advising him that Osama bin Laden was capable of a major strike against the US, and that the plot could include the hijacking of an American airplane."
- Dateline NBC, 9/10/02

 http://www.loompanics.com/Articles/September11.html

 http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/911bush.html

 http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/foreignwarnings.html