portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

actions & protests | corporate dominance | imperialism & war

Death and Birth in the Occupied Territories, by Starhawk

Sharon does not want peace. He wants the land, all of it..And if you find yourself in sympathy with that aim, be honest with yourself and recognize that to gain all of this land, the Palestinian people must be destroyed.
Death and Birth in the Occupied Territories
By Starhawk

On Death
First, a correction. Sheikh Yassin, assassinated on Monday by the Israeli military, was only 67 years old, not 92. That's the last time I take the word of an eleven year old informant!
Regardless of how old he was, regardless of his responsibility for deaths or his culpability in suicide bombings, regardless of whether you loved or abhorred him, assassinating him was morally, politically and strategically indefensible. If you make assassination a tactic in your political program, you become something vile, something that will taint every good you claim to stand for. However dangerous you might perceive Yassin's ideas to be, you can't destroy his ideas by killing him, you can only strengthen their appeal. You can't kill hate: you can only create more of it by killing. Had Sharon and company hired a PR firm to tell them how to create the ultimate Hamas martyr, they couldn't have done a better job: an old man, in a wheelchair, murdered coming out of a mosque after praying.
In fact, assassinating Yassin was not a program of security, it was a program of deliberate provocation, aimed not at gaining peace and safety for Israel, but at undermining any serious attempts at peace, negotiation, or concessions to the Palestinians. That is his pattern: any time another step toward peace is made, he stages another assassination or a provocation, and that takes care of the threat that he might actually have to give something up or make some meaningful concession.
Assassinating Yassin will surely bring death to Israelis. That means to someone like my cousin, who regularly studies at a Yeshivah, or to my friend Dana, newly pregnant, or to one of the young Israeli activists who are regulars at every demonstration against the wall. Hamas cannot be absolved of responsibility for those deaths, but neither can Sharon.
And the revenge that will inevitably come will surely draw reprisals. The Palestinians, who already have their freedom of movement restricted, their land and water resources confiscated, their economy destroyed, their houses regularly searched and trashed, their schools periodically closed down, their men arrested en masse, their women humiliated, their children terrorized, who have suffered three times as many deaths as the Israelis in this intifada, will suffer some more. That means the death of someone like my friend Hanin in Balata camp, young mother of a baby girl, or the young boy who thought Yassin was ninety-two, or the old man I stayed with in Rafah who urged me to "Eat, Eat!" in the same tones my grandmother used.
And it means the death of any possible new round of negotiations, any peace process, any road map. Be clear: Sharon does not want peace. He wants the land, all of it. The assassination of Yassin was a move on his part to gain the land. And if you find some part of yourself in sympathy with that aim, be honest with yourself and recognize that to gain all of this land, the Palestinian people must be destroyed. The name for the destruction of a people is genocide, and the assassination of Yassin was part of that policy. Not the overt genocide of gas chambers and mass executions, but the slow starvation of everything that furthers the life of a people, the constant attrition of a killing here and a killing there, the unrelenting pressure to pick up and leave a land that is held like a prison.

For three days everything was shut down in Ramallah, stores closed, cafes shut tight, streets empty. On the third day, the walls of the town were covered with Yassin's shahid poster. When someone dies in the struggle here, in whatever way, a child shot by soldiers or a fighter gunned down in a clash, the family or the political organization he or she belonged to makes a martyr poster. Hamas has made one for Yassin that depicts him in glowing white, flanked by two black silhouettes of armed men. In Arabic it says, "We accept the challenge."

On Birth
Because of the assassination of Sheikh Yassin, my friend Neta couldn't go to her brother's wedding in Tel Aviv. Neta is married to a Palestinian, Nizar, who cannot legally be in Israel proper. Neta, as an Israeli, cannot legally be in the West Bank, but she lives here anyway. In calm times there are ways Nizar might come to a family occasion safely but these days everything is tense, roads are closed, and it seems too risky. Our trainings for this week are also postponed as no one can get out of Nablus or Jenin so our trainees can't come. Also they are afraid that Hamas will take revenge for the Sheikh and Israel will avenge the revenge and tanks will roll back into Ramallah, and they could get stuck here We've postponed the trainings until next week, although there's no guarantee the situation will be better and it may well be worse. In the meantime, although I can feel Neta's frustration and disappointment at not being able to be with her family, it turns out to be fortunate that she doesn't go. For in mid-morning, her water breaks and she begins to get mild contractions. We've been worried that the baby is late: the doctors she's seen have been making noises about inducing labor, and she very much wants to have a natural childbirth, so this is good news.
We spend the day walking. Walking helps bring on the contractions. We walk around the shuttered town, looking for stores with their doors open a crack where we can slip in and buy food. We go out later with Nizar and their one-year-old daughter, Nawal, who is truly adorable, one of those happy babies who finds life delightful and funny, laughs a lot, and waves bye-bye on every occasion.
On the outskirts of Ramallah are terraced hills still planted with olives, some of them so ancient they are called "Romim", Roman. Olives can live for a couple of thousand years, and some of these have trunks so braided, swollen and thick that they could indeed have seen Herod pass by, or Jesus climb these hills. I put my hands on one of them, thinking that these trees have seen empires come and go, have seen betrayal and brutality and assassination, and still they endure. Someone long ago carved this terrace, stacked these stones one on one atop each other, carried the weight of each stone on his back and placed them with his hands, and the stones endure. Pink cyclamen and wild iris and tiny, magenta orchids peek out from among them, returning to bloom in the spring as they have always done. And though we all feel as if we're waiting in the pause, the indrawn breath, that will blow the candle of the world out, maybe this empire too will pass and the beauty and the blossom yet endure. Neta's contractions grow stronger, she pauses and leans on Nizar: a new life is about to be born and who could not feel hopeful, in spite of everything?
We return back to Neta's house. Her friend Ream comes to watch Nawal, and Nizar goes to fetch the midwife. She is an older woman, dressed in a long coat and headscarf, and she has a beautiful, strong face. Ream and I find her a bit intimidating: clearly the housekeeping and the appointments of this house are not quite up to her expectations. I've put Neta in a warm bath to relax and Um Ali, the midwife, takes the one chair in the house into the main room and prays. Neta and I have had a running competition for the chair all week: between her nine-months pregnant bulk and my bad knees neither one of us is all that happy on the floor. But we're very good, we don't fight, in fact we keep politely offering it to each other. "You take the chair." "No, no you take it." Neta and Nizar have actual furniture but it's in Nablus, where they used to live, along with boxes of baby clothes It's simply not possible to transport furniture between cities in the West Bank, because of the checkpoints and the roadblocks.
But now, clearly, the midwife needs the chair. She tells me to tie my hair back. Something about my hair is deeply disturbing in this culture where women keep it covered—probably the fact that there's so much of it and it's so fluffy and wild. I somehow don't think she likes me much, but after I find a rubber band and pull it back into a rough French braid, she nods approval.
She sets up a birth bed for Neta on the coffee table, spreads some plastic, requisitions some old clothes and towels, and Neta comes out of the bath and into full labor. Nizar and I both support her, rubbing her back, sitting behind her so she has something to lean on. Um Ali, from time to time, rubs her belly in clockwise circles while whispering verses from the Koran. I am murmuring my own prayers to birth Goddesses but do so quietly as I'm not sure how much English Um Ali understands and she's already a bit scandalized. Nizar goes off to put Nawal to sleep. He's a wonderful father, patient, affectionate, nurturing and kind, and it's a very beautiful sight to see him holding the baby on his knees, patting her and singing in a low croon as she drops into sleep I don't know if he's typical, but in the patriarchal culture, he nurtures the baby, cooks us food, does dishes, cleans the house, and grows window boxes full of plants wherever they have room, dreaming of compost bins and gardens.
Labor always seems endless but hers is not long, as births go. Um Ali tells her to push, and I hold her from behind, Nizar from in front, as the hard, painful work begins. Somehow I sense I've now slipped into Um Ali's favor. We are all working together, calm and strong, and Neta is a lion, roaring and pushing and moaning and bearing down, until that great moment of transformation occurs, and the shape in her stomach becomes a wrinkled prune of a skull that squeezes through the gates of life and blossoms into a new human being. A beautiful baby girl, named Shaden, who fills her lungs with air, cries, looks up alertly and smiles at me. I know newborns don't smile, but I swear she does.

www.starhawk.org < http://www.starhawk.org/>
Starhawk is an activist, organizer, and author of Webs of Power: Notes from the Global Uprising and eight other books on feminism, politics and earth-based spirituality. She teaches Earth Activist Trainings that combine permaculture design and activist skills, and works with the RANT trainer's collective, www.rantcollective.org < http://www.rantcollective.org/> that offers training and support for mobilizations around global justice and peace issues.
These updates will be posted on her website, www.starhawk.org < http://www.starhawk.org/> , on the Utne Reader website, www.Utne.com < http://www.Utne.com/> , and Awakened Woman,  http://www.awakenedwoman.com/


To get Starhawk's periodic posts of her writings, email  Starhawk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net <mailto: Starhawk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net> and put 'subscribe' in the subject heading. If you're on that list and don't want any more of these writings, email  Starhawk-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net <mailto: Starhawk-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net> and put 'unsubscribe' in the subject heading.

*** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes***
Why Brutal Killing ?? 26.Mar.2004 11:33

Kim Sky

Excerpt ... "I believe that this brutal killing is the major escalation that will
ultimately lead to an attempt by Mr. Sharon to kill or forcibly expel the
majority of Palestinians from historic Palestine."

Good analysis of situation in article included here ...

Peering into the Abyss
March 23, 2004

by William J. Thomson, Ph.D.
( wthomson@umich.edu)
Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

It is impossible to imagine a more provocative act than yesterday's
assassination of Sheik Ahmed Yassin by Ariel Sharon's government.

The response to this action is absolutely predictable and well understood by
Mr. Sharon, and it is totally consistent with his policies and actions
over the past several decades.

I believe that this brutal killing is the major escalation that will
ultimately lead to an attempt by Mr. Sharon to kill or forcibly expel the
majority of Palestinians from historic Palestine.

Many military campaigns begin with a feint, and clearly Mr. Sharon's
February statement to unilaterally evacuate Gaza may be seen in that
light. To raise a glimmer of cautious hope among a humiliated and
repressed Palestinian population, and then to crush it by brutally
assassinating the single person who many Palestinians, especially those in
Gaza, recognize as THE symbol of their struggle, virtually guarantees the
violent Palestinian response that Mr. Sharon will use as the justification
for ethnic cleansing.

It did not have to be thus. Repeated overtures by the Arab League, leading
Palestinians and even Sheik Yassin himself offered significant concessions
to Israel as a basis for a peaceful and just resolution to this struggle.
Many years ago I received assurances from significant figures in HAMAS
that a resolution of the conflict similar to that proposed a year ago by
the Arab
League would lead to settlement. Yet Mr. Sharon and a majority of the
Israeli public consistently dismissed these overtures in the most derisive
terms.

Faced with ageing and charges of political corruption, but most importantly
recognizing the demographic reality of a majority Palestinian population in
Israel/Palestine within a few years, Mr. Sharon has chosen to fight the
battle now, on his terms, rather than allow even the possibility of a
negotiated settlement. To not recognize Mr. Sharon's genocidal plan, and
his ruthless repression of those who have toiled with nonviolence to
provide an alternative vision, is simply pathological denial.

And what of America in this process? It is naive in the extreme to assume
that we will emerge unscathed from this coming conflict, and I hold the
American political and Jewish establishment to be primarily responsible
for any actions directed at American citizens. I know that I will be
labeled anti-Semitic for this statement (as have all of us who have in
some way placed our bodies on the line to help resolve this conflict), but
there comes a time when it is crucial to speak truth to power. Without
the unstinting support of the American Jewish establishment and its
stranglehold on the American political process in all matters involving
Israel, the decades-old occupation of Palestine and the humiliation of its
people could not have occurred. Let me be perfectly clear--the efforts of
AIPAC and its supporting American Jewish establishment (including those
who could, but have neglected, to thwart this process), and the craven
thirst for power of American political figures who allow themselves to be
manipulated by this body, will ultimately be held accountable for their
actions, with consequences to horrible to contemplate.

Can anything be done at this point to prevent this catastrophe? Can
Palestinians restrain their humiliated compatriots who are calling for
violent revenge? Can moderate Israelis and American Jews find the
strength to confront their own self-destructive establishment? Can
American politicians and Mr. Bush summon sufficient courage and foresight
to deal with the issue? And can American citizens do anything other than
sit idly by?

Sadly, I think not. The bullet has been fired--can it yet be deflected?

You idiots 28.Apr.2004 11:13

Realist

Yassin was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of innocent men, women, and children. He was the founder and leader of an organization whose declared mission was the elimination of the state of Israel and the genocide of the Jews. By his actions he was a legitimate target.

The Palestinians will never know peace until they accept the right of the Israelis to live in peace in Israel. Unfortunately, too many will never accept this, and in their irrational anger cause the very pain and suffering for their people that they claim to be trying to eliminate.

A political or military leader of a group that has embraced violence is a legitimate target for elimination/assassination. Would targeting Hitler specifically have been immoral? Of course not! Ditto for Saddam Hussein, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Mao (who was responsible for killing more innocent people than any other person in the history of the planet), etc.

Evil exists. Sometimes bad people who hurt and kill other people need to be killed, because that one death will prevent the deaths of thousands or millions. That is not a pleasant fact, but it IS a fact. The world isn't your friendly suburban neighborhood, it's a planet where most people have no protection of law and live by the rule of fang and claw.

You foolishly naive people who refuse to accept reality, who think that by wishing something were so makes it so, who think that by standing around and chanting "We shall overcome" that peace will come to the world are part of the problem. Blacks didn't get civil rights because of peace protestors, they got them because outraged people sent National Guard TROOPS down to Alabama and Arkansas to ENFORCE THE LAW by gunpoint if necessary. Genocide wasn't stopped in Europe by prayer vigils and protests, it was stopped by sending in ARMED TROOPS. Do you know what happens when you throw a war and no one shows up? One side DOES show up, like the Khmer Rouge, and slaughters millions of innocents, or like the Hutus in Rwanda who murdered 500,000 innocent Tutsis in 100 days.

Fighting for peace is possible... just ask Hitler (oops, after we fought Nazi Germany to a standstill he killed himself). Just ask Tojo. The only lasting peace comes after an overwhelming victory. That's what we need in Iraq, and against Al Quaida.