portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

corporate dominance | economic justice | government

Corporate crackdown my ass

Martha Stewart apparently too cute to go to jail.
Had she been found guilty of deceiving investors in her company, Ms Stewart could have faced a 10-year jail term.

The other four charges, arising from alleged insider dealing in shares in a friend's firm, each carry a five-year maximum sentence.

The defence rested on Wednesday without testimony from Ms Stewart.

Closing arguments will take place on Monday and Tuesday, and then the jury will start considering a verdict.

Bad news

The decision of Judge Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum to drop the worst charge stemmed from discussions with lawyers from both sides about what instructions she would give the jury.

In a 23-page ruling, she said the government had fallen far short in trying to press the charge.

"The evidence and inferences the government presents are simply too weak to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal intent," she wrote.

Ms Stewart - and her former broker, who faces five charges of his own - are alleged to have lied to investigators when asked about the sale of almost 4,000 shares in drug firm ImClone in December 2001.

A day later, a negative government report on the firm's key cancer drug saw its shares plummet.

The firm's founder, Sam Waksal, has admitted to insider trading and is in jail.

Prosecutors allege that Ms Stewart was phoned by her broker to tell her about the impending bad news ahead of its release, triggering her decision to sell.
It's always helpful to provide an original 27.Feb.2004 12:00


for reposts:

Who did she have to pay off! 28.Feb.2004 13:20

Connect the dots!

In order to have the main charge droped.