portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

government

Fury at Bush rises to furor unheard before

Fully a quarter of Americans - mostly Democrats - tell pollsters they have a very unfavorable opinion of the president, more than double the number from last April. When only Democrats are polled, more than half report they feel that way.
Register-Guard
February 23, 2004


Fury at Bush rises to furor unheard before
By Nancy Benac
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president. In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could beat President Bush.

A subtext to this year's presidential campaign is the intense anger that many Democrats are directing toward Bush, an attitude that has been growing in recent months.

``I've never seen anything like it,'' says Ted Jelen, a political science professor at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas. ``There are people who just really, really hate this person.''

Fully a quarter of Americans - mostly Democrats - tell pollsters they have a very unfavorable opinion of the president, more than double the number from last April. When only Democrats are polled, more than half report they feel that way.

Further, in exit polls conducted during Democratic primaries, a sizable chunk of voters have been describing themselves as not just dissatisfied with Bush but outright angry - 51 percent in Delaware, 46 percent in Arizona and New Hampshire, 44 percent in Virginia and Wisconsin.

``They really have a head of steam up against Bush,'' said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. He said the level of political polarization surrounding Bush, the division between Republicans who favor him and Democrats who don't, exceeds even that for President Clinton in September 1998 during the impeachment battle.

A substantial number of independents who voted in the Democratic primaries expressed anger at Bush as well, exit polls found. For example, almost half of independents in the Delaware primary said they were angry, and about four in 10 in Virginia, Arizona, Iowa and New Hampshire. In Wisconsin, one in 10 of the Republicans who voted in the primaries said they were angry at Bush, and more than twice that many said they were dissatisfied.

Plenty of presidents have generated intense feelings, of course, but Democrats - and even some Republicans - think the phenomenon is outsized this year.

``I've never seen a Democratic Party more unified and more focused, and the anger helps do just that,'' GOP pollster Frank Luntz said. ``The intensity level is just so high. They're using four-letter words to describe him.''

In a recent focus group that Luntz conducted for MSNBC, technicians had to adjust the volume levels because the Bush-haters were ``so gosh-darn loud'' they were drowning out the president's supporters, who were more numerous, Luntz said. ``It was a real problem.''

Bush was asked about the anger in a recent interview on NBC and said he found it perplexing and disappointing. ``When you ask hard things of people, it can create tensions. And heck, I don't know why people do it,'' he said.

His campaign spokesman, Terry Holt, dismisses the anger as something stoked by Democratic presidential candidates and confined to core party activists. He said it also reflects Democratic frustration at Bush's success in pushing through his agenda.

Political analysts say the intensity of the anti-Bush sentiment could translate into higher turnout by mobilizing the Democratic base.
typical corporate media garbage 23.Feb.2004 18:00

and it's time to take it out

I was going to pick this apart, but realized, what's the point? The people that can't see this for what this is aren't going to learn now.

I do have to point out one thing though. I was going to go into the difference between anger and hate until I saw "a political science professor at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas." Then realize with credentials like those this person really probably couldn't tell the difference.

Notice that "Bush-haters" is not in quotes; journalism so shoddy I wouldn't even wipe my ass with it.

don't know why you'd take Dr. Theodore Jelen to task 23.Feb.2004 18:44

with your nasty swipe?

I read the article, and find nothing wrong with it. It accurately informs as to
the REALITY facing Bush. As for your groundless swipe at Dr. Theodor Jelen, the
Professor of Political Science @ UNLV, I'm outraged at that, for I studied under
him for few courses when I was at UNLV. The guy is superb, and what a lot people
don't like about him is the fact he actively encourages CRITICAL THINKING and a
THINK FOR YOURSELF approach, rather than opting for standardized mainstream media
and government feed Pablum in his students. Most who study under him are outraged
at first, but soon calm down and realize what he is doing, then they begin the
actual process of "learning".

Perhaps this nasty swipe was made by failed Professor of Political Science that is jealous of Jelen? Makes sense, as there a lot who aren't anywhere near his
league, as they're just government elitist toadies through and through, though
they hide behind a thin veneer of "radicalism" to mask their motives! Too bad!!