portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting united states

corporate dominance | government | imperialism & war selection 2004

Faux News Says Nader Is In

Faux News Says Nader Is In
Faux News Says Nader Is In


 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,112049,00.html

homepage: homepage: http://dadapop.com

Hehehe 20.Feb.2004 16:37

Tony Blair's dog

Go Nader!!

Make'em suck eggs!

Time for a change! 20.Feb.2004 16:55

Rhinocratic

The Democrats should drop out. They are spoiling Naders chance.
It's time for an alternative to the one party system!

Biafra 2008! 20.Feb.2004 20:11

Sephiroth

Okay so I may end up voting Kerry this time around just to get the fascists out of the White House...but if Kerry looks like he's gonna have a land-slide victory then I'll wait for the last minute to determine whether it is "safe or not" to vote Nader.

Meanwhile we have four years to work on getting a strong Jello campaign. Now THAT would be something that would shock this nation in heresy... hehehe...

Hooray, I don't have to write in William Shatner! 20.Feb.2004 20:13

woo hoo

'Nader to announce Sunday whether he'll run for White House'
 http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/4620969.html

This article is a little different. The faux news article hardly mentioned Nader. This one is chock full of sour grapes:

[ Calling Nader "egomaniacal," veteran Democratic strategist Dane Strother said the independent would "have the same impact he had last time. He would hand the presidency to George Bush." ]

Again, thier message is always: "vote against this person, vote against that person", blah blah. The war? Get over it...blah blah

Well, if he really is running, he's got my vote. And I thought I was going to have to write in some goofball or my mom or something.

Them democrats CAN have my vote if they want... They only need seupply a candidate that I can vote for, not an excuse to vote against.

Nice! 20.Feb.2004 22:27

Young Culture man

Perectly said.
We all know that we want somebody that's gonna actually do some good.
I hope he comes out with both barrels blazing.

Nader 20.Feb.2004 23:55

explore

click


Inquiring minds want to know.... 21.Feb.2004 09:12

Mamabahama

I sure would like to know why Nader is not speaking about the inconsistencies in the official 9-11 story. I sure would like to know why his run in 2000 resembled CIA backed election campaigns in other countries (shore up the opposition to populist leaders). I sure would like to know why Nader didn't help Rodney Stich speak out against government/FAA corruption. I sure would like to understand Nader's connection to so-called law firms, many of whom have connections to the CIA. Yeah, I sure would like some answers to these questions because I voted for him last time, but the more I read, the more QUESTIONS I HAVE!!!

Inquiring Minds Say "Mamabahama" = DISINFORMATIONALIST TROLL. 21.Feb.2004 15:06

m

check 'her' out on this thread

 http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/02/280911.shtml

where she blathers the same garbage about Nader' "CIA connections" (as though Kerry and Bush haven't done enough with their own *real* ones)

"sure would like to know why Nader didn't help Rodney Stich speak out against government/FAA corruption"

--FALLACIOUS COMPARISON--Ralph is a muckraking corporate reformer/lawyer, and doesn't have the CIA/intelligence community experience or connections that former CIA airline pilot Stich has - they practise two completely different forms of activism. When's Rodney Stich gonna help stop oil drilling off the coast of Florida or enforce seat belt/safety regulations with auto manufacturers?

as I said on that article thread - use your overactive imagination to research and expose the *REAL* CIA connections of Bu$h & Co., Kerry & Co., BCCI, Enron, 9-11, which are the real crimes against humanity.

and what happened to all of your "divide and conquer" talk on the other thread, "Mamabahama" ? Perhaps a little too close to WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY DOING ON THIS SITE?

United Liars of America
United Liars of America
read this book (author:  Pete Brewton)
read this book (author: Pete Brewton)

Har-de-har! 22.Feb.2004 07:30

Mamabahama

I had to laugh when I read the above comment! I am a lowly social worker who voted for Nader last time, and I am sure not going to vote for Kerry this time, or Bush for that matter. I just think the system is so corrupt at present that it is no longer going to matter who you vote for. Are you SURE Ralph's run isn't connected to the CIA? How can you be so positive? Have you read "Defrauding America" Are you up on all the 9-11 inconsistencies? WHY IS RALPH NOT SPEAKING ABOUT THE 9-11 FRAUD ISSUE? I really want to know. At this point, I don't trust anyone in politics. Like I said, I will probably write in Cynthia McKinney, or Mike Ruppert, or Catherine Austin Fitts. These people are true activists who are trying to do something about the system. I am just not so sure about Ralph any more. I might change my mind if he starts addressing government corruption, and starts questioning all these so-called suicides which have befallen the enemies of the neo-cons, but my guess is he won't do that, because he sticks to "safe subjects" just like the so-called progressive magazines. BTW, I have changed my political affiliation to anarchist, just so you know. The system no-longer works any more, in my humble opinion.

Mamabahama - Troll/Anarchist/WHO THE FUCK CARES. 22.Feb.2004 18:23

m

"BTW, I have changed my political affiliation to anarchist, just so you know. The system no-longer works any more, in my humble opinion."

--then why are you *BOTHERING* to comment on this thread, and to bring up Red Herrings about Ralph?

it's not UP TO ****HIM**** to raise questions about 9-11:

_______________IT'S UP TO YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!__________________

"just think the system is so corrupt at present that it is no longer going to matter who you vote for. Are you SURE Ralph's run isn't connected to the CIA? How can you be so positive?"

--uuuhhhh, you just FALLACIOUSLY CONTRADICTED YOURSELF - if it "is no longer going to matter who you vote for", then why does Ralph - or any independent candidate - matter whatsoever??? and WHAT THE FUCK do you mean by "connected to the CIA" when there's MUCH MORE BLATANT EVIDENCE OF THAT with Bu$h/Kerry?

we already KNOW FOR A FACT that Bu$h's run in 2000 resembled CIA backed election campaigns in other countries, and about his connections to the Mafia/CIA/BCCI in Texas and Florida (read Pete Brewton's book for starters).

I know the book "Defrauding America" and who Rodney Stich is, that's an extremely important component of overall work to expose the power elites. As pointed out above Nader works from a different angle on different issues, mostly just as essential. I don't personally give a fuck what Ralph Nader does/says election-wise at this stage of his career, and as we all know either Bu$h or Kerry Bones will 'win' the 'Selection'. this isn't an "endorse Ralph" thread -

but it certainly shouldn't turn into a *Let's Start New Totally Unfounded Rumors About Ralph* thread, especially when there's PLENTY of stuff for McKinney/Ruppert/Stich/Fitts/YOU AND ME to investigate about the CIA, Skull & Bones, 9-11 and all the rest of it!!! (Ralph sure ain't gonna "save" us from all that at this point . . .)