Ask a 9-11 Researcher, "why remove transponders? & QUEUE EFFECT THEORY/DATA
author: repost
Dear Ask a 9-11 Researcher:
"How and why was the transponder in all four planes disabled?"
|
first check out the video link for the overture, then join us below
Ask a 9-11 Researcher, "why remove transponders? & QUEUE EFFECT THEORY/DATA 05.Feb.2004 17:53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ad nauseum
Dear Ask a 9-11 Researcher:
"How and why was the transponder in all four planes disabled?"
I'm unsure. My ideas are that it would be simulteneously
(a) EASIER TO SEE: easier for NORAD to know where the attack planes are (as they would still be visible by radar as the only planes in the air without the "IFF" beacon), easier to monitor progress of the standdown when there are literally thousands of planes in the air in the United States.
(b) FOR SUBSTITUTIONS: removing the IFF beacon removes the planes name and altitude height, though it is still visible on any radar clearly. It would simply be an unidentified blip instead of an identified blip. This 'blank blip' framework can allow potential substitutions by flying under/above the skyjacked planes so that their radar signals merged. It allows original planes to either land somewhere (likely only AA77 was landed somewhere in Ohio, as clinton appointee of FAA said when she reported that AA77 "was going down and likely crashed!"-- this story of course was entirely down the Memory Hole in a few minutes.). (SIDENOTE: If AA77 lands and its Pentagon black op's personnel survive (and its actual civilian passengers are killed immediately then sent to the "Pentagon morgue" to be given fake death certificates/autopsies like what happened in Waco. Fake autopsies. Hey! By the way, the very same two autopsy cover up artists of Waco were used in the Pentagon hit, by the way. Obviously they proved their worth in the mid 1990s and in 2001.
THE QUEUE EFFECT
(c) queue effect: There is in my studied opinion a 'queuing phenomenon' that shows a similar small 5 minute or less gap between a period where a plane would be a "definte hit coming up" and the next planes transponder going off, or the next plane taking off the ground. When IFF beacons go off is always right after the previous one is about to hit, (as in the case of UAL175's IFF going off right before WTC1 is hit with "AA11"; or "AA77s" IFF going off right before the substitution). The strikes in my opinion all follow a pattern of definite PRIORITIES for the order and location of the hits though little else was decided beforehand in terms of planes to do the hits. Well, perhaps the unscheduled-for-that-day AA77 plane was more hardwired, though at least I would say that the first, second, and fourth plane were more open.
For example it was only barely right before WTC1 was hit, that the WTC2 plane hit (unscheduled for that day, UAL175) was taken off its transponder. Moreoever, a bit earlier, it was right as (unscheduled for that day) AA11 stopped communicating with ATC that scheduled-for-that-day UAL175 takes off. Both of these planes come from Boston Logan.
And like telekenesis--at another airport: Once 'second-hit' UAL175 takes off (remember, exactly when unscheduled-for-that-day 'first hit' AA11 begins to lose communication with ATC), it was only minutes later at Dulles Airport that unscheduled-for-that-day AA77 takes off, only when UAL175 is assured. The AA77 is more hardwired to a certain target, because it is definitely to be the Pentagon alibi plane for (according to one eyewitness) the "cruise missle with wings" that plowed into the Pentagon). It was important that WTCs be the first two hits for the alibi with the Pentagon hit being a later hit instad of a first hit, so it waited until both the WTC1 and WTC2 planes were in the air and set. The fourth plane UAL93, following this queue, presumably takes off 40 minutes late (though there may be a discrepency between BTA data and actual take off time in this case). However, this 40 minute stall time on the ground was less than five minutes before the unscheduled-for-that-day 'first hit' AA11 hits the WTC1, which allowed the UAL175 definitely to hit the WTC2. Another option that would hold to the queue theory would be that perhaps the UAL175 was hardwired to the WTC2 hit, instead of it still being undecided. It was still designed to be in a temporal queue to make sure that unscheduled-for-that-day was AA11 was in queue itself before taking off for WTC2.
Back to UAL93, the fourth plane. In other words, with UAL93 taking off only several minutes before unscheduled-for-the-day AA11 hits the WTC1, the UAL93 may have been a "WTCs backup plane" that only takes off on another mission of terror, (undecided? who can say? or was it the Capitol?) once both WTCs hits are almost assured.
My point is that this looks like a queue effect that says "OK, that one is airbone, bring up the next one" in all three cases of UAL175, unscheduled-for-that-day AA77, and the potential "WTCs backup hit" of UAL93--that was launched toward something else and kept in the air as a backup later once the WTCs area was assured a double hit.
Second, the FAA "tells" the already-in-the-know NORAD, who have the best radar data in North America all to themselves, the code message, "xxxx plane has just been hijacked" This is the message that is always illegally late, though like the queue effect always almost immediately before a hit instead of when it stops communicating or goes off course! This means in my opinion built into this queue theory issue was a way simultaneously for the "FAA blame" alibi to be constructed as as "tell NORAD to move on" message: that "this plane has just been placed in queue for the next target in priority target list because we are confident that nothing can interfere with it at this stage and that it will be a definite hit. So we (or you?) can program and guide that next plane into the second target."
So is someone at FAA calling the shots, and reporting on successes and giving the OK to NORAD to program the next plane for its destination? My bet is that the FAA contact was MONTE BELGAR, who retires immedately after 9-11. Information on him is hard to come by. I would like assistance in finding about Monte Belgar's background.
In other words what I draw from this is that If I WAS IN CHARGE, and it was VERY VERY IMPORTANT to hit both WTC1 and WTC2 to cover up the internal implosions and demolitions, you require backups and reserves. A military mind alwasys knows that it is the reserves that win the battle or the war, instead of what you put into your immediate assault.
First, in planning 9-11, I would have had a series of priorities of what should be hit that dealt with
a. order of hits
b. symbolic rationales of hits
c. alibi for disguising demolition or bomb explosion cover-up operations (this is the case of both the WTCs and the Pentagon).
Second, and I would have backup. I would have the actual planes be a 'swarm' of backups. The targets would be settled, though the planes for particular ones would be open, instad of 'hardwiring' the overall plan to be four separate events with their specific targets and adopting the "aw shucks" attitude if one failed to work out. With this type of operation there is nothing that would allow this "aw shucks" type of attitude to a failed terror strike, because all of them were crucial to the overall plan, or the full plan for an immediately police state and WWIII would fail. One of these planes did fail in its hit by the way, and in my opinion, it has given us this slight breathing space as the Bushes attempt to jury-rig up something that would take the place of what they considered to be the carte blance that would be given to them by the missing fourth terror plane hit. So what would have been this carte blance for the Bushes that failed, which launched us into this gray inbetween, a 3/4 successfully terror strike by the Bushes? More on this below.
Anyway, back to the queue issue: if a plane or two fails to hit the WTC for some reason, this would really spoil the cover operation of demolitions of the towers! So you keep everything loose throughout the attack, monitor everything, gauge when particular hits are certain, and then and only then, move on to the next definite target using the next plane.
This accounts for why the fourth plane UAL93 was grounded for huge times on the tarmac, until the WTC1 and WTC2 were more certain, and then it could go on to its next destination or be in the air for sudden adaptations in case something else went awry.
When you create a timeline of takeoffs, waiting on the tarmac, IFF beacons, and hits it reads like one script, with tiny spaces of minutes inbetween, where once only when the previous queued target was sound the next plane was either powered up and allowed to leave the ground, or if it was in the air already, it would suddenly turn off its IFF beacon and move in for the next hit. This would be a failsafe is in case some particular ones fail to get thorugh. There was another Memory Hole story (or perhaps one I remember myself) right after 9-11 that would support this: the FBI said that they KNEW ABOUT 11 PLANES. So this brings up the question did they have many more planes than four waiting on the ground or otherwise in the air which were scheduled to take off?
THE MISSED FOURTH HIT AND THE UNEXPECTED BREATHING SPACE BEFORE FULL POLICE STATE AND SECRET GOVERNMENT OVERLORDSHIP CAUSED THEM TO ADAPT AFTER 9-11---------WITH ANTHRAX AIMED AT THE SAME MISSED TARGET
In order to stagger them appropriately through the air, the queue would read three hits and one missed hit. So the order of the four priority hits could be maintained as 1) WTC1, 2) WTC2, 3) Pentagon, and (in my opinon the Bushes wanted the fourth plane to hit.........) 4) the Congress building?
"Why do you think the fourth plane was to hit the Congress building?"
You ask, why do I think that the Congress building was the fourth plane's destination?
a. Well, because everything was going so "well" (from the Bushes/CIA/Cheney point of view), one of the planes that was in rotation for terror hits and already in the air got REAL FAR AWAY from its target. It got real far away by the time they actually decided on its final target to be, the Capitol building. This caused some trouble, because the NORAD standdown was going on about 1 hour and 45 minutes by 10:00 a.m. (Counting from the unscheduled-for-that-day AA11 stopping communication with ATC around 8:15 a.m.)
b. Why the Capitol? Well, ask whoever decided to ask for a "change of flight plan to DC" from Dulles ATC....after FAA head who said to "clear the skies and land at the nearest airport". The DC airport was very very far away by then. (DAMN! That sudden initiative from the intentionally placed first day on the job person at the "Big Board" of the FAA really messed everything up for the fourth hit. They expected him to be unable to comprehend what was going on, or be scared of taking any action when faced with this on his first day. However! HA! He said "clear the skies!" He singlehandedly ruined the chances of the fourth hit--and perhaps even others. As I said, someone had the audacity after this FAA order was given to attempt to allow UAL93 (ahem) to (alibi) head back to Dulles Airport (ahem) under these conditions of "clear the skies". Moreover, it was the FAA that simultaneously said for the Buffet "NetJet" to follow UAL93, interestingly enough, countermanding its own orders? Who gave the order to allow the NetJet to follow UAL93? Remember that this "someone" only radioed ATC at Dulles after it was supposedly (alibi) hijacked, though still on course. FAA claims that UAL93 was 'hijacked" (alibi for this one is next in queue) around 9:20. Wait a minute, UAL93 was still on course and with a IFF beacon at 9:20. It's beacon is on until 9:40 a.m. and it only goes off course around 9:28-9:35 a.m.. This sort of says to me that "well, we have ourselves a plane here, where should it go"? All this lag time here to me shows indecisiveness on just what to do with it. So they finally request on the fly in response to the FAA nationwide order to "clear the skies" a "flight plan to DC," though this was after the FAA had claimed it had been hijacked! Ouch! Sorry, we have some delightful parting gifts for you, thanks for playing. This flight plan alibi was the last ditch attempt to get it to DC.
So with this background, why do I think that the fourth plane was to hit the Capitol?
a. Cheney had made damn sure to keep the Capitol full of legislators even though he and the Secret Service had pseudo-evacuated HIM from around 9:05 a.m. to the White House Bunker--a full 30 minutes before the Pentagon was hit by the "cruise missle with wings" and ***a full hour*** before the fourth plane was shot down (that was even the US miitary's original story, then they changed it. There is plenty of seismic and other plane witness data and ATC data and court testimony at the Massaoui trial that a Warren Buffet "NetJet" was for some reason told to tail the fourth plane). Remember, that this means that the Capitol and the Pentagon, even though Cheney and the Pentaon knew something was approaching from around 9:00 a.m. (when Pentagon goes on Alpha Alert as well, though they fail to evacuate), are left unevacuated until AFTER the Pentagon hit was successful.
b. Remeber they were all ready with the Shadow Government, after 9-11, however, the expected Congressional hit was a failure.
c. Suddently there was very little "emergency" to pass the Patriot Act as the legislators were still alive.
d. So in the days after 9-11, someone in the military got the bright idea to mail out some Ft. Detrick military grade anthrax of the Ames strain (which the FBI had the original sample destroyed to cover the US's trail on this, and which was shared by groups such as BioPort (Carlye Corporation owned), Battelle (truly a NWO operation if ever I saw one), and other top secret miltiary areas like Dugway Proving grounds in Utah. The point is they picked a strain that was easily tracable to only a few domestic miltary people, and they used weaponized which even further refined the suspect list to CIA related groups. Follow: first anthrax were mailed days after the failed Congressional hit that would have killed most of the legislature. Ahtnrax is known to have about a month downtime before it infects.
e. Bush, Ascroft, Rumsfeld, everyone--are in the media early October talking about ANTHRAX coming up, danger of anthrax, this is still going on, etc. We are in danger. Patriot Act is introduced in Congress by Bush cronies.
f. Days later, anthrax finally surfaces, as predicted after being mailed out after 9-11. So the Bushes attempt scare tactics instead of mass murder of the legislature. The anthax kills........the editor of the Florida Newpaper who was the only one in the whole country to publish pictures of Jenna Bush drunk, and was ready to go with publishing nude pictures of Bush in a coffin with his male Skull and Bones buddies. This editor dies. Then the FBI CLOSES THE NEWSPAPER and refuses to let people retrieve anything. This newspaper is gone.
g. Daschle and Leahy say "screw you Bush" fu*k your police state, in so many words. We refuse to introduce this bill, it destroys the Bill of Rights, etc. They are immediately sent THE MOST CONCENTRATED STRAINS sent out, weaponized anthrax, trillion spores per gram, weaponized under patent to the CIA in a contract job. Daschle does gets his, and his whole staff is nearly infected. Leahy's anthrax letter was stopped by mail stoppages once danger realized and was only 'found' in November, postmarked the same as Daschle's letter. The letters were posted from Trenton, New Jersey. To get weaponized anthrax out of its secure environments and to handle it without killing yourself, is a very specialized operation. Plus, it is reputed that only people with the level of CIA clearances could authorize such anthrax to be removed from such US government operations as Ft. Detrick.
h. Remember that the Patriot Act was already written up well before 9-11. WELL BEFORE 9-11. WELL BEFORE 9-11. Who wrote most of it? Why, Sentaor Graham of Florida, the person who, along with an ex-Intelligence operative, were in charge of the "Biparisan 9-11 Investigation (ha) Commission". On the day of 9-11, Graham was meeting the terrorist money drop man of the Pakistan ISI in the Congress builining, Ahmad, the person who met with (likely Rice) someone in the White House in the week before 9-11, right before the money transaction was wired from Pakistan to the Florida (Sun Trust Bank) accounts of Mohammad Atta who the FBI still claims was "a hijacker." So you have Graham, the writer of the Patriot Act mostly, meeting with the money drop man to the FBI claimed terrorist of 9-11, Atta--and on 9-11 the meeting occurred. With Graham in this meeting was Goss, another Floridian Bushite ex-Intelligence operative. Lots of Florida in this story, eh? Graham says that Goss and he and everyone who was with him "received a note from Goss's aide" and they turned on the television to see a smouldering WTC2 (second hit, post 9:03). He claims that it was then this group evacuated themselves from the Capitol--early--right after WTC2 was hit (9:03 a.m). [I personaly would like to see more information about the Capitol evacuation because it is a crucial issue in connecting Graham/Goss, and whether they knew they were going to be offed by the potential fourth plane hit, or did they know to leave early? Knowing that they would be hit in the Capitol if they stayed around. Capitol was only evacuated officially much later and after the "cruise missile with wings" found the Pentagon and hit it around 9:35 a.m. or so.] In other words, DC for 30 minutes, nothing evacuated, though plane coming in? By the way, Graham came out immediately after 9-11 saying the US should attack Iraq immediately. He even called the mass murdering ex-Governor "Executioner" Bush "soft on terror." Graham used to be a Governor of Florida by the way, well know for all his executions as well. This is the same Graham family that runs the Washinton Post and has covered up "votescam" in Florida since the 1970s! [on this read half of a free book  http://www.votescam.com ]
The overall point is, people, that 9-11 is only one in a series of state teror and corrupt actions of the US. There is a direct continuity with these people. The more I looked into it, the more that 9-11 seemed to be business as usual. It was business that finally has woken up some of the sheep that is all.
The sheep theory is that 9-11 represents something different in the way of US criminal actions. However, it is the same networks building on what they have accomplished and they have been doing this for 30 years in the United States, terror, assassination, and cover-up, terror, assassionation, and cover-up, terror, assassination, and cover-up, etc.
Welcome to your world. It's high time you got to know it.
more here: want to see some video of the WTC1 demolition squibs, showing that it was a controlled demolition?
more here: Want to see the seismic evidence of huge detonations in the sub-basements, which WTC cleanup crews said left molten steel in these areas weeks?
other installments of "Dear Ask a 9-11 Researcher":
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/02/279744.shtml
|
contribute to this article
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion
|
2062907776
actually UAL175 was scheduled for that day. It was AA11 and AA77 that were unscheduled for that day--though voila! they appear on the tarmac ready to go on 9-11!
citation:
What really happened to American Airlines Flights 11 and 77 on Sept 11, 2001
by Gerard Homgren 10:44am Thu Nov 13 '03 (Modified on 2:21pm Fri Feb 6 '04) article#36354
The flights alleged to have hit the North WTC1 tower and the Pentagon did not exist. They were not scheduled to fly that day.