portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting global

corporate dominance | imperialism & war | media criticism

Richard Perle wants the US to attack...France! MEDIA PLANNING underway!

-----Perle is seriously frothing at the mouth. He should be tested for rabies.
About his latest book: "The book calls for tough action against France and its dreams of offsetting US power."
-----So, head's up if the Bush crony corporate state attempts to attack France by manufacturing some pretext. Some 'Cold War peace dividend,' eh? The world gets paranoid elitists--correction, lowbrow international organized crime--suddenly caught naked because none of their wars are ever justified anymore.
-----The nugget is the leaked backstage memos from an anonymous (though verified in real time) media executive at one of the corporate state networks: ABC, NBC, FOX, or CBS. According to the news site, the memos and their anon.source have proven in the past to be eerily predictable of how the state propaganda is managed or directed, in real time. Look for France bashing coming soon.
Perle--Zionist, militarist, theocratic, civilian appointee of Rumsfeld--
Perle--Zionist, militarist, theocratic, civilian appointee of Rumsfeld--
wants a military attack on France, country that gave us the Statue of Liberty.
wants a military attack on France, country that gave us the Statue of Liberty.
1.
MEDIA PLANNING, LEAKED MEMO SOURCE FROM CORPORATE MEDIA MAINLINERS SHOW HOW THE SHEEP ARE LED. SO, WHY IS THE INTERNET CONSIDERED "UNRELIABLE," SOMEONE TELL ME--COMPARED TO CORPORATE MEDIA? COMPARED TO WHAT THEY PUT THE WORLD THROUGH WITH THE INTERRELATED LIES ABOUT JUSTIFYING ATTACKING IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, AND 9-11?

HEY, IMCISTAS! YOU HAVE MOLES IN THE CORPORATE MILITARY MEDIA STATE!

For an explanation behind the leaked memos:

Controlling the News. Part 33


In-House Memos on Television And Print Media News Presentations
To see prior Installments of "Controlling the News" click here

During the middle of March, 2003, tbrnews received an email from a man who claimed to be a mid-level executive with a major American television network. He stated in this, and subsequent, emails that he was in possession of "thousands" of pages of in-house memos sent from his corporate headquarters in New York City to the head of the network's television news department. He went on to say that these memos set forth directives about what material was, and was not, to be aired on the various outlets of the network.

This individual claimed he was developing serious doubts about the strict control of media events and decided that he would pass this material along to someone who might make use of it.

There was the question of his job security. If someone published his name, it would be certain he was not only fired but blackballed throughout his profession.

If tbrnews.org would agree to protect his identity, he would send us these alleged thousands of pages of notes, going back to 2001.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating so we accepted his caveats and he then sent to us by disk the pages he spoke of. All are on corporate stationary, signed or initialed by the senders and again, signed or initialed by the recipients in the news division.

It was always possible that this material consisted of a very involved hoax or was something designed for the news site to use and then have it revealed that it was not original. It would not be the first time that spurious disinformation had been sent to us in the hopes that it would be used.

There were not "thousands of pages" of memos but a total of 1,497 separate pages involved. Many of them consisted of short memos while others ran to a larger format.

Naturally, someone could easily have obtained correct in-house network letterheads, made copies of them and prepared false memoranda but the sheer size and depth of the collection was impressive.

If these memos were true, they showed with a terrible clarity that at least one part of the American mass media was strictly controlled and that the news was so doctored and spun that it might as well be official news releases from the White House and Pentagon.

The best way in which to ascertain whether or not these documents contained original information was to check the dates of issuance and compare the information with subsequent news stories.

This was a terrible, time-consuming chore but by selecting random memos and looking through the archives of various national newspapers, checking AP releases and so on, the results indicated that indeed, news was being managed.

However, it was also possible that someone else did this and was preparing these after the fact and making the memos conform to published material.

That having been said, we insisted on absolutely current memos so that we could then check these against future publications. If, for example, a corporate fiat was to show certain pictures or spin a story in a certain way, it would be relatively simple to simply read the press or watch television news to see if these suggestions were implemented.

It was both shocking and gratifying to note that this proved to be the case in a preponderance of cases and so we began to put these up, either in toto or, more often, in excerpt and watch as ordained news was created before our eyes.

When a corporate order states, for instance, that certain pictures should be shown with accompanying commentary and the memo predates a published story by a week or more, then it is more than likely that the memos are not inspired guesswork but genuine.

When tbrnews put up the first two pages, there were two basic forms of public response. One was to thank us for exposing something many people believed; that the American media was controlled and not free. (That much can easily be ascertained by reading the websites of various reputable foreign publications such as the Swiss NZZ, the British Guardian, the Canadian Toronto Globe and Mail, Reuters News Service, AFP and the Jerusalem Post. What any viewer can see on these sites is certainly not reflected in the American media.)

The second response consisted of irate, and literate, statements to the effect that all of these items were just stupid hoaxes and should not be believed. "I believe," one writer who claimed to be a Professor of Journalism at an Ivy League college said, "these are just disinformation designed to discredit American journalists whose reputation for honesty and integrity is certainly beyond question. You are performing a great disservice in repeating these politically-motivated fictions... "

This is certainly a true statement because if it became generally accepted that the American media was only a mechanical parrot for various political organizations, it would no longer be either believed or watched. If viewers turned off their television sets, the networks would lose huge amounts of advertising revenue, reporters would be laid off and people would turn instead to the Internet for their news.

The file, "Controlling the News" has proven to be the most durable and viewed section of tbrnews.

As the result of our earlier postings, we have been receiving a significant amount of input that extends far beyond the scope of our original informant. These sources include, but are certainly not limited to; an employee of a major American news magazine, a source inside the corporate offices of a major media conglomerate, various military sources, foreign press and intelligence individuals and persons connected with official agencies who are greatly disturbed by the machinations of the current Administration.

That these sources have requested anonymity is self-evident

In the final analysis, it is always up to the reader to make up their own mind as to the truth, or fiction, of what they read. The media has an opposite view of this.

It is fairly obvious that the average Americans get their news either from TV, mostly, or, to a shrinking number, from the print media. If someone in East Peoria, Illinois sees something on CNN, the Voice of the White House, they have no reason to question it. And don't. The establishment does not worry about a website that, as in our case, reaches perhaps 100,000 people at a time when they have control over NBC, CBS, ABC and CNN that can, and do, reach millions a day.

What do they care about people who email messages back and forth? Even if a Pentagon plan to nuke North Korea were up on the net, all that would happen is that some would say, "See, I told you so!" while others would say "Oh shame! You are questioning our Glorious Leader (appointed to his high office by Almighty God Himself!) and putting our Brave Troops in danger!"

If the honesty of the American mass media is finally brought into serious question, perhaps the ruling Establishment cannot jam their lies down the public's throat with such ease.

Walter Storch

Part 33

(January 9, 2004) ... Send a memo to all department heads looking for any and all French-speaking journalists. This does not apply to cameramen. If the Administration's plans for a military adventure vis a vis the French materialize, we want to be right off the line with coverage... minute our people in Iraq that they must, under no circumstances, permit anyone other than our own employees to make use of our computer systems in place there. We have been virtually ordered under threat of prosecution under "national security" directives to keep irate military personnel from "leaking sensitive and always inaccurate" material. Make sure everyone gets this...

(January 10) ... with reference my memo of the 9th, do not discuss the French business unless and until. The Bush people want an administration change in Paris and we have to be careful not to mention any military assistance from our side. Diplomatic and economic pressure will be tried first. The French will cave in just like Brazil will stop its fingerprinting of US citizens. Either that or the World Bank and IMF will put them on the grill. Bush is visiting their president and will give him the word that we will not permit some third world state to dictate to us... they have even been photographing diplomats and CIA commercial cover people! [INTERESTING HOW A MEDIA EXECUTIVE KNOWS ABOUT THE LATTER, EH? or how this network has hidden links across all the above "separate" organizations above, from international financiers to international media to the CIA, mentioned in the same breath?]

 http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a784.htm


2.


FLASHBACK: Pearle Document Says France Should be Treated as an Enemy
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/31/wcons31.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/31/ixportaltop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=120459

Hawks tell Bush how to win war on terror
By David Rennie in Washington
(Filed: 31/12/2003)


President George W Bush was sent a public manifesto yesterday by Washington's hawks, demanding regime change in Syria and Iran and a Cuba-style military blockade of North Korea backed by planning for a pre-emptive strike on its nuclear sites.


The manifesto, presented as a "manual for victory" in the war on terror, also calls for Saudi Arabia and France to be treated not as allies but as rivals and possibly enemies.

The manifesto is contained in a new book by Richard Perle, a Pentagon adviser and "intellectual guru" of the hardline neo-conservative movement, and David Frum, a former Bush speechwriter. They give warning of a faltering of the "will to win" in Washington.

In the battle for the president's ear, the manifesto represents an attempt by hawks to break out of the post-Iraq doldrums and strike back at what they see as a campaign of hostile leaking by their foes in such centres of caution as the State Department or in the military top brass.

Their publication, An End to Evil: How to Win the War on Terror, coincided with the latest broadside from the hawks' enemy number one, Colin Powell, the secretary of state.

Though on leave recovering from a prostate cancer operation, Mr Powell summoned reporters to his bedside to hail "encouraging" signs of a "new attitude" in Iran and call for the United States to keep open the prospect of dialogue with the Teheran authorities.

Such talk is anathema to hawks like Mr Perle and Mr Frum who urge Washington to shun the mullahs and work for their overthrow in concert with Iranian dissidents.

It may be assumed that their instincts at least are shared by hawks inside the government, whose twin power bases are the Pentagon's civilian leadership and the office of the vice-president, Dick Cheney.

Such officials prevailed over invading Afghanistan and Iraq, but have been seen as on the back foot since the autumn as their post-war visions of building a secular, free-market Iraq were scaled back in favour of compromise and a swift handover of power next June.

The book demands that any talks with North Korea require the complete and immediate abandonment of its nuclear programme.

As North Korea will probably refuse such terms, the book urges a Cuba-style military blockade and overt preparations for war, including the rapid pullback of US forces from the inter-Korean border so that they move out of range of North Korean artillery.

Such steps, with luck, will prompt China to oust its nominal ally, Kim Jong-il, and install a saner regime in North Korea, the authors write.

The authoritarian rule of Syria's leader, Bashar Assad, should also be ended, encouraged by shutting oil supplies from Iraq, seizing arms he buys from Iran, and raids into Syria to hunt terrorists.

The authors urge Mr Bush to "tell the truth about Saudi Arabia". Wealthy Saudis, some of them royal princes, fund al-Qa'eda, they write.

The Saudi government backs "terror-tainted Islamic organisations" as part of a larger campaign to "spread its extremist version of Islam throughout the Muslim world and into Europe and North America".

The book calls for tough action against France and its dreams of offsetting US power. "We should force European governments to choose between Paris and Washington," it states. Britain's independence from Europe should be preserved, perhaps with open access for British arms to American defence markets.

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/31/wcons31.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/31/ixportaltop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=120459

3.

READ THIS ONCE MORE NOW:

Part 33

(January 9, 2004) ... Send a memo to all department heads looking for any and all French-speaking journalists. This does not apply to cameramen. If the Administration's plans for a military adventure vis a vis the French materialize, we want to be right off the line with coverage... minute our people in Iraq that they must, under no circumstances, permit anyone other than our own employees to make use of our computer systems in place there. We have been virtually ordered under threat of prosecution under "national security" directives to keep irate military personnel from "leaking sensitive and always inaccurate" material. Make sure everyone gets this...

(January 10) ... with reference my memo of the 9th, do not discuss the French business unless and until. The Bush people want an administration change in Paris and we have to be careful not to mention any military assistance from our side. Diplomatic and economic pressure will be tried first. The French will cave in just like Brazil will stop its fingerprinting of US citizens. Either that or the World Bank and IMF will put them on the grill. Bush is visiting their president and will give him the word that we will not permit some third world state to dictate to us... they have even been photographing diplomats and CIA commercial cover people!

 http://www.propagandamatrix.com/140104regimechangeinparis.html
Lafayette, I am here, and I have a few friends 15.Jan.2004 18:16

3 5 8 13 21

Attack France, this would be great for ending American involvement in NATO. Under the NATO treaty Europe would defend itself. It would give a new meaning to the term French Resistance I can only think of a few tens of million people already here, who would move beyond simple words and signs. Richard, god they are always named DICK, 'bring 'em on'.

Viva la French Fry 15.Jan.2004 19:30

pix

This is great news for America!! Now we will have control of all the French Fries, ah-ha!!!! The world will be dependent on us for once to get all of their French Fries. We will deny those countries we dispise or who fail to cooperate with us, their French Fries, because we will take over France! Yes!

Bush, upon his triumphant stroll down the Champs-Elysees... 15.Jan.2004 20:16

Spudnuts

"Dang! You got black people here too?!"

Also, ladies and gentlemen, please direct your attention to the completely spontaneous and utterly sincere effort by three genuine French persons (note the berets and baguettes which denote genuine French people and NOT regulars from the Army's 33rd Theater Troupe Patriotic Puppet and Marionette Regiment) to pull down the Eiffel Tower as a sign of loyalty to their newly arrived liberators.

Additionally, please be warned that whatever violence is inflicted upon U.S. soldiers during their multi-decade "furlough" in France will be inflicted ten-fold upon Jerry Lewis.

Finally, please stop speaking French. It sounds all "girly" and it makes your liberators laugh at you behind your backs.

That is all.

Mes Amis 16.Jan.2004 08:24

Jaques

This is a test of the Media BS system. First the mind control drug of the televised messages then the subsequent counting of the pinheads that proclaim hatred of the French people. Easy to test the effectiveness of the product placement by the MIC, military industrial complex.