portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

health

JOIN THE BATTLE AGAINST THE MYTH

Please join us. AidsMythExposed.com is the forum that EVERY member and supporter of the 'AIDS' dissident cause should consider membership of as an imperative. AidsMythExposed.com is already the largest MSNBC 'HIV/AIDS' forum but is now on its way to being the largest 'AIDS' forum in the World (Dissident or Conventional). Members from the USA, Canada, South Africa, China, Chile, France, Spain, Romanis, Korea, Thailand, Germany, Italy, and many other countries.
Victory for Truth - Smash the AIDS myth
Victory for Truth - Smash the AIDS myth
Answer me this. If 'AIDS really is a sexually transmitted syndrome (common cause -'HIV'- for old existing diseases) then why is there almost no 'AIDS' in Japan. Total cases in twenty years amount to only 7,500 or 375 a year.

The Japanese are the number one sex tourists to Thailand (Source: TAT - Tourist Authority of Thailand).

The Japanese are the largest overseas tourists visiting Nevada Brothels and even have regular bus trips to them (Sourse: Penthouse Magazine)

The Japanese travel MORE then almost any other nation.

The Japanese have a past culture that accepted homosexuality (even Samari 'swung' both ways) and have a larger than average gay community.

Japan has a booming sex trade (estimated at $13 billion annually (Source: - 17/03/03 -- San Francisco Chronicle)

Numerous surveys demonstrate that 'most men and women in their 20s do not use condoms'. (Source: 17/03/03 -- San Francisco Chronicle)

The Japanese are only different from other Asian cultures in that they have NO real poverty.

Have you considered that poverty NOT sex is the real cause of immune suppression?


NOTE: - By comparison, Cambodia, whose population is less than a tenth of Japan's, had 170,000 people living with HIV or AIDS as of the end of 2001, according to United Nations estimates. SOURCE. Reuters 19 Sept 2003 ( http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/T130295.htm).

* 'Living with HIV/AIDS' simply means that they meet the WHO/CDC Bengui definition which also fits EVERY epidemic disease in poor countries.

homepage: homepage: http://www.aidsmythexposed.com

fascinating 16.Oct.2003 09:05

Tom

I have never heard this argument, nor seen this data.

I am no AIDS specialist, but I am a physician, and try to keep up.

Lots of white, rich people in the US have AIDS, as do poor black people in Africa.

This is intriguing-- but maybe the Japanese are just genetically immune.

Or maybe it is some kind of CIA plot-- HIV is just a trigger for some other disease spread by some other unknown mechanism.

I read aidsmythexposed.com regularly 16.Oct.2003 12:20

open mind

Sadly, the HIV theory or germ theory of AIDS has become a crutch for people who are unwilling to accept the fact that the oxidative stress that human beings either expose themselves to voluntarily (bad diets, substance abuse) or involuntarily (stressful jobs, poverty, poor sanitation, malnutrition) is enough to destroy their immune systems to the point where their bodies are no longer able to fight off opportunistic infections.

Policy makers need the germ theory because they are unwilling to eradicate poverty. Activists need the germ theory because they need their AIDS jobs that are funded by million dollar foundations and taxpayers. Corporations need the germ theory of AIDS because it brings in more profits. The average weak-minded person needs the germ theory because it's far more fun to drink alcohol until you're wasted and party all night, smoke cigarettes, eat fried foods, eat processed breads and sweets than it is to munch on chlorophyll and fiber-rich raw organic green vegetables and fruits every day.

By the way, I don't believe for 2 seconds that "Tom" is a physician. He has to be one of the many scam artists from AIDS Inc., (AIDS "activists", AIDS workers, or pharmaceutical lobbyists) who constantly google search for message boards with AIDS dissident threads, then either pose as doctors or some other kind of "expert" to give themselves some "authority" and then lay on thick all the disinfo from the medical/pharmaceutical/government cartel.

Anyone who believes that a virus that has never been purified and isolated in a laboratory can go around wrecking immune systems of otherwise healthy individuals to the point where they'll inevitably die a horrible, painful death needs his license revoked. The loved ones of all the unfortunate victims of these HIV quack doctors should get together and file class action malpractice lawsuits against all these quacks who insist on prescribing toxic AIDS drugs.

Well lets see 16.Oct.2003 16:54

Rational

Poor people and cultures are MUCH more likely use the same syringe more than once and to leave oozing/bleeding genital diseases untreated which transmits the AIDS virus. Could be an explanation.

It seems unlikely that Cambodia... 17.Oct.2003 01:05

Paul King

Dear Rational,

It seems unlikely that Cambodia has serveral thousand times more Junkies than Japan, Remember this wonder virus also stops at the Canadian border, the border with Malaysia just to name two. No other std in history has ever been subject to passport control.

The std idea behind 'AID$' simply does not make sense.

THIS IS ALSO INTERESTING


Less than one in a million

Caucasian heterosexual women (even including I..V. drugs users) represent an 'AIDS' risk of only about ONE IN A MILLION or less. In California last year there were only 79 cases.

HIV Testing Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities --- United States, 1999

Of the 774,467 AIDS cases reported to CDC during June 1981--December 2000 (2), blacks and Hispanics accounted for 56% of cases, although they represented 25% of the U.S. population during this period. In 2000, the incidence of adult and adolescent AIDS cases per 100,000 population was 74.2 for blacks, 30.4 for Hispanics, and 7.9 for whites.

Of the 7.9% Caucasian cases only about 7% are said to be from heterosexual activity. (Source: - CDC)

That translates to 0.55 per 100,000 or: -

JUST ONE AIDS CASE IN EVERY 200,000 Caucasian heterosexuals.

Hardly a spectacular figure.Lightning deaths in America kill 75 to 100 people a year.

BUT WOMEN ARE ONLY A TINY PERCENTAGE OF THAT VERY SMALL FIGURE

Caucasian heterosexual women (even including I..V. drugs users) represent an 'AIDS' risk of only about ONE IN A MILLION or less. In California last year there were only 79 cases.

IN REAL TERMS A ZERO RISK!


These figures beg the question is 'AIDS' caused by an std or by poverty. Could African American and Hispanic women really be having so much more sex? A graph of 'AIDS' fits perfectly with a graph of poverty in America but in no way reflects sexual activity.

Actually no. 17.Oct.2003 01:15

Paul King

Dear Tom,

You wrote 'Lots of white, rich people in the US have AIDS" but if you look carefully at the demographics of 'AIDS' you will see this is simply not true..

Best wishes,


Paul

HIV Testing Among Racial/Ethnic Minorities --- United States, 1999

Of the 774,467 AIDS cases reported to CDC during June 1981--December 2000 (2), blacks and Hispanics accounted for 56% of cases, although they represented 25% of the U.S. population during this period. In 2000, the incidence of adult and adolescent AIDS cases per 100,000 population was 74.2 for blacks, 30.4 for Hispanics, and 7.9 for whites.

Of the 7.9% Caucasian cases only about 7% are said to be from heterosexual activity.

That translates to 0.55 per 100,000 or: -

JUST ONE AIDS CASE IN EVERY 200,000 Caucasian heterosexuals.

Hardly a spectacular figure.

'STD passport control' ROTFLMAO 17.Oct.2003 09:27

open mind

Thanks, Paul for responding to the "dirty needle" theorist. By the way, your message board ROCKS -- and I'm not even a member! I wonder how many hits it gets per day.

Let's examine for a moment what a junkie puts into his/her body on a daily basis. How many junkies are running from the shooting galleries and the crack houses to their local health food stores and ordering fresh wheat grass juice? How many junkies are eating broccoli, tofu, sprouts, nuts and fresh organic fruits every day?

The average American junkie is not likely to be health conscious. If they're poor, their daily food intake is likely to consist of fried chips, snack cakes with a shelf life equivalent to the half-life of uranium, and soft drinks, or perhaps a fried fast food meal -- the kind of food usually available in low-income areas. If they're a junkie with money, they can afford higher priced gourmet junk foods but that's still very unhealthy. Also, they're both likely to consume alcohol.

Most junkies never get any nutrients into their bodies, ever. Phytochemicals (plant chemicals), and chlorophyll (found in green, red and other colorful fruits and vegetables) are what the human body needs to help repair the cell damage caused by normal daily activities and to build a strong immune system. Chips, soda, and snack cakes contain no vital chlorophyll whatsoever, yet there are many, many people who are not even junkies living in poor urban communities growing up on and subsisting on nutrient-deficient, chlorophyll-lacking junk.

Unfortunately, the Left seems to be blinded by the notion that satiety (or lack of hunger) equals good health. The nutrient content of the food people are eating is irrelevant to them. Middle-class Leftists buy into the "HIV virus = AIDS" myth because linking the immune system and disease to nutrients means that they have to accept the fact that we have a two-tiered food distribution system in America -- the affluent have access to vital, immune strengthening nutrients and the poor do not -- and that the American poor, in spite of their lack of hunger, are actually DYING OF MALNUTRITION just like the poor in third world countries, not some STD. That kills their "even the poorest American is better off than the poor in the third world" argument.

Even with the most sterile, germ free needles in the world, smack or crack is going right into their blood streams every single day. That alone is enough to destroy the immune system and that's why needle exchange programs are totally useless for the prevention of so-called AIDS.

No one has ever produced any evidence that a so-called AIDS virus or HIV even exists. The only thing AIDS researchers have ever presented were cartoon depictions of what they "believe" an isolated, purified HIV particle looks like or photographs of a bunch of microscopic particles with an arrow pointing to one "believed" to be HIV.

Even though there are no photos of a single, isolated, purified HIV particle in existence, most sheep would rather believe a that cartoon is the real thing.

Stupidity vs. AIDS: which is worse? 26.Apr.2005 17:16

The Other Half of David Lane's Brain (the functional half)

One matter about which there can be no doubt is the stupidity of this article and some of the comments posted regarding it. HIV is not a fictitious entity dreamed up for money-making purposes. The virus can be isolated. Not only has it been genetically sequenced, but the sequences of various portions of the virus (portions that do not cause disease) have been used for therapeutic purposes. For example, experiments have been conducted in which segments of HIV were used to deliver potentially beneficial genes (like the genes for BDNF and parkin -- look them up, idiots) into mammals such as rats, monkeys, and humans. Also, many of the mechanisms of action of the virus, including some of the human proteins which which it interacts, have been elucidated. Finally, images of HIV abound; one can find images of it outside of cells, inside of cells, and attached to cells. You could literally cover the interior of your house -- no matter what size house you live in -- with wallpaper containing multiple 8x11 images of HIV, and you would never have to look at the same image twice. Many of the images, especially nowadays, permit visualization of considerable detail, not merely nondescript dots purported to be HIV. I'm sure that like HIV itself, these are all just government-contrived fictions aimed at deluding everyone into believing that HIV exists. It is truly amazing that the various governments of the world have managed to either fool 100% of the world's biomedical scientists into believing that this virus exists or to convince them into promulgating this lie in the form of spoken opinion, fabricated research, and HIV sugar pills. Morons. What is so incredibly sad about you colossal idiots espousing the HIV-isn't-real view, aside from your casual brushing aside of mountains of readily available contrary evidence and the tremendous stupidity it takes to successfully be this ignorant in today's media-saturated world, is that you convince other stupid people into doing the same. That is, you increase the number of horny youngsters with low IQs who believe that HIV isn't real and, thus, that they can have sex with as many people as they please without suffering negative consequences, so long as they eat "broccoli, tofu, sprouts, nuts, and fresh organic fruits every day." Man, I hate stupid people.

There's one born every minute 27.Apr.2005 10:28

Wilhelm Godschalk wgods@xs4all.nl

Dear half-brain,

I felt very motivated by your statement that HIV CAN be isolated. So please give me directions to your lab, so that I can personally learn there how to do that. I have experience in isolating viruses, so there should be no problem.
Beneficial genes from HIV? Don't keep us in suspense. Tell us more. If we start looking for them, we may be at it forever (could it be they don't exist?) But with the known record of molecular geneticists of exaggerating and sensationalizong, I have my doubts. If you have a cellular soup with reverse transcriptase activity (from the host), the RNA present will create a mish-mash of DNA. Viaral? Hardly. Useful? Oh, maybe there will be someone who finds something he likes in this grabbag. An AIDS profiteer, for example, who finds 'therapeutical genes - at a price.
And then thos electron micrographs of 'HIV'. Man, oh man, they are works of art! And I mean art, as in artefacts. Some of them are in living color. By the way, where do they sell those color electron microscopes?
With all those faithfull... Who needs science?