portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article announcements oregon & cascadia

forest defense

Press Release from ONRC on lawsuit

ONRC has issued a press release detailing the recent victory in a lawsuit against 6 timber sales.
OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL & WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 9, 2003

Contacts:
Pete Frost, Attorney, Western Environmental Law Center, 541-543-0018
Doug Heiken, Oregon Natural Resources Council, 541-915-2329
Regna Merritt, Oregon Natural Resources Council, 503-283-6343 x 214

FEDERAL COURT DECLARES LOGGING
OF OLD-GROWTH FORESTS ILLEGAL

Portland-- A federal district judge ruled today that the Forest Service illegally allowed logging of old-growth forests in six controversial timber sales on the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests in Oregon.

Judge Garr M. King ruled that the Forest Service violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when it allowed logging of 574 acres of old-growth forests within the Clark, Solo, and Borg timber sales in the Mount Hood National Forest, and the Straw Devil, East Devil, and Pryor timber sales in the Willamette National Forest. The judge halted any logging of the forests through November 7, when he will hold a hearing to decide whether to permanently enjoin logging.

"These old-growth forests are a legacy for our children, and deserve to be protected for future generations," said Pete Frost, attorney for the Western Environmental Law Center in Eugene, who represented three conservation groups in the suit.

The six sales contain trees up to 500 years old. The Forest Service first proposed to log these public treasures over five years ago. At that time, the agency did not survey the old-growth forests to determine if species protected under the Northwest Forest Plan lived in them. In 1999, federal district judge William Dwyer in Seattle ruled that federal agencies' failure to survey old- growth timber sales for protected species before allowing any logging violated the Northwest Forest Plan. That ruling led to an agreement between conservationists and the Forest Service to halt logging of roughly 100 old-growth timber sales in the Northwest, until the agencies performed surveys.

After that, the Forest Service surveyed some but not all of the old-growth forests slated to fall in the six sales. The surveys revealed many areas of rare species, including the red tree vole, a source of food for the northern spotted owl. The agency then reduced the size of the some of sales, but refused to survey all of the sale area, and refused to stop logging several old-growth groves where citizens had located red tree vole nests.

Judge King ruled that the Forest Service violated NEPA because it never publicly evaluated and disclosed the results of its surveys, survey findings, citizens' surveys, and management changes to the sales. Judge King also acknowledged that the Forest Service itself included these six timber sales among the 100 sales across the region that were enjoined under Judge Dwyer's 1999 order, that it had promised to perform surveys, and yet never publicly evaluated whether to log.

Citizens made critical contributions to stop the logging of these old-growth forests. Many Oregonians volunteered their time to survey timber sale sites looking for protected species. Judge King noted that their surveys resulted in reductions to the size of the sales. And yet unprotected sites found by citizens remain in the 574 acres of old-growth forests that were slated for logging.

"These old-growth forests provide habitat for rare species and provide clean drinking water for Oregonians," said Doug Heiken of the Oregon Natural Resources Council, one of the plaintiffs in the suit. "The Forest Service must engage in a public process to evaluate whether to log any of our few remaining old-growth forests."

Background:
The Northwest Forest Plan was adopted in 1994. The Plan established a "survey and manage" standard that requires federal agencies to survey for certain rare and uncommon wildlife and plant species before allowing logging, and to establish buffers around known sites to protect species from logging. The standard applies to forests within the 4.6 million acres in which the Plan allows some logging.

The Western Environmental Law Center is a public interest law firm with offices in Eugene, Oregon; Taos, New Mexico; and Boise, Idaho. It was formed ten years ago to litigate to protect the West. In 1982, its attorneys filed the first legal action to protect the northern spotted owl, along with the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund.

The Oregon Natural Resources Council and its 7000 members work to protect and restore Oregon's wild lands, water and wildlife as an enduring legacy.

Hon. Garr M. King was born in Pocatello, Idaho, in 1936. He received degrees from the University of Utah and the Northwestern School of Law at Lewis and Clark College. He practiced law for 32 years in Portland, most recently for the firm Kennedy King and Zimmer. He was appointed to the bench in 1998 by President Clinton.

In August, 2003, Jack Ward Thomas, former chief of the Forest Service and an author of the Northwest Forest Plan, called for the end of old growth logging under the plan, and urged agencies to instead focus any logging on the thinning of young stands of trees, to improve forest health.

The Boise Cascade Corporation has pledged to stop logging any old growth forests. The Home Depot, the nation's largest retailer of lumber, refuses to sell wood from old growth trees.


###
Excellent! 10.Oct.2003 12:03

Sephiroth

Now that sounds like JUSTICE! While it's too late for the already-cut sales, it finally looks like we stopped illegal government squandering of resources, at least for now. Credit goes to all activists, both inside and outside the "system," which worked together to make this outcome a reality!

NEVER GIVE UP! We won the 8-hour workday, the abolition of formal slavery (still working on the informal variety), women's suffrage, and the formation of our National Parks and Forests, and you have shown that we can protect and expand our gains from exploitative efforts on behalf of the "monied interests" that Thomas Jefferson was so leery of.

Clarifications 10.Oct.2003 12:11

curious and curiouser

I thought that Clark was in the Willamette national forest, where the Fall Creek sit is. East Devil has been renamed Canyon East. The information the we in the forest of Straw Devil was the the judge had declared all six timber sales illigal based on Survey and Manage requirments. I don't mean to be rude, but where did this informatiiion come form? Can this information be verified?

clarification of your question of clarification? 10.Oct.2003 13:57

cascadian

Clark is in the Willamette, the ONRC release had a typo!

If I'm understanding your second question correctly you're not fully understanding the basis of the lawsuit - essentially it's this:

-- In 1999 it was ruled that the FS had failed to do proper Survey and Manage work on 100 sales in violation of the Northwest Forest Plan.

-- These sales (and probably others not included in the lawsuit) were surveyed by the FS following this ruling, but the FS (always trying to pull as many tricks as possible) did not allow the normal citizen comment period required by NEPA (national enviro policy act).

-- Evidence of Survey and Manage species was found on the sales (red tree voles, psuedocyphellaria rainerensis lichen, etc.) lending credence to claims that the FS had not only failed to follow NEPA process to the letter of the law, but was clearly risking species welfare by doing this.

-- The FS eventually buffered some of these areas where the species were found, but it never allowed the required full round of citizen comments on its surveys.

-- CFA and CFD (through tree-sits and the "pods") drew attention to the issue and furthered public outcry by their atempt at stopping the illegal logging by direct action.

-- The judge ruled in our favor, presumably on the basis that the FS had violated both the letter and the spirit of NEPA by refusing to recognize public input as required by NEPA, even in the face of major citizen envolvement, campaiging, and citizen surveys.

-- This may open up the door to future lawsuits where the forest service has similarly skirted around or not fully engaged NEPA, particularly following court orders, particulary the court order from 1999.

I'm not a lawyer so I could be a little off on the specifics of all this but thats the general idea. I'd contact ONRC for more info.

more clarification 10.Oct.2003 14:23

clarification

My understanding of the "victory" is that the judge ruled the case had merit not that it out and out won. We have an injunction until November 7th where the judge tells us what the FS needs to do in order to continue to log the sales. So what we might end up with 100 foot buffers on the sites found by the citizen surveyors with logging set to continue. This is an important victory...but the battle for these areas isn't over yet . . .

absolutely 10.Oct.2003 15:19

cascadian

Absolutely right; the sales are not (at least as of yet) cancelled, let alone "saved".

(no such thing as saved in a national forest, anything can be re-initiated in the future if the FS finds the legal / political climate more appealing)

They are merely halted till Nov. 7 (post logging season) and subject to some form of re-structuring (which could take several months to several years depending on what it is).

The restructuring will probably either be a new EA (environmental assesment) or a supplement to the EA (presumably to allow for an new comment period); the former would take at least a year I'd guess, the later could take just a few months.

There will most likely be some new opportunity to "appeal" the sales and there's probably decent ground under such an appeal for demanding an EIS (environmental impact statement, a much longer EA) because of the controversy and findings of rare species in the area. This could hypothetically delay the sales for 1-2 years, but its very difficult to say.

Of course ANYTHING can happen, but I think its extremely unlikely that it will be settled anytime before spring at the very earliest.

Also:
The judge could cancel some of the sales (unlikely from what I've seen in the past) or the FS may choose to abadon the sales (especially possible with Clark since it's been on the chopping block frickin forever), or the logging companies could attempt to bail from the contracts (also possible).

hope that helps clear stuff up - if anyone out there in computer land has more specific questions let me know and I'll try to get more specific / precise answers.

Contact info is at the top of the press release 10.Oct.2003 16:17

Annabelle

To answer the question of where the info came from and if it can be verified, note that three names and phone numbers are listed at the top of the press release.

please 10.Oct.2003 17:09

fill in the blanks

Please post the judges

- snail mail address
- email address
- and/or telephone number if known

I'd love to thank this human being