portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary global

corporate dominance | human & civil rights | labor

Boycott/Girlcott coca cola

Murder, kidnappings, torture of union leaders and organizers involved in daily life and death struggles at the CocaCola bottling plants in Colombia, South America.
featured article:
COKE CAN'T HIDE ITS CRIMES IN COLOMBIA

Isidro Segundo Gil, an employee at a Coca-Cola bottling plant in Colombia, was killed at his workplace by paramilitary thugs. His children, now living in hiding with relatives, undersand all too well why their homeland is known as "a country where union work is like carrying a tombstone on your back."

A chilling description of Gil's assassination, based on eyewitness accounts, is the centerpiece of a lawsuit filed in Miami in July 2001 against Coca-Cola, Panamerican Beverages (the largest soft drink bottler in Latin America) and Bebidas y Alimentos (a bottler owned by Richard Kirby of Key Biscayne, Fla., which operates the plant in which Gil was killed.

In the lawsuit, Gil's union, Sinaltrainal, the International Labor Rights Fund (ILRF) and the United Steelworkers of America assert that the Coke bottlers "contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that utilized extreme violence and murdered, tortured, unlawfully detained or otehrwise silenced trade union leaders."

Minutes after the thugs showed up at the Carepa plant gate, they fired 10 shots at Gil, a member of the union executive board, mortally wounding him. An hour later, another union leader was kidnapped at his home. That evening, a building that housed the union's offices, equipment and records was set ablaze.

The next day, a heavily armed group returned to the plant, called the workers together and told them if they didn't quit the union by 4 p.m., they, too, would be killed. Resignation forms were prepared in advance by Coca-Cola's plant manager, who had a history of socializing with the paramilitaries and had earlier "given (them) an order to carry out the task of destroying the union," the lawsuit says.

Fearing for their lives, union members at Carepa resigned en masse and fled the area. The company broke off contract negotiations, the paramilitaries camped outside the plant gate for the next two months, and the union was crushed. Experienced workers who made about $380 a month were replaced by new hires earning minimum wage ($130 a month).

No charges were ever filed against Gil's killers or those who killed at least seven other Coca-Cola unionists (see box below). Like many multinational corporations, Coke tries to have it both ways: tightly controlling the manufacture and distribution of its products overseas and collecting the profits, but denying any responsibility to workers. But the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), enacted by the U.S. Congress in 1789, may hold the key to securing justice for foreign victims of corporate abuses.

Several companies now being sued under the ATCA claim to adhere to one or more "voluntary" initiatives (like Coca-Cola's so-called Code of Conduct) that commit them to respect human rights abroad. Unfortunately, enforcement has proven impossible.

In essence, the ATCA permits foreigners to sue in U.S. courts for violations of fundamental human rights that are clearly defined under international law. It applies to "the law of nations," which federal courts have interpreted to cover genocide, war crimes, extrajudicial killings, torture, unlawful detention and crimes against humanity.

Recently, the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, representing thousands of companies worldwide, urged the U.S. government to stop the growing use of the ATCA to sue multinationals. It's "unacceptable," they said.

"It shocks the conscience that these companies seek to immunize themselves from charges of human rights violations," says ILRF attorney Terry Collingsworth.

Javier Correa, persident of Sinaltrainal, adds: "We want justice. We want people to know the truth about what is going on in Colombia against Coke workers. Now that you know, will you please help us?"

-------
Coca-Cola bottlers "contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that utilize extreme violence and murdered, tortured, unlawfully detained or otherwise silenced trade union leaders," the lawsuit states. It also notes that Colombian troops connected with the paramilitaries have trained at the U.S. Army's School of the Americas (SOA) at Fort Benning, Ga., where trainees were encouraged to torture and murder those who do "union organizing and recruiting;" pass out "propaganda in favor of workers;" and "sympathize with demonstrators or strikes." This was made public when the Pentagon was forced to reveal the contents of training manuals used at the school. (For more information, see www.soaw.org, the website of SOA Watch.) The year that the lawsuit was filed, The Coca-Cola Co. made $4 billion in profits and paid its CEO, Douglas Daft, more than $105 million. Coca-Cola continues to rake in billions each year, yet the frightening conditions at the Coke plants remain unchanged. Labor unions and human rights advocates in the United States can stop these atrocities at Coca-Cola's bottling plants."


-------
CocaColas Casualties:

Listed below are union leaders at Coca-Cola's Colombian bottling plants who have been murdered. Hundreds of other Coke workers have been tortured, kidnapped and/or illegally detained by violent paramilitaries, often working closely with plant managements.

Date - Name - Coca-Cola Plant

1989 Avelino Chicanoy Pasto
4/8/94 Jose Elaseasar MancoDavid Carepa
4/20/94 Luis Enrique Giraldo Arango Carepa
4/23/95 Luis Enrique Gomez Garado Carepa
12/5/96 Isidro Segundo Gil Carepa
12/26/96 Jose Librado Herrera Osorio Carepa
6/21/2001 Oscar Dario Soto Polo Monteria
8/31/2002 Adolfo de Jesus Munera Lopez Baranquilla

---------
The Coca-Cola Company's Brands:
 http://www.corporatecampaign.org/killer-coke/pdf/CokeBrands.pdf

---------

More:
 http://www.killercoke.org
 http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/ideas/coke_independent.html
 http://www.hotkey.net.au/~gargoyle/CDL/BoycottCocaCola/
Etymology of 'boycott' 02.Oct.2003 14:36

James

The word comes to us from the name of one Charles Boycott who was, umm, boycotted for evicting his tenants in Ireland, after they demanded lower rents. You needn't neuter the word :)

Leader of Coke Workers Union to Visit Portland October 16-17 02.Oct.2003 15:21

CBLOC info@pcasc.net

Juan Carlos Galvis, the vice president of Sinaltrainal, will be here later this month. Stay tuned for details, or contact CBLOC for more info.

503-236-7916

not the point, I know... 02.Oct.2003 15:53

croozy

but why NOT alter the word?

because 03.Oct.2003 05:29

Bill

It is silly and makes you look foolish.

It gives anybody who wishes to avoid the real issue an opportunity to ridicule you.

And when you object, he can drag the red-herring damn-near anywhere he pleases.

Odwalla too 06.Oct.2003 10:17

girlcotting coke for good

Remember to include Odwalla in your list of products to avoid. Coke bought out the juice maker, but most consumers are blissfully ignorant of the connection between corporate death squads and the hippie new agey odwalla products. (Sneaky. It's like Nike buying Convers, which they did.)

Dumb 03.Dec.2003 10:19

T.O. Hellenbach

Girlcotting has replaced Thankstaking as dumbest mutilation of a word I have yet to see. Thanks.