portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts global

government | imperialism & war | political theory

The Luckiest Man in the World

When bin Laden made his move, there was no way he could have predicted that his greatest ally would be the current American president, the Honorable George W. Bush.

Now, that's luck!
Monday, September 15, 2003

The luckiest man in the world

Harley Sorensen, Special to SF Gate

Quiz time. Who is the luckiest man in the world?

No, not the guy who won the Power Ball drawing, and certainly not Ben Affleck (unless the postponement becomes a cancellation). But the answer is easy. The luckiest man in the world is Osama bin Laden.

Like our very own George W. Bush, Osama was born into wealth and never had to support himself. But even without that good luck, the man could have made an easy living for himself by working as a Jesus model. With his handsome Semitic good looks and his dreamy, faraway smile, he was a natural for the job. The Old Masters would have drooled.

But what really makes bin Laden the luckiest man in the world is his surprise ally. When bin Laden ordered the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 (assuming he did), he wanted to do more than kill thousands of infidels. He wanted to change the world, disrupt American society, and destroy an American culture that was slowly overtaking the entire planet.

When bin Laden made his move, there was no way he could have predicted that his greatest ally would be the current American president, the Honorable George W. Bush.

Now, that's luck!

America, whatever its faults, has always been a beacon of hope for people around the world. Although many nations have surpassed our standard of living, we are still the land of economic opportunity, virtually unfettered free speech, religious freedom and, to a large extent, tolerance of nonconformity.

People elsewhere looked to us with hope, even after the events of the year 2000, when the presidential candidate who was clearly the people's choice and the most competent for the job lost to a previously ne'er-do-well whose main qualification was that he was the scion of a rich and politically prominent family.

So when the Saudi hijackers and their helpers committed their terrible crimes on Sept. 11, 2001, the world wept for America. Never, never before in our history, not even on the day John F. Kennedy was assassinated, did the rest of the world bleed for America the way it did on that Sept. 11 and the days following.

So the combined tragedies of Sept. 11 became a kind of opportunity for America. We could have turned the tables on our tormentors by proving that we were what most people of the world believed we were, a good and kind and generous nation, truly the land of the free and the home of the brave.

But we didn't do that. We did just the opposite. Under the leadership of the Honorable George W. Bush, we showed how petty we could be, how mean-spirited, and even how cowardly. We truly disgraced ourselves in the eyes of the world as, under Bush, we started the methodical destruction of our wonderful freedoms in the name of self-protection.

We cringed, we cowered and, when the opportunity to do so arose, we bullied. And, when the chance came for George W. Bush to settle an old personal score with Iraq's Saddam Hussein, we thumbed our nose at the rest of the world and insulted it. "Old Europe," our leaders said, disdainfully.

We invented "freedom fries" to show our contempt for the nation that made America possible in the 18th century.

We took a page from the despots of the world and started making people disappear. We rediscovered torture of prisoners to make them talk, either through surrogates ("The Saudis know how to deal with these kinds of problems") or using modern, scientific, non-touching methods.

We pushed through the USA Patriot Act, an unreadable mess of legalistic mumbo jumbo, without a single senator or representative knowing exactly what was in it. It turned out to be such a bad piece of legislation that communities around the nation passed resolutions vowing to not cooperate with it. Even librarians united to defy its unwarranted snooping terms.

The Honorable Mr. Bush and his trusty cohorts created the mammoth Department of Homeland Security, a mishmash of departments that were already so big as to become dysfunctional. "Big government is never so big that it can't become bigger and more impersonal" -- that seemed to be the logic behind "homeland" security.

("Homeland," incidentally, has never been defined. Is it everything American? Just the North American part? Just the Lower 48? Does it include Hawaii, Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa? How about Puerto Rico? Kingman Reef? Does anybody know?)

In short, Mr. Bush has set about finishing the job that Osama bin Laden started. Even his economic policy -- take from the poor, give to the rich -- is designed to increase monetary discrepancies between Americans, just like in bin Laden's native land.

Nor is Mr. Bush above religious fundamentalist superstition. In what might have been a signal to bin Laden as to what kind of leadership America now has, Mr. Bush in 2001 put the clamps on stem cell research (while pretending to maintain it at low levels). His murky "logic" cramping scientific study defies rational explanation. It is Middle Ages stuff, right out of the Osama bin Laden playbook. Osama had to be pleased.

It seems quite possible that the absence of follow-up attacks on America can be explained by a lack of necessity for them. From bin Laden's point of view, everything in America is happening just the way he likes it. We are becoming more and more like a Middle Eastern emirate and less and less like the world's foremost democracy.

Why should bin Laden attack us again and rock the boat? Mr. Bush is doing his work for him.

Will there ever be another terrorist attack here? The experts say yes, and they're most likely right. When will it be? My guess: sometime next year, timed to draw the fearful closer to Mr. Bush and assure his re-election.

The best the lucky bin Laden could possibly hope for is four more years of George W. Bush.

homepage: homepage: http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/sorensen/
address: address: SF Gate

does ol' W really care about the people of N.Y. city 16.Sep.2003 08:13

shit, I think we are next!

theres been talk that little george let the towers go down. WELLL, i got your motive ........................................................................a good ol boy from texas? I think there are too many nig..er i mean african americans,spi....er imean latinos, and faaaags...er i mean artists in n.y. city for that red blooded american and we all know how mean spirited he is, he let it happen because all those damn liberals (who needs 'em)let him lose the popular vote and MADE him STEAL the election! Now by this way of thinking anybody who decides to stand in the way of a good texas upbringing by being to african american ,latino, or an artist or by having a town named little beirut, or by not voting for a bush has a high probability for a foreign terrorist attack!

Who could deny that America has changed.... 16.Sep.2003 16:18

RADREV

There is no doubt that America has changed, significantly. Did it take Bin Laden, I doubt it. The catalyst has been the elite power brokers intent on opening the world for exploitation and driving America down to limit economic prosperity to the elite. Consider how much easier it is to control a fearful and desperate population than it is to manipulate an educated and prosperous population. The power brokers in this country have this American population exactly where they have wanted us for years. Poor, ignorant, and scared. Think about it and demand not your own natural rights as they are defined by the constitution but the natural rights of your neighbor. That is a revolutionary act in and of itself and exactly what the power brokers fear the most; consolidation of interests by and among disparate populations. We have the numbers but we must share the glory everybody say; "yeah".

Bin Laden was a pawn in the master's game...an insignificant piece. There will be other pawns but eventually the game will be won by those who possess the courage to subordinate their own self-interest to their commitment to the shared ideals of enlightenment thought.

...that act was crystalline like a diamond shot through my brain, give me ten divisions of men with that commitment and our troubles here would be over very shortly....

Commander Kurtz, the night before his sacrifice
Apocalypse Now!