portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts united states

imperialism & war

Prepare for another raft of "W" lies and spin ...

Bush to address nation on Iraq

Sept. 5 As the members of the U.N. Security Council wrestled with a U.S. proposal designed to attract more money and troops from other countries for Iraq, the White House announced that President Bush would address the nation Sunday night on the subject of Iraq amid growing U.S. casualties and criticism about Bush's handling of the war, diplomacy and the fight against terrorism.
 http://www.msnbc.com/news/951994.asp?0cv=CB10

THE PRESIDENT'S speech is scheduled for 8:30 p.m. ET and is expected to last 13 to 18 minutes, NBC News' David Gregory reported.
White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the address would focus on progress so far in the war on terror and "our needs going forward."
"Iraq is now a central part in the war on terrorism," McClellan said. "And the world has a stake in what is going on, the world has a stake in helping the Iraqi people realize a better future, realize a free and democratic society. The world has a stake in confronting the terrorists that have come into Iraq."
The address will come three days after Democratic candidates for president, at a debate in Albuquerque, N.M., said Bush has unnecessarily put U.S. troops in danger and split the United States from its allies.
As of Friday, 287 Americans had died in Iraq, 149 since the last time Bush made such a speech, on May 1 when he landed on the deck of the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended."
The speech will come as the nation prepares to mark the second anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks next Thursday.

REACTIONS TO RESOLUTION
The 15 Security Council nations have widely differing reactions to the new resolution proposed by the United States: France, Germany and Syria criticized it, while supporters of the Iraq war welcomed it as a positive step. But even France and Germany called the U.S. proposal a basis for negotiations, and U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said he was ready to listen to their suggestions and consider any other "constructive input."
As council members digested the U.S. draft which some countries only received on Thursday it was clear that the United States faced tough negotiations on several key issues. The U.S. draft, in Powell's words, puts "the Security Council into the game." But it doesn't relinquish U.S. political and military control of the country.
France, Germany, Russia and other council members want the U.S.-led coalition to transfer political responsibility to an Iraqi government as quickly as possible. Many council nations are also demanding a much stronger U.N. role, and France would like to see the United Nations replace the United States as Iraq's interim administrator. Syria also wants the United Nations to command the U.N.-authorized multinational force envisioned in the resolution not the United States.
The five veto-wielding permanent council members the United States, France, Britain, Russia and China met for 1 hours Thursday afternoon to discuss the draft.
"We are going to negotiate the text," said France's U.N. Ambassador Jean-Marc de La Sabliere. Russia's U.N. Ambassador called the session a "friendly discussion," though on Friday Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said the draft "still needs further, very serious work."
WashPost: Hill braces for Iraq request

FRIDAY MEETING
An informal meeting of all 15 council ambassadors was scheduled Friday, and talks were also taking place in capitals. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz said the bombing of the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad changed attitudes at the United Nations and is allowing the Bush administration to seek more support.
"I think we had a breakthrough, a sad one, but the bombing of the U.N. headquarters I think changed the atmosphere," he said.
The U.S. draft resolution invites the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council to cooperate with the United Nations and U.S. officials in Baghdad to produce "a timetable and program for the drafting of a new constitution for Iraq and for the holding of democratic elections."
But it contains no timeframe of when this should happen, and it leaves the key decision in the hands of the Governing Council, which has taken months just to form a Cabinet. The United States believes the Iraqis must remain in charge of this process but France and Germany want more Security Council control.
"We are naturally ready to study it in the most positive manner," French President Jacques Chirac said after meeting German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. "But we are quite far removed from what we believe is the priority objective, which is the transfer of political responsibility to an Iraqi government as quickly as possible."


PROMOTING POLITICAL TRANSITION
As for the U.N. role, besides helping with the timeline, the resolution asks the U.N. representative in Iraq to facilitate a "national dialogue and consensus building" to promote the political transition. But it doesn't provide for an expanded U.N. role in the security or economic areas, except for reports at least every six months to the Security Council on the efforts of the multinational force.
"We have always asked for a central role of the United Nations in all fields," Germany's U.N. Ambassador Gunter Pleuger noted. "It's a good working basis but it certainly can be improved."
U.S. finds tables turned at U.N.
Russia's Foreign Ministry reaffirmed Moscow's push for a quick transfer from the U.S.-backed interim administration in Iraq to a sovereign government to help restore peace.
But in a strong signal that Moscow was edging closer to Washington than to France and Germany which it joined in opposing the war Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said Thursday that Russia may send peacekeepers to Iraq as part of an international force.
The U.S.-Russian tilt was bolstered by Security Council diplomats who said Moscow was working closely with Washington on the U.S. draft. And on Friday, Ivanov, the Russian foreign minister, said he was giving the measure cautious support.
"Preliminarily speaking, I can say that this initiative deserves attention since the content of the proposed resolution reflects those principles which Russia has consistently championed," the foreign minister said.
China was also against the war. But in Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan said Thursday that the U.S. offer to share Iraq's postwar reconstruction was in line with the objectives of China, which has "actively participated in the endeavor."
Council supporters of the war Britain, Bulgaria and Spain rallied behind the resolution.
Preemptive strike 05.Sep.2003 16:46

Horatio

Too bad someone ... MoveOn.org ???? ... can't mount a preemptive media blitz to set the record straight before the Oblivious One shows his smirking chimp face in front of the Nation and spins and lies .... once again. You just know he will ... once again ... convince his blind follower dupes - those people who inhabit the trailer parks and barn yards of Amerika.

blitz 05.Sep.2003 17:20

clara

MoveOn has indeed started working to get another message out. Write to local papers and speak up on talk shows about how this administration continues to use fear mongering in the nation to scare people into submission.

Bush to Address Nation on Iraq Sunday 05.Sep.2003 18:05

wrh

"My fellow Americans.

That bastard Saddam tricked us. He really didn't have any weapons of mass destruction. Obviously any leader who would play such a trick on another nation does not deserve to rule, and we were therefore right and just in invading Iraq and driving Saddam from power.

God bless America. Thank you and good night."

 http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=EN4KPJUUUHW5CCRBAELCFFA?type=topNews&storyID=3397262

That bastard Saddam tricked us.
That bastard Saddam tricked us.

Speaking of Saddam 06.Sep.2003 06:50

Scratches Head

Is he like Osama? Not an issue anymore? Never an issue, was he?

Have we rid this planet of "terra?"

Have we gotten rid of the "Evil-doers?"

How could we do that? They don't exist.

Too bad all those people in between had to die.

But they are not people. They are co-llateral damage.

Don't worry about it. Everyone is catching on. We don't even need MoveOn... although they should do what they do.

Georgie is toast.

Too bad there's no real justice in this world though.

Bu$h Sunday Speech To 'Surprise' Announce Iran Atomic Bomb 06.Sep.2003 20:39

wrh