Rebuttal to Mark Hatfield
author: CatWoman
|
ON August 21st, Senator Mark Hatfiled made his annual pilgrimage to the troughs of the republican money pit. And, just as he did last year at this time, Hatfield accuses protesters of attempting to block his, and his cronies', right to "free speech." Give it a rest, Mark. $2000 a plate ain't free.
|
Last year on A22, after police brutalized a crowd composed largely of families, children, senior citizens, and babies, Mr. Hatfield brushed aside concerns about police brutality by stating that protesters outside the Hilton had been denying delegates their right to free speech. Bullshit. On that day, a hand-picked group of rich republicans was invited to plunk down thousands of dollars a plate to rub elbows with "the president." Dinner was extra, and for an additional $25,000, people could have their pictures take with the little shit. The camera, film and development, however, were to be supplied by the donor. By even the most generous standards, this little suare, and any speech that took place therein, was anything but "free."
Meanwhile, outside in the streets, we the taxpaying citizens of this city, were asked to fork over hundreds of thousands of dollars to pay for a police crackdown on...ourselves.
History repeats, and on Thursday the 21st, taxpayers were again asked to fork out precious dollars to pay for tanks in their streets, hundreds of armed police officers to patrol their neighborhoods to keep them from becoming too visible, and a couple of limo decoys to fake people out. And once again, Ex-Senator Hatfield waxed philosophical on how the police crackdown on peaceful dissenters was needed because protesters were trying to deny him his coveted free speech.
This is more than bullshit. It's a cover up. "Free speech" doesn't cost thousands of dollars. The point is not that he was ripped off. (He was, of course. Delegates should have been paid to have to sit there with that retard while they tried to eat. But that's another story.) The point is, these delegates bought access to a man posing as OUR "elected representative." I mean, we all know he wasn't elected, and he doesn't represent us. But the fact remains that he should be obligated to at least keep up the pretense. We stood outside seeking the right to free expression, the right to petition our government for redress of our grievances, and we were denied this right. Instead, our government hid from us. Hid behind armed guards in the UP Bastile, while rich white guys bought their way in through the gates.
It took money to get through that gate. Not everyone has that kind of cash to blow. So was it free speech? No. The people outside the gates were denied free speech because they were not allowed inside to state their case before the man who would be king. And the people outside paid dearly for whatever speech went on inside the Bastile as well. We paid in dollars for the militarized security force brought down upon our city. We paid in blood, sweat and tears as we were pepper sprayed and beaten by police. And, we paid in whatever consequences will come from closed meetings where wealthy parasites whose interests are not our own are allowed to buy influence over national policies.
Free speech indeed.
|
contribute to this article
contribute to this article
add comment to discussion
|
He is a traitor to the Founding Fathers of the United States
I hope my father never supported him
I hope my grandfather never supported him
I hope none of my family ever supported him
Hatfield
You are a slug that has been leaving
a slimy trail
across the state of Oregon
for decades
I wish someone
would pour salt on you
so you can die
a slow and horrible
death