portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article commentary united states

health

doors of perception: americans will believe almost anything

by tim oshea
We are the most conditioned, programmed beings the world has ever known. Not only are our thoughts and attitudes continually being shaped and molded; our very awareness of the whole design seems like it is being subtly and inexorably erased.

The doors of our perception are carefully and precisely regulated. Who cares, right?


It is an exhausting and endless task to keep explaining to people how most issues of conventional wisdom are scientifically implanted in the public consciousness by a thousand media clips per day. In an effort to save time, I would like to provide just a little background on the handling of information in this country.

Once the basic principles are illustrated about how our current system of media control arose historically, the reader might be more apt to question any given story in today's news.

If everybody believes something, it's probably wrong. We call that Conventional Wisdom.

In America, conventional wisdom that has mass acceptance is usually contrived: somebody paid for it. Examples:

Pharmaceuticals restore health

Vaccination brings immunity

The cure for cancer is just around the corner

When a child is sick, he needs immediate antibiotics

When a child has a fever he needs Tylenol

Hospitals are safe and clean.

America has the best health care in the world.

And many many more
This is a list of illusions, that have cost billions and billions to conjure up. Did you ever wonder why you never see the President speaking publicly unless he is reading? Or why most people in this country think generally the same about most of the above issues?

How This Set-Up Got Started

In Trust Us We're Experts, Stauber and Rampton pull together some compelling data describing the science of creating public opinion in America.

They trace modern public influence back to the early part of the last century, highlighting the work of guys like Edward L. Bernays, the Father of Spin. From his own amazing chronicle Propaganda, we learn how Edward L. Bernays took the ideas of his famous uncle Sigmund Freud himself, and applied them to the emerging science of mass persuasion.

The only difference was that instead of using these principles to uncover hidden themes in the human unconscious, the way Freudian psychology does, Bernays used these same ideas to mask agendas and to create illusions that deceive and misrepresent, for marketing purposes.

The Father Of Spin

Bernays dominated the PR industry until the 1940s, and was a significant force for another 40 years after that. (Tye) During all that time, Bernays took on hundreds of diverse assignments to create a public perception about some idea or product. A few examples:

As a neophyte with the Committee on Public Information, one of Bernays' first assignments was to help sell the First World War to the American public with the idea to "Make the World Safe for Democracy." (Ewen)

A few years later, Bernays set up a stunt to popularize the notion of women smoking cigarettes. In organizing the 1929 Easter Parade in New York City, Bernays showed himself as a force to be reckoned with.

He organized the Torches of Liberty Brigade in which suffragettes marched in the parade smoking cigarettes as a mark of women's liberation. Such publicity followed from that one event that from then on women have felt secure about destroying their own lungs in public, the same way that men have always done.

Bernays popularized the idea of bacon for breakfast.

Not one to turn down a challenge, he set up the advertising format along with the AMA that lasted for nearly 50 years proving that cigarettes are beneficial to health. Just look at ads in issues of Life or Time from the 40s and 50s.

Smoke And Mirrors

Bernay's job was to reframe an issue; to create a desired image that would put a particular product or concept in a desirable light. Bernays described the public as a 'herd that needed to be led.' And this herdlike thinking makes people "susceptible to leadership."

Bernays never deviated from his fundamental axiom to "control the masses without their knowing it." The best PR happens with the people unaware that they are being manipulated.

Stauber describes Bernays' rationale like this:

"the scientific manipulation of public opinion was necessary to overcome chaos and conflict in a democratic society." Trust Us p 42

These early mass persuaders postured themselves as performing a moral service for humanity in general - democracy was too good for people; they needed to be told what to think, because they were incapable of rational thought by themselves. Here's a paragraph from Bernays' Propaganda:

"Those who manipulate the unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of.

This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society.

In almost every act of our lives whether in the sphere of politics or business in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires that control the public mind."

Here Comes The Money

Once the possibilities of applying Freudian psychology to mass media were glimpsed, Bernays soon had more corporate clients than he could handle. Global corporations fell all over themselves courting the new Image Makers. There were dozens of goods and services and ideas to be sold to a susceptible public. Over the years, these players have had the money to make their images happen. A few examples:

Philip Morris Pfizer Union Carbide
Allstate Monsanto Eli Lilly
tobacco industry Ciba Geigy lead industry
Coors DuPont Chlorox
Shell Oil Standard Oil Procter & Gamble
Boeing General Motors Dow Chemical
General Mills Goodyear

The Players

Though world-famous within the PR industry, the companies have names we don't know, and for good reason.

The best PR goes unnoticed.

For decades they have created the opinions that most of us were raised with, on virtually any issue which has the remotest commercial value, including:

pharmaceutical drugs vaccines
medicine as a profession alternative medicine
fluoridation of city water chlorine
household cleaning products tobacco
dioxin global warming
leaded gasoline cancer research and treatment
pollution of the oceans forests and lumber
images of celebrities, including damage control crisis and disaster management
genetically modified foods aspartame
food additives; processed foods dental amalgams

Lesson #1

Bernays learned early on that the most effective way to create credibility for a product or an image was by "independent third-party" endorsement.

For example, if General Motors were to come out and say that global warming is a hoax thought up by some liberal tree-huggers, people would suspect GM's motives, since GM's fortune is made by selling automobiles.

If however some independent research institute with a very credible sounding name like the Global Climate Coalition comes out with a scientific report that says global warming is really a fiction, people begin to get confused and to have doubts about the original issue.

So that's exactly what Bernays did. With a policy inspired by genius, he set up "more institutes and foundations than Rockefeller and Carnegie combined." (Stauber p 45)

Quietly financed by the industries whose products were being evaluated, these "independent" research agencies would churn out "scientific" studies and press materials that could create any image their handlers wanted. Such front groups are given high-sounding names like:

Temperature Research Foundation Manhattan Institute
International Food Information Council Center for Produce Quality
Consumer Alert Tobacco Institute Research Council
The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition Cato Institute
Air Hygiene Foundation
American Council on Science and Health
Industrial Health Federation Global Climate Coalition
International Food Information Council Alliance for Better Foods

Sound pretty legit don't they?

Canned News Releases

As Stauber explains, these organizations and hundreds of others like them are front groups whose sole mission is to advance the image of the global corporations who fund them, like those listed on page 2 above.

This is accomplished in part by an endless stream of 'press releases' announcing "breakthrough" research to every radio station and newspaper in the country. (Robbins) Many of these canned reports read like straight news, and indeed are purposely molded in the news format.

This saves journalists the trouble of researching the subjects on their own, especially on topics about which they know very little. Entire sections of the release or in the case of video news releases, the whole thing can be just lifted intact, with no editing, given the byline of the reporter or newspaper or TV station - and voilá! Instant news - copy and paste. Written by corporate PR firms.

Does this really happen? Every single day, since the 1920s when the idea of the News Release was first invented by Ivy Lee. (Stauber, p 22) Sometimes as many as half the stories appearing in an issue of the Wall St. Journal are based solely on such PR press releases.. (22)

These types of stories are mixed right in with legitimately researched stories. Unless you have done the research yourself, you won't be able to tell the difference.

The Language Of Spin

As 1920s spin pioneers like Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays gained more experience, they began to formulate rules and guidelines for creating public opinion. They learned quickly that mob psychology must focus on emotion, not facts. Since the mob is incapable of rational thought, motivation must be based not on logic but on presentation. Here are some of the axioms of the new science of PR:

technology is a religion unto itself

if people are incapable of rational thought, real democracy is dangerous

important decisions should be left to experts

when reframing issues, stay away from substance; create images

never state a clearly demonstrable lie
Words are very carefully chosen for their emotional impact. Here's an example. A front group called the International Food Information Council handles the public's natural aversion to genetically modified foods.

Trigger words are repeated all through the text. Now in the case of GM foods, the public is instinctively afraid of these experimental new creations which have suddenly popped up on our grocery shelves which are said to have DNA alterations. The IFIC wants to reassure the public of the safety of GM foods, so it avoids words like:

Frankenfoods Hitler biotech
chemical DNA experiments
manipulate money safety
scientists radiation roulette
gene-splicing gene gun random

Instead, good PR for GM foods contains words like:


hybrids natural order beauty
choice bounty cross-breeding
diversity earth farmer
organic wholesome

It's basic Freudian/Tony Robbins word association. The fact that GM foods are not hybrids that have been subjected to the slow and careful scientific methods of real crossbreeding doesn't really matter. This is pseudoscience, not science. Form is everything and substance just a passing myth. (Trevanian)

Who do you think funds the International Food Information Council? Take a wild guess. Right - Monsanto, DuPont, Frito-Lay, Coca Cola, Nutrasweet - those in a position to make fortunes from GM foods. (Stauber p 20)

Characteristics Of Good Propaganda

As the science of mass control evolved, PR firms developed further guidelines for effective copy. Here are some of the gems:

dehumanize the attacked party by labeling and name calling

speak in glittering generalities using emotionally positive words

when covering something up, don't use plain English; stall for time; distract

get endorsements from celebrities, churches, sports figures, street people - anyone who has no expertise in the subject at hand

the 'plain folks' ruse: us billionaires are just like you

when minimizing outrage, don't say anything memorable, point out the benefits of what just happened, and avoid moral issues

Keep this list. Start watching for these techniques. Not hard to find - look at today's paper or tonight's TV news. See what they're doing; these guys are good!

PAGE 2

 http://www.mercola.com/2001/aug/15/perception.htm
Good points 12.Jul.2003 22:24

Cecil

Very good points. Most of our government representatives are on the take of industrial/corporate lobbyists and front organizations like these. Arianna Huffingtons best seller book PIGS AT THE TROUGH is about this threat to democracy. The Heritage Foundation is the biggest conservative front organization that always publishes pseudo-scientific research to support their anti-environmental shit.
However, I would say the single biggest brainwashing influence in America are Detroit car TV commercials especially SUV commercials. If you havent watched much TV lately all I can say is that you have no idea what is going on for the minds and dollars of Americans. It seems every other commercial is a car or SUV commercial. Even Hummer-tank TV ads are frequent and mesmerizing, showing the Hummer gliding overr the ocean beach like a flying carpet to pulsing electronic rave music with the camera pulling away until the whole planet is shown ending with "Hummer-Like nothing else". Another Hummer ad shows a video game that becomes the Hummer implying the running down of a smaller vehicle! Have you ever wondered why polluting gashogs are rapidly taking over the streets. Look to the TV. Junk and Fast-food targeting kids is another story.

Post 12.Jul.2003 22:35

TheTroll

Tell one of us that we are wrong about anything. we won't believe it.

Advice 12.Jul.2003 23:14

Snaggle

Cecil - Quit watching television, okay?

Okey Dokey 12.Jul.2003 23:40

Cecil

Haha. SOMEBODY has to keep a watch on the great brainwasher of America. But I dont recommend it. I dont watch as much as the American average of 6? hours a day. 95% of what I watch is news and docs anyway. Mostly Cnn/Fox/MSNBC and PBS. ANd mostly for background "noise" while I slave away at my "homework". I never watch fiction series shows. I also seem to be immune to TV ads I am well enough educated to see though their shit like the author of this post writes.

the role of mandatory public schooling in the dumbing down of a whole people 13.Jul.2003 01:34

GRINGO STARS

This nation educates our young to be intellectually dependant on authority figures - teacher, politician, doctor, TV anchorperson, etc. Check out this brief history of the mandatory public school system;
 http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/historytour/history1.htm
OBEY THE STATE OR ELSE
OBEY THE STATE OR ELSE

shit is getting psychological... 13.Jul.2003 07:51

this thing here

the reason SOME americans will believe almost anything is in precise degree to the amount of psychological trickery being thrown at them.

you turn on the tube, or look at ads in magizines or on the internet, YOU ARE BEING EXPOSED TO MIND GAMES. not brainwashing persay, but definite attempts, using psychology, to get you to want things that you don't need.

just as one example, speaking of s.u.v.'s and hummers, has anyone seen the hummer television advert that shows some hummer driving in what is probably iceland, that starts off with a barely audible music track and frustration and anxiety inducing text that starts flashing quicker and quicker, and then suddenly you see this geyser erupting, and then boom, the big music track comes in?

gentlemen, why on earth do you think they included an erupting geyser of all things right at that specific point in the ad? what do you think that erupting geyser is supposed to symbolize on a primitive psychological level? that's right gentlemen, that's called ejaculatory imagery. virility and masculinity and all the rest of that shit. it's no mistake and no accident for that kind of overt imagery to be deployed in an ad for an s.u.v.

it's stuff like that ad that to me, personally, shows that this age is a very "psychologically active" age. people gotta watch their backs, not be suckers, and recognize the mind games for what they are. and look at politics. whether democrat or republican, they're using the exact same psychological shit in their messages and their policies. why do you think the PATRIOT Act is called the PATRIOT Act when it couldn't be more un-patriotic?

AFLACK 13.Jul.2003 13:22

Snaggle

I think some of the best on TV is the ads. They're creative, well done, and tend to want to make us laugh. Of course they're trying to get into our wallets. That's their job. They can try.

I think most educated people know the difference. Deep down, I mean.

There is great stuff on TV, crap on TV. And we get to choose. It's just entertainment.

And, when all else fails, it's great background noise!