portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article oregon & cascadia

government

Greenspan: Falling prices can deal 'massive blow' to Bush regime

Fed policymakers see deflation as possibility in postwar US economy amid setting of high unemployment, "sluggish industrial output," and buyers holding off for lower prices.
WASHINGTON (Agence France-Presse), May 21 Deflation, though a minor risk, could deal a massive blow to the hesitant postwar US economy, Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan warned.
"We at the Federal Reserve recognize that deflation is a possibility," Greenspan told Congress' joint economic committee.
Deflation, or falling prices, delivers a double economic punch by pressuring people to postpone buying until prices fall further, and by raising real interest rates.
Financial markets appeared to have little fear of imminent deflation, Greenspan said Wednesday.
"Nevertheless, even though we perceive the risks as minor, the potential consequences are very substantial and could be quite negative," the powerful Federal Reserve boss told lawmakers.
Policymakers were on alert, Greenspan said.
"It does require very close scrutiny and maybe, maybe, action on the part of the central bank," he said.
Underlying US inflation plunged to a 37-year low in April, according to latest figures.
Core US consumer prices, stripping away volatile food and energy prices, rose just 1.5 percent when compared to April 2002 -- the smallest annual increase since March 1966.
The Federal Reserve, in a surprise shift of focus, acknowledged the threat of downward pressure on prices at a meeting May 6, although it carefully avoided using the word "deflation."
"We believe that, because in the current environment the cost of taking out insurance against deflation is so low, that we can aggressively attack some of the underlying forces, which are essentially weak demand," the 77-year-old central bank chief said. "Indeed we have done that since we started a very aggressive easing of monetary policy in early 2001," he said.
Since early 2001, the Federal Reserve has slashed its target for the federal funds target rate, which commercial banks charge each other, from 6.50 percent to a four-decade low 1.25 percent.
The US economic outlook was murky, Greenspan said. "We do not yet have sufficient information on economic activity following the end of hostilities to make a firm judgment about the current underlying strength of the real economy," he told Congress.
A weak jobs market and sluggish industrial output outlasted the Iraq war largely because of decisions taken before the conflict, he said. But productivity had improved and financial markets had rallied.
"Looking ahead, the consensus expectation for a pickup in economic activity is not unreasonable, though the timing and extent of that improvement continue to be uncertain."
Along with low interest rates, energy prices were a "favorable influence" on the US economy as they dropped in line with a decline in crude oil prices after the Iraq war. Those prospects had been dampened, however, by the slow recovery of Iraq's oil industry and by renewed "geopolitical risks," a veiled allusion to the recent Saudi Arabian and Moroccan suicide bomb attacks.
Greenspan rang alarm bells over the rise in natural gas prices. Canada had little room to export more gas, and the limited US capacity to import liquefied natural gas restricted the country's access to abundant global supplies, he said.
The spread of the potentially lethal Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus injected new uncertainty into the global economy, Greenspan said. "To date, the effects of SARS on the US economy have been minimal," despite delivering another blow to airlines, he said.
The big question in the economy was when businesses would ramp up investment, Greenspan said. The economy continues to be buffeted by strong cross currents," the Federal Reserve chairman said.
"Recent readings on production and employment have been on the weak side, but the economic fundamentals -- including the improved conditions in financial markets and the continued growth in productivity -- augur well for the future," he said.
parralels 21.May.2003 20:32

dude

There are strong parallel to presentt imes and the 1930s and the 1950s. I figure were closer to the 30's than the 50's.

In the 50 as in 30's the state had to give commies and Labor a whipping. But this occured post civil war too.(rusty here- Chicago Hay market square stuff)

However, there is an 80 year depression cycle that has been about for centuries. So my point were about due.


Peace