The orthodox view on AIDS holds that it is caused by the virus known as HIV that is transmitted through the exchange of bodily fluids. Once infected, a person will remain well for a time, though infectious to others, before going on to develop AIDS and dying. Despite huge sums of money spent on medical research, there is still no cure, just drug therapies said to slow the progression of the disease, and regular T cell counts to measure health. A whole industry has evolved around AIDS, on which many careers and businesses depend, but which offers little hope to those affected.
It works on the premise that HIV=AIDS=DEATH.
HEAL asks you to consider the following:
What have the HIV "experts" been telling us?
We are told that HIV causes AIDS.
- However, many scientists assert that HIV is not the cause of AIDS.
The vast majority of people worldwide who are reported as "HIV positive" remain healthy. Also, within the AIDS risk groups, AIDS conditions may be common even in people who test HIV negative. The official "latency period" (how long it takes HIV+ people to get sick) has been stretched to 15 or more years because people labeled "HIV+" are surviving. People who test HIV positive, including AIDS patients, have no active HIV infections by standard methods of measurement. So-called viral load tests were invented by HIV researchers to try to explain why only vanishingly small quantities, if any virus, could be found. The methods used to "isolate" and detect HIV are so indirect that they may not even measure the presence of a virus. Does HIV exist? These are just a few of the reasons why we need to look beyond HIV in order to overcome AIDS.
"So why are people getting sick?"
- The epidemic of AIDS follows a dramatic worldwide increase of immunological stressors: chemical, physical, biological, mental and nutritional. People diagnosed with "AIDS" may be sick due to factors such as one or more of the following:
* misdiagnosis and mistreatment of at least 29 illnesses due to being labeled HIV. (The validity of HIV tests is challenged.)
* toxic chemotherapy with "anti-HIV" pharmaceuticals such as AZT and protease inhibitors
* direct or indirect effects of recreational drug consumption
* multiple infections, STD's and resulting over consumption of antibiotics
* foreign protein mediated immunodeficiency due to hemophilia clotting factor therapy and multiple blood transfusions
* chronic malnutrition
* severely impoverished living conditions
* psychosomatic terror brought on by a HIV positive diagnosis
In fact, HIV may be entirely harmless
- and treatments for it worse than useless!
We are told by the AIDS establishment that toxic drugs like AZT, DDI, DDC, and protease inhibitors aimed at eradicating HIV are valid and effective treatments.
- Pharmaceuticals prescribed to treat HIV infections may be the cause of many AIDS defining illnesses. Many of the "side-effects" of the current antiviral combination therapies are indistinguishable from the symptoms of AIDS.
We are told that there are now less AIDS deaths thanks to the new protease inhibitor "cocktail" therapies.
- The statistics show that AIDS cases were on the decline long before the protease inhibitors were available. Due to the 1993 change of the AIDS definition (U.S.) more than half the current AIDS cases have no illness at all.
We are told that "everyone is at risk for HIV and AIDS".
- At least 90% of people with AIDS are still from the original risk groups: gay men, IV drug users, hemophiliacs and transfusion recipients. If AIDS was a contagious disease it could not remain almost entirely within the risk groups.
We are told that HIV antibody testing is virtually 100% accurate.
- There are at least 8 official standards for "interpreting" the "HIV test" around the world. Your test result can be interpreted as negative OR positive depending on where you live or if you are in a "risk group" or not. There are also 60 conditions unrelated to HIV that can cause a a person to test false positive on an "HIV test".
And the list of facts that don't fit the HIV theory goes on and on...
Public officials, medical scientists, and social activists have accepted the infectious HIV/AIDS model with out properly scrutinizing it and dismissed alternative models without properly considering them.
Is the conventional view and treatment of AIDS
the answer or part of the PROBLEM?
"HIV=AIDS=DEATH" is FALSE