portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article

imperialism & war

Actual Un-Doctored Photo! Weasels to hear New Iraq Evidence

This is an actual photo of the front page of the New York Post.

(go to the website and check it out)
Actual Un-Doctored Photo! Weasels to hear New Iraq Evidence
Actual Un-Doctored Photo! Weasels to hear New Iraq Evidence
IT'S SHOWDOWN TIME AT U.N. AS POWELL TAKES ON EURO-WEASELS

February 14, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Weasel so-called allies France and Germany will hear fresh evidence today of Iraqi stonewalling, at an 11th-hour showdown with the United States in the U.N. Security Council.
As chief weapons inspector Hans Blix gives his final report, Secretary of State Colin Powell has vowed to confront the war wimps - who are leading the push against American military action - and ask them if they are simply buying time to get Saddam Hussein "off the hook."

With the United Nations set to decide whether to impose the "serious consequences" it threatened in a unanimous vote last year, President Bush yesterday bluntly challenged France and Germany to get some "backbone."

"The decision is this for the United Nations: When you say something, does it mean anything?" Bush told troops yesterday at the Mayport Naval Station in Jacksonville, Fla.

"I'm optimistic that free nations will show backbone and courage in the face of true threats to peace and freedom," added the president, who sported a military jacket and spoke flanked by rows of sailors in crisp uniforms.

Bush stressed that America must protect the world "from these thugs" but U.S. troops won't have to go it alone even if the United Nations balks since there are plenty of "friends and allies" who agree that Saddam must be stopped.

If it comes to war, "America will act deliberately, America will act decisively and America will act victoriously with the world's greatest military," he vowed to the cheering troops.

Chief weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei today are expected to report that Iraq has longer-range missiles that explicitly violate the 93-mile U.N. limit aimed at keeping Saddam from attacking his neighbors.

ElBaradei said yesterday that he will ask for more time for inspections to continue.

Blix gave a surprisingly tough report on Jan. 27 and has since spoken of only limited progress and no real sign Iraq will disarm. The big question is how tough he'll be today.

France and Germany insist there's not enough to justify war - not the missiles, nor Saddam's failure to account for tons of lethal VX nerve gas and 25,000 liters of anthrax, as well as a host of other mass-murder weapons.

Powell and other foreign ministers will be at the Security Council for the huddle that could begin the countdown to war - and Powell has vowed to confront the reluctant French and Germans.

"The question I will put to them is, 'Why more inspections? And how much more time? Or are you just delaying for the sake of delaying in order to get Saddam off the hook and no disarmament?' That's a challenge I will put them," Powell told Congress.

homepage: homepage: http://www.nypost.com/

This is good 14.Feb.2003 22:50

x

A truly disgusting display of hateful ignorance, but the more these psychopathic reactionaries rant and rave, the more resolute will the saner minds of this world become. Who knows, if there are war crimes trials in America's future, the publishers of the New York Post could find themselves the objects of "unwanted attention" for their role in helping to whip the public into a war frenzy.

The publisher of another such "newspaper" received this "special" recognition from the International War Crimes Tribunal. His name was Julius Streicher and he published a pro-Nazi hate sheet called Der Stuhrmer which was very much like the New York Post. For his stellar PR efforts on behalf of the Third Reich he was convicted at Nuremberg and hanged.

response to crap 14.Feb.2003 22:59

ziggy

Rupert Murdoch, principle owner of the New York Post (and Fox and much more), is clearly a war mongering lunatic. Some might think my statement is hyperbole. But when you consider the degree to which the fate of the entire world is in the hands of mainstream media, which is almost always pro-war, it should give you pause. Humanity has seen hundreds -- HUNDREDS -- of wars, large and small, in the last century. We, as a species, truly play Russian roulette, with the possibility some conflicts triggering nuclear early warning systems -- and even accidental nuclear war.

If you think this is hyperbole, you need to take the time to study nuclear weapons systems and policy, as dry as the subject can be. A good starting point I'd recommend is Helen Caldicott. Check this out:

 http://www.webactive.com/pacifica/demnow/dn20030102.html

and if you want to hear other speeches, enter her last name into the search engine at

 http://www.radio4all.net/search.php