portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reposts

Recovery will take years

This news isn't new: a lack of capital spending will hurt stocks . . . if a company doesn't invest in new equipment and products, it won't be able to grow. What's significant is that it comes from two of the largest investment firms in the US. Goldman Sachs predicts that capital spending will fall by 10% in 2003. Merrill Lynch adds that sales of technology products, which led the 1990s expansion, won't recover until about 2005.
Recovery Will Take Years
-- February 11, 2003
 http://www.safemoneyreport.com/home/daily.asp

This news isn't new. We've been warning investors for some time that a lack of capital spending will hurt stocks. After all, if a company doesn't invest in new equipment and products, it won't be able to grow. Productivity already fell 0.2% in the fourth quarter of 2002. And sales have plunged across industries as companies have chosen the cost-cutting route instead.

What's significant about this news is that it is from two of the largest investment firms in the US. Goldman Sachs predicts that capital spending will fall by 10% in 2003. Merrill Lynch adds that sales of technology products, which led the 1990s expansion, won't recover until about 2005.

When two major investment firms admit that capital spending won't pick up until "the middle of the decade," you KNOW that things are pretty bad. After all, these are companies that make money by selling stocks. When they tell investors that the one thing that makes stocks worth buying -- the ability to generate more revenue -- is in the pits, investors should start digging their own holes to crawl into -- or start selling.
===============

related article:

 http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/030211/1600001000_1.html
Dow Jones Business News
Two Studies Paint Bleak Picture for Capital Spending

Tuesday February 11, 4:00 pm ET
By Karen Talley, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Two reports issued Tuesday paint a dire picture for capital spending, the juice that companies need to restore and sustain profits.
Outlays for technology products won't pick up until the middle of the decade, and virtually all industries will keep their purse strings tight this year, according to separate studies by Merrill Lynch & Co. and Goldman Sachs & Co.

"Inadequate pools of available funding" will persist and push the technology industry's recovery into 2004 or even 2005, says the report by Merrill Lynch's U.S. economics team.

"Companies have made good progress at paying down debt and shoring up cash balances," said David Rosenberg, Merrill's chief economist. "But more work needs to be done before companies can shift their focus from fixing up their balance sheets to stepping up their investment spending."

At Goldman Sachs, the economics team surveyed the firm's equity analysts and found they expect capital spending in general will drop by at least 10% this year after a 15% fall in 2002. Declines by merchant energy, telecom, airline, cable and electric utility companies will more than offset "small gains" that may be made by material, financial, health-care and consumer companies, the Goldman report said.

The studies don't bode well for a stock market that prizes profit growth and has fallen over the past three years on a deficit of capital spending. In fact, investors have already gotten a taste of things to come as companies have been closing out 2002 - fourth-quarter profits in many cases are beating expectations, sometimes greatly so - but outlooks for 2003 are dismal, lacking the crucial ingredient of sales.

The studies also point out the schisms that still exist at some Wall Street investment firms, where one team takes a bearish view and another feels that investors should be buying stocks aggressively.

That's the case at Goldman, whose downbeat capital-spending outlook appears to butt heads with uber-bull Abby Joseph Cohen, the firm's chief investment officer, who has said by many measures, 2002 was a "surprisingly good year," and sees the Dow Jones Industrial Average rising to 10,800 this year, or 36% from current levels.

Cohen, who is believed to have seen a copy of the economists' report, didn't return a call for comment. But Jan Hatzius, a senior economist at Goldman and one of the report's authors, said in an interview, "I think she agrees the economy is going to be slow, but with her it's more of a valuation call," meaning she may feel stocks have fallen so low they are worth buying at this point.

The dynamic is quite different at Merrill Lynch, where the capital-spending report is very much in sync with the sentiments of chief investment strategist Richard Bernstein, who fired his own cannonball across bulls' bow on Tuesday. Bernstein, already a bear, for the first time said the economy is now in danger of a double-dip recession because of rising energy prices. "Every significant oil shock over the past 30 years has caused, or at least contributed to, a recession," Bernstein said. "Rising energy prices are already starting to constrain consumer spending and a war probably won't help the situation."

The reports are being greeted on Wall Street with a mix of resignation and incredulity by investors and strategists who at this point thought they had heard it all.

"Wow," said Peter Jankovskis, director of research at Oakbrook Investments, of Merrill's projection that technology spending won't recover until 2005. "That's going to have a very dampening effect (on stocks) if it comes to pass."

Indeed, the market's rally in early January was on the back of technology stocks as investors continued to feel the group could retain its position as a stock-market leader. Even now, when the stock market rises, the first gainers are often large-cap tech stocks.

But Goldman Sachs' view that overall industry spending will be off in 2003, " isn't really a surprise," Jankovskis said. "We know that struggles continue."

Arnie Berman, chief investment strategist at SoundView Technology Group, took issue with the Merrill projection, saying he's hearing from companies that there is a growing need for systems to keep operations going.

"They're not out for systems that will provide the next great leap in productivity," Berman said. "But after such a dry spell, there is bound to be spending on basics."

Berman said investors "don't have to jump into technology with two feet right now," but there are stocks that will be well positioned as spending inevitably picks up. He said Microsoft Corp. (NasdaqNM:MSFT - News) , Oracle Corp. , Nokia Corp. , Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE:HPQ - News) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing are among the group.

-By Karen Talley, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5106;  karen.talley@dowjones.com

homepage: homepage: http://www.safemoneyreport.com/home/daily.asp
address: address: Safe Money Report

Stocks 11.Feb.2003 22:40

Self Employed

Stocks. Great. More gibberish from Wall street.

to 'Self Employed' 11.Feb.2003 23:03

none

"Stocks. Great. More gibberish from Wall street."

--true, it is 'just Wall Street', and the reason there is a legion of stock analysis pundits is to help crapitalists prosper for themselves . . .

but when the market collapses, many *non* self-employed people will lose employment from companies that default.

better start thinking about growing your own.

Energy drives the economy... 12.Feb.2003 03:53

cedd

..And not the other way around.

According to the economists, petroleum can be "created" (!!) even if the underground reserves are running out. Or we can switch to H2, or whatever other snake oil.

According to geologists, there won't be such a thing as a "recovery". Never.

 http://runningonempty.org

That's the unspeakable truth the administration is covering up magistralement, lest they lose their last allies so far (the upper middle class and the super richs), after never having had the lower classes at all, of course.