portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article oregon & cascadia | portland metro

corporate dominance | human & civil rights | imperialism & war | media criticism

More good stuff for Steven Marks

More info for the student. John Pilger discusses the Project for the New American Century, and the document which was published over two years ago outlining the Bush regime's plans for the world. keep in mind, Steven, this was written BEFORE Bush was selected.
HOME | ABOUT
PUBLISH | NEWSWIRE
DONATE | CALENDAR
Get Involved!
Brochure (pdf)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DC IMC Meetings
General: Mon, Dec 16 at 7pm, 2211 14th St. NW
Which space to move into?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Audio Streams

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Video Channels

All IMCs D.C.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Search Newswire
any mediumPicturesVideosAudioArticles

(leave blank for all entries)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Past Features

All Features (by month)

Sept 2002 - IMF/World Bank Protests/People's Strike

April 20-22, 2002 - protests against the IMF/World Bank, Plan Colombia, the War on Terror, and Ariel Sharon.
Palestine - news reports from Spring 2002.

2001 - A DC IMC Retrospective.

J20 - Counter-Inauguration protests, Jan 20, 2001.

A16 - Protests against the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, April 16, 2000.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Us

The DC Independent Media Center is an all-volunteer group of media producers, working as part of the international network of Indymedia centers to be a viable alternative to corporate media's profit-driven agenda. Come join us and become the media.

editorial policy

en espanol


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mailing Lists
Low-volume announcement list of Indymedia events in DC.


all IMC lists


other IMCs:
www.indymedia.org

Projects
climate
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Pacific
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
jakarta
melbourne
sydney

Africa
ambazonia
nigeria
south africa

Europe
athens
austria
barcelona
belgium
bristol
cyprus
euskal herria
finland
germany
ireland
italy
madrid
netherlands
nice
norway
poland
portugal
prague
russia
sweden
switzerland
thessaloniki
united kingdom

Canada
alberta
hamilton
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
qollasuyu
rosario
tijuana
uruguay

South Asia
india
mumbai

West Asia
israel
palestine

United States
arizona
atlanta
austin
baltimore
boston
buffalo
central florida
chicago
danbury, ct
dc
eugene
hawaii
houston
idaho
ithaca
la
madison
maine
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new jersey
new mexico
north carolina
ny capital
nyc
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rocky mountain
san diego
san francisco bay area
santa cruz, ca
seattle
st louis
tallahassee-red hills
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Pilger reveals the American plan
by John Pilger 6:52pm Sat Dec 14 '02 (Modified on 1:16pm Sun Dec 15 '02)


Two years ago a project set up by the men who now surround George W Bush said what America needed was "a new Pearl Harbor". Its published aims have come alarmingly true, writes John Pilger
www.newstatesman.co.uk
 http://pilger.carlton.com/print/124759

New Statesman (London)
16 December 2002

John Pilger reveals the American plan

Two years ago a project set up by the men who now surround George W Bush said what America needed was "a new Pearl Harbor". Its published aims have come alarmingly true, writes John Pilger

The threat posed by US terrorism to the security of nations and individuals was outlined in prophetic detail in a document written more than two years ago and disclosed only recently. What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world's resources, it said, was "some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor".

The attacks of 11 September 2001 provided the "new Pearl Harbor", described as "the opportunity of ages". The extremists who have since exploited 11 September come from the era of Ronald Reagan, when far-right groups and "think-tanks" were established to avenge the American "defeat" in Vietnam. In the 1990s, there was an added agenda: to justify the denial of a "peace dividend" following the cold war. The Project for the New American Century was formed, along with the American Enterprise Institute, the Hudson Institute and others that have since merged the ambitions of the Reagan administration with those of the current Bush regime.

One of George W Bush's "thinkers" is Richard Perle. I interviewed Perle when he was advising Reagan; and when he spoke about "total war", I mistakenly dismissed him as mad. He recently used the term again in describing America's "war on terror". "No stages," he said. "This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq . . . this is entirely the wrong way to go about it. If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely and we don't try to piece together clever diplomacy, but just wage a total war . . . our children will sing great songs about us years from now."

Perle is one of the founders of the Project for the New American Century, the PNAC. Other founders include Dick Cheney, now vice-president, Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, deputy defence secretary, I Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, William J Bennett, Reagan's education secretary, and Zalmay Khalilzad, Bush's ambassador to Afghanistan. These are the modern chartists of American terrorism.

The PNAC's seminal report, Rebuilding America's Defences: strategy, forces and resources for a new century, was a blueprint of American aims in all but name. Two years ago it recommended an increase in arms-spending by $48bn so that Washington could "fight and win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars". This has happened. It said the United States should develop "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons and make "star wars" a national priority. This is happening. It said that, in the event of Bush taking power, Iraq should be a target. And so it is.

As for Iraq's alleged "weapons of mass destruction", these were dismissed, in so many words, as a convenient excuse, which it is. "While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification," it says, "the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."

How has this grand strategy been implemented?

A series of articles in the Washington Post, co-authored by Bob Woodward of Watergate fame and based on long interviews with senior members of the Bush administration, reveals how 11 September was manipulated.

On the morning of 12 September 2001, without any evidence of who the hijackers were, Rumsfeld demanded that the US attack Iraq. According to Woodward, Rumsfeld told a cabinet meeting that Iraq should be "a principal target of the first round in the war against terrorism". Iraq was temporarily spared only because Colin Powell, the secretary of state, persuaded Bush that "public opinion has to be prepared before a move against Iraq is possible". Afghanistan was chosen as the softer option.

If Jonathan Steele's estimate in the Guardian is correct, some 20,000 people in Afghanistan paid the price of this debate with their lives.

Time and again, 11 September is described as an "opportunity". In last April's New Yorker, the investigative reporter Nicholas Lemann wrote that Bush's most senior adviser, Condoleezza Rice, told him she had called together senior members of the National Security Council and asked them "to think about 'how do you capitalise on these opportunities'", which she compared with those of "1945 to 1947": the start of the cold war.

Since 11 September, America has established bases at the gateways to all the major sources of fossil fuels, especially central Asia. The Unocal oil company is to build a pipeline across Afghanistan. Bush has scrapped the Kyoto Protocol on greenhouse gas emissions, the war crimes provisions of the International Criminal Court and the anti-ballistic missile treaty. He has said he will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states "if necessary". Under cover of propaganda about Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, the Bush regime is developing new weapons of mass destruction that undermine international treaties on biological and chemical warfare.

In the Los Angeles Times, the military analyst William Arkin describes a secret army set up by Donald Rumsfeld, similar to those run by Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger and which Congress outlawed. This "super-intelligence support activity" will bring together the "CIA and military covert action, information warfare, and deception". According to a classified document prepared for Rumsfeld, the new organisation, known by its Orwellian moniker as the Proactive Pre-emptive Operations Group, or P2OG, will provoke terrorist attacks which would then require "counter-attack" by the United States on countries "harbouring the terrorists".

In other words, innocent people will be killed by the United States. This is reminiscent of Operation Northwoods, the plan put to President Kennedy by his military chiefs for a phoney terrorist campaign - complete with bombings, hijackings, plane crashes and dead Americans - as justification for an invasion of Cuba. Kennedy rejected it. He was assassinated a few months later. Now Rumsfeld has resurrected Northwoods, but with resources undreamt of in 1963 and with no global rival to invite caution.

You have to keep reminding yourself this is not fantasy: that truly dangerous men, such as Perle and Rumsfeld and Cheney, have power. The thread running through their ruminations is the importance of the media: "the prioritised task of bringing on board journalists of repute to accept our position".

"Our position" is code for lying. Certainly, as a journalist, I have never known official lying to be more pervasive than today. We may laugh at the vacuities in Tony Blair's "Iraq dossier" and Jack Straw's inept lie that Iraq has developed a nuclear bomb (which his minions rushed to "explain"). But the more insidious lies, justifying an unprovoked attack on Iraq and linking it to would-be terrorists who are said to lurk in every Tube station, are routinely channelled as news. They are not news; they are black propaganda.

This corruption makes journalists and broadcasters mere ventriloquists' dummies. An attack on a nation of 22 million suffering people is discussed by liberal commentators as if it were a subject at an academic seminar, at which pieces can be pushed around a map, as the old imperialists used to do.

The issue for these humanitarians is not primarily the brutality of modern imperial domination, but how "bad" Saddam Hussein is. There is no admission that their decision to join the war party further seals the fate of perhaps thousands of innocent Iraqis condemned to wait on America's international death row. Their doublethink will not work. You cannot support murderous piracy in the name of humanitarianism. Moreover, the extremes of American fundamentalism that we now face have been staring at us for too long for those of good heart and sense not to recognise them.

With thanks to Norm Dixon and Chris Floyd

pilger.carlton.com/print/124759

add your own comments



How far he's come
by MaxDProphet 7:03pm Sat Dec 14 '02



"We have said that ours is a government guided by citizens," Rumsfeld said in 1966 debate over the FOIA. "From this it follows that government will serve us well only if the citizens are well informed."
 http://www.johnemossfoundation.org/foi/doyle2.htm


excellent...
by this thing here 1:16pm Sun Dec 15 '02



... time and again, these "strategic policy statements" have been linked to direct actions taken after 9-11. i think it's true that all these policies and blueprints and strategies were sitting on a shelf, waiting for an opportunity to be used. and they most certainly have been...

how long were all the provisions in the PATRIOT ACT sitting on a shelf, waiting to be tried? how long were the military strategists waiting to try their new strategies and new toys? how long was the idea of a "homeland" security department waiting to be tried?...

let's talk about missile defense. the first terrible thing about it is the fact that the only way america could justify having it is by destroying and pulling out of arms treaties. the second terrible thing about is the cost, some $80-100 billion dollars. but what takes the cake is it's performance so far. just recently, a missile test was a complete failure. this failure comes after the fact that the seeker head on these interceptor missiles cannot distinguish between dummy warheads and real warheads. what a great, great track record this project has. laying waste to treaties and billions of dollars of tax payer money. way to go PNAC...