portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article

all 9.11 Airports serviced by *one* Israeli security company

curiosities of 9-11
one of those times when an innocuous comment in an unrelated news report triggers a revelation.
curiosities of 9-11
one of those times when an innocuous comment in an unrelated news report triggers a revelation.

In the article at  http://afrocubaweb.com/news/israelispying.htm there is the following paragraph:

"To make the situation worse, a private security company called ICTS, owned by an Israeli, Ezra Harel, and registered in the Netherlands, was employed at Charles de Gaulle airport to screen passengers boarding US planes. Most of its personnel are ex-Shin Bet officers. The company covers security at Boston's Logan airport, where the American Airlines plane came down after flight attendants and passengers overpowered Reid."

The point of this article was that ICTS knew Reid was dangerous, but allowed him on board a flight from Tel Aviv to Paris. Maybe they did and maybe they didn't. But the idea that an Israeli owned company had inside access to the airport used to launch an abortive terror attack brought to mind the strange message Odigo Systems, another Israeli owned company with offices near the World Trade Towers, received that warned of the impending attacks before the hijacked planes had even left the ground.

So, I went back to another story that had surfaced briefly, reported at  http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26626 about how at least one hijacker had smuggled a GUN aboard one of the hijacked planes. Even prior to 9-11, getting a gun on board a passenger plane represented a serious lapse of security. I wondered why this story of a gun was being concealed behind talk of box cutters and screwdrivers.

Then I went back to the first article and its mention that ICTS handled security at Logan International Airport, from which two of the 9-11 hijacked planes had departed.

Sure enough, a visit to ICTS' own web site at  http://www.icts-int.com/ confirms that ICTS is in fact an Israeli owned company, and that it sells services to every airport from which the hijacked planes operated, including security, sometimes through wholly owned subsidiaries like Huntleigh USA Corporation.

It has been suggested that the incredible feat of hijacking four aircraft without a single arrest at the gate would require the resouces of a nation-state. This is even more true with the revelation that at least one gun had managed to be aboard a hijacked plane. One company had automatic inside access to all of the airports from which hijacked planes departed on 9-11, and to the airports used by Richard Reid, the shoe bomber. An Israeli company. One that Mossad agents could easily find employment with without the management knowing who they were or what their purpose really was.

But one thing is clear. By virtue of the Odigo warning, someone knew enough about the planned attacks to warn Odigo before the planes had even departed the airport gates, yet they did not call the Israeli security company at the airports which could have stopped the flights from leaving.


homepage: homepage: http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/95018.php

?? 15.Dec.2002 20:44

sid vicious

What did Israel have to gain by the 9/11 attacks and further instability in the Middle East? Wars in the region, starting with Iraq, will only increase the odds of missiles or some other devastating form of attack hitting Jerusalem and/or Tel Aviv. The theory that Israel was behind all of this makes no sense. The supposed benefits to Israel are so attenuated and uncertain, especially through working with Al Qaeda, that you're laying out an explanation with innumerable steps and moving parts. It just doesn't add up.

Question 15.Dec.2002 22:16


"The theory that Israel was behind all of this makes no sense"

Thanks for the brilliant deduction! Guess when we have any questions about 9/11 we'll know who to turn to, Sid.

My question is, how many other airports is this company handling security at? If most, then this could be a coincidence. What is the statistical likelihood that they would own all three given the number that they do own in total?