portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article

FAA Alerted Military Immediately On 9.11; AF Prevented

TOP_VIEW conducted a phone interview this morning (12.09.01) with a spokesperson for the U.S. Air Force, located in New York.

This person was ordered to the Ground Zero, Pennsylvania and Pentagon 9.11 crash sites within several days of the events, as part of an Air Force investigative probe. Much of the truly eye-opening information conveyed to us by this high-ranking officer will -- unfortunately -- have to wait until some future time until we can organize it into article form; a small percentage of the information simply cannot be made public at this time for reasons of PERSONAL --NOT "national" -- security.
AF Spokesman: FAA Alerted Military Immediately On 9.11; AF
Prevented From Responding

TOP_VIEW conducted a phone interview on 12.09.01 with a
spokesperson for the U.S. Air Force, located in New York.

This person was ordered to the Ground Zero, Pennsylvania and
Pentagon 9.11 crash sites within several days of the events, as
part of an Air Force investigative probe.

Crucial information was conveyed to us, related specifically to the
entire matter of IF or WHEN FAA/ATC personnel alerted
appropriate Air National Guard/Air Force units, that four large
passenger jets were significantly off course and that all standard
communications with these craft had been broken.

We were informed that standard procedures fully in effect on the
morning of September 11 were absolutely followed to a "T" by
U.S. Air Traffic Control personnel; that via established channels
and according to established guidelines, U.S. Air National Guard
and Air Force units -- which are ALWAYS on alert to be
scrambled for intercepts of either distressed OR suspicious and
possibly hostile aircraft 365/24/7 in these United States -- WERE
DEFINITELY contacted by FAA/ATC on 9.11 IMMEDIATELY
after Air Traffic Control had become aware of the developing
situation with the jets.

The Air Force spokesman confirmed that after the alerts and
requests for intercepts of the aircraft were received from
FAA/ATC, orders from the HIGHEST LEVEL of the executive
branch of the federal government were received, demanding that
the Air Force stand down and NOT follow through with established
scramble/intercept procedures that morning until further notice!

The U.S. Air Force's hands (wings) were DELIBERATELY TIED
on the morning of September 11, until such time that the horrifying
treacherous, murderous deeds had been carried out by the
BushMob.

Our informant has told us in no uncertain terms that as much as
seventy percent of Armed Forces officers -- with the NOTABLE
exception of the U.S. Navy -- are VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED to
the treacherous, murderous actions carried out by profoundly
corrupt and demonic elements within the federal government on
9.11, and to the wholesale treachery and demolition of the U.S.
Constitution which said elements have now undertaken.

homepage: homepage: http://www.globalspin.org/some_gaps.html

same shit different pile. 26.Oct.2002 23:19

FWR

you can read this same story on the U.S. Milita sites too.

they also see the same Conspiracy under their beds too.

inferentials 27.Oct.2002 00:43

Already Published

FWR - please stop playing that corporate media "words can mean anything I want them to mean" game. It was designed to thwart explanatory evolution, and is thus a contra-Darwinian threat to the health of our species.

Conspiracy is the oldest crime in the book. The official 911 narrative is an unsubstatiated conspiracy theory! But don't take my word for it:

LA Times, September 12, 2001

"Attacks held to be a CONSPIRACY"

 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-091101terror.story


If that doesn't grab you, try this:

 http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&q=%22charged+with+conspiracy%22


Now, let's take a look at that Offical Stand-Down Order:


========================
At 9:25, Garvey, in an historic and admirable(!) step, and **almost certainly after getting an okay from the White House**,

initiated a national ground stop,

which forbids takeoffs and requires planes in the air to **get down** as soon as reasonable.

The order, which has never been implemented since flying was invented in 1903, applied to virtually every single kind of machine that can takeoff - civilian, MILITARY, or LAW ENFORCEMENT.


The Herndon command center coordinated the phone call to all major FAA sites, the airline reps in the room contacted all airlines, and so-called NOTAMS —notices to airmen — were also sent out.

The FAA had stopped the world.

Five minutes later, FAA's few staffers who had stayed to set up the emergency operations center accomplished their mission and the center was up and running by 9:30.

FAA chief spokesman Scott Brenner gave immediate orders to his press corps: hit the vending machines on the FLOORS BELOW and bring back all the candy you could carry.

Throughout the day, a hardcore group of public affairs staffers grabbed slices of pizza, scarfed chocolate donuts and swigged water and coffee.

But cellphones were virtually unusable because of the overloads, and FAA staffers in the emergency op center COULDN'T REACH their in-house experts ONLY A FEW FLOORS BELOW on the sidewalk.(!!) Minutes later, the Pentagon was hit.
[...]
Ten minutes later, at 10.31, the FAA allowed all military and law enforcement flights to resume. (and some flights that the FAA can't reveal that were already airborne).

Time, September 14, 2001
 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,174912,00.html
==========================================================
OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATIONS - THE OFFICIAL NARRATIVE STINKS
==========================================================

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The airliner crashed between two and three hundred feet from MY OFFICE IN THE PENTAGON, just around a corner from where I work. I'M THE DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL, WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE. A slightly different calibration and I have no doubt I wouldn't be sending this to you. My colleagues felt the impact, which reminded them of an earthquake. People shouted in the corridor outside that a bomb had gone off upstairs on the main concourse in the building. No alarms sounded. I walked to my office, shut down my computer, and headed out. Even before stepping outside I COULD SMELL THE CORDITE. THEN I KNEW EXPLOSIVES HAD BEEN SET OFF SOMEWHERE.
McSweeney's
 http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2001/09/19perkal.html



A personnel attorney AT THE PENTAGON, Goldsmith was riding a shuttle bus to work on Tuesday, Sept. 11, when she learned of the attack on the World Trade Center. [...] "We saw a huge black cloud of smoke," she said, saying IT SMELLED LIKE CORDITE OR GUNSMOKE.
Jewish Bulletin News
 http://www.jewishsf.com/bk010921/usp14a.shtml

===================================
TRASNPONDERS OFF - AS IF TO PREVENT
===================================

The second plane looked similar to a C- 130 transport plane, [Keith Wheelhouse] said.

He believes it flew

directly above the American Airlines jet,

as if to prevent two planes from appearing on radar -

while at the same time -

guiding the jet toward the Pentagon.

Daily Press, September 14, 2001

 http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/dailypress/main/results.html?num=25&st=basic&QryTxt=%22Keith%2BWheelhouse%22&datetype=7

huh? 27.Oct.2002 08:08

FWR

" It was designed to thwart explanatory evolution, and is thus a contra-Darwinian threat to the health of our species. "

what the fuck are talking about? keep in mind I'm just a lowly troll who works out chicago DNC office, so I'm a little slow...

you are a lying asshole 27.Oct.2002 14:46

COINTELPRO Tool

Here's the truth about the FAA/NORAD response on 9/11:

 http://mckinneysucks.blogspot.com/2002_06_01_mckinneysucks_archive.html#77997492

Cointelpro Fool, YOU are the *lying asshole* 27.Oct.2002 16:47

antitroll

URL for this article:  http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/update630.htm

 http://www.tenc.net
=======================================
POWERFUL EVIDENCE THAT AIR FORCE WAS MADE TO STAND DOWN ON 9-11
[Posted 1 July 2002]

To go right to instructions for accessing the DCANG Website, as it was April 19, 2001, click here
=======================================
In response to the letter below, we have provided a clearer explanation of the proof that the Air Force was ordered to stand down on 9-11.

Dear Emperor's Clothes,

I want to start with congratulating you on a great website, all kudos to you. I'm pointing out a key error you're making because I'm trying to help.

In several places on your 911 pages you refer to "combat ready" jets, seemingly implying that these jets are ready to take off on a few minutes notice. But the terminology is wrong.

All that the term "combat ready" means is that they are capable of Combat. It doesn't necessarily mean "scramble ready".

A much clearer phrase is "combat units in the highest possible state of readiness," which you quoted from the Washington, DC Air National Guard [DCANG] website but it looks like that's been erased from the archives since the middle of June. Any suggestions?

Best regards,
Kalun D.
Seattle, Washington USA

***

Dear Kalun,

Thanks for the kind words and helpful criticism. Fortunately, the DC Air National Guard (DCANG) Website archives have not been erased, at least not yet. We'll show how to locate them below. These archives provide a key part of the evidence that the Air Force was not permitted to respond on 9-11.

You're right about 'combat-ready.' It is too broad a term. And as you say, the phrase "combat units in the highest possible state of readiness" is much clearer. We'll go through our 9-11 texts and make some changes, using this clearer wording.

The Website of the D.C. Air National Guard (DCANG) is at  http://www.dcandr.ang.af.mil

But please don't go there yet.

As of April 19, 2001, that Website included the following statement:

"DCANG MISSION

To provide combat units in the highest

possible state of readiness."

This is powerful stuff. Consider. The military never makes public all its air defense procedures. If it did, a potential enemy could entirely circumvent defenses. So key air procedures are kept secret.

Therefore one can be sure that air defense information posted on the DCANG Website on April 19, 2001 and available to the general public excluded some key defense procedures. They would *understate*, not overstate.

When DCANG stated that its Mission was "To provide combat units in the highest possible state of readiness," they were indicating a general approach but leaving out the nitty gritty details. They were saying: 'Don't worry; we're ready. But we're not going to tell you our emergency plans.'

Given this understandable reticence, the phrase, "To provide combat units in the highest possible state of readiness," means that the DC Air National Guard at Andrews Air Force Base had fighter jets ready for an emergency.

And when you think about it, this would have to be the case. Not only is Andrews Air Force Base a few miles from the White House, the Pentagon, the Capital building and the CIA, but it is also the official airport of the US government.

The President flies out of Andrews. Other top US officials fly out of Andrews. Foreign diplomats and national leaders may arrive and depart from Andrews at any time. For instance:

"[There is] Tony Blair, Prime Minister of Britain. He has just landed here at Andrews Air Force Base." (CNN November 7, 2001)

Let us say that as it took off from Andrews Air Force Base, Tony Blair's plane was attacked by a hostile jet. Would his pilot have to radio the attackers and ask them to kindly postpone their attack until US fighter jets arrived from Langley Air Force Base, 129 miles away?

Andrew's unique role as the Federal government's official airport is another reason DCANG would withhold key details of its emergency response procedures. So again, when DC ANG stated on its Website that its Mission at Andrews included providing combat units "in the highest possible state of readiness," one can be sure this meant Andrews was equipped to scramble aircraft in an emergency.

We'll show you how to find the April 19th backup of the DCANG Mission Statement in just a moment. Let us consider the significance of that statement, as it relates to 911.

The FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) reported that it 'suspected' Flight 11 out of Boston had been hijacked by 8:20 Eastern Time. (1) So when Flight 11 hit the World Trade Center, of course the FAA knew this was a terrorist act. Vice President Cheney said on MEET THE PRESS September 16th that the FAA had open lines to the Secret Service as soon as Flight 11 hit the World Trade Center. So the Secret Service was in the know no later than 8:45 Eastern time. (2)

Flight 77 reached Ohio and turned around, heading back to Washington, DC around 8:55, we are told. At 9:06 the FAA reports that it ordered the air corridor from Cleveland, Ohio, to Washington, D.C. closed to all air traffic. (3)

We are told that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon around 9:45 Eastern time.

So here's the burning question: why weren't those combat jets which DCANG provided, "in the highest possible state of readiness" - why weren't those planes scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base *before* the Pentagon was hit?

Some respond that it was due to human error. The people at DCANG were asleep at the wheel. Well, military organizations don't accept explanations like that. A catastrophic failure leads to court martial. If the people at DCANG merely are guilty of criminal negligence in failing to respond, why haven't they been pilloried and put on trial?

Some respond that the whole military was lax before 9-11. Nobody was worried about security. Really? In a dispatch discussing security after 9-11, Associated Press noted that US military bases were already on security alert *before* 9-11:

"Earlier this summer, all three Army bases in Hampton Roads, including Fort Eustis and Fort Story, already had begun restricting public access to their grounds for security reasons. The bases did so under an order affecting major Army installations around the country.

"The Army required its bases to perform mandatory vehicle registrations. Military members and civilian employees were to receive vehicle decals serving as proof they have permission to be on base." ("Military Tightens Security in Wake of Apparent Terrorist Attacks," AP, 12 September 2001)

We'll put out an FAQ with more evidence concerning the myth of a security lapse prior to 9-11.

Now, here's how you can access the DCANG Mission Statement.

HOW TO ACCESS THE APRIL 19th DCANG MISSION STATEMENT

The Mission Statement is no longer posted on the DCANG Website, but you can (as of June 30th) access it by using the free archive service at www.archive.org. They backed up the DCANG Website as it was on April 19th (with the Mission Statement) and on September 13th (without the Statement.)

Important point: we cannot say *exactly* when the Mission Statement was removed. We can only say with certainty that it was between April 19 and September 13, 2001.

Here's a step-by-step guide to access the Mission Statement:

1) Go to  http://www.archive.org

2) You will see their logo, 'WAYBACK MACHINE.'

Just below the logo is a search box. After "http://" paste-in the following url:
www.dcandr.ang.af.mil/

3) Hit "enter." You will be taken to the index of backups for DCANG.

4) Click the hyperlink for "April 19, 2001."

5) This will take you to the DCANG website as it looked April 19th.

On the upper left click on the hyperlink, "Headquarters."

This will take you to a page with the Mission Statement:

"DCANG MISSION

To provide combat units in the highest

possible state of readiness."

HOW TO ACCESS THE SEPT. 13TH DCANG ARCHIVE

1) If you are at the April 19th DCANG WebPage, hit the back-arrow twice.

If you are not, follow steps 1, 2 and 3 above. Either way you'll be at the DC ANG backups index page.

2) Click on the hyperlink for September 13, 2002.

3) On the upper right, click the hyperlink, "About the DCANG."

4) Click "MISSION AND VISION" on the upper left. This will take you to the new Mission Statement:

"Headquarters Mission
Be the premier State Head Quarters in the Air National Guard, Critically linked to our units and influencing the future of the DCANG."

In case the April; 19th archive is pulled from www.archive.org, we have made a backup. It is at

 http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/dcandr2.htm

If possible, please make backups yourself as well.

- John Flaherty and Jared Israel

=========================

FURTHER READING :

FOR A COMPLETE LIST of our articles refuting false information about 9-11, go to  http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/911page.htm

1) NEWSDAY reported that the FAA 'suspected' Flight 11 had been hijacked. For our backup of NEWSDAY text, which should take you to the exact quote, go to
 http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nd923.htm#b

For Newsday text scroll 2/3 of the way down at
 http://www.newsday.com/ny-uspent232380681sep23.story

2) Regarding Cheney's statement on MEET THE PRESS that the FAA had open lines to the Secret Service after the first plane hit the World Trade Center, for link to exact quote, in our backup, go to 'NBC, Meet the Press' (10:00 AM ET) Sunday 16 September 2001.
 http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nbcmp.htm#openlines

Original transcript of MEET THE PRESS can be read at:
 http://stacks.msnbc.com/news/629714.asp?cp1=1 )

3) On FAA closing the air corridor, see, for exact NEWSDAY quote, our backup at
 http://emperors-clothes.com/9-11backups/nd923.htm#a

Or for original NEWSDAY text, scroll 2/3 of way down at  http://www.newsday.com/ny-uspent232380681sep23.story

=========================


to antitroll 27.Oct.2002 21:23

COINTELPRO Tool

I thought you'd quote that tripe from the ethnic cleansing denial website. What do you do for an encore, quote Holocaust deniers?

Actually, Kalun D. was exactly right on. The "highest state of readiness" boast on DCANG's website refers only to material readiness, not to being on high alert, or any state of alert for that matter.

The proof is in their name, for those of you completely ignorant of how the military works.

It's the fucking DC Air NATIONAL GUARD! What kind of flaming idiot would believe they would be our first line of defense?

They don't even report to NORAD operationally, and would not receive orders from the U.S. Air Force until first being activated and called into service.

Christ, you retards slay me! You absolutely slay me!

foolish enough 27.Oct.2002 21:48

inference

Why do zionist get so angry about facts?




Let's look at that official standown order AGAIN.


=====================

At 9:25, Garvey, in an historic and admirable(!) step, and **almost certainly after getting an okay from the White House**,

initiated a national ground stop,

which forbids takeoffs and requires planes in the air to **get down** as soon as reasonable.

The order, which has never been implemented since flying was invented in 1903, applied to virtually every single kind of machine that can takeoff - civilian, MILITARY, or LAW ENFORCEMENT.


The Herndon command center coordinated the phone call to all major FAA sites, the airline reps in the room contacted all airlines, and so-called NOTAMS —notices to airmen — were also sent out.

The FAA had stopped the world.

Five minutes later, FAA's few staffers who had stayed to set up the emergency operations center accomplished their mission and the center was up and running by 9:30.

FAA chief spokesman Scott Brenner gave immediate orders to his press corps: hit the vending machines on the FLOORS BELOW and bring back all the candy you could carry.

Throughout the day, a hardcore group of public affairs staffers grabbed slices of pizza, scarfed chocolate donuts and swigged water and coffee.

But cellphones were virtually unusable because of the overloads, and FAA staffers in the emergency op center COULDN'T REACH their in-house experts ONLY A FEW FLOORS BELOW on the sidewalk.(!!) Minutes later, the Pentagon was hit.
[...]
Ten minutes later, at 10.31, the FAA allowed all military and law enforcement flights to resume. (and some flights that the FAA can't reveal that were already airborne).

Time, September 14, 2001
 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,174912,00.html

=====================


When I wrote these things- [these instructions to the embassies to frame Arabs for Israeli terrorist activities (the "Lavon Affair")] - I still didn't know how crushing is the EVIDENCE THAT WAS ALREADY PUBLISHED REFUTING OUR OFFICIAL VERSION. The huge amounts of arms and explosives, the tactics of the attack, the blocking and mining of the roads ... the precise coordination of the attack. WHO WOULD BE FOOLISH ENOUGH to believe that such a COMPLICATED OPERATION could "develop" from a casual and sudden attack on an Israeli army unit by an Egyptian unit?
- Moshe Sharett, Prime Minister of Israel 1954 & 1955.

Cointelpro FOOL loses again 27.Oct.2002 22:34

antitroll

don't float us more Bullshit, Fool.

ANG were in *some* state of readiness that morning--

the two F-15s which appeared (too late, but **BEFORE** Regular USAF F-16s from Langley, VA) over Manhattan skies were scrambled from an Air National Guard base in MASSACHUSETTS:

Scrambled Messages
by George Szamuely
 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/szamuely/scrambled.htm
"So why were no fighters dispatched to intercept planes on an extraordinary day like Sept. 11? Within days the story changed and it turned out that two F-15 fighters had in fact been scrambled from Otis Air National Guard Base in Cape Cod, MA. Whether this took place before or after the first tower was struck is not clear. In any case it was too late to make a difference. When the second tower was hit the fighters were still 70 miles from Manhattan. We also learned that two F-16 fighters had been scrambled from Langley Air Force Base to try to intercept Flight 77, but they also arrived too late. In fact, they only took off from Langley two minutes before the Boeing 757 smashed into the Pentagon."