Missed opportunities are abound by resricting posts on this IMC, including the opportunity to crystalize arguements, refute WIDELY held fallacies, and occasionally, albeit rarely, find some common ground with those who are right. I suspect that IMC editors hear may already be acting too niggardly with respect too their tolerance of fowl posters to this sight. Sure, I realize that their appears to be a hole in the dyke of free speech restraint, and that stumptown IMC editors halve only reluctantly stuffed their respective fingers in the dyke-hole with the new censorship proceedures.
Anywho, I was recently chillin' in my crib, just a puffin' on a fag, and stroking my pussy; trying to get some perspective on this issue. I accidentally spilled a jigger of hootch on my pussy, and got it all wet. The hootch dribbled on to my boob tube, and now its tits up too. I got up to wipe it up, then sat down, not realizing that the fag had rolled into my seat. That fag didn't exactly tear me a new asshole, but it certainly sweltered my poop shute. What a mess, but I digress.
What are the alternatives? Well, perhapse the IMC editors could instead simply open up the bung-hole of the dyke, ream it out, and stuff a cock in it (metaphoricly speaking). This way they could allow some restriction of ideas, without choking the entire chicken. Maybe this is simply mental masterbation, but imposing censorship here could be the chink in the IMC armor.
I think I'll go dig some sports for a while now, and NO, just because I watch sports doesn't make me an athletic supporter.