portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article reporting portland metro

actions & protests | police / legal a22: bush protest

"We Are Not The Enemy!" - The Battle of Portland

If America needed one more example of the cancer that has been chewing through the guts of our most basic freedoms since Mr. Bush assumed office, they can look to Portland. The right to freely assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances has been rescinded at the point of a gun.
"We Are Not The Enemy!" - The Battle of Portland
by William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Report

Saturday, 24 August, 2002

The image is chilling. A middle-aged woman, plainly dressed, with a puff of auburn hair, is clutched in a hammer-lock by a Portland police officer dressed in full riot gear. His riot baton is jammed high under her chin. Around her, three more armor-clad police officers swarm in, face-masks down. The woman's face is contorted in terror. In her hand is a sign protesting George W. Bush.

This was the scene on the streets of Portland, OR, on the evening of August 22nd as captured by a photographer for the Associated Press. Thousands of peaceful protesters had descended upon the Hilton Hotel where Mr. Bush was attending a political fundraiser for Senator Gordon Smith. They held signs reading, "Drop Bush, not Bombs," and other similar slogans. Among the protesters were pregnant women, parents with infants and small children, elderly citizens, and citizens in wheelchairs

According to a report by CBS News, the protest became unruly when some of the fundraiser attendees were "jostled" as they moved through the crowd towards the entrance to the hotel. At that point, the riot police swarmed in, swinging clubs and dousing the crowd with pepper spray. Rubber bullets were also fired into the crowd, and snipers were seen on the roofs surrounding the scene. The protesters responded by hammering on the hoods of police cars and screaming, "We are not the enemy!"

A man named Randy, who attended the protest, reports the sequence of events as follows:

"I was between 5th and 6th on the sidewalk. Maybe the ones in front were warned to move, but I didn't hear any warning. It had been a peaceful protest. Suddenly the police came forward spraying pepper spray. A man nearby with an infant in a backpack got hit real good. The baby's face was so red I thought it had quit breathing. From the other direction came cop cars through the crowd and rubber bullets were fired at those closest to the cars. I kept retreating but the cops kept spraying. Lots of people were sprayed, including the cameraman from Channel 2 KATU."

Other eyewitness accounts from the streets of Portland similarly describe what appears to have been a terrifyingly violent response from the police to a peaceful protest by assembled American citizens.

This is a profoundly disturbing turn of events. Mr. Bush is protested wherever he goes these days, and the crowds which attend them are growing. These are not black-clad anarchists kicking in windows, however. The woman who was attacked by the police looked as ordinary as any small-town librarian, and anarchists are smart enough to leave their children at home if there is a riot in the offing. The streets of Portland were filled on August 22nd by average American citizens seeking to inform the President of their disfavor regarding the manner in which he is governing their country. They were rewarded with the business end of a billy club, a face-full of pepper spray, and the jarring impact of a rubber bullet.

If America needed one more example of the cancer that has been chewing through the guts of our most basic freedoms since Mr. Bush assumed office, they can look to Portland. The right to freely assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances has been rescinded at the point of a gun.

The imperative is clear. Such violence by the authorities cannot go unchallenged. The next time Mr. Bush appears in public, there must be even more concerned Americans to greet him. They must face the baton and the pepper spray, they must stare into the shielded faces of the police, and they must stand in non-violent disobedience of the idea that they are not allowed to be there. The men and women who faced the brunt of police fury in Portland are to be lauded as American patriots, and their actions must be duplicated by us all. The groups which organized this protest, and the ones to come, deserve our praise.

The media, which spent much of the evening reporting that only a few hundred protesters were in attendance, must be browbeaten into reporting the facts from both sides - from the police, who reportedly detained people like the woman in the picture "for their own safety," and from the protesters who took a savage beating for daring to stand against Mr. Bush. If the battle of Portland is allowed to cast even more fear into the hearts and minds of Americans, we have lost yet another swath of freedoms. Stand and be counted if you can.

The whole world is watching.


William Rivers Pitt is a teacher from Boston, MA. His new book, 'The Greatest Sedition is Silence,' will be published soon by Pluto Press.
keep up the reports, but do not misleed 25.Aug.2002 16:01


With much respect to mr.Pitts, i would like to remind folks that this is not just a George W. issue. The behavior of the bush administration is chilling, but was clinton's much better? i am concerned that linking the issues so closely to american party politics("If America needed one more example of the cancer that has been chewing through the guts of our most basic freedoms since Mr. Bush assumed office")may create a belief that if we just elect a democrat everything will be better. Jimmy Carter, the last democrat president before clinton hardly qualified for sainthood when he increased weapons sales to Indonesia as that nation exterminated a massive portion of East Timor's population. Bill Clinton signed NAFTA, for christ's sake, and he and his cronies are largely responsible for the starvation and pestilence that killed well over a million Iraqis, most of whom were young children. While I understand that many people need to put a face on evil, it is important that those who play off this need for organizational purposes also point out the cultural and political forces that drive such monsters, regardless of whether they are "left" or "right".

P.S.-PLEASE, PLEASE, stop using anarchists, regardless of their attire, in such a way as to paint them as aberations ("These are not black-clad anarchists kicking in windows, however"). For one, the so called "Black-Bloc" (Whom, if I may point out, I am not a part of, though certainly not out of disrespect or some beleif of moral superiority on my part)have played a priceless role in the surge of political resistance in this country, and in others. Whats more, I have noticed that that particular part of the movement has been evolving from the moment their existence was announced to the world in November of 1999, and the further demonizing of them by the press, sadly assisted by "bonafide" enviornmental and labor groups, should not be encouraged by those who stand side-by-side with them in resistance to tyranny and global destruction!

power&love 25.Aug.2002 16:50

the gray one

i am a german reading this article. stand up and fight. the world needs this struggle. against bush and the subordination in life. the authority who makes us small and foreign to ourselfes. stand up and fight! THANK YOU TO EVERY ONE OF YOU!!!