HAVE A LAST STROKE & DIE (August 3, 2002 version)
Cheney is a terrorist liar. He's about to unleash the next 911.
HAVE A LAST STROKE & DIE (August 3, 2002 version)
A T.I.P. (Text In Progress) by
On Sunday May 19 2002 you reportedly said more terrorist attacks on U.S. targets were "not a matter of if, but when":
how do you know?
Because U.S. intelligence agents reportedly have intercepted Al Qaeda communications recently, pointing to 911-size or bigger attacks.
Now, that Qaeda would still be able to mount 911-size or bigger attacks is beyond the pale.
Because "U.S. analysts believe" that "given the military setbacks in Afghanistan and recent arrests of Qaeda personnel in Pakistan, North Africa, the Middle East and Europe... 'morale among bin Laden's dispersed network has gone relatively low'".
All of this according to a "senior administration official".
So how the hell can you be ranting, Cheney, that Qaeda is about to mount a 911-size or bigger attack?
Moreover, if Qaeda has grown stronger rather than weaker since 911, to the point that it's capable of bigger-than-911 attacks, then your "war on terror" was a total failure, Dick: you killed thousands of innocent Afghanis in vain; you gestapoized America with your terrorist terror laws in vain. So why don't you step down right now?
Unless of course "Qaeda" is really Arab for "the u.s. establishment & its western allies".
Anyway, you gave no specifics, as usual. No time, place or methods. Reportedly, you Cheney don't know when or where. How reassuring.
An anonymous "senior administration official" told the New York Times though that the intercepted intelligence relates to Europe, the Arabian Peninsula or the U.S.
So this official is flatly contradicting you, Cheney. Because you said you don't know where.
Your official does. Europe, Arabia, U.S.
On June 23, Al Jazeera played a recording, allegedly by Qaeda spokesman Suleiman Abu Ghaith, stating that Osama is 'alive and well' and threatening new anti-American attacks.
I thought Bush and you, Cheney, had set out to destroy terrorists and those who harbor them.
So why haven't you carpet-bombed Jazeera TV? They are harboring - no worse - they are mass-broadcasting Qaeda's terror propaganda.
But you'll never do that. Because Jazeera is nothing but a front for YOUR propaganda.
Nothing could help your terrorist tyranny and genocidal wars more than the "Qaeda" monster live on Jazeera.
How else can one explain the absurdity that Jazeera, a Qatar (U.S.-puppet, totalitarian state where the media are under total control) TV, would mass-broadcast terrorist stuff?
And the other absurdity that Abu Ghaith would announce to the world impending Qaeda strikes - thus risking to find the enemy on high alert and diminishing Qaeda's own chances of success?
Downing Street (=Blair), in its Oct. 4, 2001 statement about 911-related "evidence" against Bin Laden (source 1 below), said that among Qaeda's features was "ABSENCE OF WARNING": "AL-QAEDA GIVES NO WARNING OF TERRORIST ATTACK." (my caps).
Which would be the only logical modus operandi for terrorist plotters.
Now instead we see Qaeda allegedly trumpeting its next 911.
Who do you think you're fooling, Cheney?
All this becomes plausible ONLY IF JAZEERA + QAEDA + GHAITH + OSAMA & THE REST OF THEM THUGS ARE REALLY WORKING FOR YOU CHENEY - BECAUSE YOU AND YOUR THUGS URGENTLY NEED A NEW 911 (possibly chemical/nuclear/bio) TO JUSTIFY YOUR PLANNED IRAQI HOLOCAUST.
Which implies that if osama's really behind 911 then you too are, cheney.
Is this why you haven't indicted osama at all, in absentia, for 911?
Your state-terrorist colleague, defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld, has already established the desired link next-911/qaida/Iraq:
source 11: "He [Rummy] said [...] al-Qaida leaders may have connections in other countries that already have the technological base for building nuclear weapons.
They have the money [...] Iraq could be such a supplier for al-Qaida or other [...] terrorist groups."
Rummy's evidence: zero.
If instead he does have evidence that qaida has money, why doesn't he freeze/seize that money? Not to mention the implication that Bush's financial front of the terror war has utterly failed if qaida still has money for nuclear shopping - and 911-size attacks.
Let me just, in passing, reply to a few rhetorical questions by senators Joseph Biden (democrat) & Richard Lugar (republican - how wonderfully bipartisan is state terror!) (Qs from source 19):
Q. "What threat does Iraq pose to our security?"
A. Proven threat: zero. That's why cheney needs to launch the next-911, conveniently pinned on Qaeda-who bought-the-weapons-of-mass-destruction-from-Saddam.
Q. "How immediate is the danger [to our security from Iraq]?"
A. Proven danger: zero. The only arguable danger to our security is cheney's state terror.
Where will you hit this time around, Dick?
Europe? (There's too many anti-Iraq-war people still left there); the U.S. again? Both?
Europe stands a good chance.
Judging from your satellite parrots over there, cheney.
Like Italy's fascist defense minister Antonio Martino: "we know for sure" an attack will come, probably involving germ warfare.
Wonder how the hell HE knows. A hotline with qaeda maybe? Or with you cheney?
It's not just about spreading psychosis/generating mass-consensus for the end of this ghost of freedom.
It's pre-empting post-attack criticism: "See, I told ya. But unfortunately, I couldn't prevent it - no specifics."
A May 2001 Digos (=Italian counterterrorism) report mentioned a qaeda, Khalifa Moussa Ahmed, spotted casing St. Mark's in Venice: why wasn't he arrested there and then?
The Digos report cited qaeda plans to attack the Vatican or Venice, and now Italian "authorities are investigating whether those plans might be revived" - conveniently in time to stir up anti-Arab hatred and justify the 2nd Iraq war.
Digos has "an informant" or "informers" according to my source nr 9. So why have these qaedas in Europe not been busted yet - after a year?
Source 14: according to them, Ucigos and Digos (2 Italian anti-terror state agencies) have got al qaeda in Italy under total control:
- they know WHERE the qaedas are ("Milano [... ], Torino, Roma e Napoli");
- they have been keeping qaeda "UNDER CONSTANT MONITORING FOR MONTHS";
- they have "A LIST OF SUSPECTS IN ITALY WHOSE MOVES ARE BEING FOLLOWED";
- they are "TAPPING PHONES";
- they have SINGLED OUT "INDIVIDUALS WHO... ARE WAITING FOR AN ORDER TO ACT" [my translation and caps].
1 - AGAIN: why are ALL of these Italy qaedas not in jail yet?
2 - since they're ALL under control, there follows that IF THERE'S AN ALLEGED "QAEDA" STRIKE IN ITALY ONE OF THESE DAYS, IT CAN ONLY BE A STATE-TERROR ATTACK OR AT THE VERY LEAST A STATE-TERROR-ALLOWED ATTACK.
Yes I know you've reportedly been making a few arrests cheney - the wrong arrests.
Like the much-hyped arrest of smallfish Padilla, who'd been... surfing the net for nuke recipes.
Or the reported arrest of Omar Shishani, who was allegedly carrying $12 million in bogus checks.
How effective you've become.
And yet: how weird. Source 13: "Knowledgeable officials said the checks were extremely well made".
So much so that they bore "West America Bank, Pomona". West America does not have a Pomona branch. "Extremely well made"?
So much so that they bore "cashier's check". West America uses "official check".
"Extremely well made"?
What a planted story. Not even a 6-year-old would have been fooled by those bogus bogus-checks.
Who do you think YOU are fooling, cheney?
Go tell your "knowledgeable officials" to go fuck themselves.
Your fake arrests are only meant, again:
- to keep the public terrorized into accepting stalinization ('my God, if with a few bucks Qaeda did 911, go figure what they could do with 12 million!')
- to psychologically prepare it for the next 911 ('my God, Qaeda is still present in the West!');
- to preempt post-attack criticism: 'See, we made arrests, we improved, we did all we could - but we aren't perfect, sorry'.
So Europe's next, right Dick?
My bet is you're going to have the next 911 performed not long after the November 5 congressional elections and then attack Iraq in January or spring 2003 - a few months in between to pretend you needed time for a military buildup that's already happening - and has been for months - and for "exhausting all diplomatic avenues" or similar fake hypocrisy.
The reasons why I think the most probable time for your next-911 is between Nov.6 and year's end being:
- the Democrats are pressing Bush to avoid "October surprises" (=the start of the Iraq war, officially; but since there's no Iraq war without mass-consensus-igniting next-911, I assume the Democrats want neither war nor next-911 before the elections; because they hope to win if the economy stays bad enough, while next-911 + war would distract voters from the economy and force them to focus on Bush-the-savior-of-the-homeland again);
- Bush has reportedly promised to do so (source 17);
- Bush wants no next-911 before Sept.11 (1st anniversary of 911) when he hopes to commemorate/celebrate the "success" of his "war on terror" & take credit; in other words, he wouldn't spoil such a party by launching another state-terror strike before Sept.11.
Let readers remember that congressional democrats have blackmailing power on Bush because they could push a lot harder for an independent inquiry of 911 for example - Bush's worst nightmare.
To sum it all up: if Bush launched the next-911/Iraq war before Nov.5, for the Democrats it would tantamount to a golpe - and they would and could respond in kind.
The alleged Abu Ghaith on Jazeera also allegedly said that "98% of Al Qaeda leaders escaped unhurt", including Osama, Zawahiri and Mullah Omar.
In other words, again: your war on Afghanistan has failed miserably Cheney - 98% failure rate. Why don't you step down?
Another of your fellow co-terrorists, senator Bob Graham, echoed Abu Ghaith by saying on Fox: "that bin Laden is still alive... That's best assessment of U.S. intelligence".
Graham added that bin Laden is most likely in Western Pakistan.
How the hell does Graham know where Osama is?
He chairs the senate intelligence committee. So he presumably has evidence.
In which case: HOW COME OSAMA HASN'T BEEN CAPTURED OR KILLED YET?
SENATOR GRAHAM, TESTIFY!
UNDER OATH AND ON PRIME TIME FOX!
Graham has his own pet German parrot: August Hanning, the head of Germany's foreign intelligence, bleated that Osama's alive, resides between Afghanistan and Pakistan, "moves around little" and in secret.
So much so that you know about it, Hanning - God knows why you can't do anything.
Hanning added "we must be prepared" for new attacks because there's over 5,000 Qaedas and Talibans left in Afghanistan and Pakistan plotting with Osama.
How did you count them, Hanning?
And now (July 30, 2002) we're being told (source 15) that Osama's eldest son, Saad bin Laden, 22, is ready to take over qaeda's leadership and even if he doesn't OBL has at least another 22 children so we'll never get rid of the qaeda threat.
Who's saying this? "U.S. counterterrorism officials" - anonymous deep throats as usual.
No word about existence of evidence - also as usual.
They know everything about Saad, even where he is (the Afghanistan-Pakistan region, as usual). But - once again - they don't capture or kill him. Also as usual.
And Bush & you, dick, are about to attack Iraq which hasn't been a threat for 10 years instead of Pakistan that's harboring Bin Laden, his terrorist off-spring and "5,000" talibs + qaedas! How weird.
Let's translate: "We, the Western establishment, have planned the next sensational 911-size attack, this time (also) in Europe, Germany Italy at least. It's comin' up so shit yourselves. We'll pin it on qaeda again so we can keep on occupying Afghanistan. We have no intention of capturing/killing Osama & his clan because if we did we would run out of pretexts not only to stay in the Caspian region but also to finish gestapoizing the US and the world. We'll do this upcoming next-911 nuclear/bio/chemical; we'll also "prove" (giving no evidence as usual - national security, you know) that qaida got its weapons of mass destruction from Iraq, so we'll go to war in self-defense".
This state-terror-orchestrated campaign of cheney trollers announcing the 'inevitability' of the next 911 has been going on for 2 months now.
In any case: what are you cheney (pretending to be) doing to prevent these future "qaeda" massmurders?
Your official said: "There's just a lot of chatter in the system again. We are actively pursuing it". What does that mean?
Anyway, you Dick have already given up hope of prevention: "It's not a matter of if, but when" you said.
You are sure it's going to happen. You are sure it's not preventable. God knows why.
Well, you are a liar cheney. And a traitor.
Because if what you're saying is true and not just a scarecrow diversion from recent attacks on Bush for failing to heed 911 warnings - then there IS something you and your henchmen could do - if you only cared.
Qaeda is reportedly being "intercepted": this implies U.S. intelligence is able to pinpoint the LOCATION of the qaedas talking about future attacks.
How are they talking? "Interception" is the word being used by U.S. intelligence: that is, they're eavesdropping on phone, email or radio messages.
Well, computers have IP addresses: we may know where these alleged terrorists are, or at least where they are emailing from. And who they are emailing to. Electronic surveillance of both senders' and addresses' mailboxes could start.
Cell-phone users are pinpointable too. And phone numbers can be monitored and connected to subscribers/owners.
Radio signals of all kinds are traceable to their sources.
I won't even mention private analog phones because if you're listening to those it means you're tapping the lines so you know exactly who and where these people are.
In other words - IF YOUR AGENTS ARE REALLY "INTERCEPTING" TALKS OF QAEDAS PLANNING THE NEXT 911: WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE NOT IN JAIL YET OR AT LEAST WHY HAVEN'T YOU LOCATED WHERE EXACTLY THEY ARE CALLING/EMAILING FROM? OR HAVE YOU?
IT'S BEEN "MONTHS".
Was it snail mail or messengers? Because if that's what you've been intercepting, it means you've made arrests or you have infiltrated qaeda: again, you'd know exactly WHO and WHERE they are.
One more time: if you have intercepts, then you must have suspects or at least their locations you could place under surveillance: why are these alleged qaedas, allegedly planning for the next slaughter of Westerners, not in jail yet?
Or maybe should I ask: WHY ARE YOU, CRIMINAL DICK, AND THE REST OF YOUR GOVERNMENT OF TRAITORS AND STATE TERRORISTS NOT IN JAIL YET?
The State Department (=your co-terrorist chum Colin Powell) has been slightly more forthcoming.
Source 4: "[... ] a worldwide [State Dept.] alert citing reports that 'extremist individuals are planning additional terrorist actions against U.S. interests.
SUCH ACTIONS MAY BE IMMINENT AND INCLUDE SUICIDE OPERATIONS'." That alert expires October 1st.
Again: if Powell has reports of imminent suicide attacks by October 1st, how come he can't arrest the planners? He knows about them! He even knows that they may be about to act!
MOREOVER: IF WE'RE ON WORLDWIDE ALERT OF IMMINENT STRIKES, WHY HASN'T BUSH CHANGED THE ALERT COLOR FOR THE U.S. FROM YELLOW TO RED?
WHY ARE THE U.S. + EUROPE NOT ON MAXIMUM ALERT MODE YET?
And finally: since Powell issued his WORLDWIDE alert until October 1st, why are European countries not listed among the countries included in the State Dept. travel warnings as of July 25, 2002 ( http://travel.state.gov/warnings_list.html )?
It's not the allegedly "vague" details that "hamper defensive action" - it's you cheney and your cohorts.
Do us all a favor. Have a last stroke & die.
When, where & how is this next 911-size or bigger state-terror strike going to happen?
I think I can formulate a working hypothesis.
"When" is clear: between now (August 2, 2002) and the start of the Iraq war (early 2003 or spring 2003, see above).
The "where" is sure to include the EU (see above). But I think I can be more specific: Germany France Italy at least (probably the UK too because a recent - July 2002 - opinion poll revealed that 51% of the Brits are against the Iraq war [source 16]).
Why? Because they are the 3 countries with the most powerful grassroots left and where the Iraq war is mostly opposed. A new 911 there would allow the already rampant fascists (Berlusconi Chirac Stoiber) to pulverize whatever's left of political freedoms and opposition. Not that Schroeder's any better anyway: he helped out for 911 (see my essay 'THE TWIN COWARDS').
How? I'll venture a guess, based on International Herald Tribune, July 1, 2002, p.3: 'Europe ports to get U.S. inspectors', by Marlise Simons (originally a New York Times article).
The U.S. + EU establishments have agreed on the presence of U.S. inspectors at EU ports like Rotterdam to inspect cargo containers, allegedly "to screen sea containers for possible weapons of mass destruction".
Could it be that these state terrorists have been sent to hide (dirty) bombs or canisters of bio agents in containers and then blow up ships or trucks or freight trains (with railway stations?) carrying those containers or release smallpox or whatever?
"The agreement [... ] will first involve the ports of Rotterdam in the Netherlands, Antwerp in Belgium, and Le Havre in France. Talks are under way with five other European ports, in Germany, Italy and Spain. A similar arrangement is already in place in Canada with the ports of Halifax, Montreal and Vancouver."
The alleged aim, more specifically, is to "learn more about cargo heading for the U.S.".
"As part of the European agreement, U.S. inspectors will be given access to shipping manifests [... ]. If any part of the cargo is deemed suspect, the containers will be scanned, inspected or even unpacked by the local port authorities."
That is: U.S. inspectors have been put in charge of container-screening in Europe. The first five of them should by now (Aug. 2) already be at work in Rotterdam.
Wait a second.
Who's screening the screeners?
Who's running background checks on these U.S. inspectors?
Since when does Western Europe need U.S. supervisors to screen its cargo?
Why must the U.S. whittle down its already strained Customs to send staff to the Netherlands?
Could it be that these unscreened U.S. screeners are in Rotterdam to instead ALLOW WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN CONTAINERS TO SLIP THRU THE HANDS OF THE DUTCH ETC?
Just a working hypothesis - but worrying enough, since these U.S. inspectors are being sent by a terrorist U.S. administration.
August 3, 2002 version. I wrote the first version on May 21-22, 2002.
1. BBC News, October 4, 2001, 12:25 GMT 13:25 UK: 'The UK's Bin Laden dossier in full', online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk_politics/newsid_1579000/1579043.stm
2. International Herald Tribune, May 20, 2002: 'Bush's critics backing off on Sept.11 clues', by Brian Knowlton, online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/58255.html
3. International Herald Tribune, May 20, 2002, p.3: 'U.S. intercepts talks of new Qaeda attack', by James Risen and David Johnston (The New York Times), online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/58250.html
4. Associated Press, June 17,2002, 15:27ET: 'Terrorism Warnings May Dampen Summer', by Calvin Woodward;
5. International Herald Tribune, June 24, 2002, p.3: 'Bin Laden alive and well, aide says on TV', a compilation of AFP, NYT, AP news reports, online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/62331.html
6. International Herald Tribune, June 27, 2002, p.4: 'U.S. believes Qaeda tape is authentic', by Walter Pincus (The Washington Post), online at: http://www.iht.com/articles/62717.html
7. Italy Daily, June 27, 2002, p.2: 'Terror warning is branded as alarmist', by Reuters;
8. International Herald Tribune, July 6, 2002, p.1: 'U.S. drafting 3-front attack against Iraq', by Eric Schmitt (The New York Times), online: http://www.iht.com/articles/63672.html
9. Italy Daily, July 11, 2002, p.1: 'Digos says Al Qaeda wanted to strike Italy', by Associated Press;
10. Italy Daily, July 12, 2002, p.1: 'Terror patrol guards Venice Ghetto', by Anne Ruderman;
11. Associated Press, July 14, 2002, 00:19 ET: 'German Spies Say Bin Laden Is Alive';
12. International Herald Tribune, July 16, 2002, p.5: 'Police to go abroad to fight terrorism' (originally an AFP dispatch);
13. Associated Press, July 18, 2002, 01:56 ET: 'Al- Qaida Weapon Access Worries U.S.', by Robert Burns.
14. The Washington Post, July 20,2002, p.A01: 'U.S. Holds Suspected Al Qaeda Trainee', by Douglas Farah and Allan Lengel, online: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34752-2002Jul19.html
15. La Repubblica, July 23, 2002, p.1 (cont. on p.10): "Il 'milanese' pentito di Guantanamo", by Carlo Bonini;
16. la Repubblica, July 29, 2002, p.2: 'Primi soldati in Iraq', by Riccardo Orizio, http://www.repubblica.it/online/esteri/iraqdue/iraqdue/iraqdue.html
17. Associated Press, July 29, 2002, 17:03ET: 'Bin Laden's Son Seen Gaining Power', by John J. Lumpkin;
18. La Repubblica, Aug.1, 2002, p.9: 'Iraq, Bush ora rallenta/niente 'sorpresa d'ottobre', by Arturo Zampaglione;
19. International Herald Tribune; Aug,2, 2002, p.4: 'Americans need a national discussion', by Joseph Biden & Richard Lugar, from A New York Times article, http://www.iht.com/articles/66446.html
No rights reserved. This material MAY and OUGHT be published, broadcast, rewritten and redistributed, as long as Adrian More is credited as author.
Other 911 T.I.P.s by Adrian More:
- Fuzzy Math
- The Pearl Harbor Lie And September 11
- Zac In The Bush
- Immoral Tenet & His Blind-Eye Surveillance
- The Twin Cowards
- Catch 9
- Shredding The Constitution!
- Air Farce One
- Mr Push, Where Is Your Wife?
- Willie Brown, You Talk Too Much
add a comment on this article