portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article

Boy of 17 hacks into missile secrets

"Cracking into the Pentagon was child's play," said the teenager.
The Pentagon has had its second major intelligence embarrassment in a week after a teenager in Austria hacked into secret plans, including the location of US nuclear missiles.

The exploits of Markus Hirsch, 17, come only days after British surveillance enthusiast John Locker was able to hack into US spy satellite pictures.

Now an FBI team is on its way to Vienna to question Markus. Their big fear is that Osama bin Laden followers may have enjoyed similar access for months.

American protection of its secrets has never been higher since 11 September, with even the most conservative estimates saying at least 7billion has gone into bolstering security.

But from the computer in his bedroom, Markus was able to get into the most classified Pentagon sites, including the one which details the silos where missiles with multi-megaton warheads are kept.

"Cracking into the Pentagon was child's play," said the teenager. "I know my way round the internet."

Markus, who lived with his mother in Germany for a while when his parents split up, eventually moved into a small flat in Vienna where he now lives alone.

He added: "I don't know anyone here, apart from my granny, so I surf all night on the internet."

WORLD NEWS ROUND-UP

homepage: homepage: http://www.thisislondon.com/dynamic/news/story.html?in_review_id=613066&in_review_text_id=582545

This article is still a hoax. 19.Jun.2002 06:06

Mojo

Seems it was created to make people believe that Pentagon has their secret information available online, and that the internet needs to be regulated to protect such information. Another stupid hoax from the "intelligence apparatus".

Article is pointless, misleading. 19.Jun.2002 14:17

anarcho-commie

The pentagon information network is multitiered. there is no direct link between the realms of sensitive information and that of the globally accessible info. Sorry but the best way is still the old fashioned cloak and dagger way. If information is a weapon then the internet is still the civilians F16. What information the pentagon guards is only useful to someone foolish enough to oppose them in the same strategic conditions. There is nothing dynamic about the US military. Why else would it need to call any militant groups "terrorist?" Subversives are successful when they are able to convince others that their strengths are the most relevant ones.