portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article portland metro

actions & protests | animal rights | corporate dominance | forest defense

Update on Subcommitee Hearing on Eco-Terrorism

Question: Ben & Jerry's, Ford Foundation, PETA, Ruckus Society, RAN, and ELF ... what do they all have in common?
Answer: They were all denounced today on Capitol Hill as either "terrorists" or "terrorist supporting".
In a meaningful turn of events, witnesses before the House Sub-Committee on Forests and Forest Health claimed that the terrorists are truly among us - and even in our refrigerators!

Among the groups of people singled out as "terrorists" or "terrorist supporting" included ice-cream makers Ben & Jerry's Inc. as well as several public interest organizations ranging from the well-known Ford Foundation to the highly-visible and controversial People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Though the primary questioning before the Sub-Committee was slated to be directed toward former ELF spokeperson Craig Rosenbaugh, representatives of several multi-national corporations were on hand and offered testimony of their own in which they made clear their belief that various groups advocating "domestic terrorism" [in the form of non-violent direct action against corporate property] are bieng financed by and share "interlocking executive boards" with various progressive companies and organizations throughout the North American continent.

The hearings opened much as was expected with the primary witness, Craig Rosenbaugh, who was present under Congressional subpoena, invoking his Fifth Admendment rights as granted under the Consititution of the United States. The chair of the sub-committee openly taunted Mr. Rosenbaugh's legal strategy and flatly informed him and his legal counsel that the sub-committee would likely reconvene for the purpose of charging him formally with Contempt of Congress. The hearing took on an almost absurd tone at one point when one of Mr. Rosenbaugh's inquisitors alluded to the recent Enron hearings and former CEO Kenneth Lay's continual invocation of the Fifth Admendment. As was pointed out at a press-conference following the hearing today, though, no similar sub-committee meeting is expected to be convened for the purpose of charging Mr. Lay with Contempt.

The remainder of the hearing did little to dispel the sense of absurdity as verbal jousting broke out between the chair of the sub-committee and individual members who took exception to the characterization of specific organizations, among them Mother Against Drunk Driving and the Turner Foundation, as "tax-exempt terrorist-financers" and a female Federal Forest Service employee was chastised before the sub-committee for making what some Representatives from timber states called "unfounded allegations" of harrasment by employees of timber companies who opposed enforcement of Federal environmental regulations. When other Forest Service employees suggested that some timber companies engage in "timber theft", several of the Representatives on the sub-committee reacted belligerently and suggested that the Forest Service was falsifying data and that any "cutting oustide the bounds of authorized timber sales" was due to ongoing attempts to destroy beetle infestations.

One of many solidarity events took place today in Portland, OR. The purpose of this was to voice our opposition to the blatant disregard that the "Subcommitee on Eco-terrorism" is showing for all non-corporate interests.

What happened in the hearing today is not suprising given the context in which we live right now. It may be shocking to those who cling to the notion that we live in a representative system, but it is becoming harder and harder not to see the ruthless face our government tries to hide behind its mask of propaganda.

It is obvious that our government will not listen to us. The fact that they are trying to marginalize such main-stream organizations as Ben and Jerry's points to the totalitarian power they feel they have over the people. So, if we are going to strive for social and environmental justice, the question changes from "what are THEY going to do" to "what are WE going to do". Apathy is not neutral at this point. It is collusion with the largest terrorist organization in the world: the U.S corporate-military complex

homepage: homepage: http://www.protectcivilliberties.com

good report--will broadcast 13.Feb.2002 21:38

theresa theresa58x@yahoo.com

I appreciate the effort reporting this story--I liked it and so I will broadcast it tomorrow morning on KBOO 90.7 (with credits, of course).



Wasn't Me 13.Feb.2002 22:15

Chyld ysab@efn.org

I didn't do it. I don't know who did it, And if you think I do well, "the truth is out there"!


Get mad - and get active! 14.Feb.2002 00:06

S. DeLoe

This pisses me off so much, that tomorrow I am going to send money to PETA, the Ford Foundation, and whoever else on that goddamn ridiculous list I can, and buy some Ben and Jerrys! If buying ice cream makes me a terrorist, so be it.

Corporate bastards are not going to own my life.

Valentine's Day Gift Package! 14.Feb.2002 13:28


This Valentine's Day, give the ultimate gift:

Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream, Teddy Bears, and Pretzels!

See if the FBI arrests you before you make it home.

ben and jerry ARE terrorists 15.Feb.2002 10:19

always think critically

its my understanding that the unilever corporation owns Ben and Jerrys Ice cream. It is also my understanding that unilever has been denounced in the past for poor labor and environmental practice. so although b&j is still parading around as this socially conscious, down to earth organization, your money goes to a giant, controversial multinational corporation when you buy their pints. also, exploitation of animals is absolutely inherent in the dairy industry. so i conclude that b&j do indeed contribute to all kinds of terrorism.
go vegan and discuss...

Fine Distinctions 15.Feb.2002 13:56


I see from his/her comment above that "always think critically" makes fine and nuanced disctinctions. Vegan or terrorist, choose one THEN we'll discuss? Isn't that like "agre to drill ANWR or be a terrorist, then we'll discuss"?