portland independent media center  
images audio video
newswire article oregon & cascadia

9.11 investigation

Do it our way...or we will kill you

I am the present General of an organization that has been responsible for the slaughter, puging, liquidation of Jews, Muslims, Protestants, Buddhists you name it. If they refuse to kneel before us, you die its that simple!
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<!-- saved from url=(0039) http://www.cyberclass.net/blackpope.htm -->
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Date</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffff80>
<P align=center><U><BIG><STRONG><BIG>The Most Powerful Man in the World? -
</BIG><BR><BIG>The "Black" Pope Count Hans Kolvenbach -- The Jesuit's
General</BIG></STRONG></BIG></U></P>
<P align=left><EM><STRONG>By RICK MARTIN<BR>The SPECTRUM Newspaper, May
2000</STRONG></EM><BR><BIG><STRONG><A
href=" link to www.spectrumnews10.com
<P align=left>Readers are also invited to visit:<FONT
face="Times New Roman"><BIG> </BIG><BR></FONT><STRONG><A
href=" link to www.spectrumnews10.com
href=" link to www.spectrumnews10.com,
you thought you were pretty well informed by now about all of the main players
on the "conspiracy" playing field? You've maybe been hearing for years about (or
bumped into on your own) the various elements of society who control our world
from behind the scenes.<BR><BR>You've gotten familiar with the role played by,
for instance, the Khazarian Zionists (who invented the word "Jew" to disguise
their adopted heritage, as distinguished from the biblical Judeans), or the role
played by the Banksters (banking gangsters) controlling the economies of the
world, by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission,
the<BR>Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300 (the 17 wealthiest so-called "elite"
families)—the Rothschilds in England and Rockefellers in America and Bronfmans
in Canada, and on and on, comprising the physical power structure of the New
World Order puppets under the direction of darkly motivated, other-dimensional
"master deceivers" commonly known as Lucifer or Satan and their "fallen angel"
cohorts.<BR><BR>While all of those details contribute to understanding the
Larger Picture, what you are about to read fills in a most important Missing
Link in this entire structure. And I don't mean a little side issue; I mean a
link so central—yet so well hidden from general public view, and for so
long—that even the most studied of "conspiracy theory" scholars probably have
not put<BR>together much of the information that is going to be presented
here.<BR><BR>To call the following outlay "controversial" and "sensitive" is
about as mild an understatement of the truth of the matter as can be made! This
missing link changes the entire slant of the entire playing field!<BR><BR>After
months of anticipation and weeks of preparation, I was finally able to speak
with Vatican Assassins author Eric Jon Phelps on Tuesday, March 14. There was
simply no other way to cover Eric's historic masterpiece spanning, literally,
five centuries, than to just ask questions covering huge spans of time and major
historical events. It took us almost four hours to accomplish the task, yet we
could easily have gone on for another forty.<BR><BR>We here at The SPECTRUM are
simply unwilling to reduce the importance of this work by presenting it in a too
distilled fashion. In fact, in order to share this material with at least some
of the pertinent backup, Eric has granted us permission to print (directly after
the interview) several excerpts from his soon-to-be-published book which will
help you in understanding certain aspects of this magnificently important and
broad-sweeping story. The missing link is surely a central link.<BR><BR>Let's
call this story the "Jesuit-Vatican Connection" to the unfolding New World Order
agenda. You make up your own mind just how absolutely central, yet well hidden,
has been this link! There's a good reason the secret Vatican library is so
extensive and yet remains so intact from outside intrusion, despite the many
others who would like to possess such a collection of information detailing much
"censored" data about our true, otherworldly cultural heritage.<BR><BR>When one
reads a work like Vatican Assassins, one can't help but reflect back on the
purposely "adjusted" and watered down and boring moments in high school history
class. Meanwhile, the true history of what has gone on is dynamic and full of
calculated intrigue.<BR><BR>In this business, I've heard and read a lot of
things. But when I had to pick my jaw up off the floor during the reading of
certain historical portions in Eric's book—well, let me just say that Truth
certainly is stranger, and far more interesting, than the many fictions we've
been led to believe are historical fact. And yet The Truth does fit together
like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.<BR><BR>This book SHOULD be a best-seller,
but it is hardly likely to achieve such general attention—considering how well
controlled and censored is the publishing business. Thus is the reason for our
lengthy presentation of this most astonishing and critically important material
here in The SPECTRUM.<BR><BR>We are in a time of Truth being revealed from all
directions. And there is probably no more fundamental, mind-rattling, and
previous notions-shattering example of that than what is being presented here.
The interview is directly followed by a number of pertinent excerpts from Eric's
eye-opening book—which will be available July 1, 2000.<BR><BR>[Editor's note: It
should be noted up-front that the information presented below is the studied
opinion of Eric Jon Phelps. We here at The SPECTRUM find much about his
presentation of his historical research which meshes with and expands upon Truth
which has been presented by many other authors in these pages and elsewhere. And
that is good; Truth is Truth is Truth, and should all mesh.<BR><BR>However, for
the peace of mind of our unique readership—which typically has cultivated a more
aware spiritual perspective than the general public—we do not want to give the
impression that we agree with (or wish to promote) some collateral aspects of
Eric's presentation having to do with his personal "religious" convictions. The
focus of those convictions follows a much more biblically conventional (literal)
path—in stark contrast to the unconventional, questioning, wide-angle vision of
his historical material.<BR><BR>Generally such opinions are simply allowed to
stand on their own—for you to sort and interpret as you see fit—rather than
being singled-out to be addressed editorially. However, in this case, the
practical side of Eric's stated religious convictions include the condoning of
some degree of violence (or violent protest) and use of armaments. And such
convictions are very much the opposite of our philosophical position—for many
reasons, not the least of which is the obvious Adversarial bait-and-entrapment
which would result from choosing what we would consider to be low-frequency
responses to schoolroom Earth's current challenges.<BR><BR>Yet, if the
perceptive reader penetrates "between the lines" thoughtfully, there is glimpsed
a recurring commendable spiritual message in Eric's commentary—of "Have the
courage to speak The Truth" and "God helps those who help themselves" — which we
certainly DO agree with wholeheartedly and have long supported
enthusiastically.<BR><BR>We are in the time of the Great Awakening on this
planet. The Light of Truth, intensifying with each passing moment, is nudging
many to step forward and share what they know. Will such ones follow that nudge
or continue to hide in fear? The answer to that question is perhaps the most
important aspect of schoolroom Earth's relentless testing at this critical
time.<BR><BR>One last-minute footnote before beginning this interview: The Arts
&amp; Entertainment (A&amp;E) cable television channel just started to air—on
Easter Sunday evening!—a new two-hour documentary called: The Vatican Revealed.
Tape it so you can study it carefully; within the lines of dialog and some of
those people chosen for commentaries are many, many clues to the true power of
the Vatican over world affairs. It would, of course, be much more revealing to
watch the A&amp;E program AFTER having read and digested the
following.]<BR></EM><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Before we begin, let me say a
few words. The topic of your book is so comprehensive and covers, literally, all
aspects of global control by the Jesuits, dating back to 1540. I would like to
begin our conversation with a very important point of clarification so that our
readers have something to hold onto while reading the historical narrative we
are about to present.<BR>Let me also add that your book is one of the most
compelling, dynamic, genuinely educational historical documents I have ever
read. I want to tell you, I am impressed!<BR><BR>You, literally, link every
major global conflict and political assassination to the hands of the Jesuit
Order. The Jews, as with many other groups you mention, have been the unwitting
pawns in this Jesuit Agenda.<BR><BR>Today, the present. I'm going to start here,
and then we're going to go way back in time and work our way up. But, I want to
start HERE because it will give a foundation for going back in
time.<BR><BR>Today, who is the Superior General of the Jesuits, the so-called
"Black Pope" [black here refers to hidden, evil activities, not to race or
color] who gives the orders to the actual Pope. Is it still Jean-Baptist
Janssens?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Janssens, Frenchman. No, he passed
away in 1964. Then Pedro Arrupe came to power. Then, after Arrupe died, in 1988,
I believe, the present Jesuit General is Count Hans Kolvenbach. [See photo
nearby.] I call him Count Hans Kolvenhoof.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Let's
discuss this position of "General" and, in addition, who is this person, Count
Hans Kolvenbach? Who does he serve? What are his origins? Where does he hail
from?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> The present General is a Dutchman, his
nationality is Dutch.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Where is he? Physically,
where is he?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>He resides in Rome, at the
headquarters of the Jesuits, called the Church of Jesu. So, the Jesuit General
resides in Rome at, what I just called, the Jesuit
headquarters.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> The Church of Jesu, is that near
the Vatican?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> It's not far from the Vatican,
right. It's in the same general area. It's headquarters of the Knights of
Malta.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Is it part of Vatican City,
proper?<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps: </STRONG>Right, I believe, yes it
is.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin: </STRONG>Where does Satan fit into this picture, and
what is the ultimate goal of the Jesuits, the so-called Society of
Jesus?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> The Jesuit General, and the other high
Jesuit Generals, they are sorcerers. They are Luciferians, and they worship what
they would call Lucifer. They do not believe in Satan. They believe in
Lucifer.<BR><BR>Now, according to Alberto Rivera, he was invited—because he was
a top Jesuit at the time in the late '60s—he was invited to a "Black Mass" in
Spain where there were quite a few top Jesuit Generals present. And he called it
a "Black Mass". Well, when you're involved in a "Black Mass", you're involved in
the worship of Lucifer, all dressed in their black capes and so
on.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> I'm fascinated by Count Hans Kolvenbach
because nobody in the world knows who this person is. I've never heard the
name.<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps:</STRONG> Let me just tell you that you can see his
picture and his top Jesuits—just a second and I'll get the book. The name of the
book is called<U> "Jesuits: A Multi-Biography,"</U> by Jean Lacoutre, and that
is available, usually, in the bookstores. It was published in 1995.<BR><BR>Jean
Lacoutre is a Frenchman. He was a communist, is a communist. On the last page of
the pictures in it, that is right adjacent to page 343, you see Peter Hans
Kolvenbach. He's the Jesuit General, and he looks like just a very evil
individual. There's a Black man, who's a high Jesuit, he's a 29 Superior Jesuit
with his cosmopolitan General staff. One of the General staff looks like Ben
Kingsley of Shindler's List. There are six White men, and one Black man. And
that's his General staff.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>What is the process of
choosing a successor General?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> The High Jesuits
elect him, and he's elected for life—unless he becomes a
"heretic".<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> And the so-called "High Jesuits"
represent what group?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> I would say that they're
the "professed", the high 4th Degree. When a Jesuit is professed, he is under
the Jesuit Oath; he is under the "Bloody Oath" that I have in my
book.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Do we have permission to reprint that Oath
in our paper?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Of course,
absolutely.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> One of my questions has to do with
the Oath and it's similarity to<EM> </EM><U>The Protocols Of The Learned Elders
Of Zion</U>, and I wrote that question before I got back to the Protocols
portion of your book.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>The Jesuits obviously
wrote the Protocols because they have carried out every protocol in that little
handbook. They have carried everything out. And, Alberto Rivera says—and he was
a Jesuit—he was greatly maligned, not helped at all by the Apostate,
Protestants, and Baptists in this country; he was helped, somewhat, by Jack
Chick. Jack Chick published his story in six volumes, titled Alberto I, II, III,
IV, V, &amp; VI.<BR><BR>Alberto Rivera says that it was Jews aligned with the
Pope who published the Protocols. Well, I tend to feel that it was just the
Jesuits themselves because they, and they alone, were the ones who were able to
bring this to pass.<BR><BR>They're the ones in the government. They're the ones
behind professional sports. The owner of the Pittsburgh Steelers is a Knight of
Malta. The owner of the Detroit Lions is a Knight of Malta. All your top owners
of these ball clubs, for the most part, are Knights of Malta, getting the people
whooped up in this hoopla over games and sports, while they're busy creating
a<BR>tyranny. So, that was one of the things in the Protocols—that they would
create "amusements".<BR><BR>Another one they used was Walt Disney, 33rd-degree
Freemason—Disneyworld, Disneyland. Another one was Milton Hersey, with Hersey
Park. They create all of these amusements and games and pastimes to get the
people drunk with<BR>pleasure, while they're busy overthrowing the Protestant
form of government.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Where does Las Vegas factor
into all of this?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Las Vegas, well, for the most
part, is controlled by the Mafia. But all the high Mafia families are Roman
Catholic, and they are ALL subordinate to the Pope or to the Cardinal of New
York, which is Cardinal O'Connor—because the Commission, the Mafia Commission
resides in New York.<BR><BR>Frank Costello was a member of the Mob Commission,
and he was intimate, personal friends with Knight of Malta, Hollywood mogul, Joe
Kennedy. And that has not changed.<BR><BR>So, the High Knights are good, dear
brothers with the High Mafia Dons—the Gambinos, the Lucchese, the Columbos, all
of them. And they control Hollywood, not the Jews. It's only Jews who are
front-men who are involved in Hollywood and working for the Mafia and for the
Cardinal, just like in politics it would be Arlen Spector. Arlen Spector was
Spelly's [Cardinal<BR>Spellman's] Jew in the assassination [of President
Kennedy], and he would never say a word about it.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:
</STRONG>Now, as we go through here, if there's anything that you don't want me
to print, please let me know because, literally, I'm going to print everything
we say in this conversation.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>That's fine, that's
fine with me because it needs to be said.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Let's
get back to Count Hans Kolvenbach. I want to shine the spotlight on this guy for
just a little bit here. Let's talk about him. What does he do? Who is he? Let's
talk about his position as "General". How do they exercise this control over the
Pope? Does the Pope know he's a pawn?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Ok, one
question at a time. So, which question do you want me to deal
with?<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Let's just shine the light right on the
Count.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>The Jesuit General,
ok.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin: </STRONG>Let's start there, and you tell me
everything you want to tell me about that position.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>The Jesuit General is the absolute, complete, and total dictator and
autocrat of the Order. When he speaks, his provincials move. The provincials are
his major subordinates. There are around 83 provincials right now.<BR><BR>As I
understand it, the Jesuit Order has divided the world into 83 regions. Ok? For
each region, there is a Jesuit provincial. There are 10 provincials in the
United States. There is one for Central America. There is one for Ireland.
They've divided up the world into these provinces.<BR><BR>So it's old Babylonian
provincial government, centered in Nebuchadnezzar or the Jesuit General himself;
so it's strictly a Roman form of government where all the states or provinces
are subordinate to this worldwide sovereign.<BR><BR>The Jesuit General exercises
full and complete power over the Order. He meets with his provincials. When they
decide to start a war or an agitation, he gets the information from the
provincial of that country, how best to go about this, the demeanor of the
people, and then he uses legitimate grievances to foam an agitation—like the
1964 Civil Rights Movement. That was ALL a Jesuit agitation, completely, because
the end result was more consolidation of power in Washington with the 1964 Civil
Rights Act that was written by [the longtime President of the University of
Notre Dame, the Reverend] Theodore Hesburgh.<BR><BR>The Jesuit General rules the
world through his provincials. And the provincials then, of course, rule the
lower Jesuits, and there are many Jesuits who are not "professed", so many of
the lower Jesuits have no idea what's going on at the top. They have no concept
of the power of their Order.<BR><BR>It's just like Freemasonry. The lower
Freemasons have no idea that the High Shriner Freemasons are working for the
Jesuit General. They think that they're just doing works and being good people.
But the bottom line is that the high-level Freemasons are subject, also, to the
Jesuit General because the Jesuit General, with Fredrick the Great, wrote the
High Degrees, the last 8 Degrees, of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry when Fredrick
protected them when they were suppressed by the Pope in 1773.<BR><BR>So, you
have the alignment with the Jesuit Order and the most powerful Freemason they
had in the craft, Fredrick the Great, during their suppression. That is an
irrefutable conclusion. And then, when you see the Napoleonic Wars, the French
Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars carried out by Freemasonry, everything
Napoleon did, and the Jacobins, whatever they<BR>did, completely benefited the
Jesuit Order.<BR><BR>It's to this end that Alexander Dumas wrote his <U>The
Count Of Monte Cristo</U>. The Count is the Jesuit General. Monte=Mount,
Cristo=Christ. The Count of the Mount of Christ. Alexander Dumas was talking
about the Jesuit General getting vengeance when the Jesuits were suppressed, and
many of them were consigned to an island, three hours sailing, West, off the
coast of<BR>Portugal. And so, when the Jesuits finally regained their power,
they punished all of the monarchs of Europe who had suppressed them, drove them
from their thrones, including the Knights of Malta from Malta, using
Napoleon.<BR><BR>And Alexander Dumas, who fought for the Italian patriots in
1848, to free Rome from the temporal power of the Pope, wrote many books and one
of the books was to expose this, and that was <U>The Count Of Monte
Cristo</U>.<BR><BR>So, when you read that book, bear in mind that it's really a
satire on the Jesuit Order regaining their power in France. <U>The Count of
Monte Cristo</U> has an intelligence apparatus that can't be beat. Well, that's
the Jesuit Order.<BR><BR>But the Count doesn't get what he really ought to have,
or his last wish, and that's the love of a woman. He gains back all of his
political power; he gains back everything he lost; but he doesn't have the love
of a woman. And THAT is the Jesuit Order. They have no women. They have no love
of a woman. Because to have a wife, to have a woman, means you have an
allegiance to your wife and family, and you cannot obey the General. That's why
they will NEVER be married, and that's one of the great KEYS to their
success.<BR><BR>They can betray a nation and walk away. They can betray all the
Irish Catholics getting on the Titanic, and walk away. They can betray us in
Vietnam and walk away. They can betray us every time we go to the hospital and
get radiated and cut and drugged, and walk away, because it's "for the greater
glory of God"—Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam: the greater glory of the god<BR>who sits
in Rome.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> What is the ULTIMATE goal of the
Jesuits?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Their ultimate goal is the rule of the
world, with the Pope of their making, from Solomon's rebuilt Temple in
Jerusalem. That's their ultimate goal.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> And why
is Solomon's Temple rebuilt so important?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG>
Because the Jesuits have always wanted that. When Ignatius Loyola first started
the Order, one of the first things he did was, he wanted to go to Jerusalem and
set up the Jesuit headquarters there. So, he went there, he tried to do it and
failed, came back, went to school, started his Latin studies, etc. Maybe it
might be a good idea to just review a little bit about Ignatius
Loyola.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Yes.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Ok,
Ignatius Loyola was a Spanish soldier, and he was wounded at a battle between
the French and the Spanish, and his leg was shattered. Well, the French General,
because Loyola was very brave in conflict, ordered his own doctors to attend
Loyola. So they set the leg and sent him back to his home—which, of course, he
was royalty to the Counsel of Loyola in Spain, in the area of the
Basques.<BR><BR>Loyola, through his series of desiring to regain his leg—it had
healed improperly, so he made a rack where he would stretch the leg, with
severe, horrible, awful pain—and trying to stretch this leg to get it back to
normal shape, he endured awful, terrible pain. He had it rebroken, again, a
couple of times and it still did not heal properly, so he had a perpetual limp.
He could no longer be the courtier among women, and as a result, he went into
this depression, and he then had this vision of the saints, etc., etc., and he
wrote his spiritual exercises.<BR><BR>I will stop at the spiritual exercises,
just for a minute, but I'll take up from there. Loyola then wanted to form an
army, but when this happened with his spiritual exercises, those spiritual
exercises would be basic training for all of his Jesuits. That's what they will
ALL go through. That's what every Jesuit goes through today.<BR><BR>One of the
maxims of the spiritual exercises is that if my superior says "black is white
and white is black", then that's the way it is. That is in his spiritual
exercises. That is what is quoted in JFK, when Kevin Costner is telling his
people: "Hey, people, we've got to start thinking like the CIA. Black is white
and white is black." That was a Jesuit giveaway that the Jesuits produced that
movie, because they're quoting Ignatius Loyola in that movie from his spiritual
exercises.<BR><BR>So, Loyola had an indomitable will. He had a will of steel,
and he set his mind to regain back what the Papacy had lost to the Reformation.
And so, he went to the Pope, and the Pope in 1540 then created the Jesuit Order.
But this man is a soldier, he's a lawyer, and he put together a legion of
soldiers and warriors to get back what Rome had lost, as well as institute a
World Government for the Pope, from Jerusalem. This was in 1540.<BR><BR>He
started the Order in 1536. He was arrested by the Inquisition, and he was
released, and he went to the Pope; he threw himself at the feet of the Pope. He
would be completely at his service. The Pope chartered him, and that Pope was
Pius III. The Pope chartered them, created the Jesuit Order; now he has Papal
protection, and they began their awful history of deeds of blood. And war after
war after war after war, they're all attributed to the Jesuit Order in some way.
Catholic nobles, with lots of money, donated castles and schools and money to
the Jesuit Order.<BR><BR>Virtually everything they own has been given to them or
stolen by them. Of course, they stole all of the fortunes of the Jews in World
War II. They stole all their gold, all their assets and everything, whenever
they went into a country. What's just been released is NOTHING compared to what
they've taken.<BR><BR>In Edmond Paris's book, printed by Ozark Publications,
called <U>The Vatican Against Europe</U>, it gets into great detail of what they
did. It calls it—the last 30 years of war is all attributable to the Jesuits,
their massacres of the Serbs and Jews, etc. But Edmond Paris did not understand
that the Jesuit General—and this is one of the most important points I want to
make about<BR>Von Kolvenbach—the Jesuit General is in complete control of the
international intelligence community: that's the CIA, the FBI, the KGB, the
Israeli Mossad, the German BND, the British SIS. The Jesuit General is in
COMPLETE CONTROL of the entire intelligence apparatus—FBI, every bureaucratic
agency in this country, all of it; he is in complete control of it.<BR><BR>So,
whenever he wants to find something out about an individual, they put in the
Social Security number, and everything from all of the intelligence apparatus
kicks-in and he and his provincials can review everything about that man. Credit
cards, you name it, everything that's attached to Rome's social security number,
which FDR put upon us in 1933 with the help of<BR>Spellman; at the time, I
believe he was Archbishop, or maybe it was Cardinal Hayes—but Rome was behind
FDR in putting him in office.<BR><BR>The couple of things that he did was
implement social insecurity, the income tax, and recognizing Joseph Stalin's
bloody Jesuit USSR government. So, with the giving of us the Social Security
number, that is Rome's number—that's why I refuse to use it—and that's why they
want everybody using it for everything: driver's license, tax return, credit
card, everything you do,<BR>that number is you and that number is Rome's
number.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin: </STRONG>Let me just back-up here for a minute.
What comes to mind is Louis Freeh, head of the
FBI.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Roman Catholic, good altar boy. Probably a
Knight of Columbus; I can't prove it. But anybody with that kind of power has
got to be a Knight of Columbus.<BR><BR>And the Knights of Columbus implement
Jesuit politics. And Louis Freeh was the one behind the Waco atrocity and the
Oklahoma City bombing atrocity. And his top sniper was a Japanese Roman Catholic
named Lon Horiuchi.<BR><BR>So, it's Roman Catholics in control, Knights in
control of the FBI, who carried out all of this killing. And those two men,
Louis Freeh and Lon Horiuchi are personally accountable to Cardinal O'Connor of
New York. And Cardinal O'Connor of New York is the most powerful Cardinal in the
country. He is the military vicar. And that's why Bush kissed his fanny for
going to<BR>Bob Jones, because Cardinal O'Connor is the King of the American
Empire. And he rules his Empire from that Palace, St. Patrick's Cathedral, "the
little Vatican".<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> And is he in contact, do you
think, with Kolvenbach?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Of course. O'Connor
himself is not a Jesuit, but the Jesuits are like the SS of the Catholic Church.
They maintain order.<BR><BR>And the ones closest to him who maintain order are
the Jesuits of Fordham University. Now, one of them—the head of Fordham
University, I believe he is an Irishman, is also a member of the CFR [Council on
Foreign Relations]. And I have that right here in the Annual Report of the CFR
of 1993. Those Jesuits at Fordham maintain semblance and rule over the Cardinal
in New York. And, of course, the powerful Jesuits of Fordham include Avery
Dulles and John Foster Dulles, one of the writers of the book on the Second
Vatican Council.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Let's back-up now, let's go
back. What's the Council of Trent?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> The Council
of Trent was the response of Rome to the Protestant Reformation. Remember—the
Protestant Reformation brought us all of the political liberty that we know of
today. There's no such thing as national sovereignty without the Reformation.
There's no such thing as private rights without the Reformation. There's no such
thing as the Law of Nations, as we know of it today, of Montesquieu and the
others, without the Reformation.<BR><BR>So, when the Reformation came with their
doctrines of salvation by grace through faith alone, and that there was no need
for the priesthood to go to Heaven—that all we need is salvation in Christ, and
Romans 1:17: the righteous shall live by faith. When the Reformation came, it
completely stripped Rome of its spiritual power. The priests were no longer
wanted because the people were getting the word of God in a Bible, specifically
in Holland, England, and Germany. And so, with these great revivals breaking
forth and the Reformation happening, nations were breaking away from the power
of the Pope. The Holy Roman Empire was breaking up. Charles V, the Emperor,
resigned and became a monk and a gardener. So, the Lord was moving mightily in
breaking the power of the Holy Roman Empire, started by Charlemagne and the
Pope.<BR><BR>Well, this was not good for Rome because they were losing lots of
money. The nations were not paying "Peter's pence" anymore, which today we call
"foreign aid" in this country. And so the Pope was very upset about
his.<BR><BR>What's he going to do? These nations are breaking away from us;
they're not under our temporal or spiritual power; and it's very important to
remember that the Pope claims two powers—spiritual and temporal—and with the
breaking of his spiritual power, he then lost his temporal power. In other
words, he no longer had the ability to rule the people through the king of
the<BR>country, because the king was breaking away, like Henry VIII.<BR><BR>So,
Henry VIII broke away from the Roman Church and formed the Church of England; he
no longer was subject to the Pope. This was happening in England, in Germany, in
Holland, and other places.<BR><BR>As a result of this, the Devil raised up
Ignatius Loyola with his demonisms, his "spiritual exercises" and—because Loyola
had been a member of the Spanish Alumbrados, which is what we call the
Illuminati today, and he used the Jesuit Order to attempt to regain back what
had been taken by the Reformation—what the Lord had done through Luther, Calvin,
and Knox. And, by<BR>the way, Luther, Calvin, and Knox—none of those men died
violent deaths. They all lived to older age and died peacefully, amidst the
power of the Jesuit machinations.<BR><BR>The Council of Trent consists of 25
Sessions. Those 25 Sessions accurse and condemn all the doctrines of the
Reformation. It condemns anybody who does not believe that the literal Jesus
Christ is in the host [holy communion bread], and that his literal blood is in
the wine. That's called transubstantiation. Anybody who does not believe that is
an accursed anathema. Anybody who believes that their salvation is outside the
Catholic Church is accursed anathema. Anybody who believes in justification by
grace through faith—anathema, accursed. Anybody who believes that the Pope is
not the vicar of Christ—accursed, anathema. You see, all of these doctrines were
being put forth as a result of reading the Bible, which produced the
Reformation, and so the Jesuits accursed everything that the Reformers were
preaching. This is all in Law called the Council of Trent.<BR><BR>In the 4th
Session, which is probably the most important Session, the Jesuits condemn
freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of conscience. So, no man
has the right to choose his own religion; no man has the right to publish what
he feels is the truth; and no man has the right to freedom of
conscience.<BR><BR>Those rights were secured by our Baptist/Calvinist
forefathers in the First Amendment. The man who wrote the First Amendment was
James Madison, who was a Baptist/Calvinist, and he was told by that
Baptist/Calvinist in Virginia, Doc. John Leland: "If you don't secure all those
rights, Virginia will not ratify the Constitution." Virginia was a
Baptist/Calvinist state.<BR><BR>So, we have a warfare between the Council of
Trent and the doctrines of the Reformation, particularly as outlined by John
Calvin in his <U>Institutes Of The Christian Religion</U>. Calvin [1536] wrote
the <U>Institutes Of The Christian Religion</U>, he finished it when he was 27,
and he dedicated it to the King of France. And because the Jesuits so hated him,
he was driven from France and he resided in Geneva to the day of his death, when
he became Governor of Geneva. It's Calvin and his Institutes Of The Christian
Religion vs. Loyola and his Council of Trent, if you want it sewed-up in two
major documents.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Council of Trent was what
year?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> From 1545-1563, eighteen years. And Trent
is a little town in Italy. So, it was a Council that took place in the town of
Trent, Italy.<BR><BR><U>The Presbyterian Westminster Confession And Faith</U>
that was finished in 1648, after the 30 Years War, is another extension of
Calvin's Institutes, and is what the Church of Scotland and the Covenanters went
by when they resisted the powers of Rome and England. That document is a major
document, and it's not the new Westminster Confession, it's the old one of 1648,
where they called the Pope the man of sin, that Roman Anti-Christ, and they also
denounced anti-Christian tyranny.<BR><BR>And that it is their duty, to use what
they call "the sword of the spirit", which is the Word of God, which we read in
Ephesians, Chapter 6, and "the sword of just defense"—the gun, the
sword.<BR><BR>So, us Calvinists believe that there is a time for peace and a
time for war, and we do not refuse to go to the battlefield when it's necessary.
It was the Calvinists who gave us our political liberty in England with
Cromwell. He was a Calvinist and an independent Baptist. It was Calvinists in
Holland who gave the Dutch their political liberty, with William of Orange,
and<BR>later his son, Prince Maurice, and then later, in our great country, when
it was Washington, the Freemason who did not go into that Masonic Lodge that
last 30 years of his life—in his own words—who was a Baptist and a Calvinist. He
was baptized in the First Baptist Church of New York by one of his captains,
Pastor Gano, all surrounded by Calvinists.<BR><BR>That's why they didn't
surrender at Valley Forge; that's why, when they were naked, when they went
through the snow, barefoot, they endured that because they were Bible-believing
Calvinists and they refused to submit to the tyranny of King George, who was
controlled by the Jesuits.<BR><BR>And that is the soul of our country. If we
lose that soul, we've lost everything. And those very same Baptists, in the
Second Amendment, secured their right to bear arms, because they secured the
right, the "sword of just defense". And the "sword of the spirit" is contained
in the First Amendment, the right to have the Bible never taken from them. The
two swords of Calvinism are secured in the First and Second Amendments. Without
those first two Amendments, all the others are nothing.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:
</STRONG>Well, I got to my question #2. So, let's go to #3 of the seventy.
(laughter)<BR><BR>How does Shriner Freemason President Harry Truman's signing
into law of the Emergency War Powers Act of 1950 factor into the Jesuit
Agenda?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> First of all, Harry Truman, who the
Japanese called "Dirty Harry"—when they heard the movie Dirty Harry came out,
they thought it was a movie about Harry Truman, according to my Japanese pastor
friend, Daniel Fuji, who has passed away.<BR><BR>Harry Truman was put in office
by the Jesuits, the Pensergast Democratic machine in Missouri. Harry Truman
takes over after FDR's murder, because he was murdered in the home of Bernard
Baruch. When he did that, he then finished up the war with the hoax called the
dropping of the nuclear bombs, to purposely create this greater hoax called the
Cold War, that would enable the Vatican to knock over country after country
after country, and replace the leaders with dictators, subordinate to the Pope.
That was the purpose of the Cold War.<BR><BR>And so, when Harry Truman in 1950
signed into law the Emergency War Powers Act, the Cold War was in full force.
They were building bomb shelters, etc. So the nation was in kind of a
frenzy.<BR><BR>When he signed this into law, it put the whole country under
military or martial law, and that's when the flags in every courtroom, state and
federal, began to be changed. And every state flag and every U.S. flag is now
trimmed in gold fringe. And whenever you see a flag trimmed in gold fringe, that
means that it is the flag of the Commander-in-Chief. Now, if it's the state
flag, it means that's the flag of the governor, as Commander-in-Chief. And if
it's the federal flag, or the national flag, more<BR>correctly, it's the flag of
the Commander-in-Chief in Washington.<BR><BR>So, all your courts are nothing
more than courts of military rule. They all proceed with summary procedures. The
jury has no power of jury nullification. And they are simply enforcing the laws
of the Empire, which I call 14th Amendment America, which is a military-style,
King of England-style country. The courts are nothing more than courts of the
king's bench, as you can see in Blackstone's Commentaries.<BR><BR>And the banks,
as you walk into every bank, they all have a flag trimmed in gold fringe. The
bank is what England would call, in Blackstone's day, the king's bank. So, we
have the king's bank, and we have the king's bench. And it's run according to
military rule, according to Berkheimer's great work Military Rule And Martial
Law, published in 1914.<BR><BR>When Harry Truman did this, there was a
consummation of a great plan to put us under the Emergency War Powers Act and,
actually, a war rule. "Daylight savings time" is what was called "war time".
This country only went to daylight savings time during World War II, and they
called it, at that time, war time. So, nothing's changed. We've never gone back
to not turning back<BR>our clocks. We're still on war time. The income tax is a
war tax. It was called a victory tax in 1942.<BR><BR>So, people are paying a war
tax, they're under war time, they're under an emergency war powers act, and the
courts are war courts.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Regarding the
assassination of President John Kennedy, which could take this entire interview,
you say that the assassination was ordered by the Jesuit General, executed by
Pope Paul VI, and carried out by the "American Pope", Francis Cardinal
Spellman—who, in turn, used the Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasons, Knights of
Columbus, and Mafia Dons, including the FBI and CIA, to carry out the order from
Rome. Would you explain why you believe your particular theory on the
assassination to be an accurate representation of the
facts?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Sure. Alright, number one: The powers
that be are properly outlined [in his book], and proven through two centuries of
showing how it's all been put together. Now, as to why, I will be conservative
and stick with Fletcher Prouty's reasons, that he outlined in his JFK and also
his other book called <U>The Secret Team</U>.<BR><BR>The reason why Kennedy was
assassinated was he wanted to end the Vietnam War, and he wanted to end the rule
of the CIA. That begets two questions: Did Rome want the Vietnam War? And, did
Rome control the CIA? The answer is yes on both counts.<BR><BR>We know, on its
face, that the Vietnam War was called "Spelly's War"—Cardinal Spellman's war. He
went over to the warfront many times and he called the American soldiers the
"soldiers of Christ". The man who was the Commander of the American forces was a
Roman Catholic, CFR member, possibly a Knight of Columbus, I don't know, but he
was General William Westmoreland.<BR><BR>So, Westmoreland was Cardinal
Spellman's agent to make sure that war was prosecuted properly. And another
overseer of Westmoreland was Cardinal Spellman's boy, Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Lyndon Baines Johnson was a 33rd-degree Freemason. He was also part of the
assassination, with J. Edgar Hoover, another 33rd-degree Freemason.<BR><BR>And
Johnson went to Cardinal Spellman's death at St. Patrick's Cathedral, and the
picture can be seen in Cooney's work <U>The American Pope</U>. So, Johnson was
completely at the beck and call of Cardinal Spellman through Cartha DeLoach, the
3rd-in-control of the FBI. According to Curt Gentry, in his <U>Hoover: The Man
And The Secrets</U>, DeLoach had a phone at his bedside direct to Johnson, and
Johnson could call him anytime. DeLoach was a Knight of Malta, subject to
Spellman.<BR><BR>Spellman wanted the Vietnam War, why? Spellman was controlled
by the Jesuits of Fordham. Why did the Jesuit General want the Vietnam War? The
people of Vietnam, the Buddhists, were unconvertible. They would not convert to
Catholicism. They didn't need Rome.<BR><BR>There had been a Jesuit presence in
Vietnam for centuries, so it had been decided that about a million or so
Buddhists would have to be "purged". They would later continue this purge of
Cambodia, with Pol Pot, and the purge is yet for Thailand. It was a purging of
Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam of all these Buddhists, just like they purged the
Buddhists of China with Mao<BR>Zedong, because Mao Zedong was completely
controlled by the Jesuits. So, they wanted the Vietnam War.<BR><BR>The other
thing is that Rome is in control of the drug trade. The Vatican controls all of
the drug trade—all of the heroin, all of the opium, all of the cocaine,
everything going around in Columbia.<BR><BR>Columbia has a concordat with the
Pope. A concordat is a treaty with the Pope. Hitler had a concordat. Mussolini
had a concordat. Franco had a concordat. They want to set up a concordat here,
which was the reason for Reagan formally recognizing the sovereign state of
Vatican City in 1984. The greatest traitor we ever had was Ronald
Reagan.<BR><BR>So, they had a concordat. Columbia has a concordat. Do you think
that drugs running out of Columbia, with a country that has a concordat with
Rome, is not controlled by Rome? If Rome didn't want the drug trade out of
Columbia, they'd end the concordat. The whole drug trade is run by high Mafia
families out of the country of Columbia, subject to the Jesuit
General.<BR><BR>And the Jesuit General ran the Opium trade, a couple of
centuries ago, out of China. They ran the silk trade, the pearl trade. The movie
Shogun is but a slight scratching of the surface of the Jesuit "black ships"
that trafficked in all of this silk and pearls and gold and opals and everything
they could pull out of the East, including opium.<BR><BR>The Vietnam War was to
consolidate and control this huge massive drug-trade that would inundate every
American city with drugs, being brought in by the CIA with their Air America,
and then distributed by the Trafficante family throughout the United
States—Santos Trafficante out of Miami.<BR><BR>So we have the Mafia and the CIA
working together in the drug trade. We have the Mafia and the CIA working
together in the assassination of Kennedy.<BR><BR>The first reason why the Jesuit
General [at that time, Jean-Baptist Janssens] wanted Kennedy out of the way was
because he was going to end the Vietnam War.<BR><BR>The second reason is, he
wanted to end the reign of the CIA, because the CIA had betrayed him in the
person of McGeorge Bundy, by not giving the cover to the Cuban patriots to
retake Cuba from that Roman Catholic, Jesuit-trained, grease-ball bastard—he was
a bastard, his father was a Nazi—Fidel Castro.<BR><BR>Kennedy was betrayed by
the CIA at the Bay of Pigs invasion, which sacrificed all the patriots on the
shores of the Bay of Pigs there, so Castro had no real opposition. This was the
same tactic, used by the CIA and the KGB at the top, working together with
Angleton controlling it, in the Hungarian Revolution, when the CIA fomented that
revolution, and then betrayed all of those patriots into the hands of the Soviet
army and KGB, which infuriated certain top CIA officials.<BR><BR>It's the same
tactic: you raise up a revolution and you sacrifice the men who truly want to
resist. When that happened, when McGeorge Bundy stopped the air cover of the Bay
of Pigs invasion, that ended that resistance to Castro and it enthroned him into
power. And, of course, it was meant to be by the Jesuits because they HAD
trained him. So now Kennedy looks bad. He's got egg all over his face. What does
he want to do? He signs a Memorandum, according to Fletcher Prouty, and takes
all of the power away from the CIA, and gives it to the Joint Chiefs of
Staff.<BR><BR>The CIA was built by the Knights of Malta. One of the founders of
the CIA was "Wild" Bill Donovan, an Irish Roman Catholic, who are the most
fanatical, and his brother was a Dominican priest, Vincent. So, the CIA was
founded by this high Roman Catholic, the first head, to solidify the Catholic or
the Vatican control of it.<BR><BR>I'm not against the Catholic people; I'm
against Rome's hierarchy. The American Catholic people know NOTHING of what's
going on. And if they did, there would be a march on St. Patrick's tomorrow
morning. So, as I'm against the hierarchy, I'm showing that Kennedy was against
the Vietnam War, and he was going to do away with the CIA.<BR><BR>Well, the
Jesuits had brought in all of their top Nazi SS soldiers into the CIA because
the Jesuits were using the SS to kill the Jews in Europe. When the
Einsatzgruppen went into Russia, the Jesuits followed with the SS and purged
Western Russia of all its Jews. That's why Stalin deliberately killed 40,000 of
his best officers. That's why he kicked out his best generals, purged them,
because he wanted to make sure that the Red Army would lose with the advance of
the German army, because following that would come the SS and purge Russia of
the Jews that Stalin so hated. And by the way, justice is often poetic because
Stalin's daughter married a Jew.<BR><BR>Now, the CIA was composed of the SS. The
CIA now was an arm—and the intelligence arm—of the Vatican. The Knights of Malta
were throughout. Casey was a Knight of Malta. Angleton was a Knight of Malta.
The Knights were through and through. Angleton manned the "Vatican desk", and
that is a desk within the CIA that has a direct link to the Vatican.<BR><BR>So,
Kennedy wanted to end this "intelligence community". That was the end of
him.<BR><BR>Thus for anyone attempting to end the CIA, and attempting to end the
Vietnam War, and also because he attacked the Jesuits' Federal Reserve Bank by
printing United States Notes, they got rid of him. They killed our only Roman
Catholic president.<BR><BR>And it's another piece of poetic justice that a Roman
Catholic—not Protestants, like Harry Truman, FDR, and others—it's a Roman
Catholic who truly sought to resist the temporal power of the Pope in this
country. And in many ways, even though Kennedy was, in fact, a socialist and
communist, at least he resisted the temporal power of the Pope. And for that we
should<BR>be thankful and remember his name.<BR><BR>But what have they done to
his name? They've slammed it. They drag it into the dirt. Every time you see it
on TV, they parade before you his womanizing, which I don't deny, but my
goodness, can't we give him some credit where credit is due? That's why they got
rid of John F. Kennedy.<BR><BR>And then, of course, as soon as he's
assassinated, John McCone, the head of the CIA, the following day goes to the
White House and they reverse Kennedy's Memorandum of reversing the Vietnam War
and make a full-scale, carte blache war.<BR><BR>The CIA then is tremendously and
heavily funded, because it was a CIA war. And there they tried all of their new
technology, their anti-gravity machines, their men who they're trying to make
like the "million-dollar man". They tried out all their new technology in
Vietnam. It was a great experimental theater, and Kennedy knew this. He knew it,
and he knew that the American people had no idea what was going down, and he
still tried to resist it, against his father's warnings. Because his father was
the most powerful Knight of Malta in the Empire.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG>
Any theories on why they took out junior?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Yes.
According to Tom Kuncle, in his publication, John F. Kennedy, Jr. wanted to find
his father's real killers, and he had the power to publish the conclusion. So,
they took him out right away. They would not allow that to
happen.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Why haven't you been taken
out?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Because I am immortal—until the Lord is
done with me. I am a Calvinist and a Baptist, and we believe in the sovereignty
of God. And as long as we are operating in His Will, they cannot touch us,
regardless of their power.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Which is why we're
having this conversation.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Which is why we're
having the conversation. Don't think for one moment they're not tapping this
phone. They know this. The issue is here. We're talking about a providential,
sovereign God who wishes to move, using second causes, men, just as the Devil
does.<BR><BR>The Devil always uses second causes, men. So, it's one group of men
vs. another group of men, and one path leads to evil, and the true, almighty God
leads to goodness.<BR><BR>The problem is, with us, there are very few men who
want to believe God anymore. Nobody believes He can deliver anymore. It's just a
handful of us who say: "Well, we're going to do His Will; we're going to trust
Him in His Power."<BR><BR>And like the Hebrews getting ready to be thrown into
the fiery furnace of Nebuchadnezzar, our God is able to deliver us. We're going
to tell the truth!<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Let's see here. I can throw
away a lot of these questions. So much of it seems, in a way, irrelevant to our
current times because there's so much going on now. But, good grief! I was just
stunned to read in your book of all the historical things that have happened as
a result of these evil people. You dedicated the book to four Roman Catholics
who, I'm sure, no one<BR>has ever heard of: Charles Chiniquy, Jeremiah Crowley,
Emmett McLaughlin, and Alberto Rivera. Why them?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Because those Roman Catholic men were priests; they left the priesthood
and told the truth about what was really happening. And all four of them, except
one, I think Emmett McLaughlin, paid with their life. Chiniquy was the great
exposer of the Jesuit assassination of President Lincoln, when he wrote his
masterpiece <U>Fifty Years In The Church Of Rome</U> in 1886. He proves that
Lincoln was assassinated by the Jesuits, and that it was covered-up by our
government at the time.<BR><BR>Jeremiah Crowley: that priest was a great
Irishman who came here and, seeing the corruption of the Archdiocese in Chicago,
that it was so corrupt, he left it and exposed it. And, of course, he later came
to Christ and became a Bible-believer, which they would call a Protestant.
Protestants today don't believe the Bible. Protestantism of today is an empty
shell, it's nothing.<BR>But, back then, in 1912, they believed the
Bible.<BR><BR>Crowley, then, exposed many things, and one of the things he
exposed, that helped me with this, was that he warned that the Jesuits, with
their Knights of Columbus—which, he says, the Knights of Columbus, named after
Columbus, who he tells us was a Spanish Jew and a pirate and a deflowerer of
young girls—that Columbus was no Christian.<BR><BR>He has a tremendous section
in his book on Columbus. That the purpose of the Knights of Columbus was to
fulfill Jesuitical politics, and part of those politics was to restore the
temporal power of the Pope because, you remember, the Pope had lost that in 1870
and they wanted to get it back. And they got it back with Mussolini in
1929.<BR><BR>Well, in the book that Crowley wrote in 1912, he says that Taft and
Teddy Roosevelt were all cow-towing to the Pope and the Cardinals of New York.
And he said they're going to use our military to restore the Pope's temporal
power around the world.<BR><BR>And THAT was absolutely correct. That is American
foreign policy. And the Council of Trent is the American foreign policy of
today. That's what's going on in Serbia and Bosnia. It's the Council of
Trent—the Jesuits using the American Air Force to bomb those orthodox people to
smithereens. But, that was Crowley's great contribution.<BR><BR>Next, Emmett
McLaughlin wrote several books. He wrote<U> The People's Padre</U>; he wrote
<U>Crime And Immorality In The Catholic Church</U>, showing that Catholic
nations are more lawless and more criminal than Protestant nations, and
he<BR>proved it with statistics from the jails.<BR><BR>Emmett McLaughlin also
wrote another book called <U>The Assassination Of Abraham Lincoln</U>, where he,
again, shows that Lincoln was assassinated by the Jesuits. So, Emmett McLaughlin
came out of the Catholic Church. To my knowledge, he never was born again. He
never was saved, but he did tell the truth. He married a nun, and lived a
virtuous and honorable life after he<BR>left.<BR><BR>The last one was, of
course, Alberto Rivera, who was greatly hated by the Vatican because he was a
very high Jesuit who came out and, in the late '60s, about 1969, exposed the
power of Rome in the ecumenical movement, that Rome controlled Kathryn Kuhlman;
that Rome controlled Billy Graham; that Rome controlled, virtually, our
government—Ronald Reagan.<BR><BR>Reagan, when he took the Oath of Office, faced
the obelisk, indicating that this country will ultimately have a concordat. So,
Alberto Rivera converted to Christ, wonderfully, and he started a ministry
called The Anti-Christ Information Center, out of Los Angeles.<BR><BR>They tried
to kill him five times. A dentist jammed a needle up between his teeth, trying
to give him an infection in the brain. When he passed out, about a year or so
later, they couldn't figure it out. Everybody was praying for him. And this was
discovered when he went to another dentist. He had it removed.<BR><BR>He was
pushed in front of a subway train. They tried five times to kill the man, and
finally he died, I believe, of cancer, in a hospital, about three years ago. But
these four wonderful, great, Catholic priests did their best to expose the power
of Rome and its attempts to destroy our sovereign, Protestant, Bible-believing
nation. And so, to them, I dedicate it.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> What
compelled you to write this book? What started it for
you?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> I was always taught to be a patriot, a
patriot first and foremost—America first, and everybody else second. Later, when
I came to know the Lord, at 17, I realized the Bible taught the same thing—that
the Lord had instituted nations. The Lord never instituted world governments;
that's always the result of the Devil's working.<BR><BR>So, being a patriot and
a nationalist—believing in national sovereignty—I was saved at 17, went into the
Air Force, was garrisoned in a nuclear weapons area for three years in Germany,
came back and started to go to Bible college.<BR><BR>When I went to Bible
college, the issue of the King James came up, as far as it being an archaic
version. And that's what I used and I had never given it a thought. Well, some
were using NIV, some NASB, and I thought: "Well, maybe it's just a modern
version of what I have here." And I thought: "Well, if they want to use that,
that's fine, but I'll use the King James."<BR><BR>I found that the underlying
Greek text for the King James, the Textus Receptus, was the Greek text of the
Reformation. It represents 95% of the existing manuscripts that we have today.
The Greek text that underlies all these other versions—there's a Westcott and
Hort Greek text, which I then discovered was really a conspiracy to adulterate
the Textus Receptus in England, led by Brooke Foss Westcott and Anthony Hort,
who were Maryolitors, Mary-worshippers.<BR><BR>Later, I found out that they had
invited Cardinal Newman to sit in on the revision committee. Well, Cardinal
Newman was a traitor to the Anglican Church, with his Track 90, which blew-off
the Anglican Church. He then left England and he was then a Cardinal by Pius
IX.<BR><BR>So, here we have Cardinal Newman, and E. B. Pusey, had been invited
to sit on this revision committee, the end result being a Greek text that had
been produced that was pro-Jerome's Latin Vulgate. Jerome's Latin Vulgate is the
basis for the Jesuit's Reheims-Douay text, that was put out in 1582, that was
attempting to rival William Tyndale's English text, which later became<BR>the
King James Version of 1611.<BR><BR>So now I see this awful Jesuit hand in my
Bible college, attempting to deprive me of the Word of God, the authorized
version of 1611, in it's present edition of 1769. Now I thought "Well, here the
Jesuits are, what else have they done?" And the next thing I was led to was the
Lincoln assassination. And I can remember reading Burke McCarty's <U>The
Suppressed Truth About The Assassination Of Abraham Lincoln</U>, and weeping in
the back room, when I was in college.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>For me,
one of the most compelling portions of your book was the series of revelations
about Lincoln. I was stunned by that.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> That's
what they did. Remember, Lincoln was not going to go along with the 14th
Amendment. He wanted those Southern states to re-enter the Union on the same
footing that they had left, which would have left us with a federal Republic as
Washington had established it. This the Jesuits would not allow. It would be
converted into an Empire. The states would be<BR>subordinate provinces to
Washington. And the 14th Amendment would accomplish this with the reversion of
citizenship. And Lincoln was re-elected, and he was ready to end this, and
that's why they killed him. Kennedy was ready to implement his things; they
would not let him be re-elected.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> This is a total
aside. Have you ever come across The Jefferson
Bible?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> The Jefferson Bible—and maybe you know
this—is Matthew, Mark, and Luke. And Thomas Jefferson, being the Deist, being
the pagan that he was, cut out all the supernatural from those three gospels.
Jefferson was a Deist; he was involved with the French Freemasons who were
involved in the French Revolution, and he was not here at the writing of our
Protestant<BR>Constitution. So, the Lord put him out of the picture. Jefferson
was just used to help with the Revolution—because the Lord does use the unGodly
for good things. But Jefferson copied much of the Declaration Of Independence
from the Mechlenburg Declaration, written by Calvinistic Presbyterians of North
Carolina, when they seceded, when that county of Mechlenburg seceded from the
Colonies.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Never heard of
it.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Yes, you'll find it in Presbyterian
writings. You can find it from D. James Kennedy; he has a thing on it. And
Jefferson copied, at the end: "...and to this end we devote our lives, our
fortunes, and our sacred honor."<BR><BR>That was copied directly from the
Mechlenburg Declaration. Jefferson was a plagiarist; he was a high Freemason;
and he was out of here at the time of the writing of our Constitution. And the
reason why the people of Virginia did elect him to office was because he was a
State's Rights man. He wanted limited powers in Washington, and that was a good
thing. And when Jefferson was elected, he undid everything the king-president
John Adams did, with his Alien &amp; Sedition Laws, because John Adams wanted to
be a king, and Jefferson undid it, and Jefferson got two terms for
that.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> I'm looking at some things that are a
little further back now. <U>The Secreta Monita</U>. What's the significance of
that?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>The Secret Instructions [excerpts at the
end of this interview] are the handbooks that are given to the professed
Jesuits, those under extreme oath. [The oath is presented in full at the end of
this interview.] And it tells them how to conduct their plans, subjugating
peoples and nations to the Jesuit General, and thus, to the temporal power of
the Pope. It tells<BR>how they are to deceive. It shows how they are to swindle
rich widows out of their fortunes, like they did with Astor's second wife who
survived the Titanic catastrophe. It shows their general approach on how to do
things.<BR><BR>This particular book cannot be known, and if it's ever published,
they will deny it's existence. But when you see the works that the Jesuits have
done, it's in complete agreement with the <U>Secreta Monita</U>.<BR><BR>There is
a very interesting section in Edwin R. Sherwin's book <U>The Engineer Core Of
Hell</U>, written in 1886 I believe—another suppressed work. It's usually in the
archives of all the older libraries back here. And he shows how this <U>Secreta
Monita</U> was discovered in South America by a Mason, and the Mason managed to
escape to a lodge after being shot. He turned the <U>Secreta Monita</U> over to
the lodge, and then these certain Freemasons saw<STRONG> </STRONG><U>The Secreta
Monita.</U> There are certain low-level Freemasons who believe that the Jesuit
Order is their enemy, so that's why it was taken to the lodge and then
published. But the high-level Masons, of course, work with them. <U>The Secreta
Monita</U> was discovered once that way. It was published in Holland. Then, in
1857, reprinted by England.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG><U>Pascal's
Provincial Letters</U> had a devastating impact on exposing the Jesuits.
Why?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Blaise Pascal was a Huguenot, a French
Calvinist. So here we have another fearless man. He doesn't fear death; he's
going to tell the truth. So Blaise Pascal wrote a series of letters that were
written to and from provincials, and he wrote them in a satirical manner, that
of course excited that wonderful French mind. The French, of course, came to the
conclusion that this was absolutely the truth, and then they moved to suppress
the Jesuits again. But his Provincial Letters are considered a classic. Blaise
Pascal also wrote some other great works, too.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:
</STRONG>Pope Ganganelli-Clement XIV abolished the Order entirely in 1773, and
was murdered as a result.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Correct; he was
poisoned.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> The Order was similarly abolished 39
times from different kingdoms throughout Europe. It doesn't take a genius to
figure out that something was terribly wrong with this
group!<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Right. Are all those people bigots? Are
all those people brainwashed bigots and fanatical Protestants who abolished the
Jesuit Order?<BR><BR>You find the greatest resistance to the Jesuits in Catholic
countries, by Catholic monarchs. And that's why the Roman Catholic monarchs and
nobilit of today don't dare resist them. The Kennedys won't touch them.
The monarchs of Europe won't touch them. The Hapsburgs won't touch them, because
the Jesuits have vindicated their power in the French Revolution and
the<BR>Napoleonic Wars—well, then they went to suppress the Jesuits again in
Europe and they were, for the most part, kicked-out of Europe in the 1800s. All
the nations of Europe banned them. Germany banned them in 1872. And so, World
War I and II, the second Thirty Years War, was pay-back for this. And ever since
then, nobody touches them.<BR><BR>Pope Ganganelli abolished the Jesuits with a
Papal Bull; the Jesuits call it a "brief". It is not a brief; it is in the
Library of the Bulls, and it is called <U>Dominic Ac Redemptor Nostor</U>. That
is the name of a bull. And when he abolished them, he abolished them
forever—that they were not to talk about their abolition, that they were not to
teach. He confiscated all of their<BR>wealth and land and property. For the most
part, the Dominicans took it over, which is why the Dominicans had their penis
cut off during the French Revolution. That's what the Jacobins did to them. It
was payback by the Jesuits: "You don't dare take our property from us, boy. And
you don't dare take Inquisition from us." Jacobins killed nearly every Dominican
in France.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Why was the assassination of William
of Orange so significant?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Williams of Orange was
the father of religious liberty. William of Orange is the man who gave the Jews
the freedom to come to Amsterdam. And the Jews called Amsterdam, "the new
Jerusalem". William of Orange was a Catholic to begin with. Remember when he was
in the forest, hunting with the king of France, and the king of France lay bare
to him their plans to<BR>destroy all the Protestants in Holland, William kept
silent. And that's why he was called "William the taciturn" or "William the
silent".<BR><BR>So, he harbored all of this in his heart, and he went back to
Holland determined that he would deliver the Calvinists and the Protestants from
this annihilation. William went to Germany with his German wife, and he,
according to Motley in his The Dutch Republic, raised an army of Germans and
they did not succeed in liberating Holland. And so, it was the Dutch themselves
who joined William of Orange in an attempt to liberate the country, which they
ultimately did as the "wild beggars of the sea".<BR><BR>So, William was a great
inspiration. He delivered flight from the seige of the fanatical Roman Catholic
Spanish, led by the Jesuits, when the Lord providentially delivered and sent a
strong wind over the dikes, and flooded the whole area, and flooded the Spanish
soldiers.<BR><BR>And then, after that happened, He sent another strong West wind
and blew the water back over the dikes. This is a historical fact! Why don't we
hear this in history? For the same reason we don't hear when Louis XIV brought
his army across the river into Holland to kill all those Dutch, in 1672, right
around there, that the river, right where the army was crossing, thawed
out,<BR>and the whole French army went to the bottom of the river, as a result
of the prayers of those Protestants of Holland. We're not taught that
either!<BR><BR>The assassination of William of Orange was probably the second
most significant act of Jesuit dominance, next to the murder of Coligny at St.
Bartholomew's Massacre. Because it was first St. Bartholomew's massacre, and
then the murder of William of Orange. And, of course, William of Orange was shot
by a Jesuit-controlled assassin, Balthazar Girard, in his own house. And the
last words of William, of course, were: "God be merciful to these poor
people."<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> What is the Royal Institute of
International Affairs?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>The Royal Institute of
International Affairs is the same as the American Council on Foreign Relations
(CFR). The Royal Institute runs England and the British Empire, what was once
the extension of the British, just as the CFR runs our country. They're sister
organizations.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Where are they
based?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> They're based in
London.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> And who is their head; do you
know?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> I don't know right now. The John Birch
Society wrote a lot about that, and they did expose the CFR and the Royal
Institute of International Affairs. Allan Stang has written a lot about
that.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> What was the "Gunpowder Plot" of
1605?<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps:</STRONG> The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was the Jesuits
attempt to destroy what William Howitt—and Howitt was the great writer who wrote
<U>A Popular History Of Priestcraft</U>, 1835—he said it was a Jesuit attempt to
destroy our Great King Solomon, King James I, along with the entire Protestant
Parliament. Because remember, Elizabeth I had expelled the Jesuits from her
empire, and if they were ever caught they were to be drawn and
quartered.<BR><BR>After she died, the conspiracy went on there that went on with
William Cecil. They named Mary Queen of Scott's son as the King of England,
rather than Elizabeth's son, because Elizabeth had a son who was the Earl of
South Hampton, Wriothesley, and that was the son of Edward Devere, who we know
as William Shakespeare.<BR><BR>There was no William Shakespeare. The man was
Edward Devere. He ran the Globe Theater. He was the Lord Great Chamberlain to
Queen Elizabeth, and he secretly had a son who was the Third Earl of South
Hampton. He was the rightful heir to the thrown, not King James VI of
Scotland.<BR><BR>You can find all this documented in two great works: the first
is called <U>Shakespeare Identified</U> and the author is Looney. The explosion
of that book is called <U>This Star Of England</U>, written by Carlton and
Dorothy Ogborn, in 1952, and it's a 1200-page work, and in it they explain all
the plays of Shakespeare, and that they are, in the words of Hamlet: "A brief
abstract and chronicle of the times." Nothing but history.<BR><BR>And then
there's another book, <U>Wasn't Shakespeare Someone Else</U>?, written by
Tweeny, and in that book he evaluates the 150 sonnets. In those sonnets Edward
Devere put his name: Vere or Uvre or Vere—he puts his name in acrostics
throughout all the sonnets. And the last couple sonnets he puts his name in
double acrostics. It's amazing, showing that he wrote
the<BR>sonnets.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Why were the Jesuits so upset
about the Edict of Nantes, and what was it's
significance?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Ok, the Revocation of the Edict of
Nantes—it can be spelled Nantes or Nantz. Anyway, the Edict of Nantes was put
forward by King Henry IV. King Henry IV was a Roman Catholic, but he converted
to Protestantism and he became a Huguenot. But he was not allowed to take the
throne of France until he renounced his Protestantism. So, for the sake of the
kingdom, he renounced his Protestantism, and in 1610, I believe, issued forth
the Edict of Nantes.<BR><BR>The Edict of Nantes guaranteed religious freedom to
all the French. That included the Protestant, Calvinist, Huguenots, which of
course included those who would have followed Admiral Coligny, who the Jesuits
murdered with that she-wolf, Catherine de Medici. With the Edict of Nantes we
have religious liberty in France. This cannot be. France is a cornerstone of
Jesuit power, so it cannot allow this to be in place. The Council of Trent
condemns it, because it's freedom of conscience.<BR><BR>So, after they murder
Henry IV with Ravaillac, when they stabbed him through his heart, according to
Sully in his memoirs, they murdered Henry IV for this, and also for attempting
to reinforce the Dutch. They then, in 1685—when the Beatles are singing about
the "Sun King" in their "white" album, they're singing about Louis XIV. And
that's telling you that the Beatles are Jesuit-controlled. The Sun King, Louis
XIV who reigned, who rules over France for, I believe, 60 years, he, because of
his Jesuit confessor, Pere La Chaise, revokes the Edict of Nantes, and with
that, no more religious freedom in France.<BR><BR>And then they sent their
French dragons out and beheaded and killed every Huguenot they could find,
driving 500,000 Frenchmen out of the country, the wealth of France, the manhood
of France, all left for Holland and England. That destroyed France. From then
on, France became a nothing nation.<BR><BR>The French Revolution could never
have happened had not the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes taken place. Because
now, there's no Bible in France. And to this day, the French have never
published a French version of the Textus Receptus. Number one, all French Bibles
have been produced in foreign countries, when they've been translated from the
Greek Textus Receptus into French; France has never done it. That shows the
Jesuit power over France to this day.<BR><BR>And the French have probably been
the most manly, the strongest, the most gracious, the most determined in kicking
the Jesuits out of their country. They've kicked them out, to my knowledge,
three times—and again, they come back, foment wars, kill off the rulers, etc.
Drive Eugene Sue into exile; he dies of a broken heart. Drive Calvin into exile;
he can never return to<BR>France. All the great Frenchmen are driven into
exile.<BR><BR>So we have, as American patriots, we have a great camaraderie for
the French. They helped us in our American Revolution. And why did they help us?
Because they've been expelled from France. Why did Spain help us? Why did they
help finance our Revolution? The Jesuits had been expelled from Spain. So
payback came for Spain and France, for helping this heretic, Protestant nation
come into existence, with the Napoleonic Wars, when they killed Louis XVI and
drove the Bubons from the Spanish thrown. That was
payback.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>For 30 years of war, from 1618-1648,
you state that the Jesuits, through Ferdinand II, killed-off 10 million people.
That's quite a statement.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>That statement comes
from Ridpath's History Of The World, published in 1899. And that is his
encyclopedia of his history of the world. That was common knowledge in 1899. The
30 Years War was hell on Earth for Europe. Two-thirds of Germany was brought
back to Rome. It was leveled, plundered, and destroyed.<BR><BR>Wallenstein and
Tilly were the fanatical Roman Catholic generals who raped, pillaged, and
plundered everything in their path. But the Lord raised up certain great
generals like Gustavus Adolphus from Sweden. He was called the "Snow King" and
he was the one who ultimately, he paved the way for the victory of the 30 Years
War.<BR><BR>But without that Protestant victory of the 30 Years War, the peace
of Westphalia, which the Pope was not invited to, there would have been no
modern era as we know it today. According to any historian, the modern era
begins in 1648. That is when the 80 Year War in Holland ended with Spain. That
is when the 30 Years War ended with Ferdinand II and the Protestants
of<BR>Germany, and Sweden, and so-on.<BR><BR>1648 is the wonderful year in which
the Modern Era began, when inventors could go to Germany and say: "Well, you
know, maybe the Earth isn't flat." And maybe Leeuwenhoek could invent the
microscope in Holland, and now, later on, James Clerk Maxwell, who was a
Bible-believing, Protestant Presbyterian, he can write his treatise called
<U>Electricity And Magnetism</U>, the father of what we know today about
electricity and magnetism. Now, science can blossom and bloom. Now we can have
literature. Now we can have great writers, like Sir Walter Scott, who writes
great works like <U>Ivanhoe</U> and <U>Peveril Of The<BR>Peak</U>. Now we can
have Charles Dickens, another Protestant, who writes <U>A Tale Of Two
Cities</U>, one of London and the other of Rome. We have great literature
surfacing as a result of the Modern Era.<BR><BR>But the Jesuits, in their
determination to destroy the Reformation and the Modern Era and bring us back to
the Dark Ages, seek to reverse the effects of the Modern Era, and thus, what was
brought about by the 30 Years War. And to know the 30 Years War is to understand
the second 30 Years War, which started in 1914 and ended in
1945.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> In 1639, the Jesuits were also expelled
from Japan. Apparently the Jesuits never forgot that.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>They never forgot it. For over 200 years they have been expelled. And
remember the words of Lincoln: "The Jesuits never forget nor
forsake."<BR><BR>So, payback time was coming for Japan. The Emperor had expelled
them, so that dynasty was targeted. Ultimately, the Emperor would be destroyed
or his dynasty would end. And so payback time was the mass fire-bombings by the
American Air Force, financed by the Jesuits, as the Jesuits own Lockheed,
Boeing, McDonald-Douglas, and Grumman, and they used their B-29 to firebomb
Japan to smithereens. You can get the fact that the Jesuits control these
aircraft companies from Avro Manhattan's <U>The Vatican
Billions</U>.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>I'm trying to get a little more
current here, but some of this older stuff is also so fascinating, I'm going
back and forth here. Our readers are just going to have to be a little flexible
in their reading. (laughter)<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Right.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>In 1649 there was the Irish
Massacre. What was it, and let's discuss the hatred between the Protestants and
Catholics in Ireland, as a result of the Irish
Massacre.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Ok. Of course, we believe in freedom
of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of the press. That is an outgrowth of
Protestantism, because all Protestants were defending their right to believe the
Bible in the face of Rome's expectations to believe the priests and the decrees
of the Popes.<BR><BR>Many of the Irish were born-again. They came to know the
Lord. Much preaching was done up there. In fact, Patrick, of St. Patrick's Day,
was no Catholic. He was a Protestant. And so, he was a great Protestant preacher
of Ireland, and many, many Irish came to know the Lord. And their point of
location was primarily in the North, in Northern Ireland, which today is Ulster,
Belfast, etc.<BR><BR>Well, the Jesuits, in fulfilling their Bloody Oath that we
are making and waging relentless war on all Protestants, and all political
liberals, they hatched-out the plot to kill all the Irish Protestants in Ireland
with the O'Neil family. And I wonder if that O'Neil family was related to Tip
O'Neil?<BR><BR>In 1641, the massacre began, carried out by Roman Catholic nobles
and the mobs in Ireland. When they started that massacre, it continued from 1641
to 1649. The massacre ended when they killed 150,000, but they still taught the
Catholic children to kill the Protestant children. So, Irish Protestants were
being massacred, enmasse, for 8 years.<BR><BR>This is NEVER told whenever
anybody is ever talking about Oliver Cromwell, when Cromwell came up with his
Puritan Army and ended that, when he took Drogheda, and killed every living
thing in Drogheda—men, women, children, animal, everything.<BR><BR>Ones say:
"Oh, the beast Oliver Cromwell. Look what he did to Drogheda!" What about those
beasts killing those Irish Protestants for 8 years, bashing out the brains of
the little babies, smashing them up against the walls like they did, led by the
priests?<BR><BR>This was just like they did in Croatia with the Serbs in World
War II, when they gouged-out the eyes of all the Serbians, where one particular
priest had 23 kilos worth of eyes. They were doing the same thing to the Irish
Protestants.<BR><BR>So, when Cromwell came up, and it was vengeance for the
Irish Massacre, and the Irish Massacre was NOT started by the Protestants, it
was started by the Jesuits according to Fox's <U>Book Of Martyrs</U>. And you
can find the whole narration there, which was a classic that all Englishmen used
to read with the <U>King James Bible</U>.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Do you
believe that Great Britain is truly Protestant-controlled, Jewish-controlled, or
Jesuit-controlled?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Jesuit-controlled.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG>
Why?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Well, let's go back. To understand today we
have to go back to the Napoleonic Wars.<BR><BR>When Napoleon came to power, he
was brought to power in Corsica. When the Jesuits were suppressed, one of their
main outposts during their suppression was the Isle of Corsica. The Jesuits,
remember, had finished the High Rites of Freemasonry with Frederick the Great,
and then used their French Freemason Napoleon to execute their
vengeance.<BR><BR>However, the Jesuits were also protected during their
suppression in England. A very wealthy landowner—and you can find this in
Ridpath's <U>History Of The World</U>—gave his wonderful, beautiful estate
Stonyhurst to the Jesuit Order. And from then on, the Jesuits received
protection by King George III, and you will find that in Mitchell's <U>The
Jesuits</U>. Mitchell is an English<BR>historian.<BR><BR>Ok, so the Jesuits are
now protected by King George III. Well, they're going to uphold his throne. The
Jesuits use the English army and navy in the resistance of Napoleon, as both
sides are controlled, so that the Jesuits can control the outcome.<BR><BR>The
end result is that, after Napoleon accomplishes everything that the Jesuits want
him to do—the expulsion of the Knights of Malta, the driving of the Roman
Catholics from their throne, imprisoning the Pope for 5 years, etc.—Napoleon is
then ordered to abandon his army in the snows of Russia, killing all of those
French and German patriots, so that there are very few patriots left in Europe
to resist the tyranny coming in France with Louis XVIII, who the Jesuits will
put back on the throne.<BR><BR>Louis XVIII was in exile, in England, in King
George's own parlor, waiting for the end of the Napoleonic Wars. So, the Jesuits
put Louis XVIII back on the throne. He readmitted the Jesuits, started the
Inquisition, just like they did with Ferdinand VII when they restored him to
power in Spain after the Napoleonic Wars.<BR><BR>And where do these monarchs get
their protection? From King George III. King George was used by the Jesuits to
restore their power in Europe, after the Napoleonic Wars, after they punished
the Pope and the monarchs.<BR><BR>So, it's been, really, from 1795, right around
there, that the Jesuits have controlled England. They've controlled the Knights,
they've controlled the King. All throughout the 18th century, now, England will
never go to war with France again. England will side with the French during the
Crimean War. England will be on the side of the French during World Wars I &amp;
II. England<BR>and France are together, both controlled by the Jesuits—even
though France is predominantly a Catholic country, and when England was, at
least on it's face, a Protestant country. Why should both be working together,
both having the same foreign policy. Why? Because the Jesuits control both
countries.<BR><BR>When Rothschild sent that note, via Roost, into London, saying
that Napolean had won the Battle of Waterloo, that's when the stocks plummeted,
and all the Jesuits bought all the stocks up, there in London, and got control
of the Bank of England. The Jesuits then made London their commercial center of
the world, and Rome their religious center, aiming that one day
Jerusalem<BR>would be both.<BR><BR>So now the Jesuits are in control of England.
After the Napoleonic Wars, we have the Congress of Vienna in 1815, and guess
who's there? All the representatives of King George. England is represented at
the Congress of Vienna, the settlement after the Napoleonic Wars. If England was
truly Protestant, they would have never went there. Now the Jesuits are in
control of England throughout the 1800s, and they use the British Empire to
further the power of the Pope. England has been under Rome's control, the Pope's
control, since, at the very latest, 1850. And I say since
1795.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Let's talk about Elizabeth
II.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Elizabeth II is a wicked, evil queen. She is
the head of the Knights of Malta in England. She curtsies to the Lord Mayor in
Old London, and she goes and visits the Jesuits of Stonyhurst and kisses their
derrières. She has complete allegiance to the Jesuits of Stonyhurst, and will do
anything they tell her to do, or they'll get rid of her just like they got rid
of all the rest of the monarchs in Europe.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> So
you see her as a pawn.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> She's just a pawn, sure.
She's nothing. Remember, White men rule the world. Evil, White, sodomite,
homosexual men rule the world, and these are the High Jesuits, with their High
Knights of Malta and High Freemasons, they rule. And these women who are
involved are just pawns in their game, like the queen, the queen of Holland,
just to give the appearance that these nations have a sovereign monarch, when in
fact, they're just tools.<BR><BR>England has done some awful, terrible things,
but all of the things that they have done increase and benefit the Jesuit Order.
They never resisted Napoleon III. Napoleon III was a fanatical Roman Catholic
Freemason, subject to the Jesuits, who was the King of France for 18 years,
second Empire. England never resisted him. They fought with him in the Crimean
War. And<BR>Napoleon III dedicated all of his ships to the Virgin Mary. England
has been on the side of the Jesuits since 1815, no later. So, that means that
the British Secret Service is totally working for Rome, all throughout the
1800s.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> How did the Jesuits regain control of the
Vatican in 1814?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Remember that they were in
control of Napoleon. A Jesuit by the name of Abbie Sieyes—you can find him,
again, in <U>Ridpath's History Of The World</U>—Abbie Sieyes was a
Jesuit-trained individual, and I believe he was a Jesuit. He was on the
Directory, and he was also on the Consulate; he was the second counsel. Napoleon
was the first; he was the second. He was the advisor and director of Napoleon.
Abbie Sieyes, being the Jesuit that he was, ordered Napoleon to imprison the
Pope for 5 years, and he did! So, the Pope was in prison for 5 years until 1814,
when he restored the Jesuit Order. The Pope, prior to that, was killed. They
brought him over the mountains of the Alps, and he died through that
debacle.<BR><BR>The Jesuits thoroughly humiliated the papacy. They used their
French soldiers to overturn St. Peter's chair, and they found, written in
Arabic: "There is no other God but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet." And THAT
is what is under St. Peter's chair today. That was stolen from some kalif during
the Crusades.<BR><BR>So, they completely intimidated the Pope and showed their
power. The Pope then restored them with a Papal Bull, calling upon the vengeance
of the Apostles Peter and Paul, blah, blah, blah, for anyone who would ever
suppress the Jesuit Order ever again. When the Jesuits were "reinstalled" in all
their power, that's when they were in control of the Pope, and from then<BR>on
they have been.<BR><BR>Any Pope who resists them gets punished or murdered. And
all the Popes know it. When Pius IX wanted a liberal constitution for the
Italian people in 1849, all of the Italians were delighted. Here is a liberal
Pope; he's going to give us constitutional rights; we're going to have a
constitution.<BR><BR>The Jesuits raised up a revolution with Garibaldi and their
Freemasons, and drove Pius IX from his throne. He had to stay in Gaeta for about
a year. When he returned to Rome, under the protection of Napoleon III's French
army—actually, it was the republic's army that would later be his "army of the
empire"—but they returned with a French army, protecting the Pope, he<BR>became
the most fanatical absolutist, pursuant to the wishes of the Jesuits.<BR><BR>So,
Piux IX was punished. But the Popes who don't obey, like, what was it, <U>In
God's Name</U>, the Pope who was murdered after 33 days, when he didn't go along
with the Jesuit Order, they ended his life.<BR><BR>[Editor's note: Eric is here
referring to the very well researched and deeply insightful 1984 Bantam Books
gem (that's very hard to find, for "some" reason!) by David A. Yallop, called
<U>In God's Name</U>, which details the author's thorough investigation into the
murder of Pope John Paul I the night of September 28-29, 1978 after John Paul
had been digging into the massive web of corruption surrounding the Vatican
Bank. For all of you who look for clues, note well the choosing of day 33 since
his election for the execution of the murder.]<BR><BR>When you steal from the
Vatican, like the Cardinal did at the PII Lodge, they killed him (Kalvi), and
they hanged the other guy, beginning with the admiralty jurisdiction, at their
first bridge of the sea. So they have their assassins everywhere to carry out
orders. They are machines. They are the perfect "Manchurian Candidates" and they
will kill popes, cardinals, presidents, kings, and kaisers, to maintain Jesuit
power. They are utterly ruthless—just like they said they would be in the
Protocols: "We are<BR>merciless."<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> As you look
around the world today, who do you see opposing
them?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> It's interesting. I have a friend who
makes quite a few trips to Haiti. I told her about the Jesuits. She got to
questioning a few people, and she found that Papa Doc had expelled the Jesuits
from Haiti.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>No
kidding?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> That's right. Isn't it interesting, his
son was also driven from power and the guy put in his place, I believe it was
Aristide, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a complete pawn of
the Pope and the Jesuit Order—for which reason, when those Haitians wanted to
drive Aristide from his power, this filthy, Jesuit-controlled government in
Washington put an embargo against Haiti, wrecking the country. See how the U.S.
government uses its military, political, and financial power to maintain the
temporal power of the Pope? And that's not only in Haiti; it's everywhere.
Russia is another example.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Don't you see, coming
up soon in Israel, some of these powers coming head-to-head over the rebuilding
of Solomon's Temple? Don't you see some conflicts with the powers that
be?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Which powers are you talking
about?<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>I don't know; there seem to be so many
involved.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> We first have to remember the creation
of the nation of Israel. World War I prepared the land for the people. World War
II prepared the people for the land. World War III, the battle of Armageddon,
will "prepare the people for their messiah"—with national repentance and
realizing that "Jesus, the messiah, is the savior and will deliver
them".<BR><BR>The present government of Israel was set up by the High Masonic
Rothschild-controlled Jews, and Rothschild has had an alliance with the Jesuit
General since 1876, with Adam Weishaupt. This is the very same Rothschild powers
who betrayed the Jews into the hands of the Nazis, killing many Jews all
throughout Europe, betraying their own Jewish people. These are the very same
powers who run the nation of Israel today.<BR><BR>I read a very interesting
paragraph by Mark Lane in his book <U>Plausible Denial</U> when he tells about a
Jew in Israel who wrote about certain criminal Jews, involved with the Nazis,
who are now with the Mossad, something along those lines. The man who wrote the
article was gunned-down in front of his home.<BR><BR>So, Rome controls the
Israeli government. It controls the Israeli government through the
Mossad.<BR><BR>Who trained the Mossad? Reinhard Gehlen.<BR><BR>We find that fact
in Loftus' work <U>The Secret War Against The Jews</U> in most telling, telling
detail.<BR><BR>So what do we have? We have high-level treason and betrayal of
the Jewish race; that is there in Israel today, by their own leaders, who are
loyal to Rome and the Jesuit Order. And to show this, we have a great big
Rockefeller edifice in Jerusalem; we have an ophthalmology center in Jerusalem
run by the Knights of Malta. There's nothing but Knights of Malta,
high-level<BR>Freemasonry, and the Jesuit Order running all of Israel.<BR><BR>So
what's going to happen, I believe, with the Dome of the Rock is, that has got to
be removed—somehow, someway. It's on the Temple site; it has to be
removed.<BR><BR>If I was the Jesuit General, I would make— somehow,
someway—American bombers do it. Because I want to create universal hatred for
this nation of the United States, because in the United States there are more
Protestants and more Jews than any country in the world, and "we've" got to kill
all those people. So what better way than to create a Jihad, a Moslem fanatical
attack against the United States, coupled with a Chinese invasion from the East.
That's what I think is going to happen.<BR><BR>The Jews are not going to destroy
that Temple site because, if they do, Rome will destroy their efforts of
rebuilding the Temple.<BR><BR>Because, if Moslems control all of Jerusalem, that
Temple will never be rebuilt. It has to stay in Jewish hands—because the Jews,
and rightfully so, need their own homeland. They're entitled to the nation. And
they haven't had their own Temple of worship. They are rightfully entitled to
that.<BR><BR>But what they don't know is that they are being used by the Jesuits
to rebuild their own Temple, that they would love to have rebuilt, for the Pope,
so he can sit there and be the man of sin, the <U>Anti-Christ of the Book of
Danie</U>l, Chapter 9. That's what I see coming for Israel.<BR><BR>The
assassination of Rabin? He wanted to give away too much. He probably wanted to
give away some of Jerusalem. The Jesuits will never allow that. So, his
bodyguards just step aside and the Mossad kills him. And nothing more is ever
heard.<BR><BR>Rome's—the Jesuit General's—international intelligence community
carries out all high-level assassinations, kills anybody who's against their
program. And Cromwell knew this, back in his day, and that's why he protected
himself—160 of his finest "ironsides" as his bodyguards, and no one got to
him.<BR><BR>So anybody who's going to resist the Jesuit Order has to be doing it
as a matter of a "religious" conviction—being protected by God and good men who
are loyal to Him. If it's simply political, with a hired Secret Service, you can
forget it.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Let's go back to St. Patrick's
Cathedral in New York. Why is that so significant? You talk about the American
Pope. Again, that person is?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Cardinal
O'Connor.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Now, what is his role in the United
States?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Ok, remember first that this title
"American Pope" was gotten from Conney's work. John Conney wrote <U>The American
Pope</U>, I believe in 1988, so a lot of this information is from that
document.<BR><BR>The American Pope is the Cardinal of New York. He is the most
powerful Cardinal in the United States. He is what's called "the military
vicar".<BR><BR>The military vicar is in command of all of the military orders
within the United States, they being the Knights of Malta and the Knights of
Columbus. He is also in command, and privately, of "the Commission" because
Cardinal Spellman was an intimate of Joe Kennedy, and Joe Kennedy was an
intimate of Frank Costello.<BR><BR>We also see that it was Cardinal Spellman who
enabled "Lucky" Luciano to be released from the prison in New York, to return to
Italy in 1946. And this was because of the Luciano Project that I mentioned in
my book. But Lucky Luciano, his Mafia on the East Coast, worked in conjunction
with the U.S. Navy, supposedly to protect the Eastern seaboard from German
U-boat attack.<BR><BR>So, as payback? Cardinal Spellman releases Lucky
Luciano—that filthy, wicked, evil, heartless spiritual bastard, who compelled
young girls into prostitution, probably one of the cruelest things any man could
do. He is released and sent back to Rome.<BR><BR>When the Kennedy assassination
comes up, the Cardinal needs a favor. After all, he's released Luciano. So now
the Mafia gets to participate: Jack Ruby, Carlos Marcello, Santos Trafficante,
all the High Dons participate. Why? Because that Cardinal in New York controls
the Commission.<BR><BR>And that Commission, you know what it controls? All of
the trucking, all the supermarkets, it's power is beyond our wildest
imagination, second only to the Knights of Malta. And, of course, they all
control the Federal Reserve Bank.<BR><BR>The Cardinal controls the Federal
Reserve Bank through the Council on Foreign Relations. The Council on Foreign
Relations belongs to the Cardinal. Spellman was not a member of it, during his
day, but two of the most powerful members were Knights of Malta: Henry Luce and
J. Peter Grace, and also William F. Buckley, to this day. William F. Buckley is
indeed one of my<BR>enemies, because I name him, and he is a powerful
multi-billionaire who participated in the Kennedy assassination, just like
Iacocca, another Knight. Both of those men are subject to Cardinal O'Connor and
will do ANYTHING he says.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Do you know who is
head of the Knights of Malta, now?<BR><BR>Phelps: Yes; his name is Flynn. He
took over when Grace died in '93. Flynn is head of the American branch. The head
of the worldwide branch, the international Knights of Malta, is Andrew Bertie;
he's an Englishman. And you can find that in the National Catholic Reporter,
when you go after their various articles on the Knights of
Malta.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Do the Knights of Malta actually meet,
actually hold meetings with the Jesuits?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Oh,
sure. Remember that Alexander Haig is a powerful Knight of Malta. His brother is
a Jesuit.<BR><BR>So, sure they have meetings. The High Knights of Malta, who
meet in their palace on Aventin Hill, in Rome, of course, meet with the Jesuit
General, and so on. And Count von Hoensbroech, who was a German Noble who became
a Jesuit for 14 years—he wrote a two-volume work called <U>Fourteen Years A
Jesuit</U>. His father was a Knight of Malta. Yes, the Jesuits work in
conjunction and have regular meetings with the Knights of Malta.<BR><BR>The
Knights control the money. The Knights control the banks. They control the Bank
of Canada, Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of England; they control the banking. They
were the ones who were behind the sinking of the Titanic, with the creation of
the White Star Line, J.P. Morgan and others.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG>
Alan Greenspan, then, would be?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Alan Greenspan
is a Jew, probably a Freemason, because he is the leader of the Temple called
the "Federal Reserve Bank" and they always put Jews in the forefront—so that
they can blame all of what they do on the Jewish race in this country, to create
an anti-Semitism everywhere, just like Charles Coughlin, the radio Jesuit priest
of the '30s did.<BR><BR>Greenspan, Bloomenthal, Warburg, and all those Jews need
to be publicly rebuked, because they are creating the mass genocide of the
Jewish race in the United States. The Jews are being blamed right now for the
foreign policy in Bosnia. Madeline Albright—she's a Jew—they're blaming her for
what's going on in Serbia. I've got a good Serbian friend who blames her. I said
she's just a pawn of the Jesuit CFR. Don't blame the Jewish people. It's these
Jewish "pawns" who are loyal to the Pope and the Jesuits who are doing
this.<BR><BR>The Zionists—the Jesuits are the Great Zionists. They control all
of the historical High Zionists—Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion, Golda Meir.
Zionism is a Masonic term, coined by the Jesuits. They are the rulers; they are
the Protocols; they are the Elders of Zion. So the Zionists are, indeed, evil
and wicked; but they are controlled by Rome. The Jews are not all
Zionists.<BR><BR>I remember when I went to Jerusalem and Israel in 1976, and a
lady said to this particular man that I had met: "You're more of a Zionist than
we are!" And I thought: "What does that mean? I don't understand that."<BR><BR>I
only later understood why Yasser Arafat says he doesn't hate the Jews; he can't
stand the Zionists. And I'm thinking: "What's the difference?" I, later, learned
that there is a great difference between those Zionists and the other Jews. The
Orthodox Jews can't stand the Zionists.<BR><BR>So what's the difference? The
Zionists are socialist communists, controlled by Rome. They are atheists, just
like the Jesuits, although they're being used to rebuild the nation of Israel.
They are the enemies of the Jewish people, per se.<BR><BR>There's no conflict
going on in the Middle East. There's no conflict going on with the Arab nations.
All of the Arab nations are under the command of Masonic kings or iotollas.
Saddam Hussein is no enemy of George Bush; they're both brothers, brothers of
the lodge. That whole thing was set up to kill off a whole bunch of Arabs for
the protection of the Zionist state of<BR>Israel.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:
</STRONG>Well, Bush and Saddam were business partners. We've covered that in
recent past issues of our newspaper.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Sure.
That's why they never killed Saddam. They could have easily killed him. The CIA
can kill anybody they want to. They could have easily killed Saddam and got out.
They could use their own Arab agents in there. Saddam was a very important
tool.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Still is.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Still is, sure. They keep the Arab peoples and nations at bay by
controlling them through their leaders. Or, when they start to get out of
control in their Moslem fanaticism, they then foment a war and kill off a whole
bunch of them. Make sense?<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>There was a statement
you made in your book about the Jesuits controlling the Nation of Islam, and
that was almost a surprising statement to read. I would think that someone like
Louis Farrakhan would be pretty adamant.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Yeah,
he would hate me for that one. Well, let's think a little bit here: Chicago is
ruled by the Archbishop of Chicago, a Cardinal. It was Cody; I don't know who it
is now. Do you think anything goes down in Chicago without the Cardinal's
approval?<BR><BR>Where was the Nation of Islam founded? Chicago.<BR><BR>Where is
Louis Farrakhan's—that murderer's—mansion? Chicago. He lives like a
king.<BR><BR>What does he hand out? He hands out the<U> Protocols Of The Learned
Elders Of Zion</U> to all of deluded Black Nation of Islam people, so that they
can hate the Jews, just like the Klu Klux Klan.<BR><BR>That's right. Those three
little tidbits, right there, prove that the Nation of Islam is totally under
Jesuit control. They are going to be used to foment anarchy and agitation,
because they have an army called "the fruit of Islam", and they have millions of
rounds stored in all the major cities—guns stored everywhere, so that they can
start the race war. And when that happens, you see, then the brothers in
Washington can implement Martial Law, suspend the Constitution, and now the
Jesuits have what they want.<BR><BR>So, they use these Blacks in the North, who
hate the White people, for their own destruction, for the destruction of the
Black people themselves. And the Nation of Islam is part of that.<BR><BR>When I
was in the Air Force, and in jail for about 10-15 days, about 10 years ago, the
Nation of Islam was paramount, or tried to be paramount, there. All the Blacks
in jail become Moslems. It's a "hate the White man" religion. Every White man is
a White, blue-eyed Devil. And they're playing—the Zodiac killer, back in
California many years ago, all Moslems. So it's a "hate the White man" religion,
designed to foment agitation and unrest.<BR><BR>Martin Lucifer King was
intimately involved with them. The only problem is, Malcolm X got on to it. He
realized he was being used and he separated from it. Then he ceased to be an
agitator.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Malcolm X was way ahead of his
time.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>Yeah. Malcolm X was a good
guy.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>Yes, he
was.<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps:</STRONG> Malcolm X, even though he was used by the
Jesuits, because he hated the King James Bible, he was a great agitator. When he
went to Mecca, he changed.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Yes, he
did.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> And when he came back, he stopped being an
agitator. He stopped hating the White man. He started to set up the
African-American Movement. And as a result, he was assassinated by the high
leaders of the FBI and the Nation of Islam.<BR><BR>And what do they both have in
common? High-level Shriner Freemasonry.<BR><BR>And so, we have the Masons in
control of the Nation of Islam and the Klu Klux Klan—one agitating Blacks, and
the other agitating Whites, to the glory of the Jesuit Order. The other Civil
Rights Movement had the Jesuits behind that—with LaFarge. Jesuit LeFarge was a
great mover and shaker of the Civil Rights Movements. And that agitation
resulted in amalgamation, race-mixing, the destruction of a White race and a
Black race, producing a nation of hybrids that cannot maintain free
government.<BR><BR>That is what they proposed to do in the first Reconstruction,
but it failed; so they succeeded in the second Reconstruction in the '60s. The
Jesuits are masters of the races. They know their strengths and their
weaknesses.<BR><BR>The only race who successfully resisted the Jesuit Order is
the White, Anglo-Celtic, Saxon race, with a Bible in one hand and a gun in the
other. And so they've got to take the Bible away, they've got to take the gun
away, and they've got to destroy that race. And that's what they are essentially
doing here. I know that's a racist statement, but I'm sorry, it's just the way
it is. That's history, and that's what they're doing.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:
</STRONG>The relationship between Communism and Freemasonry. Where do the
Jesuits fit into Communism and Freemasonry?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG>
Let's, first of all, look at the relationship of Jesuitism to Communism. The
Jesuits perfected the tenets of Communism on their "reductions" in Paraguay, for
150 years, from 1600-1750.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>What is a
reduction?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>A reduction is a commune. In Israel
they would call it a kibbutz. In Joseph Stalin's Russia they would call it a
commune. In New York they call it a village. In France, Paris, they called it a
commune. It's communal living where everybody is equal in their finances, in the
labors; you have no great, no small, no rich, no poor—everybody is small, and
everybody is<BR>poor, and everybody is controlled by a dictator. That's the
essence of Communism.<BR><BR>The Jesuits, on the reductions in Paraguay, which
were the communes, had a central bank, and it was "each according to their
ability and each according to their need". And so, the Guarani Indians that were
the subjects—and there were some 200,000 of these South American Indian natives
who were slaves of the Jesuits, putting their goods into world commerce and
trade. They were living under the tenets of Communism, perfected by the Jesuits,
as outlined in Plato's Republic and Sir Thomas Moore's Utopia. The Jesuits
perfected it on their reductions.<BR><BR>With that, they then introduced
Communism in 1848 through Karl Marx. They tutored him in the British Museum,
according to Alberto Rivera, an ex-Jesuit.<BR><BR>So Marx, the Jewish Freemason,
was to be the one to put forward this Communism for the world, so that Communism
would look like a Jewish brain-child, so that Communism could be blamed on the
Jews. Well, what's not told is that the Jews involved in the implementing of
Communism were Masonic Jews. Karl Marx was a 33rd-degree Freemason, a worshipper
of Lucifer, whose father wanted nothing to do with him, because his father was a
Baptist preacher.<BR><BR>Jewish Freemasonry, controlled by the Jesuits,
implemented Communism in Russia. Lenin, the half-Jew, was a Freemason. That
civil war that took place from 1917-1922, for 5 years, was given the appearance
that it was primarily Yiddish. I mean, they're on the streets of Russia talking
Yiddish; they had Yiddish signs; and it was wanted to give the impression to the
world that this revolution was of Jewish origin.<BR><BR>For 10 years after the
revolution, the Jews faired very well, but in 1922, Joseph Stalin, that great
Jew-hater, who was educated by Jesuits in Georgia—which was a country south of
Russia and, therefore, the Emperor's banning of the Jesuits from Russia, his
Ukase, did not reach to Georgia. So the Jesuits stayed in Georgia, trained
Joseph Stalin, brought him in after the Revolution, and made him Secretary of
the Communist Party in 1922, until he died in 1953.<BR><BR>The Jesuits used
Freemasonry and, of course, Stalin was also a brother Freemason. They used
Freemasonry to implement Communism in Russia, and from there, China, and from
there, throughout the world.<BR><BR>When Germany had their revolution after
World War I, their Communist revolution—remember, they requested an armistice —
they had never been beaten on the field of battle.<BR><BR>The Germans were
foisted into that war; they never started World War I. It was started by France
and Russia and England, for the purpose of destroying Germany, because Germany
had expelled the Jesuits. During that war, the Germans requested an armistice to
stop this Communist revolution in Germany.<BR><BR>And who lead the revolution?
The German Freemasons.<BR><BR>According to the Kaiser, in his memoirs, it was
German Freemasonry that got him off his throne and deposed him. He had to go
into exile in Holland. He wrote his memoirs in 1935.<BR><BR>So the relationship
between Jesuitism, Communism and Freemasonry we see evolving and expanding from
the 1600s to the ultimate achievement in the Bolshevik Revolution.<BR><BR>In my
book, I parallel the French Revolution and the Bolshevik Revolution, and they
are identical. It was French Freemasonry that caused the French Revolution and
the Jacobins, and it was the Freemasons in Russia, with Bolsheviks, who caused
the Russian Revolution, with their Bolsheviks, leading and ending in Joseph
Stalin. In France, it ended with Napoleon; in Russia, it ended with Stalin. And
so, that's the relationship there.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Why was
Eugene Sue so significant?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Eugene Sue wrote his
masterpiece <U>The Wandering Jew</U>, and in that masterpiece he weaves a
fantastic story from India to England to France, of the power of the Jesuit
Order and their attempt to destroy the Rennepont family, a French Huguenot
Protestant family, and acquire a fortune that's due to be inherited by the
members of that family on a certain day, at a certain time, in a certain
year.<BR><BR>Well, that fortune is held, in trust, by a Jew, for which reason
the book is named<U> The Wandering Jew</U>. It tells of the power of the Jesuit
Order in that book, and how the Jesuits mercilessly killed all these members of
the Rennepont family so they could not inherit their fortune.<BR><BR>The only
one, I believe, they didn't kill was a priest, whose name was Gabriel, who was a
decent and a righteous Catholic priest who repudiated the Jesuit Order. He
ordered the Jew to burn all the securities, that totaled something like $212
million, that would have rightfully been this French family's.<BR><BR>So, the
Jesuits didn't get it, nor did the French family get it. It's written with such
drama and feeling that you cannot put this book down. It was translated into
many different languages. As a result, the French, and other nations, had their
French Revolution, the second French Revolution of 1848. But because it was not
lead by Godly men, it benefited the Jesuits.<BR><BR>Whenever you have a
revolution led by unGodly men, it's just like a man who's on a horse, trying to
be pushed off the horse, and as he's pushed off, another dictator takes his
place. That's exactly what happened in France, and Italy, and the nations who
were involved in that second French Revolution.<BR><BR>But Eugene Sue had
motivated the people of France to expel the Jesuits, and they were finally
expelled in 1880 by a French Freemason, in the 3rd Republic, Leon Gambetta. So,
they're all Freemasons who resist them, but they pay with their lives, like
Garfield, like Gambetta, Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Roosevelt really
didn't resist them; he just was killed by them.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG>
Again, I'm jumping around.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG>
Ok.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> What was Operation
Mongoose?<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps: </STRONG>Operation Mongoose was purely "black
ops" in the words of Fletcher Prouty. Of course, Fletcher Prouty I consider the
authority on what Operation Mongoose was. Operation Mongoose was to "give the
appearance" of resistance to Castro's government by attacking Cuba but, in
effect, solidified his reign there. That's what it ultimately produced. And
that's what the Knights and the CIA ultimately wanted. Ok?<BR><BR>The agreement
that Kennedy made over the Cuban missile crisis in 1962—first of all, there was
no missile crisis. There's no such thing as nuclear war. There's no such thing
as a nuclear attack. That's all a hoax. It's just as much a hoax as going and
landing on the Moon. It's a hoax.<BR><BR>Nuclear war, that fear, was the basis
for the Cuban missile crisis. And out of that hoax, Kennedy strikes a secret
deal with Khrushchev that, if you keep the missiles out of Cuba, we won't bother
Castro anymore. Well, that's what the Jesuits wanted anyway. They wanted to
solidify Castro in power.<BR><BR>So that whole theatrical performance solidified
Castro's power in Cuba. And the question is: Why would the Jesuits create this
fanatical power in Cuba, run down the Cuban people, put them in poverty,
imprison them at random, create a living hell down there, drive out the
Mafia—the Mafia could no longer have their casinos in Havana?<BR><BR>Why would
the Mafia give up their casinos? For the international drug trade to be
developing out of Vietnam.<BR><BR>Therefore, if the Mafia is leaving, and we
don't have a bunch of American tourists going down to Cuba anymore, and Cuba is
really a secret country—the Bible is not allowed there, missionaries are not
allowed in, obviously under Jesuit control, Castro was trained by Jesuits—what's
the purpose of Cuba under Castro?<BR><BR>It's purpose is as a landing base for
foreign invasion. They have hundreds of vehicles, underground, in underground
caves there, ready for a massive invasion to the East Coast, primarily the
South. Because the last of the Protestants in this country are in the
South.<BR><BR>Cuba will always be under a dictator and will never go back to
freedom, because it is to be a landing base. And you know what? It could very
well be a landing base for a Jihad that the Moslems will foment against us,
because they'll come right across from Africa to Cuba, get reinforced, and then
go landing into Florida, with all their 5th-Column Cubans in Florida and Miami
right now. Sounds wild, but—.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> That's a sobering
thought.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Yes, it is. Sounds wild, but I'm
telling you, all the geography is in place. However, they can't pull this all
off until they get your guns. So that's why they're constantly creating these
gun issues—people shooting people, the Columbine High School bit—to justify the
confiscation of all the guns. And when that happens, then they can do what they
want to do.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>There are a lot of strong Americans
out there.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>The only problem is this: they're not
united and they can't be lead. Americans are leaderless because they do not
follow. They all think their opinions are equal, and they're not. I would follow
General Patton anywhere. I wouldn't question an order of his. We don't have men
like that today, for the most part, because we don't have leaders like that
today.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> I found your account of Patton's
assassination fascinating, also your speaking of the Jesuits' poisoning of
him.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>A member of the OSS came out in the
Spotlight [newspaper] and said that. His name was Zapata, that agent. He said he
was given a contract on Patton for $10,000. He didn't kill him, but he knows the
guy who did. So, Patton was murdered, and General Vlasov was murdered, and both
of them hated the Jesuits' "Grand Inquisitor", Joseph Stalin. They would have
united together to eradicate Russia of that dictator, but the Jesuits would not
have it because Russia is theirs. They must control the Orthodox Church to bring
it back to Rome. That's why they got rid of the
Romanoffs.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Patton's take-out was ordered by
"Wild" Bill Donovan? Did I read that?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> That's
right. Wild Bill Donovan was the head of the OSS at the time. And if you get
Anthony K. Brown's <U>The Last Hero</U>, it's on Wild Bill Donovan. He is in the
Vatican at the end of his life, in a picture, walking in the Vatican to receive
one of the highest medals from the Pope, for a "lifetime" of intelligence
service to the Vatican. That is in <U>The Last Hero</U> and the<BR>picture is
mesmerizing. I want to put it in my book.<BR><BR>The OSS is nothing but an arm
of the CIA and the Vatican, and that's why they took out Kenendy. They kill all
the generals who don't "play ball".<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Let's talk
about the CIA and the FBI some more. What can you tell me about their
relationship to Count von Kolvenbach?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Well,
based upon the past, if the CIA and the FBI carried out the assassination under
Spellman, and Janseens was the Jesuit General then, the same power structure is
in place. So, von Kolvenbach, through his Knights of Malta and Jesuits, control
the FBI and CIA. And his liason of control is now Cardinal O'Connor in New
York.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Some time ago, with Gunther Russbacher and
others, there was talk about a split in the CIA, of different factions. Some
even say there is a third faction in the CIA that has split off. What's your
opinion about factional divisions within the CIA?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>I think it's true. I know that Angelton was the mole. Angelton was the
one who betrayed all those CIA agents in Russia, in which the vast majority of
them were killed, when he gave all that information to that KGB kingpin on a
farm in New York, in a van, stuffed with all the highest, top secret CIA
documents. Ok?<BR><BR>Colby comes along as the Director of the CIA—I know his
brother, he lives nearby me—Colby comes along as the Director of the CIA and
what does he do? He fires Angelton. Bad news for
Colby.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Yeah, it was.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>They filled him up with lead. Eric Timm, he was also against Angleton;
he was history. That's all told in Anthony K. Brown's work <U>Treason In The
Blood</U>. There's a whole little chapter on Eric Timm and some of the other
guys in the CIA who were against Angelton. They all died. So there's a faction
in the CIA that knows that something is rotten in Denmark, and they<BR>don't
quite know what it is. Hopefully, they'll read my book and see that the CIA is
just an arm of the Jesuit Order and Knights of Malta, carrying out the Council
of Trent and the Pope's temple power, and will REVOLT, and start to tell the
truth themselves.<BR><BR>It's the same way in the FBI. My father lectured at the
FBI Academy. He wanted to be in the FBI, but his parents were Communists, so he
was not let in by J. Edgar Hoover. But the FBI has low-level agents who wonder
just what's going on. A lot of them didn't approve of what happened in
Waco.<BR><BR>They need to come out and tell the truth. This whole "house of
cards"—and that's what it is, this is not an undefeatable, invincible
monster—it's a house of cards; it plays on FEAR. If men would tell the truth,
and come out and tell what they know, and not be afraid, this whole house of
cards would crumble. That's what they need to
do.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Who is Avery Dulles?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Avery Dulles is the son of John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State, I
believe, under Eisenhower. Avery Dulles is a Jesuit, and he was the nephew of
the head of the CIA during the Kennedy assassination, who was Allan Dulles. And
Allan Dulles was a Freemason, also called "the gentleman spy" in the book <U>The
Gentleman Spy</U>.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> What was Angelton's role in
the Kennedy assassination?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Angelton was the one
who was to "investigate" it on the part of the CIA. (laughter)<BR><BR>Angelton
also, I believe, was liaison to the Warren Commission—no, that was Dulles. But
Angelton and Dulles were working together on that, because Angelton was the
Chief of Counter-Intelligence and he manned the Vatican Desk, and he manned the
Israeli Desk.<BR><BR>See how they're maintaining the Zionists in power, with the
Israeli Desk? So, they saved Israel's hide in the '73 war, because Kissinger
almost lost it for them. Alexander Haig gave them, the Israelis, those anti-tank
missiles, and got them in their hands before the Egyptians got into Israel and
disabled them. That was Alexander Haig, Knight of Malta, for which reason he was
also the Supreme Allied Commander for NATO, promoted over 260 of his
peers.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Do you know anything about Haig's
statement "I'm in charge now!" Do you remember that?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:
</STRONG>Yeah, I do. I don't know all of the implications, but I'm sure it fits
in with him being, in fact, in charge in the Nixon White
House.<BR><STRONG><EM><BR>[End Part 1]</EM></STRONG>
<BR>_____________________________________________________________________<BR>________________________________________________________________________<BR><BR><STRONG>Date:
</STRONG>Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:56:02 -0700<BR><STRONG>From: </STRONG>Paul Gauthier
&lt;<A
href="mailto: mikyo78@mac.com">mailto: mikyo78@mac.com</A>&gt;<BR><STRONG>Subject:
</STRONG>The Jesuit Conspiracy 2/2<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Ok, I want to
go back to the Kennedy assassination, and I'm going to just mention some names:
Clay Shaw, Jim Garrison, J. Peter Grace, Henry Luce, E. Howard Hunt, John
McCone. Why are they so important to this story?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG>
Give me one and we'll start with one.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Let's
start with Clay Shaw.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Clay Shaw was a Knight of
Malta. He was the head of the international trade mart in New Orleans. Roman
Catholic, homosexual, multi-millionaire, lived lavishly, etc. Clay Shaw was the
personal friend of David Ferry. David Ferry was a CIA agent, and was also a
pilot for Carlos Marchello—the CIA and the Mafia together. Clay Shaw also was a
friend of Lee Oswald, and Garrison proves it.<BR><BR>Here we have Clay Shaw, who
was in the CIA. It was admitted by Richard Helms that Clay Shaw was a "contract
agent" for the CIA, and the highest security involved in the Kennedy
assassination, because he gets an attorney for Dean Andrews who's subpoenaed by
Garrison. So, if Clay Shaw is involved, he's a Knight of Malta, he's high CIA,
and he can't go down.<BR><BR>That's why the court was packed. The judge was
biased against Garrison. The defense of Shaw was unlike any before. There was a
guy behind, whispering to the defense attorney. That's not allowed in a
courtroom defense.<BR><BR>Shaw HAD to be found innocent, because if he was found
guilty, now the CIA is going down. Now we're going to have a revolution. So,
Clay Shaw had to be found not guilty.<BR><BR>But it wasn't many years after
that, he died under suspicious conditions and never had an autopsy. He died of
lung cancer. But he's part of the brotherhood, and the Jesuits are very powerful
in New Orleans.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> John
McCone.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>John McCone was a very powerful
industrialist, and one who was part of the military-industrial complex, before
he became the head of the CIA. He later went on to become part of, I believe,
ITT.<BR><BR>John McCone was another Knight of Malta, head of the CIA, and
participated in the Kennedy assassination by virtue of him being its head. And
he's Knight of Malta.<BR><BR>Angelton is a Knight of Malta. Henry Luce is a
Knight of Malta. William F. Buckley is a Knight of Malta. And William F. Buckley
then ran the National Review—and what does he do? He blames Oswald as the lone
assassin.<BR><BR>Where was the picture concocted, for Oswald, as though his head
is put on this body that's not his? It was concocted, probably, I believe, in
the Time-Life Building, when they did that, because Time-Life has a whole bunch
of CIA agents in it. And, remember, Time-Life is right across the street from
St. Patrick's Cathedral, where Cardinal Spellman was ruling from.<BR><BR>So,
Spellman was overseeing the whole thing, with Henry Luce. And, if you get
<U>Luce And His Empire</U>, there is a picture in there of Cardinal Spellman,
Luce, Grace, Clare Boothe Luce, and Dean Rusk, on the 1963, 4-year anniversary
of Time magazine in the Waldorf Astoria, only months before the Kennedy
assassination. And there's Dean Rusk, the architect of the Vietnam War,
according to the words of his own son.<BR><BR>Ok, who's the other one? Howard
Hunt. Howard Hunt is a CIA agent, of course.<BR><BR>He said he was never in
Dallas the day of the assassination, but Mark Lane proved that he was. Thank God
for Mark Lane. Here's another Jew getting in the way of the Vatican. Just like
Daniel Ellsberg—here's another Jew getting in the way of the Vatican's Vietnam
War.<BR><BR>You see Jews who are getting in the way of the Vatican, and the
Jesuits are furious about it. So here's Mark Lane; he's openly defeated William
F. Buckley in court before; now he proves that Howard Hunt is a CIA agent, in
Dallas the day of the assassination.<BR><BR>The jury came forward with that
verdict, and who is Howard Hunt? Howard Hunt is a personal friend of Henry Luce,
a correspondent for Time-Life. He's a personal friend of William F. Buckley. He
goes to one of Buckley's parties at the New York Yacht Club. He knows them both.
He knows two of the High Knights.<BR><BR>And guess what? Guess what Howard Hunt
is called? He's called "Knight". (laughter)<BR><BR>I wonder what he was—Knight
of Columbus, or whatever. But he's involved with the brotherhood.<BR><BR>So he
was there on the day of the assassination, intimate with Luce and Buckley. Just
as the chart says on my web page. And by the way, your readers need to look at
my <STRONG><A
href=" link to www.vaticanassassins.org
web page.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> I'm going to mention a few more
names.<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps:</STRONG> Oh, J. Peter Grace we forgot. J. Peter
Grace was the head of the Knights of Malta in 1963. He is the head of W. R.
Grace, and he's one of the largest shipping tycoons in the world, in control of
all the shipping in South America. Grace is a powerful man, or was a powerful
man.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG> Has anyone filled his
shoes?<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Yes, Flynn is head of the Knights of
Malta now, down in Florida where there new office is. They moved from New York
to Florida, I think Bocca Raton. They have 11 Knights of Malta on the W. R.
Grace Board.<BR><BR>And, of course, guess who owns Taco Bell? W. R.
Grace.<BR><BR>So now we see W. R. Grace involved in the poisoning of America
with fast-food chains, so everybody gets heart disease, clogged arteries, so
they can go to bypass surgery and further enrich the medical profession, while
carrying out their medical inquisition. Isn't that clear? So not only are they
going to kill all of the American people, but they're going to make billions
doing it.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin: </STRONG>I'm sure they're laughing all the way
to the bank.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps: </STRONG>They sure are. And where Grace did
his banking, W. R. Grace, they did their banking at Chemical Bank in New York.
Guess who runs Chemical Bank? Knights of Malta.<BR><BR><STRONG>Martin:</STRONG>
Jim Garrison was a very brave guy.<BR><BR><STRONG>Phelps:</STRONG> Yes, he was.
He lost his marriage. He lost his children. He suffered greatly through this,
doing what he did.<BR><STRONG><BR>Martin:</STRONG> Ok, I want to talk about the
movie JFK. You mention the Jesuits, in control of Time-Warner, produced Oliver
Stone's movie JFK. What was the reason for this? To just further cement,
subliminally in the minds of the American people, their absolute
power?<BR><STRONG><BR>Phelps:</STRONG> I think that might be part of it. But, I
think it's a test. It's a test: tell the American people the truth to see what
they will do about it. And they did nothing.<BR><BR>And that was the end of
Garrison, or Kevin Costner's speech, in the courtroom, when he said "It's up to
you." And he looks directly into the camera. So, he's looking at us.<BR><BR>That
was a call to do something about it. It's a test. What will we do? And you know
what was done? Nothing. The men in power, the men in the know, the men who could
have said something, did nothing. So that was the purpose of the
movie.<BR><BR>Meanwhile, they interweave all these Jesuit subliminals all
throughout the movie: "Black is white, white is black"—when Garrison is at the
restaurant, talking to his people—that's Ignatius Loyola. David Ferry shows
pictures of his Catholic uniform there, and Satan pictures in his apartment, all
very much Jesuitism.<BR><BR>There were a couple of other things I noticed that I
can't quite remember. Oh, they had a subliminal "study the past".<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It goes on there, it's on a building or
something, "study the past".<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
they said: "It's like Caesar; he's not in the loop."<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, Caesar was murdered by those close
to him.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And the ones who murdered
Caesar were the priests of Rome.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>There's all kinds of subliminals in that movie which point to the power
of the Jesuit Order, all over.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The
assassination—right after they take his body out of Parkland Hospital, they've
got the cross on it, the crucifix.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>That is a very unique, Jesuit crucifix.<BR><BR>When I was at a Jesuit
retreat in Redding one day, I just wanted to walk through the place.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I wanted to see where these sinners rule from,
so I thought I would walk through the place and check out the rooms.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It just so happened that the Jesuits were on
the second floor, by themselves.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So I
went to the first floor and the third floor, and looked into the rooms.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They were little, tiny rooms, and on
every bed is a crucifix with a crucified person on it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's not the Jesus Christ of the <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>; it's their Jesus Christ.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that's the same exact crucifix that
was put on the coffin, in the movie, when they're shipping the coffin
out.<BR><BR>And get a load of this: the guy who came to give Kennedy the Last
Rites, Oscar Hubert, his superior was the Bishop of Dallas, by the name of
Thomas Gorman.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Bishop Thomas Gorman was a
Knight of Malta, answerable directly to Cardinal Spellman.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Let's talk about Cardinal Spellman.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Who was he?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Why was he so important?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>You say,
in the book, he really was the man behind it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Right.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why do you say that?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps</B>:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Cardinal Spellman was, first, very much
involved in politics all of his life.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Remember, he was trained by the Jesuits at Fordham.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was trained by Jesuits at the American
College in Rome.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>When he came back here,
he was taken care of by Nicholas Brady and his wife, multi-billionaires in
control of Union Carbide, and various banks,
multi-multi-billionaires.<BR><BR>Spellman was part of getting FDR into office,
although I believe Cardinal Hayes was the Cardinal. <SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN>Guess who FDR names as his international
agent, during World War II?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Francis
Spellman.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Francis Spellman was throughout
the war-front during World War II, going to and from the Vatican, the Allied
Army, etc.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And, with that, he built a
huge network of contacts.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He, also, of
course, had contacts with the mob.<BR><BR>So, by the time of the Kennedy
assassination, we have Cardinal Spellman here, who helped the Nazis get into the
United States, with the FBI.<BR><BR>I met one of those Nazis about 6 months
ago.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I call him Pete.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He showed me his Nazi SS overcoat, which is a
beautiful overcoat—I'd love to have it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And it was the FBI who brought all of these High Nazis in and resettled
them, and gave them money to settle.<BR><BR>Who did that?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Francis Spellman, by helping those criminals
escape the theater of Europe so that they could not be prosecuted.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's called the "Vatican Ratline" that
Loftus writes about in his <U>Unholy Trinity</U>.<BR><BR>So, Spellman is
involved in getting the SS out, helping the Ustashis.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Spellman is involved in this whole second 30
Years War of the Vatican in Europe, outlined by Edmond Paris in his <U>Vatican
Against Europe</U><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">.</I><BR><BR>And so, he
is in a perfect place to carry out the assassination.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He has contacts with the Knights of Malta in
England, with the Knights he controls in America; he has his Jesuit contacts who
trained him at Fordham and Rome; he was a personal friend of Pius XII during the
war.<BR><BR>He was a personal friend of the secret cold-warrior, Montini, Pius
VI.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So he is the perfect man, with all of
the connections, to carry it out.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He has
contacts with the CIA, the Knights from the CIA, the Knights from the FBI, in
the person of Carthe DeLouthe, who still lives.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He had contacts with high-level Freemasonry, with people like J. Edgar
Hoover and their raving against Communism, Communism, Communism—international,
Godless, Jew Communism.<BR><BR>He and Hoover are bosom, probably bed,
partners.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And so, Spellman is in a place
to be in control of the CIA, the FBI, the Mafia, and through Freemasonry, the
Dallas Police Department—like they control every major city's P.D.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And so he carries it out.<BR><BR>And then he's
also in control of the press, in control of <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Time</I> and <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Life</I>, with Henry Luce, so the press
never gets it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's in control of
CBS, with a man named Frank Shakespeare, who was the head of CBS at the
time.<BR><BR>So you think Walter Cronkite<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>is going to tell us the truth?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>No
way.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's in control of CBS, NBC,
ABC.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They have stocks in it, for heaven's
sake.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, there's no way the story's
getting out.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he's in control of the
CIA to hit and kill anybody who wants to come out and tell the truth, which is
why there's over a hundred dead witnesses over the last 30 years.<BR><BR>That's
why they took out Fensterwald, in 1992, outlined in the book by that CIA agent<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I><U>First Hand Knowledge</U>, by
Morrow.<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"><SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN></I></B>He was a CIA agent.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was
in on the Kennedy assassination.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He
completely outlines it in his book, and he tells of that relationship of the CIA
to killing Fensterwald.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He dedicates his
book to Fensterwald.<BR><BR>So, how's it getting out?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>This is only getting out by fearless
preachers, who preach the Word of God, and aren't afraid of telling the truth
politically, trusting God that He will move and do His part, now that we've done
our part.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B> FBI Director Hoover, Earl
Warren, Gerald Ford, Johnson—Jesuit tools?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Jesuit tools.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All 33rd-Degree Freemasons.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And remember, the Council of the 33rd Degree
is located in Washington.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
control all of the Shriners in this country.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Washington is controlled by the Jesuits from Georgetown.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>The capital of the United States is at
Georgetown University, not the White House.</B><BR><BR>And if you go into the
president's office at Georgetown, you will see a picture of Bill Clinton,
kneeling at the grave of Timothy Healy [<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">past president of Georgetown</I>], while the
present president, Donovan, who is on the Walt Disney Board, is standing behind
him.<BR><BR>I wanted that picture; I wanted a copy of that picture.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Those people threw me out of that
office.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They would not let me have a copy
of it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I sent another person, a lady, up
there.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They would not give it to
her.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I want that picture, for my book, of
Bill Clinton kneeling at the grave of these Jesuits.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Can't get it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>But if you go in the president's office, it's there.<BR><BR>Georgetown is
the capital.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They control all
Freemasonry. In fact, if you go to Maryland, they've got the great big lodge
across from a great big Jesuit institution, in Baltimore—a great huge Shriner
Lodge is across the street from a Jesuit University.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And they're enemies?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I want to talk about Bill Clinton in a
minute, but before we get to him, who is Cartha DeLoach?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>Cartha DeLoach—his sir name was
Deke.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was the 3rd-in-command of the
FBI at the time of the Kennedy assassination.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Cartha DeLoach was the real head of the FBI.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Hoover was a wimp.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>His queer buddy, Tolson, who was nothing, was
second in command. <BR><BR>So Hoover and Tolson were just figure-heads.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The real head of the FBI was Cartha DeLoach,
the Knight of Malta, Roman Catholic, subject to Cardinal Spellman.<BR><BR>Cartha
DeLoach fabricated evidence, covered-up evidence in the FBI, in the Kennedy
assassination.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That was proven by Jim
Garrison.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Cartha DeLoach went on to
retire.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He went on to work for a huge
industry corporation called PepsiCo, which the Knights of Malta control, and
which have ranches in Communist China, which they set up.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he still lives.<BR><BR>Cartha DeLoach
wrote a book called <U>Hoover's FBI</U>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>You can get it at the bookstores.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>In that book he tells about the Secret Service, the FBI, and the
Jesuits.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why do you refer to the Kennedy
assassination as the "Achilles' Heel" of the Jesuits?\</P>
<P align=left><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Because, if it's ever known that the
Jesuits killed our first Roman Catholic President, if the Roman Catholics of
Northeastern America ever find that out, and ever believe it, the Jesuits are
finished here.\</B></P>
<P align=left><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">This country is the
keystone to implementing the temporal power of the Pope around the world.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If this country would expel the Jesuits,
and we get back our national sovereignty, and we started to be self-governing
once again, we would have our liberty, and the Jesuits would be out, and we
would begin to experience REAL financial prosperity, and <SPAN
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase">real</SPAN> living.</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, if that is known that the
Jesuits are the ones behind it, that Rome carried this out, the Catholics of the
Northeast would have a revolution.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We
would have another revolution because American Roman Catholics are not like
Catholics in any other country: they think.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They have their own opinion.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
believe in freedom of conscience.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
believe they have the right to express themselves.<BR><BR>Catholics in Poland
don't believe that.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Catholics in Italy
wouldn't dare believe that.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But the
Catholics here do.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They have a lot of
Protestant principles.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They don't really
comprehend this whole idea of universal, world-wide temporal power of the
Pope.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They think it's just a
religion.<BR><BR>But, if those Catholics in New York, if those two million Roman
Catholics knew that Spellman was behind it, and O'Connor has covered it up, we'd
have a revolution!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because it's the Roman
Catholics, unfortunately, who only do anything about things.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Protestants don't do anything.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're all a bunch of wimps, a bunch of
cowards.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They don't do
anything.<BR><BR>It's the Roman Catholics who apparently have built our major
cities.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They built our skyscrapers.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're the great steel workers.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're the ones, apparently, with the guts
enough to bring about a change.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The only
problem is, they're unGodly because they don't know the Lord.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They don't read the <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They don't know Christ.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're
not born-again.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If they would get
born-again, and come to know Christ, with their determination and their
resistance to tyranny, we'd have another Reformation.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And a lot of people's heads would be going on
trial, and to the block, for treason.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm going to go back, now.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>How did the <U>Protocols Of The Learned Elders
Of Zion</U>, authored, according to you, by the Jesuits, further the Jesuit
Agenda?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>Ok.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>To anwer that, we probably ought to look at the different
<U>Protocols</U>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Now, to my mind,
I believe there's 20 or 30 <U>Protocols</U>; I can't quite remember.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But the <U>Protocols</U> further the agenda of
the Jesuit Order in that Russia would be taken and, in the fall of Russia, in
the Bolshevik Revolution, two major things would happen: The Romanoff dynasty
would be removed.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Now, of course,
the Czar was not killed at Ekaterinburg;<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>we know that from the book <U>The File On The Czar</U>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We know that his daughter died in the
state of Virginia [<I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">not very long
ago</I>].<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We know his son, Alexi,<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>became a member of the KGB, later came to New York, and he put out what
was called <U>The White Paper</U>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>The Royal Family was not killed, because they were Knights of Malta.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, the Knights of Malta took the
Royal Family out, faked their death, and then after they had taken the Romanoffs
out, the Orthodox Church no longer had a protector, because Church and State are
one in Russia.<BR><BR>Now the Jesuits were free, with their Bolsheviks, to
kill-off the Orthodox leadership that was anti-Rome.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That's why they killed 5,000 priests and nuns,
during the revolution, of the Orthodox Church.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They just beheaded all the anti-Catholic, anti-Pope leadership of the
Orthodox Church.<BR><BR>They got rid of the Romanoffs, and then the next thing
they did, they began to purge Russia of its Protestants, in general.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They purged it of its Lutherans; they burned
down the Lutheran Church; imprisoned the Baptists; sent them off to
Siberia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They even destroyed two Jewish
communities during the '20s, which we're not told.<BR><BR>The Jews fared well
for 10 years, until the purges of Stalin in the '30s.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But the Jesuits accomplished the killing-off,
the getting rid of the Romanoff dynasty and their protectorate of the Orthodox
Church, the beheading of the Orothodox Church, so they could bring Orthodox
Moscow back to Rome.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And remember, Moscow
is considered the "Third Rome".<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The first
is Rome; the second is Constantinople; the third is Moscow.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And you can find this, you can find the Jesuit
alliance with the Bolsheviks in a book called <U>Descent Into Darkness</U> by a
priest named Zatko, who taught at Notre Dame University in the '60s.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>And so the Jesuits were given
formal re-entry into Russia in 1922, after the Bolshevik Revolution and Civil
War, and from then on—the Russian College was erected in Rome in 1929, so they
could prepare Russian Jesuits to rule Russia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And that's what they've done, and they've ruled through the KGB, just
like they rule this country through the CIA and the FBI.<BR><BR>The
<U>Protocols</U> outline this.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Remember,
the <U>Protocols</U> were discovered in Russia, and translated by an Englishman,
Marsden.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But what it also
did—because then they set-up the huge gulag system, the huge concentration camp
system, that gave the Jesuits practice to do this in Europe.<BR><BR>But their
great accomplishment was, in the process of pulling all of this off, they blamed
it on the Jews, and in so doing, justified in the eyes of the European people
the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe—because it's the Jews who did this
in Russia!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Jews killed
all the Christians in Russia!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Jews
sent them off to Siberia!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>After all,
wasn't Trotsky a Jew?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Wasn't Lenin a
Jew?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's all the Jews!<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, they fell for the bait.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So they blamed it all on the
Jews, purged Europe of its Jews, so Europe is primarily Roman Catholic now.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's a Roman Catholic block, and it will be
the army of the Anti-Christ, with its European Union.<BR><BR>The Jews, then,
were forced out of the nations to Israel.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And remember, during World War II, when the Jews tried to escape and they
were desperate to get out of Germany, do you think Jew-controlled Russia would
let the Jews in?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If the Jews really
controlled Russia, they could have gone right into Russia.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They were not allowed.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Stalin would not allow any Jews to go into
Russia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Churchill would not allow any
Jews to go into England.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that
criminal, FDR, would not allow any Jews to come into America.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They were not allowed to escape.<BR><BR>They
were either to be killed or funneled down through Israel, to be killed by the
Mufti, that was working with the SS, Eichmann.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Loftus<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I></B>is right.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>There is a secret war against the Jews, and
all of the intelligence communities are waging it.<BR><BR>And the Jews don't
perceive it because their Rabbis, the majority of their Rabbis, are
traitors.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I talked to a Rabbi in
Lancaster County and I told him to look out for the Jesuit Order.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He says "Oh, they're some of my best
friends!"<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, that explains it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Rabbis betray their own people at
the hand of these inquisitors.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that's
what they did in World War II, and they're going to do it here.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><O:P></O:P><BR><BR>Martin:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>Let's talk about Garfield and
McKinley.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why were they
assassinated?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>I think Garfield was assassinated on
a monetary issue; he was resisting the banking plans of the Jesuits.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was a radical, red Republican, too, you
know, so they got rid of their own.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm
not familiar with all of the details.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All
I know is Burke McCarty in the book <U>The Suppressed Truth About The
Assassination Of Lincoln</U> named McKinley and Garfield as other victims of the
Jesuit Order.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And had the Lincoln
assassination been solved, that would never have happened.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The other important issue is that Garfield was
a Freemason.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, they assassinate their
own Freemasons, when they want to.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Going back to Lincoln, who was John
Surratt?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>John Surratt was the young man, 20
years old, who called time outside of Ford's Theater.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was mastermind of the assassination.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>John Surratt was helped by the priests of
Washington to escape Washington, went up into Canada, was taken care of and
housed by the priests, by the Bishop of Montreal, and then he was ferried across
the ocean in The Peruvian, in a steamer called The<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I>Peruvian, and he went to, I believe,
Ireland, then into England, then he went to Rome, to the Pope's Vatican
there.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He joined the Zouave<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>army,<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I></B>and he was stationed in Alexandria,
Egypt, until he was found and arrested.<BR><BR>In 1867, he was brought back and
stood trial in Washington.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>There a woman
was involved in the picking of the jury, and a High Roman Catholic was put on
it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And because it's no murder to kill a
heretic, the jury was hung in the first trial and Surratt went free.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he was also free in the second trial,
because there were <SPAN style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase">two</SPAN>
trials.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He died in 1914, I believe, at
the age of 72, and they gave him, of course, a very, very, pompous funeral, a
High Requiem Mass that are usually only given for priests and nuns.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Evidently, he deserved it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Of course, John Wilkes<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>Booth, he was never killed.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Corbett never killed Booth in the barn.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Booth escaped Washington with a password, according to Finis Bates' work
<U>The Escape And Suicide Of John Wilkes Booth</U>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He escaped to Kansas, and on his death bed
confessed to his physician that he was John Wilkes Booth who shot Lincoln.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he escaped with the help of a Masonic
password.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So just like there was a patsy
for the Lincoln assassination, there was a patsy for the Kennedy
assassination.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why is April 15th so significant?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>(<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">laughter</I>)<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, April 15 was the day that Lincoln called
out troops on the South.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It was the day
that Lincoln died.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was shot on
the 14th and died on the 15th.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's the
day that the Titanic was sunk.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And it's
the day all the <U>14th Amendment</U> citizens of this empire, like the good
serfs that they are, go to confession once a year and confess to the government
with their tax returns. Beware the Ides of April.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>(<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">laughter</I>)<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B> Let's talk about the Cold
War.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why did that come about?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We had the end of World War II.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We had the purging of the Jews and the
Protestants, for the most part.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The
British Empire was destroyed, it's wrecked, which was essentially the empire
that the Gospel went to China with.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Modern missions were founded on the British Empire.<BR><BR>So, that
Protestant Empire, even though it was controlled by Rome, was done.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We have America in huge financial debt, out of
isolationism.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We have a Russia
that's taken over by the Jesuits, through Joseph Stalin.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Of course, the great beneficiary of World War
II was Russia—Russia was the only country that won.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But the Jesuits are not finished with their
purgings and their installings of dictators loyal to the Pope, around the
world.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I mean, they pretty much
have South America.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They pretty much have
Africa.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But they don't have the East, and
the Orthodox nations, and the Buddhist nations.<BR><BR>So, the purpose of the
Cold War was to kill millions of these heretic, orthodox Buddhists, and to
install in their country dictators that will carry out the Inquisition, who are
loyal to the Pope.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>One of
those dictators was Joseph Stalin.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he
was given the nuclear device in 1943 by the U.S. government, by the U.S.
army.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And you can find that in <U>The
Unseen Hand</U> by Ralph Epperson.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He did
a lot of good documentation.<BR><BR>So, they gave him the bomb.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I shouldn't call it "the bomb" because they
gave him the nuclear device so that he could detonate it and create the <SPAN
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase">illusion</SPAN> that Russia now has nuclear
capability, when a wheel-barrow was a great invention in Russia.<BR><BR>I mean,
the Russian soldiers, when they went into Germany and they found toilets, they
were dipping their bread in the toilets and eating their bread out of
toilets.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>In Russia they were just
savages.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They didn't have technology;
they had nothing.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All the technology they
ever got was given by Vatican-controlled Western corporations, whose inventors
were Protestants.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, the
Cold War has to continue under Stalin.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And we have to divide up the world into two factions, so we're going to
put Roman Catholic NATO on one side, and we're going to put Communist-controlled
Warsaw Pact on the other.<BR><BR>But in the process of so doing, they put
Protestant East Germany under Communism to purge the Protestants of East Germany
out of the country.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That's why they sent
them to Siberia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They put
Protestant-Lutheran Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia under Communism, so they
deported them all to Siberia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They put
the Mennonites of Russia further under Communism, deporting them to
Siberia.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They deported the Baptists of
Russia to Siberia, because they could only do—wimpy, gimpy, powerless, Russian
army that it was—we could easily have beat it into the ground, if it had not
been financed and supported and built by Henry Ford and Western
corporations.<BR><BR>So, wimpy, gimpy Russia has this nuclear device,
right?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And oh, if we decide to go to war
with Russia, well, we might get bombed!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>There's mutual, assured destruction.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>So to keep that from happening, we won't fight 'em, and we'll let them
purge the world of all its Protestants.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>That's the purpose of the Cold War.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>The Cold War then went into
China, and the U.S. 7th Fleet, according to the Birch Society, and they're right
about this, blocked Chiang Kai-Shek from being able to go into China and take
over the country.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, Mao Se-Dung could
get in control, get in power, and then carry out his inquisition against the
land owners, against the Buddhists, against all the Protestant missionaries who
were in China—just like the good Jesuit pawn that he was.<BR><BR>And, of course,
the intimidation idea was that you can't go to China—why, there's millions of
people there!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Meanwhile, the Japanese
whipped the Chinese to death in their war with China, when the Japanese went
in.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Chinese had no technology.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They had no organized army.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They were easy to beat.<BR><BR>But the idea we
were sold was: Oh no—China is a great, powerful nation, and now they even have
the bomb!<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Stalin gave them a bomb, so we
can't fight them anymore.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So we won't do
anything to them, while they're murdering 50 million people.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And remember the "baby-boomers" of the United
States, we would have fought the world.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>We would have rid the world of tyranny, had we had leadership that would
have led us to that.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But we had this
farce, called the nuclear, mutual assured destruction.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We had this farce called the dropping of the
bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Whatever
it was, it wasn't dropping nuclear bombs—and Edwin Corley does a pretty good job
in his <U>The Jesus Factor</U>, in trying to tell you what else it was.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>And so, we have this nonsense
Cold War, which enables Rome to put up all their dictators, their Communist
dictators, all of them loyal to the Pope—including Ho Chi Minh.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Ho Chi Minh had a secret deal with Pope John
XXIII, and he was under the advice of a Roman Catholic Bishop all throughout the
war.<BR><BR>The purpose of the Cold War was to carry out the Council of Trent,
and to tie the hands of the American Protestants; and it was also used to unite
the Protestants and Catholics of America against Communism.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Protestants and Catholics should unite on
nothing.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We are <SPAN
style="TEXT-TRANSFORM: uppercase">different</SPAN>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Catholics have a final authority—that's
the Pope.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Baptists and Protestants
should have a final authority—that's the <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>We don't unite on anything.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We
don't agree on anything.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We don't agree
on America's national purpose, so we don't unite.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We're not uniting with abortion; we're not
uniting with Communism; we don't unite against the Black or the Civil Rights
Movement.<BR><BR>You see, all these things were used to unite Catholics and
Protestants together here, so that, ultimately, Rome would be in control of all
the Protestant denominations through the National Council of Churches and the
Royal Council of Churches.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that's
what they got.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They took Princeton; they
took Dartmouth College.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All the great
Protestant Universities are now in the hands of the Masons and the Jesuits.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Harvard has a Jesuit House.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're controlled.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And so, wherever they control education, they
control the politics.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And they control
the education in China, Russia, all the Communist countries.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Now that they have all of the dictators
installed all throughout the world, they don't need the Cold War anymore.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So now they can proceed with their next
agenda, and that's the unification of Europe, the building up of Russia, and the
destruction of the Western Empire.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
that's their next agenda.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>How do you see that unfolding?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>What's that?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B> The destruction of the
Western Empire.<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps: </B>As
far as the actions of overthrowing the government and having a tyranny, is that
what you mean?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>Right.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>What do you see life like here in the next 5
or 10 years?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's hard to put a date on it; it's hard
to put a year on it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But I would say it's
going to continually become more and more a matter of "central power" in
Washington.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>You're going to have less and
less power in the Congress.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And one of
these days, the Congress is going to be closed.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And all we're going to have is a Commander-in-Chief.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We're going to have some form of absolutism,
with the President becoming now a dictator.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Do you think George Bush, Jr. will be
that person?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He could be.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I won't say he will be, but he could be.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It will be someone like him—with complete
allegiance to Rome, just like his father.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>His grandfather helped set up the CFR.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>His uncle is a Knight of Malta.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It
will be someone like him.<BR><BR>And he WILL be the next President.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They've already chosen him in the College of
Cardinals.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Everything else is a
show.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Jesuit-trained Buchanan is a
show.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Roman Catholic McCain is a
show.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Black Roman Catholic Keyes is a
show, although he tickles me.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He
advocates abolition of the <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">14th
Amendment</I>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If that happens, what are
the Black people going to do?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They're not citizens; they have no rights!<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Dred Scott comes into play.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's a fake.<BR><BR>So, what I see is more and
more centralization of power in the hands of the President.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Supreme Court is just a rubber stamp.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He becomes the king.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The courts are nothing more than the courts of
the king's bench.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Federal Reserve
Bank will remain in power.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Everything
will be monitored and controlled by Washington, unless some of God's men start
trusting God and get in control of the state and cause it to secede.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The only answer to this is state secession,<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">
</I></B>leaving this Union—it's not a Union, it's an Empire—leaving the Empire
that began in 1868, assuming national sovereignty, once again.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And the first state that would do this, I'm
moving there.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because I don't want to see
the FBI anymore.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I don't want to see the
CIA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I don't want to see any of these
national bureaucracies anymore.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Montana seems close.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Arizona seems close.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, when they do it, I'll move
there.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But that's what would happen if
things continue as they are.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We'll have
race war.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We're going to have the Moslems
fighting the Klu Klux Klan.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Whites siding
with the Whites; the Blacks siding with the Blacks.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's going to be a blood-bath everywhere.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that will justify Martial Law, and the
military, and the whole nine yards, and also foreign occupation; we're going to
have that too.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And you know how
foreigners are in a foreign country.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
rape the women.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They couldn't care less
about the social strata of the country.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They have no mercy on the people.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They have a foreign tongue.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
that's what they'll do.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that's all
the more reason for a state to secede.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>I've advocated that Pennsylvania
should secede for the last 15 years.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We
have our own deep-water ports; we have our own agriculture; we have our own
heavy industry; we have coal; we have everything we need to be a sovereign
nation.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We don't need this Empire
anymore.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The only problem is,
Pennsylvania is COMPLETELY controlled by the Jesuits.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Every major city is under their
control.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And so, the place is slated for
destruction—all the Mennonite and Amish counties of Southeastern
Pennsylvania.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Everything else is
Catholic: Pittsburgh, Scranton, Philadelphia, Harrisburg—all Roman
Catholic.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Roman Catholic
people, too, will also be sacrificed.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They will be killed too.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Let them
not think that they're going to be delivered because the Jesuits run the
show.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>According to the Jesuit
<U>Molina</U><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">,</I> in the tape I just
sent you, it is lawful to kill—and they will kill as many Roman Catholics as
necessary to bring this plan to fruition.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Define the Jesuit term: Universal
Absolutism.<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal">Define it?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That means worldwide, universal, over
every nation, absolute power.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Absolutism is their great doctrine, that absolute power resides in the
hands of the General.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He is limited
by no constitution.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He is limited
by no law.<O:P></O:P> <BR><BR>This is the Great Doctrine of Divine Right, the
Divine Right of Kings that was so fought against by the Calvinists.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>-believing Calvinists believe in
the Rule of Law.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Law is
king.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Rutherford's "Lex Rex".<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Jesuits believe the king is the
law—Louis XIV: "I am the law".<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So,
it's going to be a universal, world-wide king who, himself, is the law.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All authority will be in him, as he
rules the world from Jerusalem, as the Beast.<BR><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Are we talking about the present Pope,
or are we talking about Count von Kolvenbach?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm saying that what's in position now
will ultimately bring in the future Pope, whoever he is, and whatever it may be,
as a Universal Absolutist—the Universal Monarch of the World, in
Jerusalem.<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Symbolic?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Or you're saying literal?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm saying that will literally
happen.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>There will be a Pope, who will be
killed; he will receive a mortal wound.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And this is going to happen in the 70th week of<U> Daniel</U>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He will receive a mortal wound,
according to <U>Revelation 13</U>.<BR><BR>This is the Beast, and he will come
back to life.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He comes back to life,
mid-trip, at the very time that Satan and his angels are cast out of Heaven by
Michael and his angels.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>At this time,
Satan goes and he indwells the Beast, this Pope.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Now he comes back to life, just like Christ.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was dead; now he's resurrected.<BR><BR>And
what is he going to do?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's going to
destroy the Catholic Church.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's going
to destroy the Vatican; and he's going to go down in Jerusalem and demand to be
worshipped as God, for three and a half years.<BR><BR>That's why the Vatican is
indestructible.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>No one can destroy the
Vatican.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All the armies in the world
couldn't destroy it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It has been
determined that it will be destroyed by the Anti-Christ.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he, alone, can do it.<BR><BR>That's
why, when the Yugoslavians wanted to mount an air attack against the Vatican in
World War II, a bunch of clouds came over the airport and they couldn't take
off, because they were going to bomb the Vatican.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The world will not allow that to happen.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Vatican will only be destroyed by the man
of sin, the Beast, the coming Universal Monarch, the ex-Universal
Pope.<BR><BR>The Vatican has the most extensive library in the world, the most
priceless and extensive library.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It goes
for miles, underground, in the Vatican.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Wouldn't you love to go in there.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I would love to.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Talk about finding sunken treasure.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We've almost covered it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I almost don't want to dilute this
conversation with the FDA and AMA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Let's
talk about them just briefly.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Ok.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>World War II, produced of course by Rome, caused the Nazi experiments on
the people in the concentration camps—the Jews, the Gypsies, the Socialists,
primarily the Jews.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But they experimented
with things like fluoride.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
experimented with things like EDTA chelation, which is THE treatment of choice
for anybody with heart disease.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
experimented with poisons.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
experimented with surgeries.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They
experimented with all kinds of things on these people.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They also experimented with vaccinations
and immunizations.<BR><BR>There's a book called <U>The Nazi Doctors</U>.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Everything that was learned by them was
integrated into the American Medical Association, after the war.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That's why we all have our municipal water
supplies fluoridated.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That's why they're
all chlorinated, because chlorine decreases oxygen, and therefore causes cancer,
because cancer grows in an anaerobic state—it's a virus, converting cells into
mutants that are anaerobic.?<BR><BR>Ok.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>All of Europe is using ozone to clean their water supplies.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Here they use chlorine.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They want us with cancer.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And how do we get cancer?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>With the vaccinations and immunizations, where
they inject us with live viruses, like the hepatitis vaccine—every one of them
has the HIV virus, SV-40.<BR><BR>What they're doing is what they learned in Nazi
Germany.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They implemented here and they
continue their research in the CIA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>There's a two-tape set called <U>The CIA And The Virus Makers</U> which
show how the CIA helped to create the HIV virus and various other viruses.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They get into Robert Gallo, the world's
foremost virologist.<BR><BR>Robert Gallo is a Jesuit.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's a Roman Catholic, Italian, the world's
foremost virologist—and yet not controlled by the Brotherhood, by the
Company?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Ridiculous.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's under their control!<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's doing all the research, and he doesn't
want to be blamed for it—as the WONDERFUL Jew, Len Horowitz, proved.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Again, we've got Jews getting in the way—Jews
blowing their cover.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I've interviewed Len many times.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's a very courageous guy.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Great guy.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he's right on target.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And he hits the Knights of Malta in his book
<U>Emerging Viruses: AIDS &amp; Ebola</U>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He was a great encouragement to me when I saw him do that, when I read
his book.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, hey, let's
just take it the whole way. Let's just go right to the Jesuit Order.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And what the Jesuits did with the Cold War,
with their Inquisition in the East, they carry out with their war on the
American people in the West, with their Medical Inquisition—cut, burn, and
drug.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that's what it is.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Personally, I have my own home
where I use ozone oxygen.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I use
ultraviolet blood irradiation.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I can show
you how ultraviolet blood irradiation incapacitates Lupus.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It destroys Hepatitis.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It destroys Meningitis.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It destroys HIV.<BR><BR>This is a very simple
procedure; I do it every day.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It can
easily be done by any medical doctor, and they won't do it. Because, when you
kill off the virus, you don't have the diseases.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>You are thwarting what they wanted to do with their vaccinations and
immunizations.<BR><BR>That's why they want to make a law.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That's why that filthy Ted Kennedy, that
Knight of Columbus, wants all these vaccinations and immunizations—when it
should be a religious tenet of everyone: "It's against my religious convictions
to put foreign pathogens into my bloodstream. It's going to make me sick by the
time I'm 40.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's going to give me plaque
build-up and heart-disease.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm not going
to do it."<BR><BR>In the meantime, they're suppressing all the things that
reverse it: soft lasers, hyperbaric chambers, ultraviolet blood irradiation,
oxygen ozone, north-pole magnetic therapy.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>All the things working together that would easily reverse it, they
suppress, and consider it a crime.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Make
sense?<BR><B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Rife technology.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>When I was in the office of my friend,
William, in Maryland, he told me that he had a guy from NSA [<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">National Security Agency</I>] come in and
talk to him about his blood irradiation, and told him: "I think that it would be
wise for you to stop this."<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Now, this guy who runs the clinic
there in Maryland is an ex-Navy Seal.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He's no pushover.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So he says to
the NSA guy: "Well, why do you say that?"<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>And the NSA guy said: "You
know how Royal Rife died?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We put poison
on his tooth-brush."<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>This
guy was from NSA.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, that was a
threat.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, now, some people get
scared, and some people get upset, angry.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>William is one of those guy who gets upset and angry, and it furthers him
that much harder.<BR><BR>So, mysteriously, the head of the Ultraviolet Blood
Irradiation Foundation died, about 3 or 4 months ago, in his apartment, with no
autopsy.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So they almost destroyed the
foundation, but now he is in the process of securing capital—and he will, I'm
sure, very shortly, and it's going to be untouchable.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The machines will be put out and it will have
UVC and UVA to do the blood, and we're going to kill-off all the viruses in the
bloodstream.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And we're going to teach the
medical doctors how to do it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We'll
provide the machines for them.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And we're
going to end this tyranny.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And we'll also
educate them—no more vaccinations and immunizations.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>There are only two things I'm a
member of in this country: one is the national anti-vaccine society, and the
other is Gun Owner's of America.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Those
are the only two organizations that are really worth supporting.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If you get the vaccinations away from the
people, they're not going to be sick.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
if you maintain guns in the hands of the people, they can still use them against
the tyrants.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And if they go to church and
read the <I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>, they'll have all the
spiritual zest and zeal to do it.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We haven't even talked about Nikola
Tesla in this conversation.<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Yeah.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He was deliberately thwarted by the FBI, all his papers stolen in
1943.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>J.P. Morgan destroyed him.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>J.P. Morgan was one of the kingpins in the
Titanic sinking.<BR><BR>Nikola Tesla was a wonderful man.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He came here for freedom.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was a Serbian Orthodox—a curse to
Rome.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The father of A.C. current.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He developed a whole system of Universal
Power, that we would need no coal or any of that.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, one of my other goals is to perfect the
electromagnetic motor.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>When my book gets
out, then I will be working with some men in perfecting electromagnetic motors,
and they will be out, without a patent, privately.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We're just about there.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Let's talk about Bill Clinton.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>How do you see Bill Clinton in relationship to
the Jesuits?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And how do you see Al
Gore?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>What can our readers glean from
what you're saying about their power base?<BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Phelps:</B><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Well, we must remember: where did Bill
Clinton come from?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>How did he become
Governor?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>His father was a powerful
political figure, because his mother was nothing.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, he came from nothing to being something,
through some powerful political figure, probably the Kennedys.<BR><BR>It's
rumored that John Kennedy was his father; could be.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>In any event, Clinton was trained by the
Jesuits of Georgetown.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was the class
president of his junior year, I believe.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>His senior year, he was not re-elected because the student body said he
was "too close to the Jesuit faculty".<BR><BR>So, he was groomed by the Jesuits
to be a powerful political leader.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He was
put in place in Arkansas, runs that scam there, while he's Governor, in the drug
trade, belonging to Rome, working with Reagan in the drug trade, and Bush.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Then he's made President.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><O:P></O:P></B><BR><BR>Remember the picture
of him at Georgetown, kneeling at the grave of Timothy Healy?<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That says it all.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He is the complete and total pawn of the
Jesuit Order ruling from Georgetown University.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He does anything they want him to do.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>He hasn't resisted a thing.<BR><BR>That's why he's untouchable.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He can commit any crime.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He can do any act of evil, and never be
prosecuted, because they'll call on traitors like Arlen Spector to vindicate
him.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And, of course, Arlen Spector was
Spelly's Jew in the Kennedy assassination—evil, wicked, lifetime Senator from
Pennsylvania, which shows me that there are no elections anymore. Nobody voted
for Arlen Spector who I know.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He's a
gun-grabber.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>So, they made him a
life-time Senator.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They made Teddy
Kennedy a lifetime Senator.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Bill Clinton is completely at
their beck and call.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He will get out of
office.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He will live happily ever after,
unless he starts talking.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If he
starts talking, he's done.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He is NOT a
Baptist.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He is loyal to the Jesuit
Order.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><BR>Martin:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>Ok, let's talk about God and His
Agenda.<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><O:P></O:P> <BR><BR>Phelps:<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN></B>As I understand the <U>Bible</U>, I
believe we are in what's called the Dispensation of Grace.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>I'm a dispensationalist.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Now, there are those who say that
dispensationalism was a brain-child of the Jesuits.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Could be, could be Jesuits were involved with
that.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But I believe the <U>Bible</U>
teaches this, because God deals with men in different ways, at different
times.<BR><BR>He commands Abraham to sacrifice a lamb, but not me.<I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I>We don't do that now.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He commands Noah to build an ark.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We don't do that now.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He commands Moses to receive the Law of
Sinai.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We're not under the Law; it's for
the Nation of Israel.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>He commanded
his son to<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"> </B>announce that the Davidic
kingdom was ready to be established on Earth—repent, for the Kingdom is at
hand.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The Kingdom, promised to David, is
about to be established, and that's why they called him Son of David.<B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><O:P></O:P> </B><BR><BR>And now we live in
the Dispensation of Grace, called the present Evil Age, of <U>Galations, Chapter
1:4</U><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">, </I>and the Dispensation of
Grace of<I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I><U>Ephesians, Chapter
3</U><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">.</I><SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>During this particular period of time, this
stewardship, the Gospel says that the Lord Jesus Christ died for the sins of our
world; he was buried and rose again.<BR><BR>And God commands all men,
everywhere, to repent and believe on His name that they might be saved.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But there is no other name under Heaven
whereby we must be saved, save the name of Jesus.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>During this time, this good news of
forgiveness of sin and free pardon, and we can be with the Lord for eternity, is
going to every nation, Jews and Gentile.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And during this Dispensation of Grace, Jews and Gentiles are regarded as
one, in the body of Christ, when they're saved.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Now, according to <U>Romans,
Chapter 11</U>, there is what is called the "fullness of the Gentiles".<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>There is a fullness that is a
predetermined amount of people who are going to be saved.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We call them "the elect".<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We call ourselves the elect of the
Lord.<BR><BR>Now when that elect, that predetermined number, is saved, then God
will begin to deal with the nations and Israel, once again.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And that will begin, according to
<U>Daniel, Chapter 9</U>, when the Prince shall come, shall confirm a covenant
with many for one week.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That is the
70th week of <U>Daniel</U>.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The
first 69 weeks have been fulfilled, from the decree, to rebuilding Jerusalem, to
Messiah the Prince, the day Christ declared himself the Messiah of Israel, was
69 weeks of years.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>After that the
Messiah would be cut-off, and Jerusalem would be destroyed.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>That is the gap between the 69th and the 70th
week.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The temple is not destroyed; the
city is not destroyed; the Messiah is not cut-off, during the 69th or the 70th
week.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>There's a gap between those two
weeks, and that gap has gone to nearly 2,000 years.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>In the year 2032, it will be 2,000 years.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because Christ was crucified in 32 A.D.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>Ok, during this dispensation, God
is saving Jews and Gentiles out of all nations and placing them in the body of
Christ, by the power of His Holy Spirit, as the Gospels preached.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>When the predetermined number comes to
fruition, then the Lord will take out his <I
style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bible</I>-believing church, and everybody
else is left to go through what is called "the time of Jacob's trouble", in the
<U>Book of Jeremiah</U>, or the Great Day of the Lord—the 7-year tribulation,
talked about in the <U><I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Book of
Revelation, Chapter 4-19</I>.</U><BR><BR>That 7-year tribulation will be when
the Lord begins to judge this world for its rejection of the Messiah, and for
their sins, having not been taken care of, not having been saved; although there
will be many people saved during this time.<BR><BR>The Jews will be tremendously
persecuted.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The vast majority of them
will be murdered, and there will be a remnant who will repent at the end of the
Tribulation, at which time the Messiah will come and they will look upon him,
whom they pierced, and weep because they will realize that the one who is going
to save them from all these Gentile armies pouring into Israel, is the very one
they crucified.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>When the
Lord Jesus destroys all the Gentile armies, he will then set up the Davidic
Kingdom that he came to set up—the born-again nation of Israel.<BR><BR>Can a
nation be born in a day?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><U>Isaiah,
Chapter 66</U>—they will be born-again, they will inherit all the promises, and
Christ will sit down in the Kingdom with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, just
like he talked about, and he will eat the fruit of vine again.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Because he said: "I will not eat this
henceforth, til ye say, 'Blessed is he that come in the name of the Lord' until
I eat it anew with you in the Kingdom."<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>Then he will drink wine; he will eat the fruit of the vine; he will break
bread; and he will be Messiah, King of the World at that time, ruling the world
from Jerusalem.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, what we
have coming is more unbelief, more persecution, less faith, less manhood, less
guts, and we have more persecution from the Jesuit Order, more monetary
control.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We have another scenario of the
World Government, under the Pope from Jerusalem, and that's what the Jesuits
want.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And, ultimately, God in His
providence, has allowed for 42 months for that to happen: 1260 days.<BR><BR>So
that's what I see coming.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But what
I believe is, I don't believe that the doctrine of the coming Anti-Christ should
be used as fatalism—that we should: "Well, that's coming, so we can't do
anything about it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>The bastards are
coming to take us out."<BR><BR>That's an excuse to cowardice.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We need to do our duty.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We need to resist evil in ourselves and around
us, and as long as we have breath.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
part of resisting that evil is resisting the Jesuit Order.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's resisting anti-Christian tyranny.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's resisting absolutism.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>It's resisting criminals who are in your
government.<BR><BR>We have a civil responsibility, and that's to make sure
government punishes evil and rewards good.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>And when it doesn't punish evil anymore, it's no government.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We don't know allegiance to it anymore.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We withdraw our allegiance, and we assume our
own sovereign power.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>And
that's exactly what the Covenanters did with Scotland when they withdrew their
allegiance from, what was it, King James II, or Charles II; they withdrew their
allegiance and the English settled there and, ultimately, many of those
Covenanters<I style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal"> </I>were killed.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>But in the glorious Revolution of 1688, they
got their<B style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"> </B>liberty.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN><B
style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><O:P></O:P></B><BR><BR>Another thing is,
all these men—they want to win right now.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>They want to do something and experience the win.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>We have no guarantee of that.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>Why not just say the way it is, resist the
tyranny, and if we get killed in the process, then praise God—I mean, isn't
Heaven a little better than this place?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>What's the big fear?<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>All these men
do not know the Lord, as far as trusting Him in the midst of a storm.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>They're full of fear; they're full of terror;
and they're all afraid to die.<SPAN
style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So, hopefully, with the true
preaching of the Gospel—and ultimately there will be some preachers who will
arise who will encourage us to do right and not fear death, and to resist these
powers of evil—hopefully that will begin to change and there will be men who
will call for secession, and states will begin to leave this Union, like
Chechnya, and these others, and then the Lord will intervene for us.<BR><BR>If
we honor Him, He'll honor us.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>If we
fight for His causes, He'll bless us.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
we need to stop looking at the odds.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>We've always been outnumbered.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">
</SPAN>We've always been outgunned.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And
that's the way God likes it, because then, when we win, obviously He did
it.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"></SPAN><BR><BR>So that's what I see for
the future, and I see there's a great vacuum right now that needs to be
filled.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>And it can be filled with the men
of God telling the truth, or it can be filled with Jesuits advocating everybody
give-up, lay down their guns, and submit to this New World Order, under the
Pope.<BR><BR>The question is:<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"> </SPAN>What are
YOU, dear reader, going to do?<BR><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"
size=2><BR>[<I><STRONG>Editor's note 1:</STRONG> Rick Martin can be contacted at
the following e-mail address: </I></FONT><STRONG><A
href="mailto: rm888@mindspring.com"> rm888@mindspring.com</A></STRONG><FONT
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2> <I>or by writing to: Rick Martin
C/O</I> The Spectrum<I>, 9101 West Sahara Ave., PMB158, Las Vegas, NV 89117. For
further information on </I>The SPECTRUM<I> newspaper feel free to visit us on
the Internet at </I><STRONG><A
href=" link to www.spectrumnews10.com
<I>or call us toll-free at: 1-877-280-2866.</I>]</FONT></P>
<P align=justify><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"
size=2>[<I><STRONG>Editor's note 2:</STRONG> The Spectrum is taking adance
orders for The Vatican Assassins (manuscript form) by Eric Jon Phelps. The cost
is $45.00 (US Funds) plus shipping and handling ($7.00 - US Funds - USA &amp;
$12.00 -US Funds - to Canada). Orders can be paid for by credit card by calling
tool-free at: 1.877.280.2866 or by mailing a money order to: The Spectrum, Box
1567, Tehachapi, California 93581.</I>] <I>- The hard copy of the book
will be available at a later date.</I></FONT></P>
<P align=justify><A href=" http://www.cyberclass.net/oath.htm"><BIG><STRONG>Read
The Jesuit's Oath and the Jesuit's Secret Instructions</STRONG></BIG></A></P>
<P align=justify><A
href=" http://www.cyberclass.net/overclass.htm"><BIG><STRONG>Read Marguerite M
Hampton's article: The Origins of Overclass</STRONG></BIG></A></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=center></P>
<P align=left></P></BODY></HTML>

homepage: homepage: http://www.geocities.com/lord_visionary/blackpope.htm


a note for the general 08.Dec.2001 22:40

---

you've exposed yourself
and now is the time

Mad?? 10.Dec.2001 17:16

O'neill

Whoever you are, stop clogging this sites valuable publishing space with your crap. If you really want people to read this shit than create your own site and list its address. People are not going to pay attention to 50 pages of hyperparanoi-newage-conspiracy bullshit. Where the fuck did you dig up this crap!! And we're all spose to take your word for it too right.